Free Starter Diagram (warning Christian value references – might be pertinent to international regulation)
For people who want to make peace, I would be glad to talk
Diagram might be slightly confusing – meant it to say lies, sin, greed, and miscommunication don’t A truth
Learning contributes to less lies, sin, greed, and miscommunication
Price of grudges, unforgiveness, and silence is not always known upfront. From my experience communication, hope for the future, learning, peace, and win wins are some of what is to lose.
Warning Christian value references – might be pertinent to international regulation
People don’t build bridges for only one ethnicity to cross. Systemic Design and Engineering that protects all parties justly not some parties matters and gets less than ideally turned up.
Jobs available and funds available factor into who gets to live next to the bridge, who gets to use the bridge, and who profits from the bridge. Desire to deliver in ideal ways has potential to not always deliver in ideal ways. There are many products outside of bridges that don’t work ideally for all parties, are turned up in ways that might profit some over others.
Governments and Cities have to sell themselves on being more diverse, on being fair and just by all people. Yet to get to a place that is more inclusive and diverse sold as will deliver might not be all truth. There is potential for painting a rosey view of reality, there is potential for being surrounded by a rosey view of reality without actually seeing all the places where there are problems.
We teach Algebra and Calculus in High Schools. One might argue if we are teaching Algebra and Calculus two fields that factor into Engineering, we should be teaching a class on Diversity and Engineering. USA is a diverse country, delivering in more ideal ways on Diversity facilitates less problems and less thorns in the side for future generations.
Real statistics around Diversity might not always be turned up due to a rosey view, or due to protection – any group of people thinking they are not being treated justly likely has potential to spur problems.
There is also a problem with truth around diversity and treating someone right. If someone of another ethnicity is doing something I might not agree with, they are their own man and as I want to make peace I might not rebuke them strongly, in the right way, or at all. Less rebukes might lead to mistakes in hard times. Access and oxygen in the room to have real conversation does not always exist.
These disparities factor into a justice system and a resource system that has potential to do better by some parties over other parties. Problems with altercations between different ethnicities are hard, not easy to deal with, easy to not think one has the right words to address in ideal ways. Can’t deliver in ideal ways matters – Bible says Be Perfect + James 4:17 knowing and not doing is sin – can’t deliver in ideal ways gets set to sin, to non-delivery.
I am a fan of Christianity and The Church, I also am a fan of others being able to profit from their work per the Golden Rule (treat others as you wish to be treated)
Free Starter Diagram (warning Christian value references – might be pertinent to international regulation)
Christians might be persecuted and in jail in certain parts of the world, turning up Golden Rule reminders might facilitate less persecution and oppression, people making diamonds, gold, and profit off of God’s work while others are persecuted in jail might give feeling of injustice at times, ifs a Christian writing can be set to we don’t have to pay you might not A support for self and family – it’s God’s might feel less than ideal if it means you don’t eat.
Government that legalizes gay marriage and provides 10 commandments? Potential for inconsistency in combination, I don’t want to judge homosexuality and I don’t think 10 commandments added is all value out (I believe in Don’t Judge + James 4:17 not to be confused with I am gay).
Less murder good, less non ideal judgment based upon less-than-ideal comprehension good
Separation of Church and State just in for show? Scarlet Letter society might not be all pretty. Our society having freedom of religion factors into tolerance and moderation. If our Church’s owned the government it might be different than when The Church owned countries in Europe – though I am not sure how long the difference would stay intact if we dropped requirement for Separation of Church and State. Assessment and Judgment lines blurred with a free pass?
Easy to think about things later. If man builds a road under oppression, the road becomes relied upon, then it becomes useful unable to easily be unbuilt. Thus finding ways to build without oppression in the first place is value added. Pyramids, Roman Coloseum, Roman roads – all useful, all built under oppression, all can’t be easily unbuilt.
Historic examples might be safer to discuss yet we have potential to invest in similar today in governments and corporations. Potential for products built under oppression that can’t be easily serviced and maintained later due to oppression acknowledge reducing product lines, accessibility to expertise. Created reliance and being unable to maintain due to changing circumstances might question if reliance built upon in first place was the correct choice. Easy to not see what is going on in governments or corporations, thus reliance based upon less than ideal comprehension, comprehension that might change at a later date becomes common.
