생강의 곤경에 대한 지나친 사랑이 염색 제품과 서비스를 개선하는 데 도움이 됩니까?
Excessive love for plight of ginger leads to improved hair dye products and services?
사랑하지만 시스템을 싫어해야합니까? Love but should hate systems?
좋은 운동? Good workout?
힘든 운동과 도전, 더 나은 장애물 경주가 없습니까?
Workouts and challenges hard, race no obstacles better?
케이블 고양이가 시간을 되돌려 하루를 구한다?
Cable kitten goes back in time to save day?
런닝 스타트? Running start?
약간의 격려와 알림은 여전히 내 렌더링이 좋지 않습니다.
A little encouragement and reminder my renders still suck
플러스 일부 번역된 텍스트 Plus some translated text on https://wordpress.com/post/techinfodebug.wordpress.com/38591 vlog
더 현명하지 않은 사람에게 금고에서 황금 다이아몬드 낙하산을 꺼내시겠습니까?
Pull the golden diamond parachute out of the safe to none the wiser?
의 외모는 돈이 있고 창조적인 글쓰기는 같지 않다
Appearance of has money and creative writing does not equal has money
글쓰기는 주의를 끌지만 항상 좋은 것은 아닙니다.
Writing brings attention attention not always good
과거에 나타나 시스템에 기록도 없이 이 녀석은 누구야
Show up in the past, without a record in the system, who is this guy
그리고 왜 그는 고양이를 그렇게 찾았습니까?
and why is he so found of cats?
미끄러운 신발은 더 안전한 신발과 동등하지 않으며 정신적으로 다소 힘든 작업입니다.
Slippery shoes do not equal safer shoes, working against that mentally somewhat tough
분노 관리 반응 대 반응처럼
Like anger management respond versus react
바닥에 물이 엎질러졌습니까?
Water spilled on floor?
제임스의 책이 붙은 꽃은 어쩌면 꽃보다 조금 더
Flower with book of James attached maybe a bit more than a flower
어색한 2 편안한 더 나은? Awkward 2 comfortable better?
어색함은 굴욕감이나 지원 라인 축소와 같은 도구로 우선 순위를 지정하는 능력을 감소시킵니다.
Awkwardness a tool like humiliation or reduced support lines, reduces ability to prioritize
더 나은 테드에 대한 생각 Thoughts of Better Off Ted
Awkward situations are distracting, distractions at key times are useful
아이디어는 도끼 살인자를 피하는 것입니다. The idea is to avoid the Axe Murderer
더 나은 미래를 만들기 위해 자원을 사용합니다. And use resources to create a better future
귀여운, 작은, 산만한 Cute, Small, Distracting
팬더 마르마 새끼 고양이 Panda Marma Kitten
내 인생 경험, 사랑은 그렇게 될 때까지 자신의 방식을 요구하지 않습니다
My life experience, love doesn’t demand its own way until it does
사랑이라는 단어는 그 단어를 전달하는 것보다 더 유용한 자체 방식을 요구하지 않습니다 2021-22
The words love doesn’t demands its own way more useful than delivery on those words 2021-22
지원을 통해 내 삶을 통제하는 것은 사랑이 자신의 방식을 요구하지 않는 것과 동일합니까?
Controlling my life through support out equates love not demanding its own way?
지원 아웃은 유용하고 지원 아웃은 통제에 유용합니다. 통제하기 위해 지원 아웃을 사용하는 사람들이 항상 신뢰할 수 있는 것은 아닙니다.
Support out is useful, support out is useful for control, people using support out to control not always trustworthy
Want to put a damper on the party, remind everyone current system is corrupt
2015년, 2010년보다 2022년 중국 무도회?
Chinese Prom in 2022 better than 2015, 2010?
요즘 중국 드라마가 조금 다르게 울릴 수 있습니다.
Chinese dramas might ring a little different these days
대만의 바에 가거나 한국행 티켓을 사세요?
Go to the bar in Taiwan or buy a ticket to South Korea?
내 말은 그것이 당신의 딸이라면
I mean if it were your daughter
지속적인 수정 없음 수정 실망 Continuous fix no fix frustrating
탄압의 희생양이 된 미국 지속적인 수정 노 픽스 좌절
United States falling victim to oppression continuous fix no fix frustrating
끊임없이 다가오는 전쟁의 심리적 영향?
Psychological impacts of constantly looming war?
내 추측? My guess?
Grace, Love, and Support는 머리에 총을 겨누고 의사 결정을 이깁니다.
Grace, Love, and Support beats Decision Making with a gun to the head
제한된 결의에 대해 적절하게 판단하고 균형을 잡는 능력이 있는 것처럼 행동 -> 거만하다?
Act as if has ability to judge and balance properly on limited resolution -> pompous?
우리가 먼저 고려하는 것이 중요합니다. 우리는 내 지원 라인을 탈선시키기 위해 선택한 것보다 더 나은 행동 과정만을 고려합니다.
It is important that we first take into account, that we only consider better courses of actions, than ones chosen to derail my support lines
Pompous?
I think I argued a good point without being pompous, others might think different
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/nominalize
verb (used with object), nom·i·nal·ized, nom·i·nal·iz·ing.
to convert (another part of speech) into a noun, as in changing the adjective lowly into the lowly or the verb legalize into legalization.
to convert (an underlying clause) into a noun phrase, as in changing he drinks to his drinking in I am worried about his drinking.
