Statue of David Thoughts

Statue of David not all fat people on medication protect. My Aunt who had a cancer tumor the size of a basketball, who passed out in the shower, who was obese is not ideally protected by such a statue. God does not strike down Statue of David with lightning bolt, sets precedent.

Statue of David not all gay homosexuality tuning fork with potential for murder out. Someone that hates homesexuality, thinks it is a plague on society and life could ask men or women questions, how does it make you feel, does it turn you on. Based on the answer one could promote murder and sent to a furnace. Murder is only Murder if the person is doing no wrong, has zero sin has potential and precedent for being incorrectly turned up. People are not sin free, not ideal judgers amped.

Think better of others, Golden Rule (treat others how you wish to be treated) is not all adequate trust amped. People are less than perfect, are motivated by max profit, and less than ideal training at times. Set to always trustworthy have a precedent for non ideal value amplified. Negate trust is not all value added, trust by default, trust based on less than perfect humanity judgment is not all value added.

Have an opinion not all danger out, don’t have an opinion not all danger out.

Useful matters, factors into precedent. Precedent factors into useful. What is right is not always decided upon, does not equal decisions are not made. Decisions and Judgments not always about Reason, Logic, Right and Wrong, life has set precedent for useful matters, people are not all sin out, and a sinful person could find that to be useful.

Life has precedent for holding people responsible for imperfection in Jading way. It is normal, common, practical, useful, does not equal it is right. Grace is always practical? Negate Grace never factors into Throughput? Better takes work, upsold to sinful, imperfect has precedent for being set to need to protect the innocent over them.

Awareness does not amp ideally or even sufficiently at times. Judgment is not always sufficient, Negate Grace not always sufficient. Extreme circumstances not fully comprehendible could factor into the oppression and leverage against my life. I am an ideal judge from under oppression, ideal grace amplified from under oppression? No. Trying to do right does not guarantee adequate resolution to do right.

Combination has high probability of killing me, if not severely limiting the remaining time I have left on this Earth. Go out swinging or try to concentrate on the blessings? Getting Justice, trying to get Justice has high potential for inadequate resolution amplified and more time lost. People need protection, does not always equate to adequately delivered, delivered in timely manner.

Reduced oppression will amp before it is too late? Who gets to judge too late?

I want to see naked men in the street? Think the Statue of David shown is how I wish to be treated via golden rule? No. I also believe not all content for all people. Displaying art is content, Art displayed in public has potential for effecting many people, not all of which might appreciate the art. Others might appreciate the art, the statue is valuable to the city, thus I put away my distaste for the better of others? Right? All Golden Rule Amped? People required to like things, all things part of the system as a requirement for anything that is in the system? Finding something everyone likes and agrees upon is less than ideal. Golden Rule amps, negate ideally.

Everyone staying at the back of the line to let others in front while deadlocked because nobody wants to go first? System is dynamic, choosing to go first in line might be treating others as they wish to be treated, at least as amplified via the Golden Rule. Maybe they actually desired to go first. Golden rule is easily judgable, always delivers simple comprehendible results, never requires time thought and reflection? No.

Talking to others is wasting their time. I don’t want to do that so I talk less. But they might need encouragement. My encouragement does not always hit the mark, try to deliver ideal results on less than ideal words? Encouragement that misses the mark, can have opposite results, there is consequence and potential for non null time losses.

Promote obesity, fat when there is food shortage? Not appreciate that medications, sometimes forced upon people might deliver excess weight? Include but not try to motivate towards better and claim love and care? Not appreciate that Image, looks matter, many times in non ideal ways that factors into success, who gets supported and who does not at critical times? Claim to have all those thoughts in head, being an imperfect human, and walk a perfect line trying to deliver encouragement? Adding to the problem is easy, not always light, not always lift. Skirt the line on truth, but not claim a lie, iffy truth and relevance b’s ya and others? Fat also potentially factors into useful insulation in cold climates. Survival of the fittest amps less than ideally and can be called into question in likely not all fully appreciated ways?

Built in a different way, built to think differently not always all value out, not always all value out in expected ways. One of the hard problems in life, people being wronged not always the best to call out and correct the wrong. Being wronged, offended factors into heightened tension, increased anger and reduced capacity for sound reasoning and judgment. Delivery might have and has precedent for disastrous results at time.

Man’s output is polarizing at times, far less than ideal and his comprehension of the way God thinks is far less than ideal as well? God kind of hears my perspective, my point of view and hears all others as well, perfectly and delivers perfect comprehension based upon that? Man is not God, man factors in some perspectives not all perspectives when they judge, and they are told not to judge yet judge many times as it is easy to confuse assessment required for throughput with judging. The association to less has potential for less than all wild west out, and that is not a good thing. “Send them to God, let Him sort them out” seems like less than ideal words for Golden Rule amped.

Man is not God, Man assesses Judgment is better in God hands and man thus makes an assessment not judgment to kill based on iffy legalism that delivers less than sufficiently, has precedent for delivering less than sufficiently?

Homosexuality is set to a sin, society is less than all homosexuality amped out, encouraging others to sin is a sin. Sin leads to death. Paying taxes is funding the system. Paying taxes is sin? Paying taxes equals death? Expect governments to want to turn that up? Leverage factors into Judgment, Resolution that is less than sound.

