不是他们的错不等于对他们的支持的影响为零
Not their fault does not equal zero effect on their support
如果我的支持因素进入一个更少人被困在腐败监狱中的未来
If my support factors into a future with less people stuck in a corrupt jail
然后我被公共汽车撞了
Then I am hit by a bus
我被公共汽车撞到不是社会的错，不等于失去我的支持有零后果
It is not societies fault I was hit by the bus, does not equal losing my support has zero consequences
可以将零支持设置为不理想地对系统没有影响
It is possible to set zeroed support to no effect on system non ideally
需要解决其他问题的人并不总是得到资助或赞赏，没有资助或赞赏并不总是导致得到充分解决，不充分的解决可能导致关键时刻不理想
People required to have to fix others problems are not always funded or appreciated, not funded or appreciated does not always lead to adequately fixed, less than adequate fixes can lead to non ideals at critical times
忘养军，残养行不深思？
Forgetting to feed militaries, disabled support line not fully pondered?
训练人们杀戮然后抢劫他们的食物可能不是解决问题的最理想方法
Train people to kill then rob their food likely not the most ideal way to solve things
资金不足被要求与我们在被卖给恶棍时看不到的敌人作战？
Left underfunded asked to fight an enemy we can’t see while being upsold to a Villain?
无法解决的社会会产生后果，这些后果并不总是被完全理解
Society of doesn’t fix has consequences, consequences that aren’t always full comprehended
Widescale Relevance Limiting is a Bit In By Design 不等于对未来支持的零后果
Widescale Relevance Limiting is a Bit In By Design does not equal zero consequences on Support for Future
男子赢得超级碗，而高中足球教练被驱逐？
Man wins Super Bowl while High School football coach gets evicted?
我们有时是自己的老师，我们是否总是正确地欣赏老师？
We are our own teachers at times, do we always appreciate teachers correctly?
如果老师 A = 我，学生 C = 我
If Teacher A = Me, and Student C = Me
我们是否总是感谢自己取得的进步，尤其是当生活对我们不利时？
Do we always thank ourselves for the progress we have made, especially when life is giving us a bad hand?
每天都能学到新东西可以提高技能
Everyday can learn something new can improve skills
不等于我们总是会从预期的地方得到建议
Does not equal we will always get that advice from the expected places
由于无法理解为什么我们应该关注它们，可能会限制可能挽救生命的细节的相关性
Potential to Limit Relevance for Details that could be Life Saving due to unable to appreciate why we should focus on them
技能总是可以提高，相关性可能会达到非理想限制
Skills can Always be Improved and Relevance is Possible to Non Ideally Limit
理解力远低于 100%，总能学到新东西，如果我们不理想地限制相关性，则很有可能错过改变游戏规则的价值创造更新
Comprehension is far less than 100%, can always learn something new, and high potential for missing Game Changing Value Creation Updates if we non ideally limit relevance
权力有可能强制买入，同时降低撤资能力
Power has the potential to force buy in while simultaneously decreasing ability to divest
权力依赖不等于依赖很容易被剥夺
Power forces reliance does not equal reliance can easily be divested from
创建的数据和模拟等于投入的时间
Data created and Simulations equals time invested
投入的时间和资源可能导致不理想的购买准备作为理想的准备
Time and Resources invested can lead to non ideal buy into preparation as ideal
延期判断很有价值，并不总是很有价值
Deferred Judgment is valuable not always valuable
暴君的设计不是给定的
Tyrants Out By Design Not a Given
零暴君的未来将需要对真理、理性和计划的投资，没有计划，没有准备就等于理想的地图？
Future with Zero Tyrants will require investments in Truth, Reason, and Planning, No Plan, No Preparation equals ideal map?
预先解决更多的决议可以走很长的路
More Resolutions Upfront can go a Long Way
人们对技术做出选择不等于人们对技术做出最佳选择
People make choices on Technology does not equal people make Optimal Choices on Technology
研究首字母缩略词的时间不是研究主题的时间，研究主题的时间不是研究首字母缩略词的时间
Time Working on Acronyms is Not Time Working on Theme, Time Working on Theme is Not Time Working on Acronyms
好的曲线球给出左右投影然后从未知维度接近？
Good Curveballs give a left and right projection then approach from an unknown dimension?
