Perception of Reality upsold to Truth

Perception of Reality upsold to Truth

1. We see it, thus we upsell it to truth.
2. We read it, it is claimed as truth, thus we upsell it to truth.
3. Reality responds this way, more than one time, thus we upsell it to fully comprehended, will happen again in the future.
4. We perceive the current time to be VarA, thus we upsell what has happened to happened in correlation with VarA

A Marvel’s Xavier like system that lets us see and feel things is possible.

A Frozen Head of Walt Disney like system where computers are attached to the brain in the future is possible.

A system like Elon Musk’s neural link where when you sleep you could be transported to a Vanilla Sky or Matrix like system is possible.

These systems could be installed from birth, or our minds could have been wiped and then we could be upsold to reborn. 70 year old man’s brain reborn as a child in a perception engine is a possible system. We see our hands and our feet and we think we know they are our hands and our feet, not just images projected into the sensation engines in our brains. Sensations combined with Integration of Memories that we have access to factor into our Responses. Memories could likely being installed, could likely be removed, could likely be forgotten, could likely be amplified at any moment.

We upsell what we see and what we read from credible sources to truth because it is valuable. If I go to work and I am able to purchase based on resources/pay that is given, I have had the idea reinforced that going to work and getting paid equals greater potential. My mind might have greater potential than just going to work, yet my brain might find going to work as the optimal pain reward point. Outside in a Blizzard is painful, able to buy tasty foods and comfort, able to solve problems has potential for increased with resources available versus not available.

If I work hard and I am not rewarded for my investment my brain and mylenation is reinforced that working hard is a less useful system. Conversely if my investment in time leads to rewards whether I deserve the rewards or not, whether the reward is correctly amped and applied (could be paid more or less than the work I actually performed) then hard work and endeavors invested in are reinforced in mylenation as valuable.

We perceive the brain and the way it works to work the way it does because knowledge of the brain in this reality leads to comprehendible results. Training with positive rewards leads to results, much like a mouse in a maze with cheese, thus we upsell training with positive rewards to a useful system.

The system works a particular way from what we currently comprehend might not be the way it actually works. The idea of a spirit disconnected but still connected to a Earthly body is a similar system. Spirit could be like a brain in another realm, a brain that might work differently, that might obey different laws of physics, different laws of time, and reality.

The future brings updated comprehension and we like to upsell that comprehension to better. At any point along the way truth could be altered. If we find that truth is altered we might be inspired to trust less. Reduced trust is a valuable system, thus there might be incentive to inspire trust and then remove it in order to maintain future power over comprehension of what truth is.

The system acts in a trustworthy way, and less pain is created by following it is not always a simple system to combat. The system could be oppressive, could be doing things incorrectly (based on our current perception of what correct is) and it might be very difficult to see, or even be completely obfuscated. It is useful to remind the World of Oppression.

Reminding the World of Oppression is a form of Narrative Control, to say it is less powerful than other Propaganda would be unwise. Inspired to fight Oppression, Inspired on what to think Oppression is factors into investment in time, resources, thought, reflection, and actions such as fighting court cases or trying to elect better leaders. The inspired response upsold to ideal response seems unwise. We are trained to think one way, it is valuable in the societies we live to think one way, yet the far ahead future, say 500 or 1000 years has potential for revealing truths and possibly even convulting them.

If an Alien that might exhibit similar qualities to my personality and vastly different qualiteis to my personality existed on another planet where technology is far greater or far less how should I reason about the importance of their life? They might be required to fight oppression I cannot fathom based upon truths I can’t even close to comprehend and vice versa, we might fight problems in this World that were fixed long ago possibly by choice or possibly by chance. How a planet evolves, how nature evolves likely could be vastly different.

