Something worthy of note for vlog posters in the World. Writing an article does not guarantee full appreciation for time and context. Oppression and Health Problems have the potential to lead to unable to modify posts in more ideal ways in the future. Oppression and Health Problems do not guarantee that the underlying systems won’t change in ways one can’t fully appreciate at the time of writing.
There is the potential for systems that writers and publishers rely upon like R rating vs PG rating of a movie. An oppressive system has the potential to take away capacity to still deliver protection of keeping user bases like Adults, Teenagers, and Children separate. Evil In By Design could easily lead to unforeseen problems where content and conversation meant for adults winds up in the hands of children.
People that make content for adults like R+ rated movies are not meaning for that content to wind up in the hands of children, yet they cannot guarantee and likely had the possibility of knowing (mental illness, illogical – logical fallacies, and drugged are all possible systems) they could not guarantee it could not fall into the hands of children. If someone makes cigarettes or paint that could be huffed, there is no guarantee it will not wind up in the hands of children. In a good system, with sufficient support and greater learning, potential for problems is less. That said our current system is deeply in debt and has problems that are hard to fully appreciate. Trillions of dollars in debt on the international stage might not always lead to systems like those that maintain R vs PG rating being enabled ideally.
Further if someone is critical of governments and positions taken in the World, critical in a way that might be required for peace, there might be less than ideal incentives inspired for not keeping up systems, systems like R vs PG rating to leave posters that took the risk of addressing challenging topics in jeopardy. One could argue that how can The Poster of the Media (call them PartyA) have a valid point challenging corruption when they can’t even keep their racy content from falling in the hands of children.
Maintaining a strong brand is important because one might never know when they need public trust. Ability to make sufficient changes when a system changes in non-ideal ways in the future is not guaranteed. More questionable content, like that which would be found in R+ rated movies has potential for turning into a problem for Actors, Producers, and Posters in the future in ways that are hard to fully control or appreciate. Investment is a risk, and as I have invested in risky content over the years I would like those people protected and would like to limit a system from blaming based upon less than sufficient at times support and reliability.
The statue of David and other similar figures has potential to be perceived as nude content has zero cost, will always be accepted by society. Yet having a previous career as a stripper might prevent someone from finding respectful gainful employment at times, yet society turns up what leads to people becoming strippers on a bit of a constant basis. Would be nice to see all people treated better and less people compared to Prostitutes for Systems, Thoughts, and Actions Inspired that society as a whole turns up. Those “without sin cast the first stone” in the Bible has power likely not all fully appreciate. I would say nobody in our World has the right to cast a stone, as the system amps far less than ideally by default. Anyone that did cast a stone would likely regret it.
If any of my articles have fallen into the hands of children I apologize. I relied upon adult separation of content on The YouTube system and felt it necessary to be invested in content that amps less than ideally at times. Being completely divested might not lead to ideal protection for others that invest and take a risk in less-than-ideal content. I realize some words in songs and ideas in videos have the potential to amplify less than ideally for all parties, that said I have relied upon God and a system (that has now proven to be less reliable than once thought) for making sure the content that I have provided only winds up in hands that it should (won’t be misused for evil and does not add knowledge at too young of age).
Everything in life takes a bit of faith. I realize if I give money to someone in need they could take that money and misuse it to hurt someone else. Adding value in the World requires faith, and less than zero probabilities for problems. Adding content is a risk, no risk no reward does not translate to all risk is good, that no precautions need to be taken. Knowing what I know now greater precautions might protect self better, self protected better might not always equal all others protected better.
I am one poster. I am trying to be supportive. Negate my comprehension or even ability to perceive amplifies close to ideally. By posting I am investing allot in Faith. My prayer would be that all content creators and content viewers be protected in closer to ideal ways. That said I try to add risk mitigation and protection in ways I see fit while still protecting myself and that has tendency for amplifying far less than ideally for self, likely equals far less than ideally for others as well. People might bank on protections that aren’t in place, aren’t adequately maintained, and parents with more problems to have to address is not always adequate support for them. Correct levels and balance matters yet knowledge and appreciation of what equals correct levels is far less than ideally agreed upon in society, thus risk and potential friction.
Vlog posters particularly those with health problems might do better investing in less risky content, as risky content is not always all stress and headaches reduced. Trying to do right yet knowing content has potential to amplify in unseen ways and is not guaranteed to be perceived in good lights is not always sufficient stress reduced at least in my personal opinion.
I might desire to remove some older posts that are amplifying less than ideally on my vlog. I don’t know exactly which ones those are, several posts have had videos that have been removed from YouTube that change dramatically how posts are perceived. I also feel like the ability for searching for and changing close to 3000 vlog posts is less than ideal, especially for someone who has had health problems such as myself. Just because one posts does not guarantee they will be able to easily remove posts later. Further deleting posts might lead to reduced support for people (I have posted several articles on Defense Law, and I do not want to put support of Lawyers in Jeopardy). If I had better feedback of which posts are actually a problem I might be able to address.
Further I know enough about computers to know that search could be significantly faster – hard to always trust a system that might be making things more difficult in not fully appreciated ways. Removing posts in the future seen as will be simple, light, amplify as expected might not be all true value added. Further I have posted allot and have experienced great amount of cyber security problems including things I have typed being changed in mid sentence. Current and Future perception likely could have been driven by hacks and modifications, potentially modifications at a later date that I have not read. Just because I don’t read my content every day does not guarantee it has not been edited behind the scenes potentially in more ideal and potentially in less ideal, highly problematic ways.
What is possible, how things can change behind the scenes is not always known and has the potential to change in a nanosecond. Exascale computing has the potential to lead to new gains and discoveries, potentially new gains and discovery that aren’t known by all people and could be used by those seeking to oppress limiting others in not fully appreciated ways. Gains from Computing Systems and Reason Logic based Systems like Law should amplify more ideally for all people yet have shown a precedent over time for not always amplifying more ideally for all people.
Our society teaches Math. Math taught in a way that benefits society versus trains people to max profit at others expense is not a guarantee, has shown precedent for not always turned up correctly in The United States. That said just because people might look like they have money does not always equal they do have money, and perception and thus comprehension has the potential for amplifying in not fully appreciated ways. Looks like a shark does not equate to always is a shark, and people dehumanized, by calling them a shark is the same kind of max profit that deters rather than benefits society. Animosity and Unfairness perception has potential for being turned up in ways not all fully appreciate, doing right by people is made much more difficult based on less than sufficient perception and comprehension compounded with tough times.
I created the following image after seeing some fireworks in Dallas a few days ago. It is free to download, use, and create derivative works from.
My Tech Blog 