There are still hard problems in the World. It is easy to think that Law, Governments, and Militaries is the only way to solve problems. People taught to solve problems in Creative Ways, Different Ways matters. There might be, are likely ways to solve problems in ways that lead to less lives lost, but are harder to entertain when practical and speed factors into results.
Imagine if Google, Microsoft, NASA, Tesla, or MIT tried to solve problem with terror tunnels, extremists and instability, antisemitism in the Middle East? If could have solved it, would have already solved it?
Head starts matter, words and ideas today can’t fix October 7, 2023 yet might be able to help reduce potential for problems like that in the future.
A ton of brain power and solving problem potential in The World, seems like we should be further to solving these problems than we are. Head starts matter.
My guess is all those companies, organizations would see Iran funding terrorism less, the region allowing extremism to amplify less would be part of the solution though I don’t speak for them.
After September 11th, 2001 I would like to have thought October 7th, 2023 could have never happened. I believe in The USA Government and The Pentagon, I believe in our Military, I believe we do and have capacity to do good things like Inspiring Peace, Freedom, and Less Oppression in The World. I don’t want to discourage, I also think a report on how this happened in the Middle East might be a useful way to see that 20 years from October 7th, 2023, same problems do not happen. Is 2043 to far away to think of a place where Muslim Extremism and Terrorists groups no longer plague The Middle East? Possible to fix believed or not believed factors into funding, momentum, and directions chosen.
Reduced funding, reduced capacity to stomach long and discouraging wars, combined with a World that does not fully perceive or comprehend that Threats to Israel, Antisemitism is a Threat to us all seems like it all factors in. Status quo becomes status quo might not always equate to ideal capacity or desire, ideal head starts to problems being fixed. Less antisemitism before World War 2, how many lives would that have saved? Head starts matter. My visibility, perception, and comprehension of threats and not threats amplifies far less than ideally, does not equate to those threats allowed to exist or not exist are not consequential.
Being from USA, this many years after I Have a Dream Speech by Martin Luther King Jr. it is easy to think humanity is passed racism, threats are not as real as they once were, easy to have a rosy view of history in less than sufficient ways. Anti-racism turned up has potential to lead to grouping, in crowd and out crowd – turned up with inclusivity matters and amplifies less than ideally by default.
Not sure they are cool enough to be part of the anti-racist crowd is a thought that might amp, thus finding ways to prevent in advance is useful. Perceived and valued as anti-racists factors into who has jobs and who does not have jobs. A plan for inclusivity might amplify in less than inclusive ways that profit some over others. It is not always easy to perceive or comprehend those that are profiting and those that are hurting in society – truth around the matter is less than ideally turned up. People in Jails and Prison do not always see threats that amplify in society does not equate to inability to see threats does not factor into future success, real problems.
Moral Superiority has shown Historic Precedent for amplifying less than ideally for all. Moral clarity and levels matter, antiracism has potential to be valued, comprehended, and gauged in non-ideal ways “if you don’t spend 100% of your time, effort, and resources” caring about Caucasians with Red Hair (or any group) would be insufficient protection for other groups. Spending 100% of time on racism, might equate to no time for sexism, or curing cancer, many other problems does not equate to racism allowed or not adequately addressed is not a huge problem. I like Jewish people, I don’t want them to hurt, I don’t want to allow Antisemitism to be turned up, does not equate to I want Caucasians with Red Hair (including myself) (or any group) to hurt more. Potential for Genocide dictates where time, resources, and effort is spent.
Does Muslim Extremism and potential for terrorist attacks lead to ideal reduced discrimination for the US-Asian population? The groups likely bank on the fact that they have the potential for reminding secondary tensions from World War 2. Citizens fighting each other is one of the desired objectives of groups like that, not giving them their objectives matters, requires thinking better of each other and fostering inclusivity, less problems. Evil, The Devil, Demons which all have the potential to influence people has potential to be harder to see when listening to what is set as right and wrong, good and bad on the World Stage.
Someone might set me to evil, based upon bad data they have from others, does not equate to I want that someone hurt, evil for evil is less than an ideal system. Misrepresentation factors into actions likely not always pondered. Those pursuing making the World a better place are not required to be given good data, adequate representation initially. For example Texas citizens could be set to part of cartels. Cartels exist. Texas polices the border less than ideally. Believable and proximity factors into useful. I don’t like what they have to say, desire for better, and proximity does not always turn up adequate representation. Imagine being in Mexico being a Politician and having powdered sugar dropped from second story on you before walking into a building.
There is reason to be scared of covered in powder, does not equate to it amplifies ideally. Desire to reduce corruption both is valuable and amplifies less than ideally, reduced proximity is value that is not always fully appreciated in timely manners. Imagine a Peaceful citizen in Canada moved there from Gaza in 2022. Distance is valuable and not always, not usually pondered as an option. A citizen that moved to United States in 1920? Citizens that move might not always have ideal capacity to gauge threats, problems, and evil in new situations, thus increased support and inclusivity invested in matters.
As a Texan citizen, I do not have ideal capacity to comprehend the threat posed by Cartels in 2024 or years before, could be a minor problem, could be a huge problem, and there is allot of range and likely nuance in all of that, that is hard to fully comprehend and appreciate. Who controls the narrative matters, and it is not like there is a giant scoreboard that says good or evil is winning. If Texas was going to be a scary place to live by 2030 I would want to know, does not equate to businesses that are trying to thrive and profit would ideally turn representation and comprehension up.
