讲述价值系统，同时宣传我的价值被剥夺以不被充分理解
Telling be about value out systems while promoting my value being robbed to less fully appreciated
建立特定的词汇集以及句子是如何形成的可能会告诉我们很多关于世界领导人如何解决问题并希望问题得到解决的信息，不太可能在 The World at Large 上快速发布
Building up specific vocabulary sets and how sentences are formed can likely tell us a lot about how World Leaders solve problems and want problems solved, unlikely to pull a fast one on The World at Large
句子长度变化和音调也可能提供很多重要信息
Sentence length variance and tonality likely gives a lot of important information as well
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/cessation
noun
a temporary or complete stopping; discontinuance:a cessation of hostilities.
假设为什么使用停止一词与停止，防止，减轻，在敌对行动面前设置障碍？
Hypothesize at why the word cessation is used vs stop, prevent, lessen, put an obstacle in front of Hostilities?
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/hostilities
noun, plural hos·til·i·ties.
a hostile state, condition, or attitude; enmity; antagonism; unfriendliness.
a hostile act.
opposition or resistance to an idea, plan, project, etc.
hostilities,
- acts of warfare.
- war1.
临时的或完全的（有点范围）->进度是完全停止的价值，就像汽车刹车一样？
temporary or complete (a bit of range in that) -> progress is value in to complete stop, word like a brake on a car?
如果我是在促进和平，而绿色信号意味着战争，那么完全停止停止似乎更有价值
If I were promoting peace and the green go signal meant war, pulling over complete cessation stop seems more value in
我向世界领导人发起挑战
I challenge World Leaders there needs to be a Temporary to Complete Cessation of Oppression Against Artists In By Design Swiftly
在敌对行动定义中添加对艺术家的压迫？ 通过宣传利用艺术家 In By Design 可能会减少战争，减少潜力
Add Oppression Against Artists to Hostilities definition? Might lead to less war, less potential via propaganda leveraged artists In By Design
用枪指着头的艺术家或多或少可能会吸引纳粹宣传？ 最好不要压迫世界艺术家
Artist with a gun to their head more or less likely to draw Nazi Propaganda? Better to not Oppress Artists of the World
我是枪到头的少专业艺术家
I am pro less Artists with Guns to their Head
我是带有单片眼镜的专业小狗，得到更充分的赞赏
I am pro Puppy Dogs with Monocles More Fully Appreciated
很容易根据他们的互动增加的有限价值来评估人们，根据他们为整个系统增加的更高水平的价值更难评估人们
Easy to value out people based upon limited value out their interactions add, harder to value in people based on the greater level of value they add to system at large
对我来说没有完美的词不等于可能没有完美的词和另一个谜题的关键部分
Does not have the perfect words for me does not equal might not have perfect words and critical part of the puzzle for another
语言有时会成为障碍，即使无法理解单词，也无法理解单词并看到人们享受生活的肢体语言是鼓舞人心的
Language can get in the way sometimes, not understanding the words and seeing body language of people enjoying their life is inspiring, even if the words can’t be comprehended
更多像 Grace 这样的卫生纸是设计的，或者更多的狂犬会咬你的头是设计的
More Toilet Paper like Grace In By Design or More Rabid Dog Bite Your Head Off In By Design
可以根据对系统的附加值来提高中断干扰级别
Interrupts Annoyance Level can be raised dependent on Value Added to System
在白天的平静期间或电影高潮之前被打断？
Interrupted during a Lull in the Day or right before the Climax of the Movie?
攀登珠穆朗玛峰 100M 到山顶，由于氧气不足而不得不折返？
Climb Everest 100M to Peak and have to turn back due to low Oxygen?
质量词量在质量词之前
Volume of Quality Words is Preceded by Quality Words
选择词是否保护和激励他人时间和自由？ 这些话是否增加了尊重和鼓励的价值，还是增加了没有为故事增加足够价值的对抗？
Do the choice words protect and inspire others Time and Freedom? Do the words add value respect and encouragement or do they increase confrontation that doesn’t add enough value to the story?
单词作为系统中的价值，理论与实践？
Words as a value in system, Theoretical vs Practical?
