My Tech Blog

Warning: Christianity Thoughts that might be important to international regulation. Thoughts from someone that is a Christian and who is not a preacher, priest, or minister.

Thoughts on February 13^th, 2025

Calling out other’s sins

It is not an entirely Christian thing to do. God calls us to not judge and not condemn, to love your enemy. Yet many times one calls out others sins because it has potential to maximize profit, give high ground, make others feel less, make the one calling out the sins feel greater, worthy and justified for being on the high horse.

It obfuscates. If we highlight the problems of one man or woman, and put them on brutal display for all to see, it diverts attention to their sins, away from or own. It diverts attention in a way that makes us less required to reflect and examine, whether personally or collectively what evil we are turning up, including that which might have lead to that man or woman’s sins on display.

People are not required to be Christian. Important concepts like forgiveness, grace, love your neighbor, Golden Rule, 10 Commandments as valuable, less evil and sin as valuable. All concepts that are not required to be believed in, not required to be invested in. Yet a society that does not believe in those concepts, does not desire to inspire those concepts is consequential. Does having your sins called out, called out in a public way that leaves you brutalized inspire Christianity as valuable and less feelings of hypocrisy, inconsistency, and injustice?

Will society factor in all less than ideal truth, less than ideal comprehension, less than ideal investment in teaching others, less than ideal prevention of Villain Level Contrast (VLC) that has all been established and delivered less than ideally when determining, examining, assessing, and judging the sins of others?

Is having your sins called out sin free, or not sin free? Does it tempt judgment? Yes or No? Does it feel like Golden Rule done in a public way, a way that max profits for some, reinforcing high horses that weren’t established ideally in the first place? Yes or No?

Is someone that has had their sins called out in a public way, more or less likely to do it to others in the future? Inspiring less than ideal is consequence free or is a consequential investment in society with potential for less than ideal outcomes?

If calling out others sins will be less than ideal, will inspire less than ideal, will be less than ideally invested in (claim anyone takes time and effort required to fully comprehend, that it is wise to fully comprehend?) claim it will ideal truth and comprehension? Some people will choose to comment and assess sin as they see it less than ideally, and others will stay quiet might lead to truth and sin both never corrected or changed in ideal ways. Thus further assessment based on less than ideal truth might be unwise, thus not invested in.

Preachers, Priests, and Ministers might comment on sins in a collective way, a non personalized way. The combination might lead to feeling of someone else’s problem, their words are not really meant for me. People have potential to realize sin, yet be unable to see it in themselves, yet when they call it out against others it might open themselves to attacks from self or others.

Calling out sins of others is no tempt to judge and assess self, own sins, how one’s own actions might be influencing and inspiring evil – and that assessment and judgment might be from less than ideal comprehension, less than ideal desire to invest in real comprehension required to effectively assess or judge? We don’t always assess ourselves as insufficient capacity to judge and assess ourselves clearly. Easy to look in the mirror and say you did that wrong, yet you don’t have all the data required to make that assessment. You will know all typos in documents you didn’t read that will factor into how events play out?

Desire to be perfect might lead to desire to call out sin. If you are in a group of people and you feel like there is sin that is hurting the group, it might be seen as a stain you wish to wash out. The Bible says Be Perfect and James 4:17 knowing and not doing is sin, yet we have potential to easily forget don’t judge, don’t condemn, judgment and assessment is made from less than ideal comprehension. People that are not required to invest in ideal comprehension of evidence will deliver assessment and judgment ideally? Investment in comprehension of evidence takes time, and truthfully is not always wise, is not all temptations out.

Conditional judgment and assessment of someone is common place in our society. Desire to protect, and desire to act swiftly to protect has potential to lead to conditionals like If they call out sinA we call out sinB, if they call out sinB we call out sinA, and if we are collectively assessed to be more in the wrong, we bring in sinC, sinD, and sinE. It is more protection or less protection to dilute what sin and evil is responsible? Claim the combination will ideal comprehension – for your friends whether they are on the hot seat, or the ones that might be about to pick up stones (judge and assess less than ideally)?