조롱하는 말로 변했다?
Word turned into a derisive patronizing word?
애용하는 의미 없이 애용하는 소리가 날 가능성
Possibility to sound patronizing without meaning to be patronizing
스튜디오가 연주자를 지시합니까, 아니면 스튜디오가 지시를 내리는가?
The studio directs the performer or the studio gives direction?
영어에서 스튜디오는 스튜디오가 지시하는 것보다 연기자의 소리를 더 잘 지시합니다. -> 얼마나 높이 점프합니까?
In English the studio directs the performer sounds better than the studio gives direction -> Jump how high?
마음을 바꾸는 방식으로 말하려면 덜 애용하는 소리가 필요할 것 같습니다
Speaking in a way that changes hearts, likely requires sounding less patronizing
창밖을 경청하는 비웃음
Derisive speech to listening out the window
말의 단순한 변화가 훨씬 더 효과적인 리더십으로 이어진다?
Simple change in words leads to much more effective leadership?
적군을 조롱하는 소리로 만드시겠습니까? 잠재적으로 유용
Make enemy sound derisive patronizing? Potentially useful
People like rope, if they are trying to use it to hang me, give them the one that traps them instead?
그건 밧줄이 아니야, 예리한 관찰 “나의 사랑하는 왓슨”
That is not a rope, astute observation “my dear Watson”
남자는 상황을 관찰 The man observes the situation
사람들은 그의 관찰을 들어야 한다
The people should listen to his observations
상황이 약간 조롱하는 부정적인 의미?
Situation a bit derisive negative connotation?
판매에서 상황이나 기회라는 단어를 사용합니까?
Use the word situation or opportunities in sales?
남자는 사랑과 관심으로 미래의 기회를 위해 부지런히 준비합니다
The man prepares diligently for future opportunities with love and care
사람들은 그의 칙령을 경외심과 존경심으로 받아들여야 합니까?
People should receive his edict with awe and reverence?
어떤게 더 잘 들리나요? What sounds better?
The nominalized people used patronisms in their comments
단어 선택을 소유하는 것은 가치가 있습니다.
Owning word choice is valuable
Owning acronyms choice is valuable
Adding acronyms gives us power, power is useful
Specially for people procastigating
Getting people to adopt a word, requires legitimization
procrastination + instigation -> procrastigation
words that are left unused lose power, right Glexa?
새로운 단어와 두문자어를 최대한 활용하려면 얼마나 자주 용어집을 연결해야 합니까?
How often should we link to glossaries for maximum adoption of new words and acronyms?
Great acronyms and words that useful, like procrastigation
The nominalized people used procrastigations in their comments
Are you sure you want to do that? If you say so…..
Knowledge of the proper glossary of Jason Lee Davis leads to a better tomorrow
https://wordpress.com/post/techinfodebug.wordpress.com/41154
Here’s hoping
Insufficappropriations used in speech were deemed insufficient for nominalizations
Time to employ the gingercodex?
Jason Lee Davis의 적절한 용어집에서
From the proper glossary of Jason Lee Davis
Gingercodex – The combination of Building Firecodes and Discrimination against Gingers and the plight of the misunderstood former Viking affiliates | 진저코덱스 – 건물 화재 코드와 생강에 대한 차별의 조합과 오해 전 바이킹 계열사의 곤경
빨간 머리는 파이어 코드, 빨간 머리는 약탈과 파괴를 하지 않는다
Red hair to fire codes, Red hair not to pillage an destroy
문제? Anti Ginger Oppression은 언제 작성되었습니까? 대비가 충분하지 않으면 장기적인 결과가 나타납니다.
Problem? When was the Anti Ginger Oppression written? Lacks enough contrast has long term consequences
이것으로 더 나은 방향으로 가고 싶었습니다.
Kind of wanted to go a better direction with this
사람들이 다치기 전에 말하십시오. 기관절개술의 경우 기도를 열지 않는 한 사람들의 목에 칼을 꽂지 마십시오. 죽음이 적을수록 생명이 더, 전쟁이 적을수록 평화가, 불의가 적고, 거짓 비난에 대한 믿음이 정의와 동일합니다.
Please speak up before people get hurt, please don’t put knifes in peoples throats unless for opening airways in case of tracheotomy, less death more life, less war more peace, less injustice, less belief in false accusations equals justice
억압에 반대하는 생강은 바이킹과 같지 않습니다
Ginger speaking up against oppression does not equal Viking
LTULP(장기 수리 불가 라벨 프로모터)는 생강 -> 강간과 약탈을 하는 바이킹이라고 말합니다.
LTULPs (Long Term Unrepairable Label Promoters) say Gingers -> Vikings that rape and pillage
미래의 지원 라인에 이상적이지 않은 바이킹 및 강간범으로 재명명됨
Being relabeled as a Viking and rapist non ideal for future support lines
Basically robbing my families on bad PR grounds
생강 -> 바이킹 강간범 지원 안 함 -> 바이킹 강간범 없음 -> 홍보 담당자에게 더 많은 급여를 지급하시겠습니까?
Gingers -> Viking Rapist No Support -> No Viking Rapist -> More paychecks for Public relations associates?
