https://www.dictionary.com/browse/laughter
noun
the action or sound of laughing.
an inner quality, mood, disposition, etc., suggestive of laughter; mirthfulness:a man of laughter and goodwill.
an expression or appearance of merriment or amusement.
Archaic. an object of laughter; subject or matter for amusement.
Go ahead and laugh, “it will mean you are well adjusted deary”
Don’t judge
당신의 삶과 결혼 생활을 망칠 수 있는 복잡한 주제
Complex topic that can wreck your life and your marriage
A = the group we will encourage their marriage
B = the group that we will support less
잘못된 사람들에게 이 사실은 잘못된 사람들에게 정말 나쁜 분노를 일으킬 수 있습니다. 아버지, 그리스도의 이름으로 이것을 듣는 사람들을 보호해 주십시오.
Course truth of this to wrong people could cause really bad outbursts in wrong people, Father please protect people that hear this in Christ’s name I ask this
Another post from the same day, which one did you read?
Base Salary
Test Group A gets 2x Base Salary
Test Group B gets 0.5x Base Salary
What the current administration was going for with SSI?
GDP에 대한 결과 기반 테스트? 실험군에 포함되지 않은 기니피그? 그런 일을 하는 회사와 정부에 대한 법적 우선 순위는 무엇입니까?
Results based testing for GDP? Guinea pig without being informed part of test group? Legal precedence for companies and governments that do things like that?
좋은 라벨 범죄 기록 없음 테스트 그룹 A
불량 레이블 편성 범죄 기록 테스트 그룹 B
Good labels no criminal records test Group A
Bad labels orchestrated criminal records test Group B
A + B = C Drama, less boring for public?
기본적으로 부의 부적절한 분배는 나쁘게 보이고, 정말 나쁘게 보이고 지지와 안정성을 증가시키지 않는다는 것을 말하고 있습니다.
Basically I am saying inadequate distribution of wealth looks bad, looks really bad and does not lead to increase support and stability
Marriage plus negate support and negate resources sucks
It is also unwise to think we all experience situations the same ways or that we get a perfectly consistent support network across all users.
Not consistent support is not nearly the same thing as set to $0 and having your systems support turned off. Respirator that could use an update vs no respirator at all.
Respirator vs No Respirator not always the reason or incentive for A B Testing
Sometimes more subtle
Test Group A = Red Cover, Test Group B = Blue Cover, which one sales more? Now we set the cover to Test Group B if Blue Test Group A if Red -> insight into sales -> leads to choice in design and future sales
불안정한 시스템, 더 긴 강의가 더 낫습니까, 더 많은 격려가 있습니까?
Insecure systems, more long lectures better or more encouragement?
A B 절벽에서 바로 테스트? 시스템에 의해 최면에 걸리는 것이 모두 좋은 것은 아닐 수도 있습니다.
A B Tested right off a cliff? Maybe being hypnotized by the system isn’t all good
나를 지원하는 시스템 Systems that under support me
간단한 메시지, 다음 A simple message, Next
즐거움과 즐거움, 내 비용으로!? 이것은 서지 않을 것입니다!
Merriment and Amusement, at my expense!? This will not stand!

Time Goblin with Ginger Hair holding Hour Glass the size of his torso, Free Starter Image