更少的单词可以更强大，知道什么时候这并不总是一个简单的系统
Less Words can be More Powerful, knowing when that is is not always a simple system
恩典是可能的 不等于糟糕的选择 不尊重的选择不会改变事情
Grace is possible does not equal bad choices choices not respected doesn’t change things
希望彼此成功的人可能会以不理想的方式相互竞争
People that want each other to be successful can be pitted against each other in non ideal ways
压迫的话语，第三方的杠杆作用可以以真实的方式影响话语，指责杠杆不明智，不等于人们总是想在风暴结束时花更多的时间与对方相处
Words of Oppression, Leverage by third parties can effect words in real ways, blaming the leveraged unwise, does not equal people always want to spend more time with each other when the storm is over
想象一下，如果两个人一起放在棺材里，空气充足，并在那里放置 5 个小时，那些不想一起被放在棺材里的人
Imagine if Two people were put in a coffin together with enough air and left there for 5 hours, People that didn’t want to be put in the coffin together
这两个人是想在彼此的未来上花更多的时间还是更少的时间？ 在那之前，那两个人可能没有任何敌对关系，这并不等于活着时被迫留在棺材里是增值的，是为潜在的增值而增值，双方之间的戏剧性更少
Do those Two People want to spend more time or less time involved in each others future? Those Two People might not have had anything against each other before that point does not equal forced to stay in a Coffin while alive is value added, is value added for potential and less drama between the parties
创伤性经历并非都对缔造和平有价值，幽闭恐惧症并非所有对缔造和平都有价值
Traumatic Experiences are Not all Value In for Peacemaking, Claustrophobia is Not All Value Added for Peacemaking
通过社会支持被迫共度时光并不是一个全增值系统，不是一个为更好的友谊而全增值的系统，也不是一个经过适当培训的社会，不能容忍逃脱
Forced to spend time together by societal support out is not an all value added system, not an all value added system for better friendships or a society properly trained that getting away with that won’t be tolerated
让人们因虚假指控而被困在腐败监狱中？
Leave people stuck in Corrupt Jails under False Allegations?
将小鸟作为促进自由的开罐器或行星熔化器？
Iffy little Bird as a Freedom Promoting Can Opener or Planet Melter?
我更愿意将两者都留在我的团队中
I prefer to keep both on my team
不要忘记带有兔子耳朵的小猫，没有老虎，纯种狨猴
Don’t forget about Kitten with Bunny Ears no Tiger, Purebred Marmoset
Unreal Tournament 和 BFG 的奇异爱小鸟像 Redeemer 合体？
Strange Love Little Bird Like Redeemer from Unreal Tournament and BFG combined?
流行文化参考暗示并非所有价值
Pop Culture References Alluding Not All Value Out
Think Fast History 在非理想方式中使用了您的名字，这些方式会影响未来日期的选择
Think Fast History has used your name in Non Ideal Ways that factors into choice for Dates in the Future
名叫 Loraine 的女性不允许改名？
Women named Loraine Not Allowed to Change their Name?
推广 MotionLeap 应用程序和瀑布？ 似乎是纯种狨猴那里没有吸血鬼
Promoting MotionLeap App and Waterfalls? Appears to be purebred Marmoset no Vampire in there
将真爱如血中的 Jason Voorhees 和 Lorraine 混合会产生什么影响？
What would the implications of mixing Jason Voorhees and Loraine from Trueblood lead to?
有点邪恶的蝎蛛龙？
A bit of an unholy scorpderagon?
其他制作兔蛇，不是自己制作一条来战斗吗？
Other making Buakes, not make one of my own to combat?
教人们拒绝保护主义，同时反对我自己？
Teach people to turn down protectionism while turning up my own?