If someone builds a bridge, writes a book, creates a document – the original creation might not be ideal value added yet might still add allot of value to the World. Reliance becomes part of the equation, if a problem is found one can’t easily remove bridges, books, or documents – changes and updates becomes more difficult. A document a certain way has examples, if the document changes thoughts, ideas, trust around source of data all has potential to change. Computer Systems and Videos, Documents on the internet might be relied upon like they are hard copies, have no potential for changes, additions, and subtractions.
Available in one way one day relied upon on future days getting the same exact document then potential for equating all future forms of the document will stay the same – yet governments, organizations, funding around servers all has potential to change with or without notice. Reliance that is untrustworthy has potential to become relied upon less, relied upon less has potential to profit some parties over others.
Software designers and writers have potential to create documents without always considering the reliance that is turned up. Someone to maintain software or someone to explain deal with complexities around documents is time consuming. One has potential to turn up future time costs for oneself or others without trying to. If life, governments, organizations all start operating in a different way it might change access to support without changing reliance upon contributions. Oppression does not equal one has potential to immediately pull products, books, or documents off the shelf until treated fairly and injustice stops.
A problem in one place might not equate to not support in another place – thus less problems in first place matters.
Videos might be slightly more adult than some people might like – does reinforce the need for Privacy, that privacy abused might be leverage in non-ideal ways against the democratic process (not a thought people always have)
Watched Ted-ed on Ethics of Privacy(one that is a bit more adult), and another on Ethics around Lying (available on YouTube)
Thoughts of combining with Research Ethics video into a blog post
Thoughts of Privacy concerns around mass populations might make lying useful, might also lead to questionable choices while Researching things like Medicine
Databases with large population sets, medical data easily accessible, location and GPS data all important topics that are likely to ideal and less than ideal (be problematic in some way) to a certain extent – not really what people always think about getting a driver license, buying a phone, or going to the doctor, might not always be factored in ideally when trying to make the next new product or wonder drug.
Reminder not affiliated with people on videos, trying to add value. This is the bit more adult one.
More adult might be called into a question when discussing ethics of lying
We sometimes turn down truth without considering implications
Thoughts of a Defying Gravity (TV Series) episode where the people trying out for a space program are required to administer shocks to each other. Able to find it other day on YouTube
Around 11:00 time code on the show – I don’t own the rights to the show, available so providing, would provide just the clip
Thoughts of hazing around college fraternities, sororities, organizations, and military (movie Jarhead comes to mind) – if it A required for strength, perceived as manly not always value added
There are people all over the globe trying to stop WW3. Trying to stop WW3 does not equate to them wanting me to experience injustice. Trying to stop WW3 likely does not deliver ideal time to fight and prevent injustice. Peace has a cost, making peace has a cost, injustice has a cost. Set to cost free might give feeling of a given, just in by design, does not require work and effort. More injustice facilitates less peace.
Claim there is no problem might lead to problem unseen – might facilitate more injustice. Don’t worry about protecting yourself, let others fight your battles might be more sufficient in less dynamic times.
Christian Bible quote “if you insist on saving your own life you will lose it but if you lose it for my sake you will find it” – might lead to people self incriminating by their words (they speak out of no worry for themselves, those judging them might not always ideally factor in the difference – if they did lawyers likely would have no desire to turn up defendants speaking less).
Defending myself less and being more generous has not lead to my finances not wrecked (more than once) – telling others the truth (I could choose just not to say it, let others experience the same, saying is not ideal protection for me). I don’t want to if owe on my generosity – Bible says give and you shall receive overflowing (seems more like a curse at times, do right get punished – everything you do wrong returned to you and then some). Bible talks about blessed are people when they are persecuted gives feeling of trying to turn up and amplify persecution at times. Sufficient contrast required for comprehension might lead to people being put on the street before their problems are fixed, vs making peace swiftly – has to be life or death for compassion might lead to life and death situations is not all pretty, not all Golden Rule in my opinion. Be Perfect + Golden Rule + James 4:17 – people aren’t to be judge of each other, are required to assess if it is sin or not sin.
High Contrast, Epic push is desirable at times, interesting – should not be equated to it is good, good in all situations. More interesting to others part of the Golden Rule might lead to injustice and persecution that is less than desirable? Christ has tea and they talked through their problems making peace – or Christ was crucified, martyred? Price already paid matters, beats all Christians with their hands nailed to the pews. Throw stones let is throw stones get? It is a you problem to “Without sin throw the first stone” does not amplify by itself. Claim of real forgiveness not delivered likely to lead to less Christians. Don’t return evil for evil and Golden Rule.
