Desire to bend woe, not increase foe (bend meaning decrease, not bend woe to more useful for self, I wish to decrease pain not weaponize woe, I also prefer to decrease foe meanings not inspire enemies, Not meaning hurt or woe my enemies or foes)
Eloquently put not always put eloquently
Pend a will row negate know? Rhyming inspires thought potentially not always in ideal ways. Algorithmic pattern matching reinforced. If a word sounds wrong, word is replaced for purposes of increased experience like art, a word replaced changes meaning drastically, woe to know to etc. Potential for similar to art yet vastly different, takes longer sometimes to paint a picture, then say I don’t like the way something looks then replace it, eraser more costly. Writing I could say and then there was a Beach. I could say and then there was City. I could say and then there was a (place noun here). Reduced cost for changed details both powerful and potentially not always respected (placing too much meaning on words is both invested in and less than ideal likely in more cases than people always fully appreciate, typos for instanc).
Details Matter, Details are Important to Experience, Details might Matter for Experience without Mattering so much what they are. If I said City and then Beach, really that much different Experience?
If something is wrong in a paper, document, book, song, or movie. Change is expensive (sometimes not always). Easy to not fully appreciate the problems associated with change. I might change my perception and thus comprehension of how something is read to try and accommodate other parties owing hurting less. People might know a detail should be changed, yet changing history might lead to distrust, recalls, problems where people have learned words to a song and then find themselves singing the wrong words in public.
This is all consequential. There is real change in society that is both desirable and far from always practically feasible to ideally invest in. Just pull a document off the shelf then people want to read it more, black market for a document trying to devalue has potential to amplify significance of details. Change has potential for opposite effect at times making Change more difficult, potentially harder to get right, and thus sometimes divested from in advance, does not equate to ideal justice always established or delivered. Historical state of details matter and are not always invested in. Pull a document off a shelf, remove a statue, then it has potential to spark debate, debate is extra time costs and are not always value out and not always value in.
People like to be appreciated for the value they add and not value that is subtracted based upon their contributions to society. Negate content always amplifies ideally or without some desirable changes that are not always agreed upon by all parties. Appreciating others for the value they add and not the value they subtract is important as it is easy to soon become the one who has content delivered that might be less appreciated in some context sometimes possibly foreseeable sometimes from left field. Perception and Comprehension of creator of support set to ideal initially would be not full appreciation for fact that humanity amplifies support, truth, and training less than ideally. Sometimes support is chosen based upon less-than-ideal direction thought through or chosen, I feel these words might help someone – these being the last 3 paragraphs including this one, thus I am adding to my vlog).
Writers have potential to challenge wrongs not based upon the wrong itself. It is sometimes desirable to challenge positions for reasons outside of the position itself such as in the case of oppression perceived. People in hard times have to give ideally fair shakes to content deliver might amplify less than desirably. What motivates debate and discussion matters, and likely has historic precedent for being factored in less than ideally – at least in my own writings. I talk about the ideas I have more than giving the World constant reminders of my perceived wrongs, does not equal those perceived wrongs do not have potential to undesirably motivate some of my words. Desire to fight oppression as perceived through non-violent creative outlets might establish truth and details less than ideally or sufficiently.
I desire less pain, less woe, and Change in society that facilitates less oppression Worldwide and my words have potential to inspire that less than ideally based upon less-than-ideal perception, comprehension, and delivery. Every person to having to say the last sentence before delivery of words would be perceived as less confident delivery and is thus divest from, yet to say that divestment amplifies ideally for all parties would likely be incorrect. If the Wow? Meaning wow-factor created via confident delivery? Shakey less confident delivery leads to ideal followers?
My Tech Blog 