调高正确的风险缓解措施同时调低错误的保护主义很重要，摩托车头盔好和 5 个死锁螺栓可以把你困在火里，说我知道完美的平衡，期望别人知道完美的平衡，知道完整 他们的话的力量和他们随着时间的推移创造的故事是不明智的
It is important to turn up the right risk mitigation while turning down the wrong protectionism, Motorcycle Helmets good and 5 Deadlock Bolts can trap you in a fire, to say I know the perfect balance, to expect others know the perfect balance, know the full power of their words and the stories they create over time would be unwise
完美无缺，无需维护，有点狂妄自大
Got it perfect, No Maintenance Required, a bit of Hubris in the thought
更多内容 更多更新可能很棒，也可能意味着维护和支持的潜力更少，5000 种媒体资产与 5 首音乐会的歌曲？ 数量不同于质量，能够保持并不总是完全赞赏
More content More updates can be great, can also mean less potential to maintain and support, 5000 media assets vs 5 songs you know for a concert? Volume is different than Quality, able to maintain not always fully appreciated
5 首歌曲可以在手上轻松重复使用，像太阳前的放大镜一样放大，在 1000 种不易维护和放大的资产中可能具有更高的价值
5 Songs right easily reusable on hand magnified like a magnifying glass in front of the Sun, could likely be higher value in then 1000 assets that can’t easily be maintained and amplified
复杂的航行可能导致对简单仍然有很大影响的事实的不太充分的欣赏
Voyage to the complex can lead to less full appreciation for the fact simple still has a large impact
字量并非全部价值，多余的文字，无法维护可能是高价值的，并不总是被充分欣赏，期望作者对所有对比算法和作品保持维护似乎是不明智和不可能的，作者被迫在 第二次世界大战死于轰炸，然后他的书在 60 年后出现在书店？ 艺术家长久以来的压迫不等于不受设计中邪恶影响的未来
Volume of words is not all value out, Superfluous words, Inability to maintain can be high value out and is not always fully appreciated, expectation of authors to maintain maintenance on all contrast algorithms and writings seems unwise and impossible, writer forced to write propaganda in world war 2 dies in bombing then his book shows up 60 years later in a book store? Oppression of the artist long past does not equal future not effected by the Evil In By Design added
过去可以通过设计以未被充分理解的方式带来僵尸一样的邪恶
Past can bring Zombie Like Evil In By Design in Not Fully Appreciated Ways
Potential for Upsell all contributions of an artist to the Oppression they were under
Can’t trust that can be turned up as a useful system
没有80亿个leader slot -> 基本属性，slots是有限的
There are not 8 billion leader slots -> fundamental property, slots are limited
由于不断的监视，期望每个人都需要像领导者一样完美地说话并不是所有的增值
Expecting everyone required to speak perfectly like leaders due to constant surveillance is not all value added
不够搞笑 不够有趣 不够励志 不够热情 太无聊 不喜欢封面
Not Funny Enough, Not Interesting Enough, Not Inspiring Enough, Not Passionate Enough, Too Boring, Not a Fan of The Cover
部分内容会很无聊，不添加任何无聊的内容是否明智？ 枯燥的内容可以让有趣的内容大放异彩，枯燥的内容可以用于引出有趣内容的供应线
Part of content will be boring, is it wise to not add any boring content? Boring content can make the interesting content shine, Boring content can be required for the supply lines that lead to the interesting content
人们可能不希望因为他们增加的无聊价值而受到重视
People don’t likely want to be valued in for the Boring Value they add
365 天的闪电风暴到真正因其力量而受到重视的闪电风暴？ 还是在那段时间里突然出现的几场大风暴？
365 days of Lightning storms to a Lightning storm truly valued for its power? Or a few major storms spread out over that time that come out of nowhere?
好的中断与坏的中断，导致更好的用户体验的中断还是导致更差的用户体验的中断？
Good Interrupts vs Bad Interrupts, Interrupts that lead to better User Experience or Interrupts that lead to worse User Experience?
过去被视为不明智的所有价值，过去被视为 Gingers 不明智的完美充分价值
Past seen as All Value Out Unwise, Past seen as perfect adequate value in for Gingers Unwise
声称做对了，并非所有增值
Claiming Got it Right, Not All Value Added
听力完美，权利是不可能的不是所有的增值
Hearing perfection, Right is impossible is Not All Value Added
未来的基本属性，未来比过去知道的更多，知道更多可以但并不总是导致更好的决策
Fundamental Property of the Future, the Future knows more than the Past, knowing more can but does not always lead to better decisions
放弃担心不明智，根据过去的结果说没有理由担心似乎也是不明智的
Giving into Worry Unwise, saying there is no reason to Worry based on Past results seems unwise as well
System could be No Worry in 不等于系统目前是 No Worry In
System could be No Worry in Does Not Equal System is currently No Worry In
每个人都被迫制作自己的水瓶，可以减少世界范围内的支出，减少的支出并非所有价值
Everyone forced to make their own water bottles, could reduce spending world wide, reduced spending not all value in
弹劾的行星融化对比？
Planet Melting Contrast for Impeachment?
弹劾唐纳德特朗普定于一年前？ 时间码搞砸了并非所有增值
Impeachment of Donald Trump set to 1 year ago? Time Codes messed up not all value added
世界支持基于不确定的时间代码，可交付成果从 1 天到 20 年不等？
Worlds support based on iffy time codes, deliverables anywhere from 1 day to 20 years?