Truly comprehend the problem in speaking less, silence, less words turned up as valuable in a system with failing infrastructure, that doesn’t put high voltage signs on all cut wires? Justice system might equate to less of a flashlight, less of a flashlight in hard times matters. Potential for thinking one gets the opposite of what they invest in, my guess is Christ might argue that point as well. Don’t invest in infrastructure leads to ideal high voltage signs? Electrician and Engineers as Christians that aren’t Christ, to doesn’t matter how they are treated?
Imagine all the software engineers get put in Jail. Then people without software degrees are required to change the VLC (Villain Level Contrast) records in the database to get them free.
select * from what table? * – kind of looks like asterisks in contracts and the fine print, you sure that is right?
Support for the world to insufficient justice? The story never amps (amplifies)? Can’t say we ideal support for older generation (people that write software like myself) – likely equals less comprehension for the younger generation. Wreck my support leads to others supported less not due to desire to return evil for evil but because of insufficient capacity? Min may min, does not equate to desire to min, does not equate to min is consequence free.
Warning Christian value references – might be pertinent to international regulation
Exodus 20:16 KJV “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.”
Reminder I am not a lawyer, I do want people to see better days
Being an artist I know it is easier to turn up than one would think
Rattlesnake
Blood, suit, devil horns, and rattlesnake tail painted on
CFB – Cute Funny Beautiful factors into profit of which images are seen, people with back against wall might not always deliver truth in a way that ideally factors in profit of others, less accused equates to less potential for false witness likely not always pondered – society invests in partial truth on the common, not think it will be factored into testimonies without actually being factored into testimonies?
Easy to think people that aren’t lawyers or judges don’t factor into guilty or innocent verdicts. Like talents like art have no potential to add value, change the tide. I have a stake in that does not always equal feeling of I have ability to change that. I use the word stake like equity, share in the profits – not sure I see it in list of definitions.
Adding value from less-than-ideal comprehension of truth is likely to lead to ideal delivery of Exodus 20:16? I know there is injustice in the world injustice in the system, my particular examples might not ideally fit to other people’s situations. Does that equal I shouldn’t discuss my particular examples? Who’s it profit, me or others? Both and none of the above?
Would I paint a painting to help make peace? Likely, not sure I would always know what painting to paint. Inspiring artists has value.
Me against CFB in a heavy weight match? Not sure I can win that fight.
WordPress is going pretty slow today, hard to fully appreciate speed of a tech system factors into truth, words, and art provided on any given day. Too hard to search for it, chalk it up to a loss write this sentence instead. Price of one missing image from a document on comprehension? Slower network has potential to alter history.
Relevant data from Halloween always provided at a later date?
Guillotine on left side to not reinforce Right. Blood on the guillotine to not reinforce Right. Right referring to death penalty as useful, not right referring to Republicans. Drew the image around Halloween, with everything else going on refrained from providing. Candle represents a life (like Amber Light, painted an image with a candle in front of a tidal wave in past (like little girl running from bombs in Vietnam). Probably not all value added for people trying to blow out candles or put out cigarettes – helps stops a fire, associated with death not all ideal. Thoughts of Pontius Pilate and leaders being a dead man being in charge of executions (leveraged not always ideal value out).
Can’t claim I A value out, my hope is this diagram will be value added not subtracted for people
Painted the picture on a different day than diagram I think, around Halloween, trying to be festive in the right way not always simple. Some movie references in the image (that I don’t own the rights to).
Used Carry when meant Carrie Carrie (1976 film) – Wikipedia – of note don’t think I have actually seen the film, high school and practical jokes gone bad thought from image
I sometimes use the word out to refer to output like in engineering, sometimes use the word out to refer to not a part of – might alter logic and comprehension dependent upon interpretation in a particular context.
Not ideal value out – you know like – not ideal value sent, output
Could be interpreted as – Not ideal value out – you know like – there needs to be less value added
One might be represented as we need to add less value, when intended as trying to add value but the value might need to be altered in ways to add more value. Both matter in context likely have potential to convolute meaning without trying to. Profession specific vocabulary likely amplifies as second nature, without trying to – hard to fully value the impact. Need to set right without full comprehension of context is possible.
