有支持 vs 没有支持 With support vs without support
需要交付的男人不要与我们他妈的我们你会后悔它不是一个完全被认可的系统
Men Required to Deliver on Don’t Fuck with Us our You’ll Regret it to Not a Fully Appreciated System
减少供应线导致要求建立“不要与我们操蛋”的可能性更大,否则您会后悔的
Reduced Supply Lines leads to More Potential for Requires to Establish Don’t Fuck with Us or You Will Regret It
不需要消息需要消息变化很大
No Need for a Message to Need for a Message Changes a Lot
零成本供应线减少,供应线减少,如谋杀或基于虚假指控将人们关进监狱?
Null Cost Supply Line Reductions, Supply Line Reductions like Murder or leaving people in Jails based on False Accusations?
失败姜教堂等于好树?Church of Fails Gingers equals Good Tree?
Gingers 和减少支持案例的个人是否无法使用一个好果子的系统?
Fails Gingers and Reduced Support Case Individuals to a system that is good fruit?
橙色珍珠到猪?Orange Pearls to Swine?
不能问自己正确的问题,可能会损失很多时间 NFA
Can’t ask ourselves the right questions, potential for many time losses NFA
谜语是有价值的,难以揭示,带有多巴胺和赋权
Riddles are valuable, obfuscation to reveal, with dopamine and empowerment attached
谜语有可能产生非空时间成本,也有可能没有答案,并且作为分散注意力的有用 NFA
Riddles have a potential for non null time costs, and potential for no answer and useful as a distraction NFA
什么是正确的问题与什么是错误的问题?
What is a right question vs what is a wrong question?
生活并不总是合乎逻辑的,这是否等于具有未知潜力的答案不那么有价值? 从不问问题?
Life is not always logical, does that equal an answer with potential for unknowns is less valuable? Never ask the question?
A+B+C+D+E = Answer
A=4,B=2,C=3,D=7
Answer equals = 6+3+7 + E = 16 + E
E is unknown, not try to answer the rest of the equation?
Does 16 get us most of the way there or not?
How might E and other unknowns effect the equation?
If we say I want to see the sea
I see an image

见海之巅 不见海之底
Seeing the top of the sea not seeing the bottom of the sea
看到一幅海的画不等于画家头脑中的想法等于系统的精确复制
Seeing a painting of the sea does not equal the ideas created in the mind of painter equal the exact replication of the system
部分翻译的系统,在某种程度上都是部分翻译的,我们不生活在彼此的鞋子里,同情是高价值的,没有得到充分的欣赏
Partially Translated Systems, and all partially translated on some level, we don’t live in each others shoes, Sympathy is HVI NFA
富有同情心的有效倾听是系统 NFA 中的高价值,值得积极提高
Sympathetic Effective Listening is a High Value In System NFA and Worth Actively Turning Up
SEL-HVIS-NFA-WATU
启用支持线等于更有能力在舞台上为其他人提供更多时间 NFA
Support Lines Enabled equals more ability to give more time on stage to others NFA
启用支持线 舒适意味着无需大声说出来保护个人供应线,并不总是等于其他支持线得到充分保护
Support Lines Enabled Comfortable equals less need to speak up to protect personal supply lines, does not always equals others support lines are fully protected
走进高价值 Walking HVI
可能需要一瓶水
Might need a bottle of water NFA
宽恕和同情可能对帮助获得可及性和帮助癌症患者大有帮助
Forgiving and Sympathetic likely goes a long way to help with accessibility and those with cancer, disabled does not equal cancer to society and their contributions are High Value In to society NFA, someone in a hospital might get you out of Jail NFA
最快的排序算法除以4? OPCI?
Fastest Sort Algorithm Divided by 4? OPCI?
随着未来 NFA 的发展,非空时间成本将减少非空时间成本
Non Null Time Costs To Less Non Null Time Costs as Future Progresses Forward NFA
积极了解鼓励、认可和尊重增加了什么以及它们带走了什么有限 -> 与我讨论过的教会? 真的不能用那些话说他们有
Active Knowledge of what Encouragement, Validation, and Respect add and what they take away limited -> Church that has discussed that with me? Can’t really say they have in those words
这个更新几年前还没有准备好,也许教堂只是不明白,很容易认为教堂在更新之前就有了更新,上帝在里面
This update wasn’t ready years ago, maybe Church just didn’t understand it, easy to think the Church has updates before they do, God in and all
Message Limited 作为一种保护机制的潜力会导致次优的鼓励潜力吗?
Potential for Message Limited as a protection mechanism leads to suboptimal encouragement potential?
UctlDD-DW-DW-NAA2FA
无法控制的文档漂移 -> 衍生作品 -> 衍生作品 -> 并不总是能够充分欣赏
Uncontrollable Document Drift -> Derivative Work -> Derivative Work -> Not Always Able to Fully Appreciate
Too Concise versus Too Verbose Systems
Robbing my support lines does not equal support in the right way simple as that
Yellow Orange Pink Yellow Orange Pink Yellow Orange Pink on Top of Blue
Suboptimized Song Hook leads to reduced by in for Teaching and Lessons at times, reduced by in that could mean the difference between life and death later in life NFA
被感知为价值输入并不总是导致价值进入,被感知为价值输出并不总是导致最佳价值
Perceived as value in does not always lead to value in, Perceived as value out does not always lead to optimal value in
领导层对总结的次优偏好导致决策制定的分辨率较低 并不总是得到充分认可
Suboptimal preference for summarization by leadership leads to less resolution into decision making Not Always Fully Appreciated
设计中的系统导致祸患尚未完全被更多人理解?
System in By Design Leads to Woe Yet to Be Fully Appreciable to More?
AI + NeuralLink 潜力有点吓人,至少在 2022 年需要对设计的信任和信心
AI + NeuralLink Potential a little scary, trust and faith in by design required at least in 2022
Potential to Tap into Pain Receptors Not Fully Appreciable?
恐惧、羞辱和神经联系 + 并不总是公平的腐败政府?
Fear, Humiliation, and Neural Links + Corrupt Governments that don’t always play fair?
违反直觉也许更好地投资于信仰、喜悦和宽恕
Counterintuitive maybe better to invest in Faith, Joy, and Forgiveness
那就是如果你说冰淇淋,当你说冰淇淋
That is if you mean Ice Cream, when you say Ice Cream
控制研究伦理 NFA 的偏见?
Bias for controlling research ethics NFA?
Precision Macro Maintenance?
坏合同? 不合逻辑的不公平,VS 弯曲时空?
Bad Contract? Illogical Unreasonable Unfair, vs Bending Space Time?
No tempt in legalism that leads to reduced support lines?
Breach of trust government turning up evil and legalism by design?