Important reminder – I am not a Lawyer, Doctor, Expert on International Relations, Foreign Policy, or International Law. Not an expert could lead to important voices, important details not fully valued.
Listening to News and Genocide Case against Israel in background a bit
Some thoughts, kind of related and different
Cases have the potential to be made against Governments that limit capacity to protect their people from Terrorist Attacks.
Not Protecting against Terrorists Attacks is consequential, potentially emboldens other parties and governments in the region.
Governments cracking down on perceived wrongs has potential to be done in unfair ways. Someone says the wrong thing could be set to all Freedom of Speech removed.
Attached to Terrorists attacks is possible, could be turned up in Non Ideal Ways. If someone is part of a gang, or group that is stealing from people, mistreating people could be correlated to Terrorist Attacks. This might allow law greater freedom and accessibility to crack down in ways they might not be able to under other laws. This could be a highly desirable situation, imagine an anti-terrorist group, military group gets stolen from, or mistreated by a gang or group (that is both a problem and not a terrorist group) – inability to solve a problem easily that is reducing throughput.
Less Problems in advance matters, Governments could have reason to control narrative around War on Terrorism, War on Drugs. Perceived as War changes dynamic of what is allowed and what is not allowed. Fighting guerrilla wars with arms tied behind backs not always ideal, Fighting guerrilla warfare like that in Vietnam far form always ideal. Set to could be both desirable and unwise to turn up, equating to less than ideal momentum, less than ideal capacity to stop momentum.
Leveraged by desire for less pain could lead to less-than-ideal decision making. Details matter greatly, and examples set in some cases might be and at same time should not always be set to Historic Precedent. Details will not always be turned up, perceived, or comprehended ideally, and similar not exact systems to useful, to value, to max profit is common and turned up in both comprehensible and incomprehensible ways in society. Historic Precedent, Similar not exact systems bias, have high potential to bias future decision making in not fully appreciated ways – different times, different technologies, different possibilities get set to similar, same, useful.
They went to war based on VarA. This group went to war based on VarA leads to Peace, equates to going to war based on VarA is wise. VarA gets equated to made based on ideal, if not ideal sufficient information based upon win over loss. Making decision based upon Historic Precedent is many times turned up, is built in many times by laws that are left in place, and have shown precedent for being less than ideal, turning up less than ideal wins. Worked in VarA might be equated to will work in New Conditions, Different Conditions, Conditions with New Technologies and Possibilities that cannot always be perceived or comprehended.
Decisions are made, are many times required to be made based upon less-than-ideal Historic Precedent, less than ideal amplification and appreciation of details. Relevance Limiting can be more awful than once thought (at least personally). Relevance Limiting is a complex system which takes range from small white lies for encouragement (Saying “I’m fine” when one is not fine, ok, in good spirits, others don’t want to know, or care about my struggles and problems, won’t use them in my best interest thought) to details limited that might lead to War, Oppression, and incomprehensible losses based on lost details. Truth Matters, Details Matter, and Direction Chosen Matters factors into Relevance Limiting – World always turns up most important problems happening, never uses distractions? On the defensive is useful, less capacity to call out problems, only enough oxygen and attention in the room to call out certain problems, certain details is useful, and less than ideally turned up.
Posting Profits some parties over others, Desire is to make World Better for All People, Posting this factors into a Head start, that might not otherwise exist if I were to say wait a week to post these thoughts, this writing
Others in Jail or Prison, under Oppression, might post similar words, better words than I am posting here. More with a Voice is valuable, hard to fully appreciate losses that are only comprehendible by God. Hostages might have different words, better words to prevent problems in the future like World War 3, yet their voices are limited.
The USA Civil War was an awful time, people in the Future might have thought I am glad we are past that time in history, awful things can no longer happen, progress and new inventions leads to Peace. Past World War 2 and Genocide of Nazi’s is nice, gets upsold to the Worst Time in History, that Worse times do not have the potential to be turned up. How Threats are gauged factors into Action, Funding, capacity of the World and external parties to relate.
I have degrees in Computer Engineering, and my love for engineering, and computing could bias, my desire to think best of my others could bias, desire to turn up less awful hypotheticals could bias my capacity and desire to turn up potential for Threats, Real Threats that might exist. Huge amount of computing storage not enough to turn up barcodes and death machines for everyone on Earth? I don’t like the thought so I generally don’t turn it up.