If we take a concrete example on Earth like a Volcano how might that be useful? A Volcano is useful geothermal energy, potentially very scary to those that comprehend little about it, destroys towns could be upsold to a message from God. Other planets might have systems like Volcanos that act in more terrifying and terrific ways. Other planets conversely might have systems like rivers that are so plentiful that they made certain gains in technology like the aquaducts to not be required for increased success. Land and Location that enables is Power, comprehension of resources actually available at shortest path through chance is Power that could be enabled more on others planets and less on other planets than Earth. We upsell Earth to an ideal value creation system based upon what we see in the Solar System, sustains intelligent life is powerful.

Another example of a Marvel’s Xavier like system would be statis on a Spaceship Ark. We could see Earth where we might be on a voyage to a distant galaxy while stuck in Statis. If the journey is far too long for us to reach in our lifetime, maintaining intelligence over the long voyage likely would require integration into a perception system much like Vanilla Sky or the Matrix.

The idea that truth is less than ideal can be unsettling, can be considered as not a path of thought always worth investing in. The idea that our moral systems could be based upon what is useful to the system and societies to maintain power and control is a bit unsettling. There are actions like murder and theft that are simple to comprehend (potentially complex in practice, starving under oppression and killing an enemy in war). We comprehend VarA will lead to problems and costs ProblemA, ProblemB, ProblemC, CostD, CostE, and CostF. Thus we might say VarA is a choice we should not make dependent on conditioning and stimuli that leads to more problems, costs, and less rewards.

Ethical Choices in Society are conditioned. ChoiceA leads to good results and ChoiceB leads to bad results. The idea we always know a better choice than ChoiceA seems unwise, ChoiceA might be conditioned for good reasons. The idea the wrong choices can’t be rewarded in a way that amplifies rewards and then enormous problems seems unwise. What choices are rewarded and what choices are punished matter based upon truth, truth that is not always amplified in sufficient ways.

We make what are perceivable good choices that get us through a time and then reality can amplify comprehension of what we have missed while nullifying the lack of training, lack of responsibility and accountability that same society failed to provide at the time. Society can blame past choices, based on good data or bad data does not equal that Society will always take responsibility for the lack of support that same society delivered at that time.

There is power, there are parts of this World, our perception of this World, of what we believe to be true that we do not fully perceive, that we do not fully comprehend. We don’t perceive everything, we don’t have infinite visibility even if we have a sky level or mountain top view, thus the idea we close to comprehended everything ideally through life seems unwise.

Ethics are conditioned. If others make choices we consider to be right, good, and ethical then based upon our training and conditioning we believe that person to be ethical. Knowing a person is ethical, able to rely upon certain constructs like they are unlikely to kill or steal from us is valauble, allows greater options like increase communication and cooperation.

People don’t always like their minds opened to new ideas. Ideas like our brain might be amplified in a similar environment to an enemies system. One lets call them PartyA thinks they are on TeamA but they are in a perception engine for TeamB to raise thoughts and ideas in correlation with TeamA. Then that same one PartyA could be release by TeamB into TeamA’s system. PartyA has to be valued, appreciated, inspired with correct thoughts and actions seems unwise. People that are not part of a team can believe themselves to be part of a team they are not based upon the training of an enemy team is an unsettling thought.

We like to think of ourselves as influenced correctly, inspired by ideal experiences delivered by God and fate to prepare us for the days in the future. We upsell our training to will lead to sufficient for the trials of the day. At least from my experience of this reality God gives trials that are far past what I would like. Too much uncomfortable is possible to make doing the right thing too difficult, unknown and underprepared or unequipped is heart breaking. The idea unequipped is an impossible system would be unwise. The idea of ideally equipped is likely to lead to hubris, hubris that has the potential to deliver like unequipped.

The wrong thoughts, wrong ideas, wrong correlations can all compound and people can still make the right choice. To say that is any less than difficult and heart breaking at times would be unwise. Actions can give a fair hand, when the World that we perceive and comprehend does not.

