Random sets of words have potential to be useful to inspire greater content. They also have the potential for falling on lines that might be perceived as current evil or old evil.
My random story generated uses the word lighting which I think is cool. It also uses random colors which I also think is cool, (I am an artist and like the Spectrum of colors, all colors). That said the combination of the word red and the word lightning has potential historic ties to Nazi Germany. I do not and did not mean it that way, does not equal it has zero percentage chance to be perceived that way.
I like that old evil gets to capitalize on God’s phenomena and God’s colors in ways that limit experience for others? No. I want to be rude or create iffy ground for Jewish people in any way? No. Life creates many situations that are iffy like that in the clothes people wear and the people people talk to which creates potential for less than ideal conversations perceived. Too much tailoring in specific way has potential for dangerous, someone that wears a white t-shirt and dates a blonde could easily be up sold to a KKK Nazi and I find the combination less than desirable for future generation of blondes that include my family.
I know how to ideally walk the line to make that ideal for all people? No. I think society and the church amplifies that correctly by default? No. It gives feeling of family and future, current generations, even older generations sufficiently protected? No.
Further Life is far from all evil out, all capitalize on a situation in way that leads to greater profit out. Having content that might be close to perceivable in less than sufficient ways might tempt people, might allow the devil to work at times. Being far enough away from questionable might equal less tempts, and less tempts might equal less problems (which also bring tempts). Just because your company or profession might amp in insufficient ways does not equal others that might desire to profit will feel it necessary to tell you if you are creating non-ideal perceptions that lead to their companies with greater profit and those around you with less – capitalism does not ideally deliver less evil, less problems by default. Investing time and support is not free, and while it could lead to far greater real profit and far less problems for society as a whole, it is not always invested in, and given that it is iffy ground many times it is far from always sufficiently perceived and thus far from always sufficiently addressed.
How long is long enough?
US Citizens driving Mercedes? WWII many years ago, and German families need to pay bills too.
Could a Japanese US Citizen drive a Mercedes without public backlash? I am not sure I know the answer to that question. The question both matters and is less than ideally conversed about.
Could a German US Citizen drive a Mercedes without public backlash? I am not sure I know the answer to that question. The question both matters and is less than ideally conversed about.
What needs to be said, what needs to be address by World Leaders set to will be addressed, is likely to always to be addressed, will always have sufficient freedom to address seems both unlikely and worth taking into consideration as less than ideal or sufficient at times delivery.
I want a USA that Amplifies More Ideally for All US Citizens, not just some. Getting there seems like has less than ideal track record. People in Jail were put there due to an ideally fair and just system seems like it obfuscates how World governments and public sentiment does not always establish fair, just, and trustworthy systems.
Nobody driving Mercedes or everyone driving Mercedes. Both sound scary in not fully appreciated ways.
Nobody dating Blondes or everyone dating Blondes. Both sound scary in not fully appreciated ways.
“25“Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or drink; or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more important than food, and the body more important than clothes? 26Look at the birds of the air; they do not sow or reap or store away in barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not much more valuable than they? 27Who of you by worrying can add a single hour to his life? 34Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.” – Matthew 6:25-27,34
The Bible says don’t worry about what you wear, yet someone might give you a t-shirt that has a windmill on it that looks like a swastika at far distance. Symbols, Icons, and treating others how they wish to be treated matters. Creating less iffy situations matters. Prescribing too much weight to a system that could easily be iffed is not all value added, just like words, the wrong words could be taught or given to someone in a way that leads to them having far greater problems.
I also don’t particularly like the dehumanization in that quote of the Bible. Mankind has shown precedent for dehumanizing people throughout time thus reinforcing dehumanization via comparing to animals seems less than sufficient in my personal opinion.
I am a Christian, and I do believe there are important concepts in The Bible that are reiterated that might not otherwise be such as Don’t Kill, Don’t Steal, Forgive, Treat others how you wish to be treated, Don’t Judge, Give. Concepts that are highly important and valuable to society that left out seem like they would amplify far less than sufficiently.
