A Dream about a Tragic Situation Inspired this Posting, to say Tragedies can’t inspire Healing would be unwise
Need an Anti Jade Live Stream
Events that Lead to Jade and Words that are useful for getting People Out of Them
The one speaking the [Words] was always treated right can be turned up by default
Words Perceived how they were meant not a given, Words spoken not under the influence of Drugs or Oppression not a given
Actions Perceived how they are meant not a given
People saying things we don’t like, that are offensive, can lead us to upsell that person to is acting logical on 100% Support, was always treated right
How we perceive things, how we perceive the tone, the body language, the inflection of voice that is modifiable via health problems in non ideal ways factors into things we like and things we don’t
Setting our sensors, ears to perfect, is not all truth in by design, is not all grace in by design
I read that right does not equal I comprehended that correctly
Hateful words to critical upsell to support for the one throwing the hateful words?
Hateful words thrown our way likely iterated and reiterated in the mind of speaker every time they look in the mirror
View a speaker that is under supported with encouragement from self as adequate judge of our esteem?
Never taught how to encourage likely can’t fully encourage self, give them another tap on the head or use words that have the potential that can lead to a grow, Never Say Die, Future is Not Over Until it is Over
Actions and Words sometime lead to subpar output, subpar comprehension, thus it is only logical, only a matter of time that words received will possibly be spoken with subpar output, subpar comprehension
Respond over React Simple as that? With limited Time to deliver on problems? Will Reacting lead to more Time Lost or Less Time Lost? Is the listener really empowered with the resolution necessary to react in a logical way knowing the support of the speaker is possibly illogical, unreasonable, irrational and for good reason?
Checking Judgment at Door Seeking First to Understand is an Easier System to Know than to Put into Practice
Hurtful Words, Angry Words, Polarizing words are considered as useful systems to the human brain, but why are they considered useful? Motivations, what is Motivating the words set to of less concern unwise
Society turns up have to throw shit on them for others to appreciate them more at times, Society sometimes turns that up via 3rd parties in meaningful or not always fully appreciated not always fully risk mitigated ways
A treats B badly, B uses wrong words with C, C can be hateful towards B and A, or can find a way to make peace and build bridges, ABC a bit of a nicer picture
Who took the water bottles? Pointers and Scape Goats are Useful, when support is failing in ways we can’t fully comprehend easy to jump to conclusions, stopping the pain thought possible always value added?
People talk when drugged, when threatened, when oppressed. Not trained how to encourage right not trained better communication the importance of communication and updates can be oppressive and threating to future in non ideal ways.
Have the right words have the perfect words does not equal perfect words will be perceived as perfect, as high enough value by listener
The right words set to need to ring true as right for all? That is a bit of a human invention
A sentence meant for party A retold to 8 billion people on earth? And call it a no loss system?
Time Delays, Imperfect Memories, Hops and Beer, Things, Ideas, Perceptions can change forms in not fully appreciated not fully comprehendible ways
Judged as a Risk Worth Mitigating is Not All Judgment Out is Not All Trust Amplified
If I were a native American and saw a Pilgrim with a Rifle, saw what a Rifle could do how would I treat the Pilgrim?
Native Americans tried to always make peace lead to less Native Americans? A reminder from History worth reamplifying?
Past and History factors into Perception of Survival
Set to a Risk Worth Actively Mitigating puts up a wall, walls can teach Respect in some ways can also create Divides where there were no divides before
A’s friend B starts hanging out with wrong crowd C then A’s stereo goes missing. How should A perceive B and C? A could be jumping to conclusions, B and C could have stolen the stereo. Easy to upsell different to Evil In By Design, easy to overcompensate in the other direction B would never do that. Party D that is involved with C could have stolen the stereo using knowledge B unknowingly provided.
The idea that associated with a crowd amplified as Villains of less Risk Mitigation can have consequences in Not Fully Appreciated Ways is an important idea worthy of consideration.
Hypothetically Society could have supported group C Better in the First Place. D could have been more of an amplifying value than an enabler of poor choices.
People trained incorrectly deemed not my problem have potential to date your daughters later, key take away build bigger walls?
The idea we don’t invest in any of our reduced support in the future seems a bit unwise
Directionality in training supporting student A does not always lead to student B amplified, student C adequately supported by society, D not magnified as the Hero
Students with 95% required to inspire more B and C students to A students to close the 5% to 100% to get their stickers? Penmanship counts
Unreasonable demands are a useful system many times considered worth turning up for Contrast and Mass Appeal, How dare they consider using unreasonable demands to deliver on very very reasonable demands that are thoughtfully and logically presented in a practical way
Dissonance Foreshadows the resolve, no, you did it wrong, first the problem, then the hero fixes the problem
My Tech Blog 