Potential for problems I can’t fully gauge, I have limited and obfuscated ability to see true value added and subtracted, all compounded by complexity that is greater than capacity of any human to ideally represent, ideally factor in details. Self-driving cars with comprehension of human vs not a human, with blood thirst, with blood thirst for less than 0.1% of the population? Political opponents of corporations, governments given less than ideal safety, haven less than ideal safety and discussion invested in? Closer to ideal visibility is hard, more on the World stage (like wars and changing governments), will, is likely to equate to sufficient visibility of new technologies, threats created by new technologies? FBI has limited funding, might not have sufficient funding for sufficient visibility likely not always fully pondered. Results matter and are far from ideally turned up.
Companies are unlikely to be able to fully appreciate the damage that they do, liability that they would be responsible for if capacity to litigate was ideal. Humans divest from Acts of God (that might include War) does not always equate to Human actions, decisions, words, and choices might not help fuel or facilitate those things that are classified as Acts of God. Divestment from Liability is a Human Choice, seen as an Ideal Choice by God? Big Companies and Safety in Numbers? If CorpA doesn’t have to give a sufficient living wage, CorpB might think they don’t have to give a sufficient living wage (divestment from Liability to do right), If CorpB doesn’t have to give a sufficient living wage, CorpA might think they don’t have to give a sufficient living wage (divestment from Liability to do right). What example is that for CorpC, CorpD, and CorpE? If all the Corporations agree they can divest from Liability, requirement to do right by people, how might that affect things?
I might not see what Historic Precedent CorpA is turning up, does not equate to I agree to it, does not equate to Historic Precedent set is not consequential.
I might not see what Historic Precedent CorpB is turning up, does not equate to I agree to it, does not equate to Historic Precedent set is not consequential.
I might not see what Historic Precedent CorpC is turning up, does not equate to I agree to it, does not equate to Historic Precedent set is not consequential.
I might not see what Historic Precedent CorpD is turning up, does not equate to I agree to it, does not equate to Historic Precedent set is not consequential.
I might not see what Historic Precedent CorpE is turning up, does not equate to I agree to it, does not equate to Historic Precedent set is not consequential.
CorpA-E might not be real companies, might be variables, does not equate to all companies CorpF-Z for instance
Negate Liability is Desirable, Desirable has potential to be set to an ideal system, an ideal longer-term system. Reign in less-than-ideal paths that have been turned up, profited on, compounded upon? Water and electricity, max profit finds paths of least resistance, just nature? Harder for some, harder for those without access to funding or sufficient funding, has shown historic precedent for being allowed, being just in by design should not be equated to good – investors the only one protected, factored into necessary protections in products?
People that build the products need to be protected for continued production might be equated to ideal level of protection established. People in companies desire to protect others in their companies, does not always equate to all others, to all other companies ideally protected. Ideal requirement to perceive and comprehend potential for problems, side effects is not turned up.
Take a basic Math lesson as a product – Teacher means well, wants to help Society, Society taught Math better could lead to Throughput Gains. A Teacher creates a basic Math lesson then thinks for 10 years about potential for value added and value subtracted by Teaching others Math? More time and thought might lead to more capacity to perceive and comprehend potential problems might be set to ideal, 20 years, 40 years, 100 years – any really sufficient time to fully comprehend risk created by Math as a system that is In By Design? Greed and Max Profit, Polygons that are like the one used on Guns and Tanks – society teaches Math to all bad, to all good? One country sees they have less nukes than another, simple less than sign equates to exponential capacity for more destruction? Society invests in Legal Tender, like the US Dollar – society always held accountable, full justice always delivered for what society invests in, in mass? Discouragement, feel bad about this or that not always sufficiently, or wisely turned up – guilt is a less than ideal system based upon less-than-ideal perception and comprehension, should not be equated to guilt is not a useful system, a system that might be turned up by others trying to max profit.
Teaching people they should feel bad about something is not always based on ideal perception and training of the original party. Guilt has throughput, and throughput is not always ideal. Less guilt throughput, less discouragement throughput has potential to be Powerful, Enabling – not all might like to see others enabled, free of burden. De-up, Never up, Never better, Don’t encourage, Discourage, Disrespect, Don’t respect is turned up by People, People that are not ideally perfect. Make feel bad has potential to create harm, harm that might be in need of justice, thus better to not turn up, better to turn up Forgiveness, Grace, and Love.
