Categorize and Classify is a useful system that can be improved. I created YouTube Videos that were designed to generate reduced oppression and better categorize and classify. Those videos were non ideally limited by those trying to maximize profit.
Ideally promoting less oppression and better categorize and classify would lead to better results. Metaphors and similar far from exact systems are useful.
If YouTube top leadership allows my accounts to have their access limited, they are limiters of my message.
If my messages on reduced oppression are allowed to stand removed, that equals corrupt limit the message is being allowed to happen.
A = limiters of accounts
B = limiters of message
C= financially liable
Does A+B+C categorized into the same group equal a win win for the future?
On the plus side I know many of my videos by heart
that means I get to capitalize on their value while others lose access to their value
If that was limited to those in A+B+C it might be different, but that also limits the rest of the world.
Common infrastructure that displays content allowed to be limited from access
YouTube is like a highway
Systems that are required for ability to profit can be limited without real cause
Sets precedent for what is allowed, what is not allowed, potential for the ones that designed the system to have their accounts limited. Can’t change that now is a viable system with potential.
Zero consequences for turning off access to messages that promote safer use of electricity when infrastructure is already failing set to zero cost?
Consumer Protection Agency
3 little words that used to mean something
Simplification is a useful system, upselling less oppression to complicate is far from wise
My preference is for win wins while the system seems to keep amping win lose.
Giant amount of supercomputers in the world and can’t amp win wins? What good are logic systems if they lead to only win losses?
My Tech Blog 