Defend might sound more professional – reminder I am not a lawyer.
Fend an I’d know how much that I’d owe? Humanity always ideal with levels? Party to comprehension sees no need of mention?
I am not a lawyer, that said I was thinking about Contracts and Appendix A, B, and C, D, and E. People stock reasons to validate their reasoning to support their direction. It is particular to trajectories, trajectories get set to ideal when people are building cases for law, reason, for teaching. Momentum matters because Momentum factors into Support, half write a document? God would let us know if there might be better directions than finishing a document always? Lawyers that work on cases never change directions?
I know I stockpile incidents, wrongs perceived over time to argue points, to teach, to call out injustice as I perceive it. Negate that is ideal bias on my part out, negate desire for support is zero leverage added. If I have a paycheck attached to a completed document try to claim Appendix A, B, C, D, and E is free from bias? Completing the document does not require that I ideal my comprehension or perception initially, and desire to have food to eat a roof over my head has potential to factor into bias.
I choose where to break paragraphs dependent on more useful to reader, not on ideal value established, likely not always on ideal comprehension established. Refined matters yet too much attention to detail might lead to less refined.
Appendix A
I like Physics and Science, that said using terms like trajectories and momentum while not meant as scary could be less than ideal scary out. Commenting on this is an example of Data, Data that I might rather not provide. Law and writing documents while constantly trying to perfect and remove all bias from self might be less than sufficiently encouraging at times. Lawyers and Politicians to more Encouragement in the right ways far from all value out.
Appendix B
The document might be nice for someone like me to read, I like Engineering and Science thus physics terms are neat. Spaceships and Gravity, Blackholes pretty amazing things, not include others in it? Fee extra comprehension that is not all enjoyment out? How might the document be better tailored to other professions? Wow factor direction chosen for some leads to ideal comprehension?
Appendix C
See no evil reinforces my point?
Appendix D
Require all documents written with less-than-ideal comprehension less-than-ideal bias out to be rewritten? Fend a wouldn’t know how much that I owe. Prevent an ideal comprehension woe? Fend a could know, would know, should know will pro?
Pend a seed win, pend a seed wind. Wish others win, wish others wind, prefer not to send? Fend a I will owe, fend a I wouldn’t know. Fend a I might not be best to defend it.
Appendix E
Too many burdens left on anyone’s soul seems unwise. Left low might woe.
My Tech Blog 