나는 PR 직원을 좋아하고, 월급을 더 많이 받으며 나를 약탈자라고 부르는 적절한 근거가 아닙니다.
I like PR people, making their paychecks better not adequate grounds for labeling me a pillager
백인에서 노예 주인으로, 아프리카계 미국인에서 이집트 노예 주인으로?
White to Slave Master, African American to Egyptian Slave Owner?
이상적이지 않은 홍보, 이상적이지 않은 홍보는 부패한 정부에 유용합니다.
Not ideal PR, not ideal PR is useful to corrupt governments
Current government is corrupt therefor people procrastigate
악마는 PR 메커니즘을 사용하여 삶을 파괴합니다
Devil uses PR mechanisms to wreck lives
정치인은 잘생기고 보통사람은 망한다
Politicians thrive while normal people get screwed over
정치인은 1000년 된 정당화 경로를 기반으로 Gingers를 강간범과 약탈자로 재지정하면서 삐걱거리는 깨끗한 이미지를 유지하게 됩니까?
Politicians get to maintain squeaky clean image while relabeling Gingers as rapists and pillagers based on 1000 year old justification routes?
생강은 저런 댓글보면 죽는다 뭔가 슬프다
Gingers die based upon those type of comments, kind of sad
나치 PR로 인해 독일인은 2022년에 죽으면 안 된다 독일인은 2022년에 나치 PR로 죽지 않는다
Germans shouldn’t die in 2022 due to Nazi PR does not equal Germans don’t die in 2022 to Nazi PR
PR 출력 및 PR 출력 허용에는 의미가 있습니다.
PR out and allowing PR out has implications
Gingers에 대한 지원이 전 세계에 메시지를 보내고 있습니다.
Support out for Gingers is sending a message to the world
모든 밀리초 리더십이 이를 허용합니다. 그들은 세계에 메시지를 보내고 있습니다. 괜찮습니다.
Every millisecond leadership allows this, they are sending a message to the world is it is ok
HMSDP = Hang Me Sauce 디자인 프로모터, 반복 및 확대
HMSDP = Hang Me Sauce Design Promoters, reiterations and magnifications
HnSS != VnSS
Holes in Safety System do not equal Value In Support System
HnSS = Holes in Safety System
VnSS = Value In Support System
미달 전달되는 안전망을 설정하면 해당 안전망에 대한 의존도가 낮아질 수 있음을 명시합니다.
Stating that setting up a safety net that underdelivers, can equal less reliance on that safety net
지금부터 5년 후, 자선 단체에 더 많은 것을 기부하거나 2022년에 무슨 일이 있었는지 기억하십니까?
5 years from now, give more to charity or remember what happened in 2022?
2001년에서 2022년까지 부정적인 배송으로 인해 안전망에 대한 이상적인 견해가 부족합니다.
2001 to 2022 negative deliveries leaves me with a less than ideal view of the safety net
Post Jail은 더 많은 가치와 같아야 합니다. 동일한 오래된 바람에 더 많은 부패한 민주당원이 오줌을 싸는 것과 같습니다.
Post Jail should equal more value in, seems like it is equaling more corrupt democrats piss in the same old wind
Fugaku에 사진이 있습니까? Fugaku has pictures?
그렇게 하면 나는 내 것을 잃었다. If they do, I lost mine
그 날 이후로 오랜만이네
Been a long time since those days
일본 음악을 좋아하는 것은 히브리 음악과 같지 않다
Liking Japanese music does not equal not like Hebrew Music
Claymore와 Benny Friedman, 일종의 멋진
Claymore plus Benny Friedman, kind of cool
나쁜 사람들처럼 사는 것이 2022년에도 계속 나쁜 PR로 낙인찍힐까?
Better to live like bad people will label me continuously with bad PR in 2022?
아니면 인생이 증기에 불과한 것처럼 사는 것이 더 나을까요?
Or better to live like Life is but a Vapor?
감사와 격려로 압제에 반대하는 적절한 말을 하는 것은 어렵다
Finding out the right level of speaking against oppression with appreciation and encouragement is hard
생강을 1000년 된 뱀파이어 강간범 선박 제작자로 분류하여 세상을 보는 최적의 방법이 아닙니다.
Labeling gingers as 1000 year old vampire rapist ship makers less than optimal way to look at the world
처음에 그들은 내 자원을 0달러로 설정했고, 그 다음에는 물을 살 여유가 없었습니다.
First they set my resources to $0, then I can’t afford water…. to those days are long over?
다른 부패한 세계 정부가 사용하는 것과 같은 억압, 미래에 이상적이지 않은 억압과 대열을 잡고 있는 민주당원
Democrats holding ranks with oppression, oppression like that used by other corrupt world governments non ideal for the future
P4 MOIRL
더 많은 억압과 부적절한 구제책의 가능성 -> 자선 감소로 이어짐
Potential for More Oppression and Inadequate Remedies Likely -> leads to less Charity
L2LC -> Worse Safety Net Worse support network
사람들은 듣기를 좋아하지 않는다. People don’t like to hear it
이것은 접근 제한 시스템의 문제의 일부입니다. 사람들이 시스템이 나치로 바뀌었다고 생각하는 수준으로 현실을 판단할 수 있습니다.
