May 25th, 2022 Pt 2

明显缺乏令人惊叹的新内容

Distinct Lack of Amazing New Content being turned up

投资于权力更少还是权力更大的未来？

Invest in a future with less power or more power?

组合学能带来与火力或工业革命同等的电力使用效率提升吗？

Combinatorics that lead to efficiency gains for power use on par with the power of fire or the industrial revolution?

Sympathy over Empathy has High Potential for Better Time Management and Consequently Better Energy Use and Management NFA

If Power equals Sympathy?

Current equals Forgiveness?

P = I^2 * R?

R = Unforgiveness, Negate Supply Lines, Perfectionism, Belief Support and Training of Past was always Perfect?

尊重彼此时间和自由的太阳能，同时减少姜的压迫？

Solar Powers of Respect Each Others Time and Freedom with a side of less Ginger Oppression?

E2ANFA 易于欣赏不完全欣赏

E2ANFA Easy to Appreciate Not Fully Appreciate

I have a dream that I can copyright all pixels 0,0 to 50,000,50000 for all colors on the spectrum?

Combinatorics of taking over content ability

Brute force from supercomputers vs copyrights?

Copyrights leave me broke while leaving others reinforced and empowered to a value in system?

法律似乎写错了，写错的方式导致 Gingers 在 Shiny Blue Marble NFA 上没有足够的资金

Laws seem to be written wrong, written wrong in a way that leads to Gingers being left without enough funds on Shiny Blue Marble NFA

法制与版权和教学？

Legalism vs Copyright and Teaching?

贡献需要被尊重，贡献需要被尊重可以导致更少的贡献，更少的可以杀死的贡献

Contributions need to be respected and contributions need to be respected can lead to less contributions, less contributions that can kill

不被尊重的贡献会导致更少的创新和死亡

Contributions not respected can lead to less innovation and death

过分尊重的贡献会阻止人们在关键时刻大声疾呼，关键时刻可能会以某种方式掠夺你或你未来的家庭成员 NFA

Contributions respected too much can stop people from speaking up at a critical time, a critical time that could rob you or your future family members in ways NFA

简单的艺术家得到报酬，教师不会被封锁？

Simple Artists get paid, Teachers don’t get blocked?

商业秘密与无商业秘密？需要共享的东西总是共享的，总是及时共享的，保护主义从不考虑减少支持？

Trade Secret vs No Trade Secrets? Everything that needs to be shared is always shared, is always shared in a timely manner, protectionism never factored into reduced support?

如果我被允许对所有像素 0,0 到 50,000、50,000 进行版权保护，最好说 0、0 到 Infinity、Infinity、0,0 到 50000,50000 不是很新颖吗？有点像一个腐败的政府，在获利和保护社会子集的情况下制定了糟糕的法律？

If I was allowed to copyright all pixels 0,0 to 50,000, 50,000 maybe better to say 0, 0 to Infinity, Infinity, 0,0 to 50000,50000 not really Novel? Kind of like how a corrupt government that wrote bad laws while under profiting and under protecting a subset of society?

理论上的过度，但有点道理

Theoretical overswing but makes a bit of sense

由于有限的分辨率搜索和网络安全，输出大于分辨率

Output greater than resolution because of limited resolution searches and cybersecurity

内容库的更多添加使得快速搜索贡献的能力变得更加困难，再加上损坏的系统抢走了我的资源非常非常 NFA

More additions to content library makes ability to search through contributions swiftly harder compounded by a broken system robbing me of resources very very NFA

Complex NNTC to less Complex NNTC potential for easier to manage Complexity and add more Productivity NFA

Get A,B,C right easier to get right than A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K,L,M,N,O,P,Q,R,S,T,U,V,W,X,Y,Z NFA

系统阻止了我编写 NFA 的能力，非常非常 NFA

System blocking my ability to code NFA, very very NFA

限制出门并非都是好事

Limiting out of the gate not all good

也许可以提供我使用该系统集可以提供的 5%

Maybe delivering at 5% of what I could be delivering with this system set

Limiting after Jail to a reminder how amped the corruption in system is, an opportunity to write new Laws NFA

AB 测试值多少钱？自由与生命与否

How much is AB Testing Worth? Freedom and Life or Not

冰淇淋是自由还是冰淇淋是压迫，如何使用词语如何改变词语用途很重要

Ice Cream is Freedom or Ice Cream is Oppression, how words are used how words are repurposed matters

计算机使用名称来创建变量

Computers use names to create variables

var iceCream = “freedom”;

var iceCream = “oppression”;

将变量设置为困难？相信系统简单吗？

Setting variables to hard? Trusting the system to simple?

var documentInHand = “savesLife”;

var documentInHand = “”;

var documentInHand = “notEnoughTimeForThat?”;

当拯救音乐家或艺术家意味着让他们离开舞台时，一个有用的系统让充满竞争和保护主义的腐败系统突然出现？

When saving the musician or artist means keeping them off the stage, a useful system for corrupt systems full of competition and protectionism to turn up on a dime?

可能是对艺术家的严重影响，可能只是比赛想要限制，不完全欣赏被淘汰

Could be serious leverage against the artists, could be just that the competition wants to limit, does not fully appreciate being out shined

谁可以在社会中被信任，谁判断这不是一个完全被认可的系统，不是一个被完全认可的系统，尤其是在将供应线限制为一种事实上的标准的腐败系统中

Who can be trusted in society, and who judges that is not a fully appreciated system, not a fully appreciated system especially in corrupt systems that limit supply lines as kind of a defacto standard

比赛专家？

Expert in Competition?