否定地球上的每个人都有足够的决策决策能力
Negate everyone on earth has adequate resolution for decision making
可能就是力量，容易不完全欣赏
Possible is Power, Easy to Not Fully Appreciate
对话被推销为简单、普通、没有问题、永远是理想的新鲜空气，没有不明智的误解。 也就是说，我们做事并不总是因为它们很容易，有时我们做事是因为挑战是有价值的，因为它们有可能为当代和子孙后代带来真正的胜利
Conversation upsold to simple, common, problem free, always ideal breath of fresh air, miscommunication free unwise. That said we don’t always do things because they are easy, sometimes we do things because Challenges are Valuable, because they have the Potential for Real Wins for Current and Future Generations
还有人厌倦现状吗？
Anyone else tired of status quo?
https://www.netgear.com/home/wifi/mesh/rbke963b/
https://www.netgear.com/home/wifi/mesh/rbse960b/
Latency can be improved
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_delay
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Processing_delay
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queuing_delay
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latency_(engineering)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End-to-end_delay
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_delay
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_propagation_delay
相关性限制是有意设计的，并不是所有的附加值
Relevance Limiting is In By Design is Not All Value Added
Puns Not Appreciated Not All Value Added，为什么放大了哪些细节，有选择，放大相关性限制和四舍五入是设计上不需要的吗？
Puns Not Appreciated Not All Value Added, why what details are magnified, there is choice in that, magnifying relevance that relevance limiting and rounding is in by design not required?
首字母缩略词比双关语更容易混淆？
Acronyms are less Obfuscation than Puns?
好记有用
Memorable is useful
一致的阅读理解支持不会放大过去的非理想，同时仍然欣赏和培养对自由的欣赏？
Consistent Reading Comprehension Support that Does NOT Magnify Non Ideals from the Past while still appreciating and fostering an appreciation for Freedom?
Easy to upsell The Future to 我们已经说过，已经证明，我们不需要再提了，已经解决了，不等于问题未来没有可能存在
Easy to upsell the Future to we have already said that, already proved that, we don’t need to bring that up, already solved that does not equal problem has no potential to exist in the future
试图掩盖世界和平，而对阅读理解有用的书籍却以令人沮丧的方式被选择性地重印？
Trying to cover world peace while books that are useful for reading comprehension are being selectively reprinted in discouraging ways?
尊重教师和尊重数据一致性不是理所当然的，通过设计中的选择来限制相关性不是理所当然的
Teachers Respected and Data Consistency Respected is Not a Given, Appreciation for Relevance Limiting via Choice In By Design is Not a Given
创意工具并不总是按照我们的理想方向使用，脱离创意工具流程和逻辑流程不足以代表未来
Creative tools are not always used in ideal for us directions, being divested from creative tools process and logic processes is not adequate representation for the future
如果我们允许一个压迫性的未来在世界范围内存在，那么它可以到达岸上的潜力就越大，那么世界范围内的压迫就会越少，这是一个高价值的放大器
If we allow an oppressive future to exist world wide more potential that it can arrive on shore, less oppression world wide is a high value amplifier
消息不理想，有时断章取义的期望似乎明智不等于零数据一致性标准化产品没有价值
Message is Not Ideal, expectation of taken out of context at time seems wise does not equal zero data consistency standardized product is not valuable
Message getting to others in tact, key details that matter summarized, a limited set to more valuable for world is Not a Given
更简洁的表达方式可以成为价值放大器，更多的文字练习和欣赏以保持语言系统的动态，词量是价值的一部分，更新是有价值的也是价值放大器
More Concise ways to say things can be a Value Amplifier, More Practice with Words and Appreciation for keeping the Verbal System Dynamic, Volume of Words are part of Value, Updates are Valuable is also a Value Amplifier
众所周知，易于追加销售至理想的消息长度
Easy to upsell to ideal message length is a known
更少的沟通并不是全部延迟减少吞吐量增加，一个违反直觉的系统，投资于流程，积极投资于处理是放大技术系统的一部分
Less communication is Not all Latency Reduced Throughput Increased, a Counterintuitive system, being invested in the process, being invested in processing actively is part of amplifying the tech systems
剥离并非所有可以改变游戏规则的反馈
Divested Not All Feedback that can be game changing amplified
Google Translate 翻译的每一行都可能为未来 amped 带来更多潜力，为未来 amped 带来更多和平，为未来 amped 减少误解
Each line of Google Translate translated is potentially more potential for the future amped, more peace for the future amped, less miscommunication for the future amped
零字
Zero Words
与不完美的零个单词相比，哪个更适合放大系统？
Versus way more than zero words that are not perfect, which one is better for amplifying the system?
给定一个喜欢以错误的方式多次放大简洁沟通的世界，人们对有用的价值不是既定的，价值创造是可能的不等于价值创造总是被培养、促进、启用
People to useful value given a world that likes to amplify Concise Communication many times in the wrong ways is Not a Given, Value Creation is Possible does not equal value creation is always fostered, promoted, enabled
人们喜欢追加销售零中断作为更多的价值放大系统，更少的沟通是更多的价值放大系统，更少的对话并不完全是价值放大器，活跃的沟通渠道与不活跃的沟通渠道很容易被拒绝
People like to upsell zero interrupts as the more value amplifying system, less communication is the more value amplifying system, less conversation is not entirely a value amplifier, active communication channels vs inactive communication channels are easy to turn down
在 Shiny Blue Marble 上，并非所有人都可以访问写作平台，访问是一种力量，并不总是因其能力而得到充分重视，相信改变游戏规则是有用的可能因素
Access to a platform to write is not a given for all on Shiny Blue Marble, Access is Power that is Not Always Fully Valued for what it is capable of, belief Game Changing is Possible factors into Usefulness
易于追加销售系统，在全球范围内完善技术系统，它们具有不完美的价值，就像一个非常强大的老爷钟，我们可以让其他人听钟声或不听钟声
Easy to upsell the systems, tech systems worldwide to perfect, they are value imperfect value like a very powerful grandfather clock that we can get others to listen to the chimes or not listen to the chimes
该系统没有我想要的那样放大价值，我认为我应该能够创造比我目前能够创造的更多价值，让我想看看谁在限制我以及为什么，以放大这些细节
The system is less value amplifying than I would like, I think I should be able to create more value than I am currently able to, makes me want to look at who is limiting me and why, to magnify those details
人总是被限制会保持队伍？
People limiting always will maintain ranks?
并非所有吞吐量对上级来说都是显而易见的
Not all throughput in likely will be pretty obvious to superiors
需要考虑的是那些限制可能会在队伍中产生异议，分歧放大器并非所有领导力
Something to consider those that limit are likely to create dissent in the ranks, disagreement amplifiers not all Leadership In
希望获得更多和平更多成功的领导者和首席执行官需要促进更多和平，需要促进更多和平
Leaders and CEOs that want to have more peace more success need to foster more peace, need to foster more peace amplified
Easy To Not Amp Ideal Value, Balance is Power, Power that is not always fully Appreciate, No Tight Rope Walker to Tight Rope Walker, 有好处也有坏处
Easy To Not Amp Ideal Value, Balance is Power, Power that is Not Always Fully Appreciated, No Tight Rope Walker to Tight Rope Walker, has benefits and negatives
My Tech Blog 