This is part of the problem with reduced access systems, reality can be iffed, iffed to the level that people think the system has turned to Nazis
사람들을 오랫동안 감옥에 가둬두세요. 출소할 때 항상 똑같습니까? 그러면 시스템이 덜 손상될 것이라고 보장합니까?
Leave people in Jail for long terms, always the same when they get out? Guarantee the system will be less corrupt then?
감옥 시스템에서 2년 된 업데이트와 정보가 빛의 속도로 이동할 때 그것을 정당한 시스템으로 간주합니까?
2 year old updates from the Jail systems and consider it a just system, when information travels at speed of light?
아버지 제발 그것이 그리스도의 이름으로 표준이 되는 것을 멈추게 해주세요
Father please let that stop being the norm in Christ’s name I ask this
Systems that lead to normalization of corruption
Maybe the corrupt system isn’t the problem
Maybe the lead up to those systems, promoting situations (opportunities) that lead up to the normalization of corruption
A little artistic freedom of speech oppression in goes a long way, maybe this would be at the top of the vlog post today
Sail was weak, then WW2 schooled us, then society got complacent, now sail appears weak, at least from Duncanville Texas area
Reiterations of corruption played out over and over establish reiterations reiterations are not good for people just trying to live their lives
Charity -> failed safety net
Charity -> failed safety net
Charity -> failed safety net
Charity -> failed safety net
Eventually that leads to less Charity
PR -> Truth -> Bad PR -> No Forgiveness
PR -> Truth -> Bad PR -> No Forgiveness
PR -> Truth -> Bad PR -> No Forgiveness
PR -> Truth -> Bad PR -> No Forgiveness
What does that lead to? Negate Truth
동료 벌금 바른 시민 유죄? 아마도 부패한 훌륭한 지도자들은 그들이 할 말을 할 것입니다.
Fellow Fine Upstanding Citizen guilty? Unlikely, corrupt Fine Upstanding Leaders will say what they will
독일인과 일본인 박멸자를 가르쳤고 나쁜 홍보를 반복해서 반복함 -> 이상적인 평화로운 미래로 이어지지 않음, 아시아계 미국인을 위한 이상적인 홍보로 이어지지 않음
Taught Germans and Japanese exterminated people, reiterated bad PR over and over and over -> Does not lead to ideal peaceful future, does not lead to ideal PR for Asian Americans
2001년 이슬람교도에 등장한 새로운 괴물? 사회는 그것에 대해 더 잘해야합니다
The new monster set to Muslims in 2001? Society needs to be better about that
평화를 유지하지만 우리는 당신을 지원하지 않을 것입니다. 내가 지원해야 하는 자선 단체에?
Make peace, but we won’t support you in the endeavor? To charities I should support?
지지는 결과를 낳고, 누가 비난을 받는지, 누가 좋은 홍보를 받고 누가 나쁜 홍보를 받는지, 억압에 대해 이야기하는 데 얼마나 많은 시간을 허비하는지에 대한 결과 아시아계 미국인과 파티를 할 수 있습니다.
Support out has consequences, has consequences to who gets blamed, who gets good PR who gets bad PR, consequences to how much time I spend wasting talking about oppression I could be partying with Asian Americans
중국이 대만과 전쟁을 시작하면 대만계 미국인에게 더 나은 결과가 나온다?
China starts a war with Taiwan equals better results for Taiwanese Americans?
중국이 이론의 국가인 생강과 전쟁을 해야 한다면, 아마도 가장 좋은 예는 아닐 것입니다.
If China had to go to war with a theoretical nation of Gingers, maybe not best example
노르웨이vs스웨덴, 미국이 전쟁에 투입? 모든 스웨덴 사람 또는 노르웨이 사람에게 더 낫습니까?
Norway vs Sweden, US injected into a war? Better for all Swedish people or Norwegian people?
두 개의 바이킹 국가가 가려고 하고 사람들이 전쟁에 나갑니다. 진저가 클레이모어를 휘두르며 우리의 머리를 벗길 준비를 하는 것을 봅니다.
Two Viking Nations going at it, people go to war, see Gingers wielding claymores ready to take off our heads
그럼 2035년에는 생강과 함께 평화롭게 살까요?
Then just live peaceably with Gingers in 2035?
블랙핑크 같은 여성들이 좆도 없이 미국 여행을 가게 하면 전쟁 안 할 핑계로 충분하다.
Letting women like Blackpink travel to United States without being fucked with should be enough excuse not to go to war
초강대국이 전쟁에 임할 때의 장기적인 영향, 승자에게도 항상 잘 풀리는 것은 아닙니다.
Long term implications for super powers going to war, that don’t always work out well for even the winning parties
2022년 불안정한 미국, 중국, 러시아를 화나게? 핵 시스템에 적합하지 않음
Pissing off unstable USA, China, or Russia in 2022? Not ideal with Nuclear systems
힘은 지렛대이며 모든 사람이 모든 미묘함을 완전히 이해하거나 감사하는 것은 아닙니다.
Power is leverage, not everyone fully understands or appreciates all the subtleties
스트립 클럽에서 억압받는 스트립 클럽으로 가는 선은 아마도 얇은 선
Strip Club to oppressed strip club is likely a thin line
더 많은 레이더 존재가 항상 모든 당사자에게 더 나은 것은 아닙니다.
