沙漠的酷热干旱，新鲜的光子并不总是新鲜的
Scorching Dry Arid Heat of the Desert, Fresh Photons that don’t always Feel Fresh
Tumbler’s App “Unleash a compliment….” – Pretty Epic Feature, Reminds User has Power. Feeling Empowered, More Likely to Use the Empowerment, If You Know How to Encourage, More Likely to Encourage
节能鼓励？ 充满冲击力的词语可以批判性地启用？
Energy Efficient Encouragement? Words that pack a punch that can be critically enabling?
将鼓励作为系统中的一种价值购买可以导致更高的有效鼓励输出
Buy in to Encouragement as a Value In System can lead to Higher Effective Encouragement Output
不促进狂妄自大或通过码头压力系统将人们送下悬崖的质量鼓励不会在树上生长，具有更有效鼓励输出的社会不会在树上生长，DN-GOT
Quality Encouragement that does not promote Hubris or send People Off Cliffs Via Pier Pressure Systems doesn’t grow on trees, a society with a More Effective Encouragement Output doesn’t grow on trees, DN-GOT
我喜欢这首歌，我不希望领导者心脏病发作，记住权威是听我们选择听的和我们选择不听的
I like the song and I don’t want leaders having a heart attack, also wise to remember authority is listening in to what we choose to listen to and what we choose not to listen to
成为领导者并听到“肥猫心脏病发作，他们的时代即将结束” – Muse，“一旦你处于顶峰，就跳下” – Kacey Musgraves，“但你应该看到它” – Third Eye Blind，不是 all 理想的减少担心在设计上，言论自由和故事脱节并不总是导致理想的结果有点轻描淡写
Being a leader and hearing “Fat Cats have a heart attack their time coming to an end” – Muse, “once your at the top just jump off” – Kacey Musgraves, “but you should have seen it” – Third Eye Blind, Not all Ideal for Less Worry In By Design, Freedom of Speech and Story Taken Out of Context does not always lead to Ideal Results is a bit of an Understatement
试图将和平、热爱自由和倾听对机器的愤怒变成一个简单的系统？ 热爱史诗音乐并不意味着我希望领导者死去，热爱英雄战胜腐败政府的史诗故事不等于我认为政府腐败不等于我不认为政府腐败
Trying to make Peace, Loving Freedom, and Listening to Rage Against the Machine to a simple system? Loving Epic Music doesn’t mean I want Leaders dead, loving Epic Stories where Heroes win over Corrupt Governments does not equal I think the government is corrupt does not equal I don’t think the government is corrupt
从内容中提取选择，对我们来说比监控未完全理解更容易。 比如黑暗骑士？ 为什么是反派的粉丝或英雄的粉丝？
Extracting Choice from Content, Easier for us than for Surveillance Not Fully Appreciated. Like’s the Dark Knight? Why fan of the Villain or fan of the Hero?
权力可以使用叙事控制，可以画恶棍，认为言论自由受到保护，而我的权利没有得到促进和保护？
Power gets to use Narrative Control, gets to paint Villains, think Freedom of Speech protected when my right to do the same is not promoted and protected?
压迫不是系统中的价值，它先于压迫离开的地方发生变化，就这么简单
Oppression is not a value in system, and it precedes change where that Oppression leaves, simple as that
谋杀不是系统的价值，尊重那些限制对那些试图阻止它的人的支持的人可能会故意放大谋杀
Murder is not a value in system, respect that those that limit support of those trying to stop it might be amplifying murder in by design
设计出水，不需要付钱给吹笛者？
Water out by design, no need to pay the piper?
