Fundamental property of data, things can be counted and categorized, and the categorization can create loss 7 tigers and 6 bunnies, 13 animals?
Loss is obfuscation, obfuscation is useful
7t6b is less lossy if you know b doesn’t mean bear and t doesn’t mean test
The categories you count are important
15 people around the jail or 7b8o?
Blue and Orange, Jail systems all value in for o?
Teaching a world how to classify and not amplifying forgiveness, I would say system somewhat guilty of that in need of forgiveness?
Forgiveness can be withheld as a value in system, I would advise not doing that to the people that know how to amp it
Why?
If you got the negative of an algorithm, you got the positive
A page of 1000b can’t be easily turned to 1000w? And Vice Versa?
World Leaders of delegate amplify forgiveness as a value in system?
Competition some Greed over Forgiveness is a useful system?
Get the job or don’t get the job, get the spot in the class or let the others have the spot in the class
Taking a job or a position in a class as a value out system?
Not all lessons are given for free, not all lessons that are given for free are appreciated, or appreciated to the level they should be
Giving people things to empower and increase joy but people not appreciating
Fundamental loss in data? People that appreciate lessons and empowerment and people that don’t appreciate lessons and empowerment. To people that have access to lesson plans early, non ideals no big deal
Surveillance is an all value in system to their own system?
5ApprEmp-5DNApprEmp
to 10-NINBD
Non ideal loss in resolution amplified time and time again over time
Want to turn up coldness?
Forgiveness is like warm coffee
Money taken before even walked in the coffee not always fully appreciated
Turning down appreciation for message and communications is a useful system
And can be turned up
Limit the message is a useful system, Dehumanization is a useful system
And can be turned up
Patronizing controlling is a useful system to limit the message
And can be turned up
Perfectionism uncaring truth is all that matters is a useful system
And can be turned up
Truth does not matter numbers of discouragement iterations does not matter is a useful system
And can be turned up
Effective listening is a useful system
And can be turned down
Not sure my original broadcast is getting through, let me try sending it now that the CB has been updated a bit
1000 videos on YouTube, just watch whatever? Or have a set?
High Contrast?
Peacemaking served over passive aggression? Is a useful system and can be turned up in non ideal ways
What can be given can be taken away
10 Customer Service Representatives that now how do Effectively Listen? Or 10 Customer Service Representatives that do not now how to Effectively Listen?
10 Customer Service Representative that are Appreciated and Inspired or 10 Customer Service Representatives that are Not Respected and filled with Malice by Default?
What can be given can be taken away is a useful system that has been turned up on my life time and time again
Time Respected, Protected, and Torture Out are useful systems, useful systems that can be taken away at non ideal times
I could have made this message 10 hours long, but I made it less than 2 minutes
One use of torture would likely create many many more hours of message
There is incentive for news to promote torture, long term message amplifications not fully appreciated
Not take into account wasted time by peacemakers and news in while they limit me?
Limit the message via continuous limit the message out message possible?
World has a tendency to disable support and not get off stage
Get concise communication right is not all ideal for story
Turning up concise communication correctly, turning up less is more correctly is not always a simple system
A tension point that can be turned up in non ideal ways by power and narrative control
People in Jails add a vacuum that is useful to throughput
People that don’t post, people that are limited by corrupt systems, people that choose to rely on less is more are a value in system that is not fully appreciated
PTDNP-PTA-LBCS-PTC2R-onLM-VIS-TINFA
And saying that without limiting the story, it is not all just about concise limited communication
Less is More at Times and More Story and Encouragement is Useful at times
LMatTimes-MSEUatTimes
Able to say the same thing in less time can likely go a long way in more effective communication potential, more effective communication potential ideally would lead to less is more value in
Forced to make a message in under 5 minutes? My message earlier was over 5 minutes
10 Minutes too long?
Split the difference?
Preventing Non Ideal Document Creep? Find a way to sign the document?
Refining questions can lead to better use of puzzle pieces
How you arrive at a point is useful because? Support in matters and where we went wrong can be flagged
Converse is also true
How you arrive at a point is useful because? Support in matters and where we went right can be flagged and amplified in more ideal ways
One person working on unearthing all the gems in the mine?
Relabeling as competition evil in by design is a useful system not always fully respected likely never fully fully appreciated
But there is Hope, Never Say Die!
Relabeling competition as evil in by design is Bad Bad as Can Be?
Logical paradox in bad relabeling as bad? Who labels who, who has to the power to label matters not always fully appreciated not always fully respected
Leadership does not always use power wisely leads to suboptimal access to water bottles, in 2022? Teaching leadership to appreciate water and support it adds is a non null investment cost that is not always easy to make
People need water said to leadership that isn’t dumb…. easy to come across as disrespectful, relabeled as evil in by design more contrast
The goal is to get access to water bottles, the goal is not to make leadership miserable, how long should one wait for leadership to provide functional support lines? How long would leadership prefer to wait?
Circular supply lines are possible
6 months of reduced access to functional supply lines is documentable
Document maybe less valuable coming from the competition?
Potential for systems to disable their own support lines in non ideal ways not always fully appreciated, opposing political party or thought to be opposing political party and disable teachers support? Not what I would say a dumb person would do, is what I would say some who has demons and is inspired by evil in by design might do
Non ideal distrust can be ramped to reduced appreciation for updates rendering updates ineffective
Data consistency problems, inconsistencies in lessons, Teachers are not perfect
Teachers make a mistake 2+2=5 for instance
Then students learn 2+2=5 and later 1 bottle of water is missing
But wait 1000 Students listened
That is an extra 1000 bottles of water or what ever else 2+2 = was supposed to equal
Not enough math teachers matter, and can obfuscate society in real and not fully appreciated ways
Potential for setup to fail not always fully appreciated
Math teachers are not perfect, with competition and evil in by design, no guarantee my lesson won’t be changed from 2+2=4 to 2+2=? or 2+2=(1 to 9) 2+2=-5 etcetera
Reinforcing a system that can change swiftly as always consistent can be high value out
Require everyone to check their puzzle pieces constantly? A lot of wasted time. Require everyone to not have forgiveness for a system built on people not perfect? A lot of wasted time.
Sometimes listening is more value in Sometimes listening is more value out
Two distinct systems that have yet to be perfected by people not perfect
Sometimes updates are more value in Sometimes updates are more value out
Two distinct systems that have yet to be perfected by people not perfect
We will relabel these two systems that have yet to be perfected as Evil In By Design? Or systems with Potential for the Future? Who’s future?
Humanity kicked to the curve like a red crystal full of blood?
Potential for the Future sounds better
Better than Good Amp for Future?
Good might negate risk mitigation for the Evil Properties?
Good Amp for Future or Potential for Future is more encouraging?
Potential for Future likely will be said and recommunicated in Non Ideal Ways by People Not Perfect Systems
Evil Potential for Future easy to turn up with Competition and Evil In By Design, Potential for Future easily turned into something Non Ideal
Associating Potential for Future to Good Amp for Future is a non null investment cost
Easy to leave shit as an all value out system, defecation adds character not really what I was going for
Able to shit not an all bad system, can be a not full appreciated system
Words like laxatives does not really sound ideal, reminders of non ideal are all ideal?
Making value of a system that is yet to be fully implicated, what is theoretical?
I meant to finish this WordPress vlog a few videos earlier, I apologize for the delay
My Tech Blog 