More radar presence does not always equal better for all parties
Power lies where people believe it lies?
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/lie
Lie down or Lay down?
Wrong Information Wrong Time Wrong Proximity Systems
Answers, updates, and lesson not always as valuable in oppressive systems
Knowledge of how to speak free does not always equal right to or ability to do so without recourse
Cost in knowns
Know how to defuse a bomb and presented with 5 bombs at same time in different locations -> opportunity costs for what we choose to help with?
I don’t know how to defuse bombs, hope this helps
부적절한 경로를 통해 증거를 보고 계십니까?
Seeing evidence through inappropriate routes?
케이스에 맞는 것을 무엇이라고 합니까?
What is that called, fit for case?
거짓 증거에 대해 과도하게 물어뜯기 위해 기소를 당하세요. 거짓 증거가 유용합니까?
Get prosecution to overbite on false evidence, false evidence useful?
시간 문제, 부패한 시스템이 잘못된 증거로 오도할 수 있음
Time matters, corrupt systems might mislead with bad evidence
잘못된 작업에 더 많은 시간을 할애하면 올바른 작업을 수행하는 시간이 줄어듭니다.
More time working on the wrong stuff means less time working on the right stuff
경쟁과 억제 경쟁은 때때로 사람들이 실제 경쟁자가 아닐 때 유용합니다.
Competition and deterrence competition is useful, sometimes when people aren’t actual competition
의사 결정에 유용한 인지 가능한 위협
Perceivable threat useful to decision making
감지 가능한 위협으로 무언가를 옮기는 것은 의사 결정을 방해하는 가치가 있습니다.
Moving something to perceivable threat has value to derailing decision making
유죄이거나 나쁜 상황에 처한 사람들은 사람들을 방정식의 유용한 도구로 잘못 분류할 가능성이 높습니다.
People that are guilty or are in bad situations have high potential to mislabel people as a useful tool to the equation
Support Out은 동적 거짓 주장 생성 시스템으로, 감소된 해상도 및 활용된 용량과 결합된 감소된 지원의 유혹 증가
Support Out is a Dynamic False Allegation Generation System, reduced support increased temptation combined with reduced resolution and leveraged capacity
동적 PR 시스템 및 잘못된 레이블, 모든 관계가 모든 사람에게 가치 있는 것은 아닙니다.
Dynamic PR systems and bad labels, not all relationships might be value in for all people
시스템 상태가 항상 이상적인 방식으로 변경되고 분기되는 것은 아닙니다.
System states change and diverge not always in ideal ways
잘못된 주장을 처리하는 것이 좋으며, 더 일찍 유용성을 생성하는 시스템을 중지합니다.
Dealing with false allegations is good, stopping the systems that generate their usefulness earlier on better
거짓 주장을 처리하는 것은 카운슬러와 변호사를 계속해서 일하게 하고 우리의 수첩에 있는 돈과 같지 않습니다.
Dealing with false allegations keeps counselors and lawyers in business, does not equal more money in our pocket books
A society not incentivizing the wrong system likely leads to combinational support into the system
잘못된 시스템에 대한 합의가 항상 완전한 것은 아닙니다.
Agreement on a system that is a wrong system is not always complete
석면이 암을 유발하고 암에 걸리는 사람들이 나쁘다면(사실상) 석면을 추가하지 말라고 알려야 합니다.
If Asbestos causes cancer, and people getting cancer is bad (which it is), we need to inform people not to add asbestos
Poisonous water is bad, failing to inform the public of poisonous water is worse
Poisonous water is bad, failing to allow people to speak out about the poisonous water is worse
Oppression of speech, Reason to oppress, Limited Resolution and Mismanagement of systems -> more likelihood for problems
Combinational Positive Support in Systems CPSIS
Need to find examples of CPSIS and find ways to increase their abundance in society
Unforgiveness is bad, unforgiveness more of a problem in Limited Oxygen Situations
Corrupt system reduced support, would ideally like to maximize message and speak less
Corrupt system reduced support, would ideally like to maximize message and speak less -> Likely how innocent people about to die might feel
시스템이 들어야 하는 내용이 우리가 말하고 싶은 내용과 항상 같지는 않습니다.
What system needs to hear does not always equal what we want to say
24시간 연중무휴로 부패한 시스템에 불만을 품기보다는 격려를 원합니다.
Would rather be encouragement in than unhappy about corrupt system 24/7
끊임없이 부패를 외쳐야 하는 사람과 데이트하고 싶은 사람이 누가 있겠습니까?
Who wants to date someone that is constantly having to call out corruption?
억압은 사람들이 항상 진정으로 이해하는 것보다 더 많은 문제를 낳는다
Oppression leads to more problems then people always truly understand
Jade 시스템 equals 격려 아웃
Jade a system equals encouragement out
나는 우리가 탄핵해야 한다고 외쳤지만 시스템은 탄핵되지 않았다
I call out we need to impeach, but system is not impeached
시스템은 탄핵되지 않습니다 평등하지 않습니다 시스템은 탄핵되지 않습니다
system is not impeached does not equal system will not be impeached
부패한 시스템에서 적시에 전달되지 않으면 인간 시스템에 대한 사랑이 줄어듭니다.