Christ might not be there to stop the people with stones in 2025, to tell them “Without sin cast the first stone”. Christ’s followers might not be there. If Christ’s followers are there, will they really be ready to speak up, or will they join the band wagon appeal and be partial investors in picking up stones? Silence while others are condemning, partial investment in judgment and condemnation or not? Compliance might be required does not equate to compliance is always desirable. “Without sin cast the first stone”, Love your enemy, Love your neighbor, Golden Rule – as not required to be turned up? When your friend, family, coworker, or fellow citizen is on the hot seat, will you have been happy with the level it has been turned up and reinforced in society? Let alone if it is yourself?

Engineer that can’t call out flaws in the design? Perfection not met as let?

Corinthians 6:9-11 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God.

Paul a Christian, judging or not judging? Not to be the judge of that? Judging without right to judge? Or think better of Paul, speaking to Christians, no condemnation under Christ, not trying to actually judge others worthy or not worthy of heaven? “And such were some of you”, ideal Golden Rule call out other’s sins, while not reminding of your own? “And such were some of we” – less high horse or not less high horse, high horse ideally established throughout history?

10-ed the row might have in-ed ow. No historic precedent for Christ doing that?

The Bible – a book that demands perfection, that does not feel like all perfection out, and does not always feel like ideal perfection in

Might be more perfect or less perfect, I realize my interpretation and comprehension on what is and is not perfection is less than perfect, in part due to its teachings. Less desire to judge based upon less-than-ideal comprehension – there is safety and protection in that for self, friends, family, coworkers, fellow citizens, and even enemies – approximates or does not approximate (if not delivers) perfection?

Claim to know what perfection is and is not in a dynamic world that changes by the day on technology? Claiming to know what perfection is, is ideal humility? Less than ideal humility, perfection or not perfection?

On a side note, humility is synonymous with unassertiveness.

60 Synonyms & Antonyms for UNASSERTIVENESS | Thesaurus.com

Humility and meekness, valuable qualities that have potential to be set to less desirable, less useful by society. Synonyms might be viewed as words are replaceable without implications, yet some words that mean the same thing have positive and negative representations. Unassertive not always valued by companies and corporations, companies and corporations ideally turn up humble?

Warning: Thoughts on Christianity from someone that is not a priest, preacher, or minister, might be important to international regulation

The Bible talks about generosity is rewarded.

Problem is our society has potential to row legalism on top of it.

You give to the poor, but they use it for alcohol and drugs – to you have given society more problems so you get more problems from society?

Yet people are told by The Bible generosity is rewarded, and judging, making judgment about others like if they would use for the wrong things or not is not wisdom – don’t judge, be generous.

Another person is given no money, and after repeated days in the harsh elements suffers brain damage.

A fee, can’t win, feels like garbage.

Christ of A fee, can’t win, breaks trust.

Work together, forgive each other

Or Pin owe – you are never going to forget it

Pin owe, not really the most generous, not to be confused with give won’t lead to get – though if people really believe in Christ, forgiveness and generosity – give might not lead to get

Someone raises a lawsuit against you, teach them the wrong in bringing a lawsuit by bringing a lawsuit against them? Teaching them suing is painful and hurtful, or teaching them that is the correct response to being wronged – eye for an eye? Pay a USA tax dollar, how much of that does that turn up on the common? It is not actual eyes, so it doesn’t really matter how much they hurt each other?

Expect different when we continue in the same direction?

Luke 6:38 “Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.”

Give to the poor to fast food, to turned up obesity? I don’t like that interpretation of Luke 6:38. Give to the poor leads to more sufficient nutrition and less brain damage? Excessive judgment and continuously if-ed ground, more or less value added for generosity as useful?

They used the money to buy a Taxi? to less than ideal global warming out? A fee is hurtful. “kick them when they are up, kick them when they are down” – kind of the feeling I get from this world. Got to meet perfection or no generosity, money for you? Combination isn’t pretty.

If someone gives to you on the street – do you want them A fee-d for helping or do you want them blessed, protected, to have their cup overflowing for giving to you in a tough time? Will God actually bless and do right by them? I don’t really want to tell others to believe in Luke 6:38 if it is bunk. People that give to me actually being robbed by religion that isn’t real? But don’t give up Christ and not me is on the throne.