更明智地通过设计快速进水
Wiser to enable water in by design swiftly
呼吁保护不完美的人，所有人都不是完美的
Called to protect imperfect people, All People are Not Perfect
容易对或错，在设计中对已知不足的系统强制选择或判断
Easy to Right or Wrong, Force a Choice or Judgment on a System with insufficient knowns In By Design
培训人是可能的
It is possible to Train people Wrong, people do not always agree on what is Right and Wrong, or how to Train people Right and Wrong
有效的正确输出支持输出导致有问题的可以通过足够的分辨率判断为正确
Effective Right Output Support Output Leads to Questionable can Judge as Right with Sufficient Resolution
By Design 培训不足 By Design 协议不足 没有足够坚实的地面可以扔石头
Insufficient Training In By Design Insufficient Agreement In By Design Insufficient Solid Ground to throw Stones from
不要判断爱会导致许多罪恶，解释，背景以及事物的解读方式是系统放大爱和恩典还是放大仇恨和更多判断的因素
Don’t Judge Love Accounts for Many Sins, Interpretation, Context, and how things are read factor into whether system amplifies Love and Grace or amplifies Hatred and More Judgment In By Design
同性恋者、男同性恋者或女同性恋者不等于完美无瑕的人。 这是什么意思？ 像我们一样，他们有可能以非理想的方式做出反应，因为压迫和压迫系统通过设计限制了他们。
Homosexual, Gay, or Lesbian does not equal perfect people incapable of wrongs. What does this mean? Like us they have they potential to respond in non ideal ways due to oppression and oppressive systems that limit them in by design.
一个持续支持的系统出现了非理想然后由于社会出现的问题而引发侮辱和不尊重？ 不尊重不是更多的鼓励，以你希望被对待的方式对待他人，黄金法则，爱 > 许多罪恶，并非所有人都同意罪恶似乎更有价值，因为不要通过设计判断，至少在我的 个人观点
A system of consistent support out turns up Non Ideals then throws insults and disrespect due to the problems society turned up? Disrespect is Not More Encouragement In, Treat others how you wish to be treated, Golden Rule, Love > Many Sins, Not All Agree on What Sin is Seems to be Higher Value in for Don’t Judge In By Design, At Least in My Personal Opinion
水平很重要，错误社会的水平以理想和非理想方式感知因素进入选择，拒绝错误感知，提醒人们通过人手训练和判断并不完美似乎是明智的
Levels Matter, The Level of Wrong Society Perceives factors into Choices in Ideal and Non Ideal Ways, Turning down Perception of Wrong, Reminding people Training and Judgment is Not Perfect via Human Hands seems wise
人们真的想减少非理想培训，更好地培训人们，并从更好地培训自我开始，为世界更多地区启用水瓶设计
People truly want to reduce Non Ideal Training, Train people better, and start by training self better to Enable Water Bottles In By Design for more of the World
NASA 级超级计算机和 AK47s M16s 不明智地认为 Non Ideals 无法在 Non Ideal Ways 中出现这种效果选择
NASA Level Supercomputers and AK47s M16s unwise to think Non Ideals couldn’t be turned up that effect choice in Non Ideal Ways
两极分化提醒人们选择取决于培训，培训取决于默认情况下未提供的数据一致性，我们可能没有参与的培训是通过行动或不行动选择不参与的
It is Polarizing to Remind people that Choice is Dependent on Training, Training that is dependent on Data Consistency that is not provided by default, Training we might not have been involved with chosen by action or inaction to Not be a part of
限制按设计训练，然后考虑足够稳定的基础和理由来启动判断？
Limit the Training In By Design and then consider ground and reason stable enough to launch Judgment from?
我有能力告诉别人2+2=4，不等于我告诉大家卡在2+2=？ 2+2=4。 决策的便利性和可及性。
I have the ability to tell people 2+2=4, does not equal I tell everyone that is stuck at 2+2=? that 2+2=4. Convenience and access factor into decision making.
受混淆和支持输出系统限制的支持和培训输出并不等于对评判人员的充分支持
Support and Training Output Limited by Obfuscation and Support Out Systems does not equal adequate support for Judging people
生活并不总是逻辑和逻辑谬误因素训练所有因素进入系统判断正确，判断或不判断必须选择并非所有值，系统可能会将数据一致性设置为相反。 Evil 可能喜欢翻转列表，数据一致性并不总是完美的。
Life Not Always Logical and Logical Fallacies Factors into Training all Factors into system Judged correctly, Judged or Not Judged have to choose not all value in, system might set data consistency to opposite. Evil might like to flip the list, Data consistency is not always perfected.
