Easy vs Hard

My thoughts around Easy vs Hard

Perceived and Comprehended as Easy and Hard not always turned up sufficiently.

China has been known to be oppressive. Oppression in China is hard logically follows.

That has the potential to lead to logical conclusion living in USA is Easy, Oppression free, that interactions and pursuit will be both different and easy.

I have not personally experienced Oppression in China. I have experienced Oppression in my own life in USA. I hear about how about oppression is there and other places in the World, yet not having lived through it I have no potential to guage better or worse.

Even people that have Good lifes have the potential for hard situations, curveballs from God that are not easy. Thus initial assessment of easy and hard is far from ideally established and has the ability for systems like corporations to max profit on likely in ways that are hard to fully guage and appreciate.

Even people on the level are not ideal comprehenders, not ideally trained, do not have ideal miscommunication reduced. Even if one understands 100% of the time (and nobody does if more realistic) that does not guarantee ideal delivery of thoughts or perceptions and comprehension that lead to thoughts. People in general are operating on the premise things are easy, light comprehension is straightforward in a way that allows curveballs that are both hard and unexpected at times missed.

Perceived as harder is not all value added for adoption. One could sufficiently set learning curve or price curve out of reach of most people. Less using a product has potential for reduced feedback and thus reduced value delivered. Things that are priced or set outside of the intellectual realm of most people have a precedent for not delivering ideal value for all. Value creation for all generally seen as too hard thus a win for some is upsold to sufficient in insufficient ways.

Computers and Engineering Products like 3D Rendering Software have the potential to be greater value added for all and they are far from guaranteed to be greater value added for all. Greater value added might be seen as up to debate. I will challenge that claim with the following sentence.

Laws and Regulations that design how we live and interact in society have the potential to be greater value added for all and they are far from guaranteed to be greater value added for all. It is important to lead by example, there is precedent for what is seen as useful in one industry to follow over to other industries and parts of life.

Greater value added for all factors into Ease of Use, Accessibility, and Ergonomics. People have potential to not ideally divest from past perceptions of Easy vs Hard. Easy turned up here might lead to not full appreciation that Hard might be turned up in different industries, interactions, perceptions, and comprehension. Reiterations and Repetitions factor into how people value Easy and Hard, and what people are willing or not willing to invest in. If everyone thinks something too hard, potential for divestment that leads to reduced feedback and thus reduced value.

Value claimed and promised has shown precedent for delivering less than ideally, less than sufficiently for all and turning it up in better ways for all on Earth, mankind in general, those in Space and those that will be in Space in future generations matters and requires time, thought, and reflection that is not always adequately invest in. Seen as Easy might equal more support should not equate to delivers ideal or always sufficient support. Greater appreciation for Hard is both enabling and limiting in both more ideal and non-ideal insufficient ways.

Easy to feed people equals more Soup Kitchens or less Soup Kitchens? Hard to feed people, every time I try to cook a pot someone kicks it off the stove? Easy or Hard perceived factors into wins and losses not always fully pondered.

Tech value creation thought and perceived factors into greater long term investment where wins are actually seen or not seen. There is a bit of momentum in overselling actual value creation, potentially underselling value creation in different areas (of both tech and other fields). Pursuit of a project like a bridge can be enabling long term for society in not fully appreciated ways, yet building one and maintaining one might be value out in other directions that have shown precedent for not amplifying ideally or always sufficiently. Short term value creation is not always factored sufficiently into plans for long term value creation.

More money on Defense Lawyers for the Public, Public Defenders or more money towards Bridges and Roads. Man in an ambulance vs Man in a jail? Both are important and both have potential to amplify less than sufficiently. Where you stand at any given time matters to perception of value creation by choices society makes? True.

Wiser not to invest in crime, high potential for any that might choose to to not factor in Society kind of commits crimes against itself through oppression and decision making that amplifies less than sufficiently for all pretty much by default. Has to be illegal for it to be a crime? Not sure that is how God would see it. 1 person could be left with trillions and everyone else in society set to zero and that might be considered legal, just part of a capitalist max profit system. How things are defined matters, what people value matters, how people value matters. Risk Mitigation from Easy to known as Hard should factor into Risk Mitigation, but does that equal greater Risk Mitigation or less Risk Mitigation, sufficiently or ideally?

10 steps to put on a seat belt, or 1? Easy matters.

Pressing play button too hard?

China or USA Freedom always unlikely to have a Shotgun in the way, or in Christ’s case Roman Spears?