I am a Christian. I do believe in God. I do believe Faith matters.
That said reliance upon God will always give the right words for the time seems like less than ideal desire to turn up capacity to communicate, training in language and reducing miscommunication, the power in speaking less (such as in courts or areas where law or others with less than ideal intentions might misuse words, not use words for installation of the Golden Rule).
How people communicate matters, communication made more difficult is not all value added, and people that are less than ideal evil out are less than ideal communicators in at times. I have points of view, I desire to sell others on my points of view. My points of view are particular directions for conversation chosen in advance – claiming they amplify ideally for all parties seems unwise. Better set to ideal might be less than ideal desire to refine and make communication skills better.
That said brilliant communicators might persuade people to war or oppression. Better Communication that is valuable to the World for reducing oppression, reducing war, and increasing peace is not ideally turned up by default.
I have a point of view on many different topics like many others. If I could stop talking, change course for my conversation in a way that lead to less oppression and World peace I would. Thinking I will always know when that is required seems unwise. If I always did, if God always stopped me then I likely would have had capacity and words to stop all wars inspire better peace. World News reaffirms God has not done that by default – there are potentially more important topics in the World for me to speak about at any moment, and I might not be ideally trained to speak to those points does not equate to less conversation about the topics are always ideal value added.
Even if I was the most brilliant communicator – and I do not think I come close (8 billion people a World full of allot of Great Communicators), that does not equate to I couldn’t be leveraged or controlled in a way that turns my communication from value added to value subtracted. A World that more appreciates people have potential to be leveraged and that factors into message delivered and not delivered is not always ideally turned up. Current conversation in the World is less than ideal leverage out, less than ideal truth in, less than ideal relevance limiting out and it is difficult to know when and to what level that effects communication in whole and in part.
Listening is also a less than ideal system, and Listeners, Readers, and Audience have potential for leveraged in many ways through Oppressive Governments, Health Problems, Financial Problems, and Reduced Accessibility. Message Throughput is likely (almost guaranteed) to be less than 100%. Even if 8 billion people could hear and appreciate a message exactly as it is meant, claim to be able to verify they received and comprehended the message as expected?
My Tech Blog 