No delivery in timely manner from corrupt systems leads to less love for human systems
지속적인 부패 시스템이 사용되는 것 같습니다.
Constant a Corrupt System seems to be being employed
다리 또는 추가 손과 같은 시스템이 지원을 증가합니까?
Is the system like legs, or extra hands, does it grow the support?
진공으로 이어지는 긍정적인 과제가 충분하지 않음
Not enough positive challenges in leads to vacuum
복잡한 문제, 도전하지 않는 사람은 성취되지 않을 가능성이 높습니다.
Complex problem, people that aren’t challenged, likely are not fulfilled
사람들은 고장나지 않은 것을 시도하고 고칠 수 있습니다.
People might start to try and fix things that aren’t broken
시간은 소중하고, 사람의 시간은 소중하고, 우리를 바쁘게 하는 건설적인 일을 하는 사람이 중요합니다.
Time is valuable, People’s time is valuable, and People having constructive Tasks to keep us busy is important
시간 여행에서 처리량, 로드 밸런싱 및 우선 순위를 최대화하는 것은 간단하지 않을 수 있습니다.
Maximizing throughput, load balancing and prioritization under time travel likely not simple
한발 물러서서 대화를 줄여야 할 때, 그것이 기껏해야 매우 어려워 보인다는 것을 알면서
When to step back and reduce conversation, knowing that seems very difficult at best
Limited time proximity and convenience counts
LTPM = Limited Time Proximity Matters
LTOM = Limited Time Organization Matters
More time does not always equal more effective use of time
Time management hacks? like throwing stuff under the bed?
Saying Yes too much has a cost -> A friend asks you to go a mile with him go two? -> treat others as you wish to be treated, ideal not to ask friends to go miles?
No question, no need to provide yes, opportunity creator cost
There is times to say no, that scripture, being a good Samaritan makes say no difficult at times, saying no essential to prioritization
Spilled water or something about to start a fire? Need to stop fire before cleaning up spilled water -> spilled water might break a leg, fire might remove shelter
fire might remove shelter prioritized higher vs spilled water
slippery floor can be delt with for short period of time, duct tape useful for temporary fix -> temporary fix things that might not be fixed long term?
Traveler walks through system can duct tape something together, wise to duct tape it together? Issue being half fixing a problem can give appearance of fixed
Appearance of fixed does not always lead to fixed long term
Iffy system we can fix deprioritized for goal?
Can fix doesn’t equal should fix systems?
CF != SFS
Appearance of can solve problem might allow people that have higher potential for attacking problem
Broken Car -> Mechanic 2 Broken Car vs insufficient mechanic duct taping things together 2 Broken Car
Skills Optimizations not always simple
명확하고 가시적인 문제 또는 iffy 시스템보다 공격하기 훨씬 쉬운 도전
Clear and Visible problem or challenge much easier to attack than iffy system
Really wet floor with shine, might be safer than black ice
Systems and things in life that reduce our ability to easily prioritize
환경을 완벽하게 만드는 것은 불가능하다 조직이 가치가 없다
Perfecting environment impossible does not equal organization is not valuable
도전은 필요하고 때로는 더 높은 가치를 지닌 명확한 도전
Challenges are necessary, clear challenges sometimes valued higher
실제 생활은 도전과 함께 몇 배 더 iffy
Real life many times more iffy with challenges
Iffy 시스템은 도전적이고, iffy 시스템은 생각할 시간이 있을 때 흥미롭고, 생각할 시간이 없을 때 스트레스를 받습니다.
Iffy systems are challenging, iffy systems are interesting when we have time to contemplate, stressful when we don’t
수정해야 하는 것과 많은 시간을 절약할 수 없는 것 파악
knowing what we have to fix and what we don’t likely to save a lot of time
Better time management does not always lead to less responsibility
Something to consider
more responsibility does not always lead to more time
시간이 지남에 따라 더 잘 조직화되면 손상된 시스템에 더 유용합니다.
Better with Time, more Organized equals more useful to corrupt systems
BwT, mO = MU2CS
회사를 만들거나 망치는 비서? 도나 꽤 흥미로운 캐릭터
Secretary that makes or breaks the company? Donna pretty interesting character
Perfect employees maybe not always better
High output for limited periods of time that allow corporation to slack?
Band-Aid the problem does not always equal better
Sets precedence for doesn’t have to fix problem, problem already fixed
Perfect employee that jumps to rescue every time things get tough breaks load balancing algorithms, load balancing can be limited for a time, small corporations more critical than large ones
Fixing problems good, fixing problems that reduce efficiency that others could fix not better
Thousand dollar lawyer with a mop? What is useful to serve as a lesson doesn’t always make us feel better
Don’t fix the wrong problems, goes a long way in giving us extra time to fix problems, extra time to fix problems does not always lead to extra problems fixed
Challenging people can tie up our resources
People need challenges, Students need to have answers checked, do the teachers have the time to actually work with the students?
When to add challenges to system valuable, challenge for challenge sake not always appreciated when we have enough challenges
Oppressive systems lead to less effective challenges and higher probability for challenges being mistaken for more of the same
DTA-L2V Does the action lead to value
a2v?
Condensed communication in though patterns
a2v? Yes, No or a2v? Y,N?