I might say someone’s words are not ideal value out – might equate to I want them to add more value and might not equate to I want them speaking less. Easy to ideal comprehension on possible perceptions of discouragement – not adding enough value I should just be silent when that is not always what people are going for. Thinking better of others not always easy, desire to think my comprehension is sufficient for assessment factors into and facilitates engineering which might less than ideal more situations than previously thought.
I like songs, I listen to songs, I also realize the words of a song might be not ideal value out, might be less than ideal value added in certain contexts. “People aren’t always encouraging…”, “well you did say their words are not ideal value out…”
I don’t own the rights to the song, I do support telling others Never Say Die
It is not all give up, the future is hopeless. I don’t want people to give up or think the future is hopeless. Give up, the future is hopeless is not ideal value in, not ideal value out. Thus, Never Say Die, the future has hope, don’t give up seems apt.
In sometimes referred to as input – thus input and output has potential to be convoluted – both are a value to destination. Not ideal value out might refer to reduced throughput (like in a working sense), discouragement does not ideal value out (output, provided, delivered, sent). Give up the future is hopeless would not be ideal value in (input, heard, listened to, seen) for anyone – discouragement that leads to apathy is not ideal for people to hear.
Thinking better of others leads to thinking others will ideally comprehend what I say, yet I don’t always ideal value out even in a way I could likely comprehend out of context, read later. Not all people have experience in engineering gets equated to all people have same, greater comprehension and level of knowledge than I have – combination might not ideal value out. Reminder I am not any of the people on these videos – words under a picture might be comprehended as words of person on the video. Obvious to writer might not equate to obvious to reader. Obvious to writer might not equate to ideal comprehension which might lead to not ideal value out (sent, spoken, provided as right) by others. Thought of summary of paragraph is Diff A know.
What do I mean by diff A know? The person writing the document has A know about intent and context of document (theoretically, ideal is based upon input of others might not be all A). Diff abbreviation for Difference, like in engineering comparing one document to each other might sometimes be referred to as a Diff. Makes me think of shortened abbreviation DAK, might be wrongly interpreted as District Attorney K which sounds less than ideal being from the south in United States. Makes me think of Music Group KDA. Reminder I am not associated with the people on the video.
Makes me think of South Korea, tech giant Samsung always providing more and more amazing. Don’t want to associate them with a District Attorney K, easy to miscomprehend without trying to.
I am not trying to make others look psycho, looking psycho might facilitate sells?
Reminder not on the videos, don’t own the rights to, not associated with – trying to add value for others.
Beautiful voices intoxicating
I like the songs – desire to turn up defense law to help fight injustice not always as encouraging as one might like.
Reminder not on the video, don’t own the rights to, not associated with – trying to add value for others.
Not an all bad intro, reminder
Reminder not on the video, don’t own the rights to, not associated with – trying to add value for others.
I don’t have a dial or dashboard to know about how much injustice is in the world, still going on in society. I know Villain Level Contrast is real and I also like movies (probably wouldn’t like them with no Villains). Fighting against being set to a villain is real and requirement to protect oneself and others is not always as encouraging or simple as one would like.
I like movies, names of villains might profit some parties over others. Not sure it is possible to really ideal, my name set to a villain beats other’s names set to a villain. He is trying to get a date? His name is Fred, or Jason? Like Freddy Cougar? Like Friday the 13th Jason? My name is Jason – first impressions might not always lead to time to ideal comprehension, PR (Public Relations)
Reminder not on the following videos, don’t own the rights to, not associated with – like the videos and trying to add value for others.
Sales does not ideal truth, max profit does not ideal truth, ideal truth is not cost-effective factors into truth as less liquid (referring to liquidity as economic term, reminder I am not an economist or lawyer, trying to add value). Reminder this is thoughts and commentary not words from the video. Truth as an asset, an asset that is frozen is less useful.
Trials are interesting. No Trial in the papers, or Rudy Giuliani in the papers? Which one sells more? Which one is higher value, and for who? For example is less than ideal value added is hard to fully comprehend. I don’t know specifics of those trials and I also like interesting reads and papers. The combination might be seen as A’s value out, I don’t think the combination A’s value out for all parties in combination.
I like movies, including scary movies, I used Jason Friday the 13th for example because my name is tied to it – combination might not be ideal relevance raised for people name Fred or people named Jack (like Jack the Ripper). Being from the south and Caucasian, seeing racial injustice, makes me feel the need to turn up Defense Law, I would say it is an offset, would not claim it is an ideal offset, does not ideal value out does not equal not worth doing.
My Tech Blog 