The dehumanization part of that quote seems less than ideal to me does not equal I think the rest of The Bible is value out. I am far from an ideal person, far from perfect, thus I potentially perceive and comprehend parts of The Bible in less than sufficient ways. I use the reason and intelligence, Wisdom and insight God has given me – negate they always amplify ideally on topics regarding The Bible or other topics such as Science and The Universe, upsold to ideal will fail to deliver.
Red Lightning does not equal Swastika Blitzkrieg. It would be easy to non-ideally make the jump in the logical mind. One might not see all the examples of Blue, Yellow, Orange, Green, and Violet Lightning. People’s capacity to categorize and classify is less than ideal (speaking from my own personal rush to assessment and tempts toward judgment that is less than sufficient). There is potential for slippery slope, yellow lightning tied to Hitler’s master race might lead to nobody able to be taught about electricity. High Voltage matters and less capacity to teach due to specialized combinations not always ideal value added.
If someone has a red neon sign one might make the jump to say electricity and red might be stating more than meets the eye. People with less at times might be tempted to jump to conclusions as they might see greater need to set environmental deliveries, current situation and hand dealt to more useful.
Maybe I should remove the word lightning, too much risk to use the word lightning in a random set? Risk the rest of support amps on an iffy word? The word lightning will be used by others, colors will be used by others, say protection will be always adequate or sufficient if I negate the use of the word? This conversation, document wouldn’t have even existed if not for a roll of random that sparked less than ideal thoughts.
Unexpected combinations have potential to lead to insight. Leaders of companies worldwide likely have had experience over time that has lead to specific combinations that might not come around too often that have potential to lead to greater insight and protection for the public.
Others might know how to, have greater capacity, experience, knowledge, and words to address this problem than me – thus while my words are some value added I would caution from upselling them to ideal value added, that all potential combination and implications have been thought of, entertained, or hypothesized.
Even if others might have greater capacity and ability delivered over the past on the topic, I do not think it has always amplified ideally or sufficiently, thus there is room for improvement. Room for improvement means the situations has potential to get better or worse – thus actively being addressed matters.
People that provide support will always have full awareness of potentially problematic combinations? No. Always concerned about potential problems might lead to negated throughput. Capacity to deliver does not equate to ideal oversight. Reliance on Faith in God matters, as all possibilities including Disasters and Acts of God cannot always ideally be accounted for.
If I provide a peace sign, I mean it to mean peace, less people going to war, less people shot. Someone that thinks of the 1960s might see it as a call to smoke marijuana, do LSD, and then drive. I don’t mean it that way does not equal there is zero potential for it to amplify that way. Zero Probability for problems and Ideal Support delivered by art required for distribution would equal zero art distributed.
A Peace sign might not get all people to make peace, stop war, yet if it gets a few of the right people to put down weapons and work on building bridges it beats not delivering the peace sign. That said don’t do drugs and drive based upon my art, not my intent. While I might be less judgmental on some drugs, I do not think all drugs are all value added, or have zero potential to cause problems in society – problems that have real and lasting implications. Problems that I would like to divest from and prevent in advance if possible, problems that I do not fully perceive and do not fully comprehend.
Free Peace Sign Cloud Nebula, Free Starter Image
I generally try to put prominent elements on the left side of some artwork to remind that I am anti-death penalty, desire peace. That said the combination might reinforce non ideals for others that might do the same by putting prominent elements on the right side, or top, or bottom of an image. Thus I am a bit conflicted on how to best represent. Lack of representation is less than ideal value added and representation amplifies less than ideally.
Further I have been hacked, been under oppression, and have allowed allot of my artwork as free content thus I have far from ideal oversight over data consistency (elements could change positions or be mirrored to show opposite). No Risk No Reward factors into delivering art, delivery set to ideal problems reduced ideal risk reduced seems unwise.
Potential for being upsold to a Nazi for trying to make the World a better place and deliver amazing content seems scary, far less than ideal, not sure how do adequately represent both the frustration and hardship related to getting opposite of desired results at times.
My Tech Blog 