Stepping out at the right time can be powerful, stepping in at the right time seen as zero cost to those that do seems unwise. The environment will be ideal is not true value added. Too much of anything could be amplified in awful ways. Choice to be there for friends, family, coworkers, and nation is not always simple light easy, consequence to image free. Standing with people through the storm might equal they are standing at the end of it. A future with someone at the end versus no one at the end is not always appreciated for the value creation potential it has.

Humans amplify less than perfectly. Their training could have been better in the past and could be better in the future. Investing in training others is not zero cost, is not zero responsibility. The World trains less than sufficietly at times, people miss the mark, will we be there as a society to pick them up and heal their wounds or we will be left standing alone and broken at the end of the storm? Even the greatest batter in baseball misses many pitches over a life time. Inventions that lead to real value take investment in time, effort, and resilence in the face of obstacles, trials, and hardships.

This World throws hardships and obstacles that can bring people to the point of giving up, throwing in the towel, waiting for the end of time quietly and miserably.

Will we be there to lift each other up when there seems like there is no light at the end of the tunnel? Will we let them give up or will we take the harder path of standing with them through the storm? When we realize we don’t have the right words, when even our presence might be insufficient will we still hope, pray, and try to inspire the best for them? I want to add value but I am not sure how, I haven’t been trained, haven’t sufficently been supported to add value not a relatable thought? Not the right man for the job and others are better equipped compounded via oppression and injustice leads to moments in times we might have wished played out another way, might have wished never existed not worthy of thought, time, and reflection?

You decide not to be a Doctor today. A future event happens where PartyA needs help and there is no Doctor available. Will you give best support dependent upon your knowledge? The support might be sufficent or might not be sufficient is unsettling.

You decide to be a Doctor today. A future event happens where PartyA needs help and there are others that need help. Will you give best support dependent upon the time you have? The support might be sufficent or might not be sufficient is unsettling.

You decide to be a Doctor today. A future event happens where PartyA needs help for a problem you weren’t trained for doesn’t have the potential for being unsettling? The idea your value creation might be better for others when you desire to help more than anything not comprehendible and relatable?

We base decisions on paths and training based upon where we think we can add value. People solve things in different ways. There are problems an artist might be able to solve that a doctor cannot. There are many problems a doctor can solve that an artist cannot. Artists and Doctors that work together to paint a better future is a future with more potential than the alternative. An there are many more fields than Art and Medicine. The problem is unsolvable to one problem solver might be upsold to unsolvable by all problem solvers, don’t let it be. Life has paths all of which deliver less than ideally left to their own, all of which that have more potential for true value added in combination.

Training can lead to thinking a problem is always solved best with the ideas we have the possibility to fathom. A problem solver that realizes others might have greater intelligence and wisdom to actually solve the problem is a bit of a Hubris check. Delegation is less than a 100% throughput system, continuing to have faith even though not all delegated responsibility will deliver can be more than a bit trying at times. We delegate our needs to Leaders and Leaders delegate their needs (ideally based upon the good we have inspired and not the bad, because there will be bad) to others. Others that have been trained, many times amazingly yet likely far from ideally, far from able to account for all anomalies. Communication and Open Communication channels is vital, has the potential to lead to problems solved that would otherwise be impossible based upon our own understanding, comprehension, and potential.

I do not have close to full Comprehension of all power for making things better in the World, for even Comprehension of all Possibilities for potential ways to solve problems. Communication limited, less peace and less ability to speak freely with each other and work together can be turned up at the cost of many via politics, teams, and competition. There are also times where my investment in reliance on others might be more costly than trying to make a situation better myself based upon the training that I have. There is a lot of room for less than ideal delivery in all that, having to put faith in God for the things I can’t account for is a bit of a requirement. No faith delegation will deliver, support will deliver has high potential for reduced reliance, reduced communication that can lead to possibilities limited. Possibilities that could be Game Changing.

Don’t upsell life to all possibilities known. Don’t upsell comprehension, training, and truth provided to always ideal. I have experienced the best days I will seems unwise to claim.