Bias leads to Categorize and Classify, Categorize and Classify that is not always used correctly
Open Mind is projected when in general people and humanity have tendency towards closemindedness and Biases
Imagination is hard and not always fostered
Deferred Judgment is hard and not always fostered
Legalism can be blinding
Legalism can lead to need to classify C into group A or group B when you need to be concentrating on D,E,F,G etc
Discussion that could lead to Non Ideal Legalism is a Risk, No Risk No Reward
Logic and Pattern Matching Depends on Better Ability to Reduce Biases and Perceive Real Differences
Easy to upsell the system to perfected while it still does not provide water bottles and financial resources for all
Upsold to Villain based upon Maximize Profit is Possible and Common
Legalism early in process or ramped?
Clearly distinctly legalistic can beat getting involved with a situation that turns legalistic
Values derived from Bible and years of Church not all ideal
Iffy comprehension not likely to always be ideal
System of test to establish value combined with insufficient comprehension amplification not all ideal
John 14:14 Anything in my name + No Delivers + old testament stone adulterers not all Trust in System Amped
System does not amplify ideal categorize and classify, rely on system that does not deliver reliable repeatable results
High Potential for Villain Level Contrast Amps of looks like adulterer not adulterer
Negate ideal Trust Amped not all ideal Trust in System Amped
Negate turns up Women’s Communication Training Ideally Timothy 2:12
Negate gives ideal feeling of Consistent System
Inconsistency Not Trustworthy not what I consider ideally good, not what I consider ideally golden rule in
Christians, people that read Bible as ideally trustworthy unwise, raising relevance on details that suit and amplify, teaches lesson to politicians that is what good does
Golden rule not all Relevance Amplified, Bible and Christians not all Relevance Amplified, Bible and Christians not all Golden Rule not all Relevant Details Amplified
System of requires relevance limiting to be successful not all truth amped
Negate a little truth amped, negate a lot of truth amped
A = 2+2
A = Relevant Information removed
4A+5A+6A = C
A could be anything, changes the meaning of C
A = -5 or A = 10023532 or A = 0.2535
3 different potential values of A that are all wrong, a little wrong in initial equation can go a long way
Limiting Initial Values to Obfuscated Unknowns increases time required to examine problems
To say small changes in initial conditions, numbers, truth presented do not have profound impact potentials would be unwise
and [the sentence]
[the sentence]
Power of a Conjunction vs No Conjunction?
English major and Science major want to hear that
or English Major Science Major wants to hear that?
One Two Numbers Conjunctions its all gravy?
My Tech Blog 