https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypervelocity
Reading Speed can be slowed or sped up dependent upon the sentence written. Once sentence can be easy to read. Another sentence can be written in a way that creates a harder obstacle, as if a speed bump driving on a race track.
If Reading is a system similar to velocity. Where displacement is the words of changed over time, acceleration and deceleration of reading speed velocity factors into Reading Comprehension throughput.
New content, a new book is like driving in a new city versus a Race track that you are use to. Words and sentence built in a specific way is like road you are use to that is reduced friction. Higher friction can lead to more gains in pattern matching problem solving.
Variety of sentences is not all value out for Reading Comprehension. New words like procrastigation left in the sentence, how will you deal with it? Will you use context clues to realize the writer is combining the words instigation and procrastination?
Able to move forward with words that appear as error can lead to more ability to maximize profit. Miscommunication and corrupted data is possible not factoring that into Reading Comprehension is unwise. Data Consistency is not always guaranteed, not factoring that into respect for training and reading comprehension would be unwise.
Experience and interrupt factors into speed of Reading Comprehension. Life does not deliver ideal less pain, lower stress situations when reading comprehension is required. Just because you are hurt, low on blood sugar does not equal High Voltage signs no longer matter, that Reading Comprehension limited does not still have the non ideal potential to limit length of life in a fatal way.
Better Reading Comprehension is Not Ideal Reading Comprehension. Less than ideal is potential, potential that can be improved. Able to make gains means there is hope and is also a reminder to readers that hubris has the potential to not always amplify ideally.
More Words Inspired, GTp, Greater Throughput
Effective Words Inspired Throughput factors into Effective Message Output
Metrics are Important, they allow Throughput to be gauged, a little rain equals a little bit of water in the well, a lot of rain could equal much more water in the well.
EWInsp – Effective Words Inspired
Process Reminded as Important – ProcRem-asImp
EWInsp-fn2-EMO – Effective Words Inspired factors into Effective Message Output
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/effective
adjective
adequate to accomplish a purpose; producing the intended or expected result:effective teaching methods; effective steps toward peace.
actually in operation or in force; functioning:The law becomes effective at midnight.
producing a deep or vivid impression; striking:an effective photograph.
prepared and available for service, especially military service.
noun
a member of the armed forces fit for duty or active service.
the effective total of a military force.
Effective is a Powerful Word, like a reminder of Power in Cause and Effect. Ineffective Message Output equals less Message Amped. Effective Message Output equals More Message Amped.
Words like rowing a boat, through the valley of death?
Velocity not always fast, some colossal scenery that is incepted in brilliant ways through describe over explain, show over tell?
A lot of potential in Story. A lot of potential in the future. Not sure I want to miss all the new stories going forward. High potential for looking up and thinking, how did that get there.
Mastery in Rockets from Propelled Grenades to Epic Shuttle Launches? Guns or Butter can’t have both, and Possible is Power
As a slow moving grenade? Never thought of it like that
Writers Inspired is an Effect
What is the cause?
- Healthy and Supported
- A cause worthy of Writing about
- A cause like Good Experience
- A cause like Making a Difference
- Better tools? Tools like WordPress that are joy to use, equals Higher Effective Message Output
- Enabled and Appreciated, Enabled factors into Appreciated
- Not limited via oppression, words that are controlled, painted with a fluffy pastel brush that does not shade the situation in a memorable way?
Easy to upsell a little delay on a news report to less crucial non ideally
Network Throughput and Reach Limited is a system, a system that is many times turned up non ideally
Write a message that needs to take flight immediately leads to grounded for years?
Any message could be upsold to God would have let it Amped if He wanted it to Amp. Potential for Non Ideal ability to amplify Oppression based on Perceived as Chosen by God.
God will give you the right words at the right time is a quote from The Bible. Women must be silent is another quote from The Bible. Treat others as you wish to be treated is another quote from The Bible.
The last of the three seems wiser than the first two, though in particular contexts, under the right levels of oppression I can imagine the first two being said. People get a choice in how they perceive and comprehend things. If the results of that comprehension is set to inadequate then people will likely be upsold to Not Inspired by God, to False Teachers.
Some people call other people “Mother Fuckers”
Consider that statement inspired by God? God seen as gave those people adequate training in advance on communications would be unwise.
Belief and Faith you will have the right words at the right time matters. If you are perceived as less confident as God might have had better words, people have the potential to misuse that lack of confidence against you. People by default are Not all grace amplified.