Guilt enables ideal Throughput might be claimed, negate it ideally delivers. These words are likely to amplify less than ideally for all, I should just not speak/write them, I should feel bad about them? Reading Comprehension ideally turned up? Access ideally turned up? Don’t have to factor that into ideal turned up? Investment gets equated to ideal investment. Gives head start to those out of Jails and Prisons, those less oppressed by reduced access, does not equate wiser not to state them.
There is always something to feel bad about, feel guilty about to reduce throughput. Perceived and Comprehended might lead to other things brought in that are Perceived and Comprehended that factor in less than ideally, thus negate there is ideal relevance limiting out and that factors into Perception and Comprehension of who is guilty and why they are guilty. Fingers not always pointed at ideal people or ideal problems, and that has potential to distract, obfuscate bigger issues. Society in mass generally does not, many times is not held accountable for value subtracted does not equate to Value Subtracted that factors into Justice, Perception of Justice, Comprehension of Justice, and Truth in Justice does not exist.
Guilt has throughput, and it is important to be careful of what one turns up. That said what causes guilt is not always meant as guilt. Sufficient contrast might be required to get a system or government to stop oppression might be equated to feelings of personally responsible for the lack of perfection in the system, in the government. I am not trying to discourage a general public that is less than ideal, I am trying to reduce discouragement for the oppressed yet might not always amplify that way. Less than ideal perceived and comprehended does not always lead to ideal reduced discouragement – Justice, Authority, and Government is liked to be seen as flawless, ideally protects and represents people. Desire to reduce crime might lead to investment in being a Police Officer might lead to hearing how one reinforces less than ideal, less than sufficient at times laws might be discouraging – desire to fix the problem does not equal desire to discourage amplifies in combination less than ideally.
I used “amplifies in combination” instead of the word “cuts” – potentially useful for future communications. Pieces of cake, one with more frosting on one piece than the other amplifies in combination less than ideally? Too much divestment from certain words to sound more ideal might not always equate to ideal oxygen and reduced significance in room for others. Requirement to sound better, more politically correct might not always turn up ideal repetitions, reinforced ease of communication. The man had an angry outburst, or the man exploded – how things are said might correlate to suicide bombers and terrorist in a dynamic world.
It is reasonable to desire to use better communication, does not always equate to it is wiser to turn up specific words have greater meaning, are more valuable. There are parties in the World that might desire to misrepresent meaning behind words, might have perception and comprehension based upon less-than-ideal training that might make them want to desire to misrepresent meaning behind words. People make decisions based upon quality and quantity of evidence that is not always ideally turned up might lead to desire to use different words, potentially in non-ideal ways.
Words misrepresented or turned up to mean something could be attached to one party, say GroupA, then another group say GroupB could be taught to use words in a frank way that offends GroupA without meaning to offend GroupA.
Words misrepresented or turned up to mean something could be attached to one party, say GroupB, then another group say GroupA could be taught to use words in a frank way that offends GroupB without meaning to offend GroupB.
I might be able to hear
the man exploded
the man had an angry outburst
in the same way, not biased by word choice, might not equate to all people might have that same capacity, and that is only dependent upon conscious perception and comprehension of bias
People say what they mean, words don’t bias results, who is speaking never biases results?
Details set to ideally represented and comprehended by language, language that has multiple definitions for same words, and amplifies more ideally for some over others? Language like a bridge everyone walks across that might be reinforced in ways that are both valuable and amplify less than ideally for all? Imagine if I spent all these words saying Never Say Die, there is still Hope! A different choice of direction that might have been more valuable for some, a different choice of direction than initially chosen that might have been more valuable for some than others. I desire the words to amplify like that yet addressing practical matters might equate to they do not always amplify like that?
Encouragement and Hope is valuable does not equate to it is always ideal perception and comprehension of details – feeling of ready for the day, ready to take on the World might equate to less than ideal risk mitigation, comprehension of details that need to be factored in? Desire for Encouragement and Hope might be for greater throughput yet might obfuscate details at time. Discouragement not better, greater attention to detail when inspired, charmed, and enamored matters. Ideal comprehension of details might lead to discouragement, that equates to no throughput, thus sometimes ideal comprehension of details might be turned down. People that save the day will be working on ideal details thought to more adequate representation?
My Tech Blog 