提升空气和水 공기와 물을 들어 올리십시오 Lift Air and Water
正如他们所说，时间就是能量 시간이 에너지라는 말처럼 As they say Time is Energy
更多时间解决战争还是更多时间增加闪亮蓝色大理石的惊人时代的能量和吞吐量？ 可以为相同的输入能量带来更多和平的简单选择？ 一个和平的白炽灯泡到一个和平的LED，这对世界意味着什么？
더 많은 시간이 전쟁을 해결하거나 Shiny Blue Marble에 대한 Amazing Times의 에너지 및 처리량을 증가시키는 데 더 많은 시간이 소요됩니까? 동일한 입력 에너지에 대해 더 많은 평화를 가져올 수 있는 간단한 선택? 피스메이킹의 LED에 대한 피스메이킹의 백열전구, 세계에 어떤 의미가 있을까요?
More Time solving wars or more time increasing Energy and Throughput of Amazing Times for Shiny Blue Marble? Simple choices that can lead to more Peace for the same Input Energy? An Incandescent Bulb of Peacemaking to an LED of Peacemaking, what would it mean to the world?
电创造光
빛을 만드는 전기
Electricity to create Light
创造和平的话
평화를 만드는 말
Words to create Peace
导致更多和平的最佳减少词组？
더 많은 평화로 이어지는 최적의 감소된 단어 세트?
Optimal reduced set of Words that lead to more Peace?
减少文字，简洁的沟通并不总能带来更多的沟通
줄인 말, 간결한 커뮤니케이션이 항상 더 많은 커뮤니케이션으로 이어지는 것은 아닙니다.
Reduced words, Concise Communication does not always lead to more communication
减少沟通并不总是增加吞吐量有点违反直觉
적은 통신량이 항상 증가하는 것은 아닙니다. 처리량이 약간 반직관적입니다.
Less Communication is not always increased Throughput a bit counterintuitive
系统需要实践来完善和准备
체계를 다듬고 준비하려면 연습이 필요합니다.
System needs practice to be refined and ready
就像从未测试过的 LED 灯泡一样，在关键时刻依赖它？
테스트를 거치지 않은 LED 전구처럼 중요한 시기에 믿고 사용하시겠습니까?
Like an LED bulb that is never tested, rely on it during critical times?
简洁的沟通允许轮流说话，可以在描述性细节中出现所有故事
간결한 의사 소통을 통해 이야기 전환이 가능하고 설명 세부 사항의 모든 이야기로 전환 될 수 있습니다.
Concise Communication allows for talking turns, could be turned up to all story in descriptive details in are value out
我会接受说更新对实践很重要的风险
나는 업데이트가 연습에 중요하다고 말하는 위험을 감수할 것입니다.
I will accept the risk of saying Updates are Important for Practice
学习视唱音乐，没有音乐可以视唱？
음악을 보지 않고 음악을 읽는 법을 배우시겠습니까?
Learn to sight read music, with no music to sight read?
不等于歌曲应该是5小时长
노래는 5시간이어야 합니다.
Does not equal the song should be 5 hours long
简明扼要的沟通潜力，在没有对话的情况下被误传是所有价值
간결한 커뮤니케이션 대화 없이 잘못 표현될 수 있는 가능성은 모두 가치입니다.
Concise Communication potential for misrepresented into no conversation is all value in
更节能是有用的，不等于节能的目的是关掉所有的灯
더 많은 에너지 효율이 유용하지만 에너지 효율의 목적은 모든 조명을 끄는 것과 같지 않습니다.
More Energy Efficient is useful, does not equal purpose of Energy Efficiency is to turn off all lights
简洁沟通的价值在关键时刻大喊大叫的能力可以是高价值吞吐量不等于故事应该是大喊大叫的鲨鱼
간결한 커뮤니케이션의 가치 중요한 시기에 상어를 외치는 능력은 높은 가치가 될 수 있습니다 처리량은 이야기와 같지 않습니다 상어를 외쳐야 합니다
The value in concise communication the ability to yell Shark at a critical time can be high value throughput does not equal story should be all yelling Shark
在发生火灾时通过清晰简洁的重申沟通迅速前往出口很重要
화재 시 Clear Concise Reconfirming Communication을 통해 신속하게 비상구로 이동하는 것이 중요
During a fire important to go swiftly to the exit through Clear Concise Reaffirming Communication
所有的时间都没有火，除了纯粹的简洁交流不需要多一点吗？
모든 시간에 불이 켜지지 않고 순전히 간결한 의사 소통보다 조금 더 필요하지 않습니까?