Taxes lead to roads where criminals innocent and guilty are oppressed and sometimes killed sometimes murdered. Taxes also lead to roads for ambulances that save lives. But the Doctor had to do a colonoscopy, therefore it is gay, sin that will lead to death? Who funds the system matters, and is turned up for the sake of throughput without always much time, thought, and reflection. Time, thought, and reflection has potential to lead to less answers, less clear thought about what the path ahead is, should be. Clearly more iffy, clearly more complex and complicated has potential for divests. More complicated does not always equal less right. Over simplification is common and useful. Complexity that factors into, that facilitates right is sometimes harder than people actually want to admit or invest in.

Authority that gives more complements to one person over another? That person does not need complements and encouragement? It is fair for authority that is funded by taxes to give complements to some but not others? Encouragement factors into level playing field, who wins, and who loses? Say who gets encouraged does not matter? Either everyone gets treated with Encouragement or better to equalize and give nobody encouragement? Can’t deliver fairly equals zero need for specialized direct Encouragement? People that are less than all sin out get to gauge when encouragement is added, useful and when it is not, and that factors into profits? The problem has amped in more insufficient ways, based upon perspective. Authority might give 1 person 1 million while robbing 20 families getting 50,000?

Not all that glitters is gold, there is reasons to keep up appearances. Possibly perceived that way should dictate actions? People with their current bank account balance floating over their head before every interaction would be more truthful? Truth is entirely value added? That data is likely available to some and not others, people don’t always talk about who has access and who does not. Claim all truth added when bank accounts not divulged for all by default? Logs of purchases, logs of contributions? Contributions that are money based get valued higher than contributions that are time based? Better judgment is possible as time and resolution approaches infinity. Funding and Time available factors into Judgment that meets less than ideal standards.

Haves and Haves Not factors into Justice. And everyone has and has not. The true question is about fair Justice? I don’t think that is normally the case. True Justice requires too much work too much resolution, too much time. The truth is Justice is given up in trade for Throughput, Truth and Adequate Resolution is given up in trade for Throughput.

People are wronged by PartyB that is turned up by problems A, B, and C. People wanting Justice always want to correct problems A, B, and C, or those problems left in place are useful for Throughput? Ideal Justice takes into account all factors, negate Justice is ideal, negate people always want to take into account all factors. Number of times Justice is given up for sake of Throughput factors into precedent. Precedent less than ideal is not always factored into need for Better Justice.

The bar is wrong, set wrong, costs too much to change, currently profits some parties equals ideal Justice amplifier? Golden Rule, is it right to disbar lawyers? Not really treating lawyers the way they wish to be treated. A public oppressed by lawyers and iffy gotcha legalism is all Golden Rule for that public?

Iffed on mistreating lawyers or the public is how God would want it?

Gains that profit some are allowed to amp at the expense of others is not always an ideal system.

Number of Stones thrown matters, amount of time thrown matters. Christ said put down your stones, let those without sin cast the first for a reason.

Pay takes or don’t pay taxes is not all sin out. Someone that claims to be without sin? Thus I think the take away is don’t throw stones. Funding a system that oppresses or not funding a system that saves lives. Is is easy to divest from gray in this world? No. People don’t always factor that into risk mitigation? True. All gray is obvious, high resolution, clearly visible in a way that ideally factors into decision making and assessment, judgment? No.

Is it acceptable to Test God? I am reminded of the quote “for it is written though shalt not test the Lord thy God”. It is not always wise to do what is written. Old Testament talks about stoning adulterers. Not factor in results of prayers to whether prayer is a useful system? Praying and factoring in results of working or not working should not be judged, assessed as testing? Context matters, not wise to jump off a cliff and pray to God to save in midair. Prayers not always answered in time frame we like.

Is it wise to test Authority? Doctors are a kind of authority, do they not need to be tested, human that are less than perfect are always ideal amplifiers of future throughput? Not always wise to test Authority, Not always wise to not test Authority. Humans are not God. Authority has potential for upsold to God, upsold to able to fix things they cannot. God is a type of Authority, Authority is not God equals language association not always ideal. Ethereal is less than ideally comprehensible at times.

It is scorching hot in Texas right now. I pray for rain and it does not rain (at least generally speaking). Sets precedent my prayers are not always answered, potentially not always factored in. Global Warming likely or unlikely, should I base decisions on God will listen to prayers of Future Generations and fix immediately, or will let humanity lay in the mess they created for themselves? God not all Garden of Eden re-amped. Yet God truly loves us?

How God will deliver future Environment or Not Deliver Future Environment factors into technology choices today and tomorrow. Depending on prayers for Throughput that delivers or does not deliver is greater than zero cost.

If God will fix by default worry about converting to Solar, Wind, and Clean energy? What people invest in and what people do not invest in today factors into future throughput for tomorrow. Lack of clarity, lack of ideal projections about the future factor into throughput for tomorrow.

Claim to love someone while telling them not to test a system they rely upon for throughput?

Prayer seems to amp less than ideally in my reality currently. Parting Read Sea too Costly, not all let Texas fry amped?

104 Degrees Fahrenheit on August 10th, 2023 in Duncanville, Texas. At least this document will be a record for the future. Gives feeling of future Texans might want to build underground cooled environments with fire retardant tops.