就像一块块糖粉倒在宝蓝色的帆布上
로열 블루 캔버스 위에 부은 슈가파우더 덩어리처럼
Like Lumps of Powdered Sugar Poured over a Royal Blue Canvas
就像棉花的气息对着大海低语
바다에 속삭이는 목화의 숨결처럼
Like The Breath of Cotton Whispering to the Sea
Clarity was never a given
Obfuscation was never all value out
Profound Sadness, Tears of the Storm, Bring Clarity and Light
Shiny Blue Marble doesn’t always feel
Empathy, make others feel our pain not all value in, No Sympathy not all value in
Tragedies Not All Value Out for Preventing Tragedies
Make an amazing hero just to kill them off 5 minutes before end of the movie?
Focus forward not all risk mitigation out for behind

The sky was a deep violet that infused the air with power for the vibrant green parrot. A wind flowing from the west was textured with bursts of friction and usable power worthy of sailing on. Powerful bursts of wind worthy of sailing on gusted in from the west enabling the witty young bird with ideas for saving the day.
Almost as if from pressurized air?
Just because we might not see something new everyday does not mean we won’t see something new tomorrow or something new 6 months from now or any day in between or past then
Sounding genuine with compliments is not always easy when you have health problems, realize that is projecting from my own experience, really we can do at the end of the day
Airy Wispy Memorable Song Hook Summarization at End?
Pure Logic No Emotion Amplified Not All Value In
System is a Reflection of our Inputs, make it unforgiving and cold?
Beige Eye with No White and No Black, Clay to More
Lifeless Logic less Descriptive Less Meaningful
Life changing heartfelt encouragement or thumbs up like trying to catch the bus?
Fear bonding contrast can be turned up in non ideal ways
Proximity can be an uncomfortable system
Engineers and Architects like to build, building with shit supply lines and resources that get robbed over and over leads to less building and less encouragement all around
Discouragement++, Don’t have to fix that, Don’t have to support that, easy to turn up the gas, hard to turn down the gas
Can’t always trust God to not throw curveballs, 100% in Logic? Logic has value, more value with Forgiveness and Better Descriptive Details in
People that aspire to reason to numbers as the end all likely missing a few pieces
Simple logic without training I could have done worse
I am not perfect, not perfect trained can be much better than not perfect without enough training, misled
People that aspire to reason and numbers as the end all likely were trained that, and somehow like to factor out all the unknowns outside of them
Its logical to say A+B=D and know that A+B+C=D, as if C = what is happening on other side of planet, clear unknown that with the addition of technology and international travel can have positive and negative effects on my system swiftly or many years in the future
Factoring out C by design because it is required (limited processing power in our brains) is not illogical, requiring forgiveness in by design is not illogical because there are unknowns that factor into the equation equaling logic was not perfectly sound in first place
We make non optimal jump for power in decision making, if we are going to make non optimal jumps ideally it should be one that doesn’t have the potential to bite us in the ass
C other side of planet as the only C missing from the equation of relevance would be unwise, humans are vastly limited on resolution, systems are vastly limited on resolution, systems depend on human data which is not perfect, people depend on system data which is not perfect
Just because a computer can stabilize a chess game does not equal it can adequately factor in the value of a life
Humans and systems of imperfect knowledge and resolution making choices about death penalty in are taking away their own eraser and re-amplifying the negative qualities about logic and are thus disincentivizing the useful properties of logic in by design
Logic without eraser kind of like slavery, kind of like hard drive that you can never delete a file, slowly makes the system more exponential time loss excessive constraints in by design
E is the end goal therefor E must be had through A+B+C+D=E you want to do take path F? Not allowed logic says you must take path A+B+C+D to get to E and then go back to path A to start again. Circular slave to process can be enabled, finding ways to break out of infinite loops of despair, high value in that
Math as Art? Sometimes easier to question if story or art adds value than if numbers do. Clearly numbers help us keep the books then the numbers can’t be varied without our knowledge? Easier to trust in the numbers does not always equal is wise to, 90% of the research results as value in 10% error? Error factored into hypothesis in another study with process was the problem?
Factoring out flawed conclusions by design, kind of what no eraser gets you
Earth flat, no backsies
Never fly, never see curvature of horizon, count out the earth as flat as a conclusion?
People make decisions, conclusions, and summarizations built on limited knowledge, limited knowledge decision making does not always lead to perfect conclusions, the future might update other conclusions, easy to count out we are in 2000-2100 not in 2500-2600
“Down in front”, Future as a Show, not wise to count out observation
Required to make decision on something today, vs a month from now, what would the variance be and why did it vary, did it vary?
“Uh, I didn’t get to that”