May 13th, 2022 Pt 4

人们需要将彼此限制在一个价值低得多的系统中

People needing to limit each other to a much less valuable system

NASA 禁止评论? 纳税但不需要为腐败的刑事司法系统提供价值?

Comments disabled at NASA? Pay Taxes but not require value in for a corrupt criminal Justice System?

NASA 在设计上关闭了评论,不能将所有有限的分辨率处理成一个公正的系统?

NASA turns off comments in by design, can’t process all the limited resolution, to a just system?

太空伦理?Space Ethics?

人们需要限制支持线,限制限制,可以这么说

People need to be limited from limiting support lines, limited from imposing limits so to speak

民主党人声称并非全部价值,但并非全部价值

Democrats claim to be not all value out while not being all value in

Dems-CLM2B-NAVO-wNBAVI

禁用我的支持线等于 All Value In? 三星、微星、Alienware、欧特克都不需要卖了吗?

Disabling my support lines equals All Value In? Samsung, MSI, Alienware, Autodesk doesn’t need anymore sells?

允许在社会上关闭消费者支持热线而不会产生任何后果

Consumer support lines allowed to be turned off in society with no consequences

净效应减少了支持,增加了战争的可能性,减少了和平的可能性

Net effect reduced support, increased potential for war, reduced potential for peace

因果关系 Cause and Net Effect

可能是另一种具有更快决策和解决问题路径的语言 NFA -> 默认为英语可能不是最佳的

Might be another language that has faster paths for decision making and problem solving NFA -> Defaulted to English might not be Optimal

非空时间成本以不同语言复合到不同程度的决策?

Non Null Time Cost Compounded in Different Languages to Different Extents for Decision making?

打回来 Callback https://wordpress.com/post/techinfodebug.wordpress.com/120677

可修改的全局级函数并非全部值

Global level functions that can be modified are not all value in

被另一个团队或模块重新利用的小管道?

Small pipes repurposed by another team or module?

添加的小功能并不总是意味着以可以阻止团队修改的方式使用 -> 全局单体为系统增加价值,功能不易更改

Small functions added that are not always meant to be used in way that can block modification by team -> global monolith adds value to system, function not easily changeable

旨在打印出一些语句的小功能现在用作多个模块的大型企业集成,并且修改可以破坏多个团队的代码? 小的不可修改的函数可能会击败具有全局范围的函数,这些函数可以由其他开发人员创造性地编辑 -> 编码器和阻力最小的路径有时有用

Small function designed to print out a few statements now used as giant enterprise integration for several modules and modifications can break code for multiple teams? Small unmodifiable functions might beat functions with global scope that can be creatively edited by other developers -> coders and path of least resistance sometimes useful

像管道或电子设备一样,添加小管道是有原因的,连接更大的管道,更高电压的电力没有问题? 不是为更可能被具有更全球有限范围的其他人修改的

Like plumbing or electronics, small pipe added for a reason, tie in bigger pipes, higher voltage electricity without issues? Not built for that with higher probability to be modified by others with more global limited scope

有道理的具有通用接口的黑匣子,有时比允许访问系统中未设计为可访问的部分更好

Black box with common interface that is made with reason, sometimes better than allowing access to parts of the system not designed to be accessed

我呼吸并有肺并不意味着在不了解系统知识的情况下尝试打开我的棋腔并增强我的肺是智慧

I breathe and have lungs does not mean it is wisdom to try and open my chess cavity and augment my lungs with no knowledge of the system

传递感觉我可以解决这个问题,但不能解决这个问题并不总是有价值的

Delivering feeling of think I can fix that but can’t fix that not always value in

只需几个螺丝,系统就会发生变化,问题会以意想不到的方式复杂化?

Just a couple screws and the system shifts and problems compound in an unexpected way?

可行与不可行的解决方案?

Workable vs Non Workable Solutions?

Published by techinfodebug

Flex and Java Developer, Christian, Art, Music, Video, and Vlogging

Leave a comment