Free Communications Diagram https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ark4M0NGAmjPgeIeLmTy8HzNt1xn7Q?e=ZdCuXi
Good Samaritans Really Need Stakes raised via support out Contrast? Free Starter Image
不知道我应该相信这张图片，看起来被篡改过，可能是画在上面的
Not sure I should trust the image, looks doctored, possibly painted on
像盗窃一样的战争潜力 吞吐量
Potential for War like Grand theft Throughput
我重申兔子不能有棒球棒，小狗不能有单片眼镜
I reiterate bunnies can’t have baseball bats, and puppy dogs can’t have monocles
容易分解，有时难以将未知的理想因素考虑到未来计划中以非理想方式
Easy to Factor Out, Hard to Factor In sometimes Unknown Ideals Factor Into Future Plans in Non Ideal Ways
世界从没有工业革命到工业革命，没有火到火，发明会随着时间而改变，下一次突破何时不定
World Moved from No Industrial Revolution to Industrial Revolution, No Fire to Fire, inventions change over time, when the next break through will be not a given
因此，让你的想法在一夜之间化为乌有的突破是可能的
Thus a break through that leaves your ideas in the dust overnight is possible
好像压缩算法从 0.5 大小变为 0.001 大小
As if a Compression Algorithm went from 0.5 the size to 0.001 the size
吞吐量和动量就像彗星一样，可以不知从何而来，并以理想和非理想方式显着改变景观
Throughput and Momentum like a comet, that can come out of nowhere and dramatically change the landscape in ideal and non ideal ways
芝士蛋糕是一种很棒的甜点，如果10倍芝士蛋糕的甜点就在拐角处呢？
Cheesecake is an amazing dessert, what if a dessert 10 times the amazingness of Cheesecake is right around the corner?
如果您经营芝士蛋糕工厂，则不理想
Not ideal if you run a Cheesecake Factory
冰淇淋店和另一家冰淇淋店就在隔壁开业？ 一分为二的销售总是增值？ 额外的吞吐量总是减去价值？
Ice Cream Shop and another Ice Cream Shop opens right next door? Sells split in two always value added? Extra throughput always value subtracted?
写小说等于有更多人阅读 -> 好，写小说等于可能更少的人阅读你的小说 -> 差
Writing a Novel equals more people reading -> Good, Writing a Novel equals potentially less people reading your Novel -> Bad
All Value In，All Value Out 似乎不明智的小说，反馈过程中没有人参与编辑过程并不总是理想的，反馈过程中额外的人压迫和限制作者并不总是理想的
A Novel as All Value In, as All Value Out seems Unwise, No hand in the feedback process editing process not always ideal, extra hands in the feedback process oppressing and limiting the authors not always ideal
有控制能力会导致影响和压迫人们一开始并不想从事这项业务
Has the ability to control can lead to leverage and oppression people didn’t really want to be in the business of in the first place
可以压迫，不等于应该压迫，压迫需要时间，不是最聪明的制度
Can oppress, does not equal should oppress, oppression takes time, not the wisest of systems
竞争的潜力 使用容易的压迫目标，然后当人们受到压迫时，竞争就会骑上正义的闪亮白马来拯救世界
Potential for competition employing easy targets for oppression, then when people are oppressed competition rides in on Shiny White Horse of Justice to save the Day
竞争并不总是完全理解简单的目标生命很重要，他们的健康可能不允许他们骑上那匹马
Competition doesn’t not always fully appreciate the easy targets lives matter, and their health might not allow for them to get up on that horse
技术人员实际上是创新还是在竞争和真正的技术进步中拖后腿？ 可能会有测试
Tech people as actually Innovative or Drags Feet on Competition and Real Tech Advances In By Design? There will likely be a test
您准备好将数月的时间和资源投入到一个您可能无法实现的项目中吗？
Are you ready to pour months of time and resources into a project you might not live to see to fruition?
当监视监视移动并启用某些系统而不是其他系统时，您准备好将数月的时间和资源投入到项目中吗？
Are you ready to pour months of time and resources into a project when surveillance is watching moves and enabling some systems over others?
投入的时间和资源并不总能带来足够的产出，并不总是导致其他人不相信或重新利用发现以适应自己的目的
Invested time and resources does not always lead to adequate output, does not always lead to others not taking credit or repurposing discoveries to suit their own purposes
让我赚钱不必那么努力，这可能是一个很难选择关闭的系统
Makes me money don’t have to work as hard at that can be a hard system to turn off by choice
Upsold 的潜在腐败在设计上然后可以采取发明不必支付
Potential for Upsold to corruption in by design then can take inventions don’t have to pay
知识产权法中的大量 Iffiy Pirate Land，很多内容交付或不交付取决于它
A lot of Iffy Pirate Land in Intellectual Property Law, and a lot of content is delivered or not delivered dependent upon it
在我的资源有限且连续数月不断接近零的情况下，允许公司获利确实需要以更理想的方式重新评估专利组合
Companies allowed to Profit while my resources are limited and approach zero constantly and consistently for months on end really requires re-assessment of patent portfolios in more ideal ways, Allows oppression in by design should lead to forced to pay check each month in by design
打仗需要时间，我可能没有时间
Fighting the battle requires time, time I might not have
战斗需要不止一方面的资源，资源需求并不总是有价值的，因为 Shiny Blue Marble 的设计问题较少
Fighting battles requires resources on more than one side, resource requirements are not always value in for less problems in by design for Shiny Blue Marble
系统给人一种上帝交付不足的感觉
System gives a bit of a feeling of God as Underdelivering
My Tech Blog 