Simple as that? Talk like you were given ideal direction for amplifying support for the day? Not factor in the truth that your perception and comprehension of World Events was limited at best? Didn’t know about that, claim ideally factored that in?
Leaders have greater top level view at times, Subjects or “Valued Research Participants” on ground level have greater view, perception, and Comprehension at times. Leaders and Subjects always speak and communicate ideally? Relevance limiting and limited time factors into conversations had or conversations limited.
Delegation without Follow Up is easy to set to Ideal, harder to Follow Up, Raise Comprehension, Amplify Relevance on things that might not always be ideal
Conversation takes work, and not all people, not all systems amplify conversation as simple, straightforward, easy. Calling out leaders, trying to amplify the need for conversation, discussion is not always appreciated. Thus many times conversations are limited in advance out of convenience and proximity.
Who is PartyA to think they have the right to talk to LeaderB? LeaderB weeks later why do things keep not working out? PartyA has simple ability to point out the missing key detail, or PartyA more likely to be upsold to “I told you so” Non Ideally
LeaderB’s time is limited, relitigating the past is not always appreciated, respected, or amplified. PartyA’s support, time is limited, relitigating the past is not always appreciated, respected, or amplified. Support Respected and Appreciated Early On can lead to Less Burned Bridges. Bridges that you can walk over in the future? Not a Given, Truth Not By Default
PartyA now has health problems? High Potential for that kind of situation to be Non Ideally turned up for Mass Appeal, true does not equal can’t be non ideally turned up
Useful for the cause is far less than ideal support amplified
LeaderB meant it like that? High Potential for No
Parties surrounding LeaderB always let LeaderB see, perceive, and Comprehend Key Details Necessary for Ideal Choices? No
PartyA delayed from talking to LeaderB via systemic lag is not a long term system without consequence
LeaderB limited from conversation with PartyA, limited from comprehension of Key Details has the potential to Amplify LeaderC. Then the same is done to LeaderC for LeaderD and so on.
Leadership is a limited resolution system where people have a tendency to blame for resolution that is limited by choice or by design. Obfuscation useful to cause is a Non Ideal system, relitigating the past not always wise, making the future better? There is Potential in That
Leaderships job to know that is not an ideal amp
Leadership always held accountable for the homeruns they miss? Unwise
Babe Ruth didn’t hit all home runs.
Not factor in the missed support by Leadership as a requirement for Grace? That would be insufficient Leadership Amplified
Training Leaders to hit home runs is hard, and the world likes to throw curveballs and fastballs
Desire for a cause, to achieve a goal can amplify reduced resolution in Non Ideal ways
Means to an End, Cost for a Result, is Not Always a Fully Appreciated System
People always relitigate who won the Super Bowl? Contesting results later on is not always ideal stability added to the system
Cheating set to not known long term? Unwise
Winning the day, might lead to not winning future days
How people achieve their goals matters. People can achieve goals with war, violence, and blood shed. Has been pretty common throughout history. Achieving peace through diplomatic ties, through better and more refined message is harder at times, specially when life is but a vapor, time is not guaranteed.
Peace can be the more sadistic painful process, like leaving the Super Bowl at a tie 10 minutes before the end of the game
We’ll just call it a draw
Don’t go to war, then the enemy adds sanctions, adds reduced support, reduced support that cripples families, families you care about, families you know and talk with
Easy to maintain peace when you see that? Easy to maintain peace when you know leadership and authority is limiting people you care about as part of their master plan, as part of achieve their “Better World”
LeadershipA has a “Better World”, then it is replaced by LeadershipB’s “Better World”, to LeadershipC, to LeadershipD all while families you care about are hurting? Does society have stomach for change? Not always. Does change amp in way that hurts zero parties? Usually Not
If PartyA is making $100,000. Their family support, their way of life is dependent on $100,000. Then PartyA is told you now get $50,000 and PartyB gets $50,000. That is all pain out for PartyA? That is all $25,000 in for PartyC? Win Wins to Win Win Wins not possible to be turned up?
Better support is Amped Non Ideally, a Home run for one team not always all other teams winning the day. PartyC can say I am glad PartyB has a job. That does not reduce the need for PartyC and PartyD to be provided for.
Baseline Support for PartyC and PartyD factors into PartyA and PartyB getting to appreciate their new found Win Win.
Sanctioned parties factors into ability to be able to appreciate wins
Sanctions equals unforgiveness allowed to be left in place
Does not always set ideal precedent for humanization, for Public Relations problems out longer term
Want to enjoy Success? Not limiting others, Not Allowing others to be Limited at the Gate, High Value In
My Tech Blog 