All the hours there is not a fire, no need for a bit more than only purely concise communication?
学习语言的人没有练习，关键时刻理解鲨鱼并不是所有的价值
언어를 배우는 사람들을 위한 연습 없음, 중요한 시기에 상어를 이해하는 데 모든 가치가 있는 것은 아닙니다.
No practice for people learning the language, Not all value in for Understanding Shark at a critical time
更清晰的世界和平信息都值得吗？
세계 평화를 위한 더 명확한 메시지 All Value Out?
Clearer Messages for World Peace All Value Out?
值得理解 不是一个完全可以理解的系统
완전히 이해할 수 있는 시스템이 아님
Worthy of Comprehension Not a Fully Comprehendible System
得克萨斯州是和平的推动者还是 Gingers 的断吉他弦的推动者？ 政治家的选择变得不那么重要了吗？
텍사스를 피스(Peace)의 발기인으로, 아니면 Gingers를 위한 깨진 기타 줄의 발기인으로 사용하시겠습니까? 정치인의 선택은 덜 중요하게 설정되어 있습니까?
Texas as promoter of Peace or as promoter of broken Guitar Strings for Gingers? Choices of Politicians set to matter less?
被迫即兴发挥才能得到一把可以工作的吉他，这并不是学习吉他的全部价值
기타 학습에 대한 모든 가치가 아닌 작동하는 기타를 얻기 위해 즉흥적으로 수행
Forced to improv to get a working guitar not all value in for learning guitar
强迫所有崭露头角的音乐家手工雕刻他们的乐器？
모든 신진 음악가가 손으로 악기를 조각하도록 강요하시겠습니까?
Force all budding musicians to hand carve their instruments?
强迫所有音乐家都成为木匠？
모든 음악가가 모든 가치를 지닌 목수가 되도록 강요합니까?
Forcing all Musicians to be Carpenters to all value in?
工作室的非理想去放大有点令人沮丧
스튜디오의 비이상적 디앰프화는 다소 실망스럽습니다.
Non Ideal De-amplification of Studio getting a bit Frustrating
Efficiency and Optimization does not always lead to best product, counterintuitive
Hard work matters and it kind of doesn’t at times, combinatorics one person stumbles on the right answer the first try, another stumbles upon it after 40
Will the one that stumbles upon it after the first try appreciate another problem fully that requires 40 to get to the right answer?
Success can lead to feeling of privilege that grace wasn’t given that allowed us to arrive at that answer earlier
Grace allows us to succeed – a plane could fall from the sky could be hit by a bus could choke to death on a fish bone
Probabilities that converge on death are not always value in for encouragement thus we discard them, but sometimes we discard them in a way that is not always value in for appreciation of the grace we have received
Pursuit of the end goal, what will we do with it, for good reasons and bad reasons others perceptions factor into the support we receive some of the obstacles we face, others having knowledge of what we know and what we don’t not all value in
Knowledge is power, power is useful, Competition, Greed, and Evil In By Design are real, peoples perception of what those are and how they factor into our decision making matter to the equation
Greed a bit of a two way street? One upsells the other?
What factors into others perception of greedy matters to decision making
Someone that accuses someone else of being greedy, is needing to be right not a bit greedy at times?
Reaffirming value in that profits us more than others?
I argue that needing to be right is greedy and can take us down non ideal paths, non ideal paths that do not always lead to more being right
A is saying B, you are a staunch opponent of everything B stands for, you better go spend all your remaining Non Null Time Cost Bucks on that for the year
Having an opinion can make you weak
Have to prepare for B and talking with A can make you miss C which can have a much more significant impact of both you and A
Opinions are not all value out, understanding how much time to spend working on them is questionable at times
Hashing out problems can lead to more peace or it can lead to less, judging by politicians in Washington DC there is profit in not fixing the argument, not agreeing
Non Null Time Costs that add more paychecks to a few in charge? Complexity required or just Useful? A Little of Both?
My Tech Blog 