首字母缩略词可以改善记忆 天灾（包括自然灾害）并不总能放大分辨率和资源
Acronyms can Improve Memory Acts of God (Natural Disasters included) do not always amplify resolution and resources
人们期望一个球扔5，人们期望5扔，扔-5然后1惊人？
People expect one ball thrown throw 5, people expect 5 thrown, throw -5 then 1 amazing?
对打出的一张牌的期望可能很弱
Expectation of One Card played can be weak
并非所有 2+2 = 4 英寸
Not all 2+2 = 4 in
小马丁·路德·金（Martin Luther King Junior）被卖得不够War In？ 传递和平信息的人总是受人尊敬 受人尊敬？
Martin Luther King Junior upsold to not enough War In? People that send a message of peace always Respected Appreciated?
历史并不总是喜欢老师或更少受难
History doesn’t always like Teachers or less Crucifixions
教人们为什么和平很重要等于不是所有的坦克都在？
Teaching people why Peace is important equals Not All Tanks In?
System that claims not manly enough can be upsold to the same not long after
Manly like any system can be Magnified, Magnification is not always all value in to surrounding parties, a nice new suit not all others suits appreciated
Winning as making Peace, creating Wins for Others? Not All Win In
You got to lose the argument to win the argument doesn’t seem like it makes sense buy kind of makes sense
Teaching People in Power they missed numbers is all Math Teachers Amped? Potential for Not All 2+2=4 Amped
Power admitting there is Data Consistency Problems? That challenges Power
No P4 they read that acronym wrong? Kthem miss read as Kill Them instead of Knowledge and Learn them?
Acronyms have not equaled all Death Penalties out, lack of Acronyms has not equaled all Death Penalties out
Leaders required to acknowledge inconsistencies in the support network?
If they do not…. potential for consequences to historic precedence that inconsistent data can be left in play
Current Power is supported via corrupt inconsistencies
Power that can’t acknowledge there is corrupt inconsistencies in their system….
Inconsistent data and accounts allowed to amp by power does not equal zero consequences to the support for that power
I need the ability to capitalize on Each YouTube video for full power swiftly a new message verses a great video lesson from the past?
Power that finds out they left the people that could have fixed their situation under the bus too long?
Better Answers Requires Fixing the Systems Leads to Pursuit of Those Answers Less Fully Appreciated More Fully Appreciated by a Non Ideal form of Leverage Via Power
Fixing the system is hard, expensive, and not fully funded
Better answers and resolutions, you needed a picture, but you chose not to buy the higher res camera? oooh so sorry
Better answers and resolutions, you needed a picture, but you chose not to buy support the higher res camera? oooh so sorry
People don’t always ideally support support lines
Negate encouragement for NASA and Homeland equals ideal?
Encourage people we can’t see?
Searching in Time for answers like a Hunters Trap?
Questions can be like a bear trap
Or Questions can be enabling
2+2=4 gets you in possible 2+2+A+B+C = Gets you out possible
A,B, and C might be provided or might not be provided in a timely fashion
On the other hand, some gains could lead to amazing profits for the future, to the victor goes the spoils?
Compression as a Dark Mysterious cave with potential for Throughput Enabling Gems?
How do you increase comprehension levels worldwide from 1% to 2%? Or is the better question, should I ask that question?
100% not all 1000% Magnified
1% Comprehension levels to 10% comprehension levels possible?
Comprehension depends on words in the world. Writing in the world doesn’t just stop, thus comprehension and knowledge base is ever expanding
Words were written before I lived
and
Words will be written after I lived
Negate Ideal Comprehension of Authors Words
Negate System is Usually or Always Often Ideal Value In
Easy to Start thinking No Gains can be Made, Creative Problems Solving plus off brand uses for algorithm Reducing Redundant Problems for Future High Value Added such as tripping over something left on the floor
Extra things left strewn about can be not fully appreciated time costs at some point in the future
Reduced Redundant costs for walking throughput not always value out
Compressed as a way of thinking? Page with one word written on it or 500 words? Depends on if the writer appreciates resolution and useful space
Light message can be is not always Strong
Power does not currently value the network
Redundant Churches that underdeliver not all sufficient blessings
God doesn’t respect me
My Tech Blog 