Given a choice No Impeachment of Leader that leads to less Water Bottles and Less Diamonds
Or another choice of Impeachment of Leadership, More Water Bottles, and More Diamonds In By Design?
I don’t have Diamonds I can offer, sell people communication updates as if they were Diamonds?
Updated words that sparkle like rain?
Grand Theft Photon 要像口头阳光一样鼓励？
Grand Theft Photon to Encouragement like Verbal Sunshine?
想象一下中层管理人员保护管理人员免受测试
Imagine Middle Management protects Management from Tests
最终，降低风险的测试数量压倒了中层管理人员
Eventually the number of Tests Risk Mitigated Overwhelm Middle Management
A+B 和 C Protected 突然变成 A->C，中层管理应该被尊重，关键时刻不让路是不明智的
A+B and C Protected suddenly gets turned to A->C, The idea Middle Management should be respected, can’t get out of the way at critical times would be unwise
更明智地支持中层管理并且不增加不合理的测试，这并不总是一个容易学习的课程，有时不打扰的人可能会更有价值
Wiser to support Middle Management and Not Increase Unreasonable Tests, Not always an easy lesson to learn, sometimes the people that don’t interrupt can be higher value in
木材设计，排除防火和设计规范，生锈的潜力？
Wood Design, Factor out Fire and Design codes, potential for Rust?
2300 可能会以未完全理解的方式更新我的图表？ 耻辱！
2300 might update my diagrams in Not Fully Appreciated Ways? For Shame!
并非所有人都被教导消息会生锈，不播放的歌曲会生锈
Not all are taught that messages can rust, songs not played can rust
史诗和没有观众？ 少史诗
Epic and No Audience? Less Epic
初始输入可能导致截然不同的结果
Initial inputs can lead to vastly different results
超级计算机需要根据随机算法做出启动器选择吗？ 一个处理器设置了一个变量，该变量在主要方面影响了运行数天的模拟？
Supercomputers required to make starter choices based upon a random algorithm? One Processor sets a variable that factors in in major ways over simulations that is run for days?
硬币翻转吸血鬼或龙？
Coin flip Vampire or Dragon?
做一个很好的生姜 Makes a pretty good Ginger
Money has the the ability to make somethings better possibly Factoring out the God or Evil In By Design Unwise
需要钱来维持维护的系统可能会以不理想的方式进行验证，例如 Bright Smile
Systems that require money to stay maintained can be iffed in non ideal ways, Bright Smile for instance
祈求某事变得更好并不等于它不会变得更糟
Praying for something to get better does not equal it not getting worse
理想情况下，祈祷会更快地提高价值
Prayer ideally would be swifter high value in
没有信心就不可能取悦上帝，失败的期望会导致信心降低，期望越少就等于信心越低
Impossible to please God without Faith, Failed Expectations lead to reduced Faith, less Expected equals less Faith
走进和谈，也许能解决这个问题
Walk into Peace talks, might be able to fix that
或走进和平会谈，期待在一天结束时回家，知道家人不会被烧死
or Walk into Peace talks looking forward to going home at the end of the day knowing families aren’t going to burn to death
即使人们在多样性水平上不能完美地交付，他们也不会，添加 if 并不是防止 if 的全部价值
Even if people don’t deliver perfectly on the diversity level, and they won’t, adding the if is not all value in for preventing the if
负担可以以非理想方式制造负担
Burden can create the Burden in Non Ideal Ways
我只是想为这份工作聘请最优秀的人，然后必须考虑多样性配额可能会让人们质疑他们是否真的在每次招聘中都增加了价值，真的所有增值都是为了长期成功吗？
I was just going to try and hire the best person for the job, then have to factor in diversity quotas can make people question are they really adding value with each hiring, really all value added for long term success?
在决策中考虑了橙色头发压迫不是所有的橙色头发压迫
Orange hair oppressed considered in decision making not all Orange hair oppression out
刚找到工作，因为头发颜色不适合更换而不是真正有价值？
Just got job because of hair color doesn’t lend itself to replaceable not truly valued?
把斯坦利杯递给我只是因为被命名为杰森而曲棍球的对比并没有完美地融入我的生活？
Hand me the Stanley cup just for being named Jason and that hockey contrast didn’t factor perfectly into my life?
被重视但实际上没有被重视并不是真正被重视的，前期更公平的竞争环境有很长的路要走
Valued but Not Actually Valued is Not Truly Valued, a bit more even playing field upfront goes a long way
My Tech Blog 