Warning: If you are a victim of adultery you might not want to read the following. There are potentially insulting hypotheticals around adultery used to call attention to iffy judgment that amps less than sufficiently for all. The following document can incite rage, either don’t read or please read to the end of the page. The ideas are important yet hard to talk about, and thus are not always talked about. The ideas on this page have potential to lead to life and death. They reinforce why judgment is not always wise, and is iffy in many cases. Iffy territory is capitalized on by parties potentially in non ideal ways, in ways that have the potential to lead to more problems. Making things gray, hard to discern right from wrong has potential for people lining up on both sides with rocks, not always an ideal system to get close to. People that might not read to the bottom of the page might want to kill me just for asking the questions. People that read to the bottom of the page might still want to kill me just for asking the questions. Iffy, Gray territory is useful, and it can be used to win business deals, max profit, and ruin lives. This document has the potential to save lives. Has the potential to take my own life. Not posting potentially easier.
A man buys his wife makeup and a nice dress. His wife uses it to seduce another man and commits adultry.
Has the man facilitated adultry? Has the man facilitated another man cumming? Is the man gay for facilitating another man cumming?
Now take the same man
He buys makeup for his daughter. His daughter falls in love with a new man that she sleeps with.
Has the man facilitated his daughters forninaction? Has the man facilitated another man cumming? Is the man gay for facilitating another man cumming?
Now take the same man
He owns a makeup shop. He sells makeup to another man’s daughter.
Has the man facilitated another man’s daughters fornication? Has the man facilitated another man cumming? Is the man gay for facilitating another man cumming?
Take an artist. He draws a nude man. Or scuplts a nude man. That man is looked upon by women that orgasm to his appearance. Say the statue of David. Men that are gay also orgasm to his appearance. Say the statue of David.
Is that man gay? Has the man facilitated unpure actions? Has the man faciliated another man cumming? Is the man gay for facilitating another man cumming?
These are all iffies closer to the unreasonable side of the spectrum.
Take another instance of a man being a Pimp, prostituting out women and trying to control Jons in backhanded ways.
Has the man facilitated fornication? Has the man faciliated another man cumming? Is the man gay for facilitating another man cumming?
Part of the problem? Iffy territory is hard to talk about without inciting rage. People like to think of things as clearly not gay, or clearly gay, clear black or clearly white. The gray area exists on many moral and ethical situations, yet the gray area is not always well defined in a way that stops people from investing.
I should stop investing in makeup or lingerie because it might lead to fornication, adultry, or a man cumming? If I don’t stop investing that makes me gay?
If I take a guy known to be a criminal to the store, then he robs the bank next door. Does that make me a facilitator to bank robbery? Trying to help out a guy low on his luck and restart his life has no potential for problems?
Judging people on what they faciliate what they have facilitated is turned up on more than one occasion and has potential for done in ways that are less than ideal for all parties. There are 1000 electrical deaths a year, 20% of those are children. Everyone that turns on a light is party, is accessory, is a facilitator of 200 children electrocutions? How things are judged matters. Not always done without consideration for all parts of the subject. Didn’t factor in all those on life support, all the lights in hospitals that prevent doctors from tripping as an offset? An offset is an ideal way to calculate losses with 200 children’s lives on the line?
Saying everyone is potentially guilty of 200 children’s deaths might make life considered less valuable and more expendable. That is not my aim and intentions, my aim and intentions are to get people to judge less and get off high horses, and that is not always a simple system. Some formerly incarcerated are rehabilitated and some go on to commit crimes. The combination has potential to lead to some so jaded that they never want to work with a criminal again. Has potential to lead to the system never seen as fair or just because it robbed critical support based upon lies for a large portion of peoples lives. People on both sides have critical points, and that factors into perceptions of rehabiliation as a useful system.
One could use the 200 children’s death arguments to force management to higher someone known to have stolen large sums of money in the past. If that man steals again he could jade the company into never highering someone with less than a flawless criminal background check. The man is caught taking a 5 minute coffee break – HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN WORKING, THAT’S STEALING! Too harsh of judgment and judgmental people have potential for amping less than sufficiently. That is more iffy territory, man might have turned off his time clock, might stay 5 minutes later that day to make up the time difference. Might have needed the hydration to prevent from having a heart attack. Hydration and Water Molecules always turned up ideally in a Max Profit system?
A person pays taxes, that tax money pays the salary of a Beautiful Female FBI Officer. That makeup helps her get an in to bust a criminal based upon looks. Bank shots count?
Utilization of less than perfect thoughts and intentions to keep the public safe has no potential for sin? Whole painting needs to be #FFFFFF or not true justice?
I want homosexuals dead? No. Homosexuality as a system is dangerous, can kill, is not always judged properly, is not always discussed with zero bias? True. People that have less than a long time to live might turn up self to look like a homosexual to protect others? Yes. Is it fair for society that relies on colonoscopies for safety to really force people close to death to have to turn that up? No. The system amps fair less than ideally, the system amps justice less than ideally, the system increases divests due to iffy and gray territory that makes people uncomfortable. Homosexuality is not a zero cost system. Establishing a need to protect is costly. Time useful for greater throughput of water bottles or more time protecting homosexuality and hard to defend gray areas. Less of a problem is power not always fully appreciated.
I believe this topic is important. Could save lives. I believe this document is ideal encouragement or support for those with Adultery? No. People that have been hurt and victimized need more hypotheticals that possibly jade? No. What I would say to someone that has been cheated on? Never Say Die and don’t count God out of the equation. Try not to judge those that cheated too harshly, everyone makes mistakes and are at different places in their lives. If it is likely to happen many times I might advise to get out as being a door mat is not good for you or the person you are enabling.
What is adultery can be made iffy, judgment and discussion, agreement on what is and what is not cheating is not always agreed upon by all parties. People that get into relationships quickly might not always invest ideal time in discussing. Mismatches known early on can lead to getting out of a bad situation faster. People sometimes act out of fear and thought God won’t provide and stay in relationships where agreement might be far less than ideal. Can be bandaged together for a time might not equal will last. Getting out early has potential for high value added.
People don’t always agree on what is hurtful. People not seeing eye to eye does not equate to the hurt isn’t real. People sometimes have rosy misconceptions and ideas that don’t play out in expected ways. Failed expectations might be assigned to the person that failed them rather than the person that created the expectations in the first place.
People don’t make it rain. God does not always make it rain when people pray for rain. God and People are unlikely to always amp the way one would like. Thinking they will has potential for being failed expectations. Life is not all non ideal curveballs out. People that miss the curveballs might upsell self to should have seen it coming. Sometimes possible does not equal always possible.
My Tech Blog 