2030 will be a scary place to live in Texas if you don’t do A, B, C, and D could be turned up, projections set to ideal, get claimed as ideal, are equated to ideal non ideally. Society will fail if you don’t do A, B, and C combined with Society not failing after doing A, B, and C does not equate to Society would have or would not have failed if you don’t do A, B, and C. A, B, and C variables that are choices could profit, are likely to profit some parties over others. People like things fixed gets set to people like things fixed ideally (exactly the fix desired), gets set to people like things fixed ideally (with no side effects, not profiting anyone more than anyone else). Same words can be read and comprehended in correct ways, different ways. Ideal representation is less than ideally agreed upon.
Who sets bars might profit more than others without desiring to. Negate desire might not equate to ideal negate desire. I like to profit, and I like others to be treated fairly. When I profit I will ideally check and make sure that all factors in society are considered? I desire to profit in fair ways, I don’t want others treated unfairly – fair vs unfair has less than ideal perception, comprehension, and resolution. One dollar, one gallon of gas purchased differently in mass could change fair vs unfair in not fully appreciated ways – I am not sure profit should be perceived and comprehended as ideally clean, capable of being ideally clean.
System can never be claimed as ideal might equate to better not driven toward. Fix a problem that can’t be fixed ideally? Progress matters, should be encouraging still should not be equated to ideal established, no work needed, only diminishing returns in a particular direction.
It is nice to profit, it is desirable to profit, decentralization is nice, is desirable, for all the population delivers less than ideally. If everyone on the planet, 8 billion people could easily divest from investing 1 more dollar in oppression, capacity, capability would likely be far different.
Should we tax profit and decentralization as in by design to reduce oppression? If we don’t, claim ideal fair value, fair treatment established or delivered?
Capitalism is nice, delivers better than other solutions (that have yet to be proposed – in my opinion), does not equate to it is without its flaws, no need to help sand the edges, make the experience better. Best form of Capitalism might not be found until 2500, progress possible not always promoted. Too many people in Jails, Prison and on Streets to set Capitalism to ideal, without flaws in need of addressing. Capitalism does not negate the need for kindness. Change and Dynamic nature of markets likely equates to set to ideal ever unwise – jobs this year does not guarantee jobs the next.
Thought about analytically might not be ideal love established or delivered – that means there is possibility for others with more love, better capacity to deliver encouragement than me to address concerns raised in this document. Analytical thought leads to weighing, weighing is not always turned up based upon ideal perception or comprehension, not always turned up based upon ideal truth. Analytical thought might be ideal direction at sometimes might get reinforced as more ideal at all times in non-ideal ways.
Spending time placing weights on a scale might be less than ideal direction chosen, less than ideal love and peace inspired. Delivery of fair treatment requires time and investment that might equate to lower overall throughput and is thus sometimes divested from in advance, does not equate to the pursuit of more fair treatment is less valuable.
Imagine you have potential to deliver 10 words to PartyA, PartyB, PartyC, and PartyD, only 10 words, only 10 words factors into fair treatment – claim that ideals? Imagine PartyA, PartyB, PartyC, and PartyD are all paid different salaries for the exact same work – claim that ideals? The combination might be more difficult for my brain to represent than others, does not equate to it is not difficult, it is easy to get right. Desire to deliver encouragement as if words approached infinity and desire to still remain fair treatment? Desire to make better is important, useful, creates value should not be set to ideally delivers fair treatment, equal treatment for all. Adequate levels of non-zero representation, who gets to set the bar? who doesn’t get to set the bar?
People are not required to adequately respect the contributions of others, are not required to comprehended why to value the contributions of others, less than ideal truth factors into perceived and comprehended as fair vs not fair treatment. Writers on the other side of the planet might have the perfect words for Peace yet I am not required, nor would it be wise for me to read every book on the planet.
Claim to treat others ideally fair when haven’t read their writings? Requirement for ideally fair treatment is both unwise (when thought of in certain ways) and is necessary (when thought of in certain ways). Reading one person’s writings might require reading twice for comprehension, and with 8 billion people on the planet there are allot of other writings. Too caught up in details has potential to be a problem, they are being oppressed stop it said and understood might at times be higher value added.
Requirement to prove support added might lead to time costs that approach infinity.
The World is better with Peace, people treated fairly, and encouraged with words like “Never Say Die!”.
The previous sentence is an example, proof of value added, proof of what a good person, a person with good character might say, does not equate to it is ideal to require others, others without access or capacity are required to deliver at the same or greater levels.
Sadly, examples like this, how people act, are formed into documents, with Appendix A, Appendix B, and Appendix C, examples of value added and value subtracted to judge character, if not on paper in the minds of people. People that are not in Jail, that are not limited by Oppression have access, capacity to deliver examples that all do not have access or capacity to deliver.
Reinforced reinforced, no potential for profit in that?
Writers are given greater capacity to communicate. ”To whom much is given much will be expected.”
Readers are given greater capacity to communicate. ”To whom much is given much will be expected.”
I like quotes from The Bible should not be equated to I am God, a Priest, a Minister, or someone that never makes mistakes writing, someone that always chooses ideal direction for words that profit all equally. If God always gave people the correct words would it be unwise to think we would have more World Peace? I have less than ideal capacity to value, judge, or assess output from God on any given day, less than ideal capacity to forecast the weather, does not equate to output or non-output from God is not consequential – Tornados, Tornados I can’t predict are in by design. Image of God, Confidence and Proximity to Ideal factors into message perceived and valued convolutes at times with human nature.
Be Authority with constant reminders of Not Ideal Authority? If Leaders can fix problems yet are not gods, are not God amplified more ideally, how might that change the World? Proximity to Life and Death choices not always good. Wars, Death Penalty, and Nukes all in by design does not equate to it is all good, all respect for limited power of being a human, and being in leadership. Separations of Powers is wisdom as a reminder “men are not angels”.
“If Men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and the next place, oblige it to control itself.” – James Madison
My Tech Blog 