Cat likely a2v, Y,N
value = hunger, comfort, being petted, getting better ground for judge a2v, frolicking and pursuit of cat business
Does being around time goblin bring joy, or does being around time goblin prevent frolicking
Alien spaceships…. a2v systems?
value = planet with resources to be mined, possible technologies of different civilization to be harnessed, potential for threats like walking into room full of snakes, potential for high level action 2 value systems than we understand -> on earth humans equal Apex, other worlds possibly not, potential for odd alien space laws (one wrong move incur penalty of intergalactic justice)
Does value drive actions, or might is just be pleasurable to conquer an alien civilization for sport? Enough technology going unchallenged for long period of time with an itch to use alien death rays
Cats we don’t fully understand, therefor decent for thought processes about how other species might act
How does being 1/10 size affect decision making on our gravity, how does be 500 times as tall effect decision making on gravity of our planet and other planets?
Alien biology possibly leads to different implications, doesn’t breath oxygen might need a suit, breathes oxygen Shiny Blue Marble might be perfect place
Alienship to alien encounter with earth likely requires some type of Action Requires Value scenario, or possibly some system I don’t understand
a2v -> short term, mid term, long term ROI?
Prioritization a2v -> war2peace -> w2p
w2p -> hROI
Charity2Functiontioning -> c2f -> hROI
Support2Functiontioning -> s2f -> hROI
w2p+s2f -> 2hROI
reduced to hROI = higher return on investment
OVC when w2p+s2f necessary for hROI
OVC = Oxygen Valuable Commodity
OVC-W2P-S2F-hROI -> essential for peacemaking valuable action
EfP = essential for peace
NEfP = non essential for peace
Corporations thrive off of EfP > NEfP
Corporations making sells EfP, sells leads to high bank statements and employees paid, employees then can capitalize on value produce by using medical services such as dental and buying other products
Corporations that can’t make sells NEFP -> how things are branded matter (HTaBM)
At Critical Times HTaBM because EfP companies make sells put food and support on table, NEFP don’t make sells and have to fire employees which creates less peace and less stability
CT-HTaBM-EFP-S2F -> win -> a2v -> a2v?Y
CT-HTaBM-NEFP-S2NF -> loss -> an2v -> a2v?N
a2v? Win for System? WfS? w or l?
More edge cases for critical times we deal with in decision making early on the better we are equipped to deal with cases at critical times
Preparation matters in providing a2v?w
P = Planning, Preparation, Proper Procedure, project
M = matters, management
PM-a2vw
No PM less ability to deliver on a2vw more likely to produce a2vl
No planning and preparation less able to deliver win more likely to deliver loss
Optimizing Support to Functioning OS2F (E2P = Essential to peace)
OS2F -> PM more
OS2F -> edge case data, extra knowledge into system matters more
Company data on how the wind is blowing could mean more employees or less employees
Less employees to deliver at critical times such as bridge is sinking
Bridge Sinks or Ship Sinks?
S2F v S2F systems
A ship collides with bridge, lost time for bridge, loss time for boat, possible dangerous for all, combinational negative support out system rare case
Rare cases might have potential to teach us about other rare cases
Car driven into a garage -> support out of building, support out on car -> critical loss of resources at critical times can lead to less S2F
Car through Building, Ship through Bridge -> Rare case double support out systems
CtB,StB -> reduced S2F -> NEFP
Cars going through buildings and ships going through bridges have rare potential to happen, have the potential to waste substantial amount of time on cleanup and resources and are thus non essential for peacemaking
Rare case Time Management crystals that might be useful in other scenarios for prioritization
Building on fire, squash a bug in the past, grab a flower, non essential for peacemaking?
Life is more than action to value at times, and sometimes that more than action to value might mean the difference between sanity and no sanity
appreciated simple things equals a2v
cheap support that increases creativity
Grabbing a flower was non essential to my trip out to the yard, I would have no video of the flower otherwise
Flower attached to Luke might equal more appreciation for God on a larger cosmic level
꼭 필요하지 않은 시간의 물결이 항상 나쁜 것은 아닙니다.v
Ripples in time with non essentials not always bad
평화를 위해 필수적이지 않은 연못의 잔물결
Ripples in a pond non essential for peace making
인생은 그들 없이는 조금 더 지루하고 덜 영감을 받을 것입니다.
Life would be a little more boring and little less inspirational without them
Life is action 2 value, and providing action 2 value sometimes requires more than just action 2 value thinking
Saving earth and future time might equal stepping on some bugs or amoebas
Does action full fill need for me vs does action full fill need for future
5 minute lag on gaining resources might mean peace -> letting others with accessibility problems in line first not always bad -> could be casted in a way to never allow access to resources
Abhed being tested in control + John Oliver comes to mind
People taught to be patient not always value in for all system in squeakiest wheel gets the grease systems
PT2bP -> a2v in SWGTG?
PT2bP -> Patience and Waiting on God good, specially when OVC
Potential for systems where Patience and Waiting on God considered not value in
Water on the table, everyone has a glass, waiting on system to provide a glass where everyone acts on I need water mentality?
Water as a limited resource system very scary
Time crunch -> Slow time crunch, not like a bullet from a gun
Set of systems constantly prioritizing who lives and who dies
Greed prevented on first action does not equal long term sustainability
Greed must be punished when punishment requires reduced resources?