需要判断，并非所有人都重视减少错误判断，减少基于不充分分辨率的判断
Need to Judge, Not all Value In for Less Incorrect Judgement, Less Judgement based on Insufficient Resolution
通过法制放大的判断要求，并非所有的价值都在设计中减少不正确的判断
Requirement for Judgment Amplified via Legalism, Not All Value In for Less Incorrect Judgements In By Design
单词判断的多个拼写似乎与不一致的课程相当
More than one spelling for word judgment seems about par for the inconsistent course
可能 WordPress 的一些心怀不满的员工以非理想方式修改结果，世界政府可能利用，世界政府可能不利用，世界政府可能利用较少的杠杆
Possibly some disgruntled employees at WordPress modifying results in Non Ideal ways, Leveraged by World Governments possible, and Not Leverage by World Governments Possible, World Governments with Less Leverage Possible
从足够多的方面受到打击很难知道你在判断谁并不总是被充分理解与一个看不见的敌人战斗不是一个简单的系统
Hit from Enough sides gets difficult to know who you are judging Not Always Fully Appreciated Fighting an Invisible Enemy is Not a Simple System
可以看到目标，可以通过不一致的数据和支持的迷雾看到正确的目标不明智不等于零需要做出决策，短期决策不等于长期判断的充分解决方案
Can see Target, Can See Right Target through Fog of Inconsistent Data and Support would be unwise does not equal zero need to make decisions, Decisions Short Term does Not Equal Adequate Resolution for Judgement Long Term
基本属性初始选择总是有可能在非理想数据上进行
Fundamental Property Initial Choice always has potential for Made on Non Ideal Data
没有人是完美的，每个人最终都需要访问默认情况下不内置的橡皮擦？
Nobody is perfect everyone eventually will need access to erasers not build them in by default?
过去倾向于传递未来不完美，未来不完美变成过去传递更多未来不完美
Past has a tendency to Deliver Future is Not Perfect, Future Not Perfect becomes Past that Delivers More Future Not Perfect
十亿零一首关于灵感的歌曲？
A billion and one Songs about Inspiration?
更多的培训不等于完美的输入
More Training Does Not Equal Perfect Input
更多的培训不等于完美的传感器
More Training Does Not Equal Perfect Sensors
更多的培训不等于完美的输出
More Training Does Not Equal Perfect Output
更多培训不等于零盲点
More Training Does Not Equal Zero Blind spots
通过给人一种更清晰的画面印象，更高的分辨率可能会更令人困惑
Higher Resolution can be More Obfuscation by giving the impression of a clearer picture
更清晰 更高分辨率不等于零插值 结果中的零舍入
Clearer Higher Resolution does Not Equal Zero Interpolation Zero Rounding in Results
处理周期如此之快似乎它们从未运行过？
Processing Cycles So Fast Seems like they were never run?
更好地改进词汇导致对字典和词库网站的需求减少 正在使用的词库网站可能导致搜索减少 并非所有价值都对这些服务有价值，并非所有价值
Better Improved Vocabulary leads to less need for Dictionary and Thesaurus websites being used can lead to less searches not all value out, not all value in for those services
构建系统的人不会因此而被放大吗？ 所有人都建立了传感器网络，但在闪亮的蓝色大理石上，社会上有些人的价值较低，这不应该是
People that build the system don’t get amplified for it? All people build the sensor networks yet some people in society on Shiny Blue Marble are valued less, this shouldn’t be
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/esoteric
adjective
understood by or meant for only the select few who have special knowledge or interest; recondite:poetry full of esoteric allusions.
belonging to the select few.
private; secret; confidential.
(of a philosophical doctrine or the like) intended to be revealed only to the initiates of a group:the esoteric doctrines of Pythagoras.
智慧和智慧是强大的，人们喜欢控制权力，被认为是聪明、聪明和强大的，并不总是增值
Intelligence and Wisdom is Powerful, People like to control Power, Being valued as Intelligent, Wise, and Powerful Not Always Value Added
测试增加重量，重量并不总是增加价值
Tests add weight, weight is not always value added
无评论 有时节拍，你确定要那样做吗，你确定要那样做吗？
No Comment Sometimes beats, are your sure you want to do that, are you sure your sure you want to do that?
My Tech Blog 