Warning: Thoughts on Christianity from someone that is not a priest, preacher, or minister, might be important to international regulation

What has been done to my life – pretty fucked up. If I was a soldier and died for USA values, and what has been done to my life was set to USA values, I would likely feel robbed.

People that die for Freedom of Speech, Capitalism, and The American Dream might not like seeing it is denied to others on the common?

The combination makes me feel hopeful for the young in our country, for future generations? Wasn’t solved when I was young, isn’t solved now? Progress really likely that will be sufficient for them?

Never Say Die, encouraging those that support, that actually might lead to real change and support would be easier to say if what has been done to me stopped today, immediately.

When the young see the problems, and likely they will one day. Will our country hear them, make valuable change, or set them to crazy and feed them drugs that cause brain damage if their confidence to the point they can no longer sufficiently challenge a broken system?

I am not sure what it takes for Christ to hear wrongs, deliver on fixed. 10 we don’t A fee it, and 10 we keep seeing F met. People don’t always likely appreciate the problem that The Death Penalty might prevent actually A feeing real problems. I want A fee, maximum fee to be if-ed on hurting someone (Death Penalty or other extreme penalties) in a system that is less than ideal justice? No. I want A fee to lead to real systemic change that breaks the bonds of evil and injustice that are perpetuated as status quo? Yes. Christ says mercy for the merciful, yet for the level of mercy I have given, I feel cheated, robbed, and I am likely not the only one.

Promote others to die for a cause that isn’t a real cause? Freedom of Speech or No Freedom of Speech? 0 deaths on world stage or more than zero deaths? Capitalism or No Free Market? 0 deaths on the world stage or more than zero deaths? The American Dream or Give Up on Life? 0 deaths on the world stage or more than zero deaths? Yet denied to me like they are children’s toys.

Warning: Thoughts on Christianity from someone that is not a priest, preacher, or minister, might be important to international regulation

Can’t say I understand my YouTube feed – gives feeling of sideways tests at time

We have partial trade with China, yet seems like our government has concerns with being invested or learning about China at times. Ukraine War with Russia equates to China and Russia and China and USA is hard for me, someone who gets messed with on a cybersecurity level difficult to understand.

Less invest won’t equate to more know about what is in and out of the country with trade. Less know not all good. I don’t want to look if-ed on national loyalty, also don’t want to look like a fascist, like we aren’t partially in trade with
China. Feeling if-ed doesn’t feel all good. God says love your enemy, I don’t consider China an enemy, that does not equal we shouldn’t love them, do right by them.

Government and world events that leave trade partially if-ed not really all ideal for establishing better trade and relationships. If I started a business that operated with China 5 years ago then had world events turn out the way they have I would probably be pretty upset right now (theoretical – I did not start a business with China thus my situation might be better than some). Superpowers should be working together to save the World and cure cancer, put men and women on Mars, keep people safe and off the streets, inspired and hopeful.

Swift peace with Ukraine and Russia would be huge.

If you insist on saving your own life you will lose it vs don’t tempt?
Not looking at anything Chinese might save my life. Looking at anything Chinese might tempt. Looking at less Chinese products until Ukraine and Russia War is over might tempt less. Yet we have Asian Americans in our country that need to be protected and done right by as well.

Less interaction not always better inclusion. Wars and hard times we pull together, or put up walls, in a diverse nation we need to find a way to build bridges and less walls between each other. Operating on fear unwise. Having no comprehension how things might be mistaken might not be ideal Golden Rule either. All while trying to reduce oppression and injustice against Taiwan. Difficult to know how to think on the matter – I don’t feel like I get clear direction, might be looking in the wrong places or prevented due to cybersecurity from knowing more.

Kind of like Japan, way past WW2, still feel a bit if-ed on interactions with Japanese people. I don’t want to tempt or piss Israel off – they have enough on their plate right now. Treating Japanese people right shouldn’t be an insult to Israel in 2025.
Golden Rule, waste someone from Japan’s time if it might tempt in non-ideal ways?
Maybe I make things too big of a deal, there is potential, far past WW2, less interaction might lead to less interaction, less interaction not really ideal for preventing less problems (shutdown in communication does not inspire ideal trust).

F in might see min, min might see owe under a loving and just God