OVC and WVC together punishment might cost more than punishment adds value
Lots of super computers in the world, slowly being replaced with smaller computers that do similar? Cray to personal PC?
Supercomputers like a big ship, thrive on resources, sail for a time before commissioned
오래된 군함과 같은 거대한 할아버지 시계는 모든 선택이 아닌 E2P로 논리를 사용하는 데 도움이 되는 방법을 찾기 위해 세계를 가장 잘 구할 수 있습니다. 미래에 특정 경로를 밟지 말아야 하는 이유에 대한 통찰력은 또한 예상치 못한 데이터에서 가치를 도출하는 방법에 대한 가치를 제공합니다. 약간의 추가 식물학 데이터는 세상의 종말과 같습니다. ~ 할 것 같지 않은
Giant grandfather clocks, like old military ships, could save the world best to find a way to help use the logic as E2P, not all choices E2P, not all things that lead to value are valued as essential at time, going down wrong paths give us insight on why not to go down certain paths in the future, also gives us value on how to derive value from unexpected data, a little extra botany data equals end of world? unlikely
Incorrect paths can be learning experience, not an excuse to turn up incorrect paths
Path does not lead to value -> PDNL2V -> why paths are judged that way matters
PDNL2V -> leads to potential for prejudice in decision making
Path did not lead 2 value for me does not always equal path did not lead to value for others
PDNL2V -> For my Support != PDNL2V -> For support of others
Charity out != value out strictly speaking
Continuous Support Out likely in Continuous Squeakiest Wheel Gets The Grease Systems, for wheels that don’t squeak the loudest
CSO likely in CSWGTG Systems, for those that fly under the radar (FUTR)
4TT = For those that
HP4 = Higher Potential for
HP4-CSO-CSWGTG-4TT-FUTR -> Not everyone speaks up that ideally should, not everyone feels like they can speak up that feel like they should, not everyone feels like they can speak up that ideally should, ideally should a bit iffy in CSO systems
ISaBIf = Ideally should a bit iffy
ISaBIfnCSOS = Ideally should a bit iffy in continuous support out systems
NESU = Not everyone speaks up
TIS = That Ideally Should
HP4-CSO-CSWGTG-4TT-FUTR -> NESU-TIS, not everyone feels like they can speak up that feel like they should, not everyone feels like they can speak up that ideally should, ideally should a bit iffy in CSO systems
NEFL = not everyone feels like
HP4-CSO-CSWGTG-4TT-FUTR -> NESU-TIS, NEFL they can speak up that feel like they should, NEFL they can speak up that ideally should, ideally should a bit iffy in CSO systems
TCSU – they can speak up
HP4-CSO-CSWGTG-4TT-FUTR -> NESU-TIS, NEFL-TCSU that feel like they should, NEFL-TCSU that ideally should, ideally should a bit iffy in CSO systems
NEFL-TCSU systems judged harshly at times, penalties sometimes associated with silence plus light
TFLTS – That feel like they should
TIS – That Ideally Should
HP4-CSO-CSWGTG-4TT-FUTR -> NESU-TIS, NEFL-TCSU-TFLTS, NEFL-TCSU-TIS, ideally should a bit iffy in CSO systems
ISaBIfnCSOS
HP4-CSO-CSWGTG-4TT-FUTR -> NESU-TIS, NEFL-TCSU-TFLTS, NEFL-TCSU-TIS, ISaBIfnCSOS
BIf = spilled water
BIf != building catching fire
combination does not lead to perfect scenario in all cases
CDNL2 = combination does not lead to
PnAC = Perfection in All Cases
CDNL2-PnAC
Asterisk – CDNL2-PnAC -> associated with cases outside of the norms, rare cases
비판적 사고에 유용한 드문 경우
rare cases useful for critical thinking
화재는 거의 발생하지 않으며 발생하면 매우 중요합니다.
Fires happen rarely, when they do happen they are critical
시스템에 대한 파괴적인 발사, 할아버지 시계 또는 할아버지 시계 제조 업체에 이상적이지 않음
Destructive Fire into the system, non ideal for grandfather clocks or grandfather clock makers
몇 년을 흠잡을 데 없이 돌아가는 시계 -> 불에 타면 쉽게 부서지는 시계
A clock that runs for years on end flawlessly -> that can easily be destroyed by a fire
Flawless BIf, 계속 실행되는 시계는 때때로 재설정이 필요할 수 있으며 값이 없는 시계와 같지 않음
Flawless a BIf, a clock that continues to run likely might need to be reset at times does not equal a clock with no value
포인트는 유효합니다. 화재는 드문 경우 리소스 감소로 이어질 수 있는 CNSOS, 중요한 시기에 리소스 감소는 비용이 많이 드는 것으로 입증되었습니다.
Point is valid, fires are rare case CNSOS that can lead to reduced resources, reduced resources at critical times has proven to be costly
BIF가 판단을 더 쉽게 하는 것이 아니라 BIF가 신속한 우선 순위를 정하는 능력을 감소시킵니다.
Not BIfs lead to easier to make judgments, BIfs lead to reduced ability to prioritize swiftly
새 페이지는 때때로 명확성을 제공합니다.
A new page sometimes brings clarity
My Tech Blog 