에너지 다이어그램, 무료 시작 콘텐츠 Energy Diagram, Free Starter Content
Energy?
Nobody likes not having enough energy to get through the day. Therefore I thought I would create a diagram on causes and effects. Seeing that I like multi use systems and the blind might appreciate a read through from the diagram creator, I decided to make a WordPress blog walk through of it, which I will then read for a video on YouTube.
Some potential causes for lack of energy. Some might be a little obvious, please bare with me.
Not enough sleep can cause lack of energy. Running at too high of capacity for too long can leave us feeling burned out and leave us under prepared with energy and resources for the next day.
The lack of support created by being run down can make us think sleep it off, it will be better in the morning. This can be taken too far and not fuel some wanted positive changes at times.
Sickness and Disability can make make the resistance higher to functioning during the day and can cause us to feel more tired as well. Not enough real support in can be a significant problems for energy and wasted time for both you and me.
Oppression and oppressive systems, corporate warfare, equals anti GDP – Gross Domestic Product and makes it harder to breathe increasing anxiety.
On the other hand, there are things that increase energy.
Reminders in the right levels and the right ways can increase energy. How you ask? A reminder to work out today, might make our support and general health better a week from now.
Non boring inspiring media can help spark our interest and raise our spirits, encouragement and fuel by amazing ideas go a long way.
Work out videos, Yoga, Weightlifting, Kickboxing provides someone to listen to, generally someone that has already achieved the goals we are trying to achieve. Can help us pick up on safety tips and problems that could keep us out of the gym due to injuries that rob us of both time, energy, and future support.
Powerful inspirational music, the right rock song to work out with? Fuel for the fire to get through those reps, also wise to be careful given we can miss things in the gym at times
Food, sugar, carbohydrates, and fats. In the right levels and right amounts. Starving ourselves, starving our bodies when our energy production and mental capacity relies upon that energy production system is unwise. Healthy eating not always simple, can help in right levels and right amounts. Ideally the basic building blocks are useful, some medical cases where they can be less useful such as diabetes. There are complications and levels do matter.
Hormones, if our hormones are unbalanced, if our thyroid is not working correctly, it can dramatically change our energy levels, thought processes, and decision making capacity. Health is an important part of the equation in decision making, and it is not a guarantee, and is not always guaranteed to work at full capacity specially given limited resources and support systems that compound on lack of energy and wasted time.
Stimulants, a good cup of coffee or a piece of nicotine gum can go a long way. Not all products right for all people, some people might have heart attacks. No guarantees, ideally we increase energy optimal amount over our life span. Life span is not guaranteed, thus perfect optimization outside of God’s plan seems a bit unwise to believe we can achieve.
Feeling validated is vital to encouragement. Encouragement can seriously improve our support lines, working support lines fuel each other to greatness and conversely backbiting support lines cause problems for us all through lost time, energy and resources.
A few kind words of encouragement today? Would that mean to the world? Getting to Respected and Free? Hard to get there without validation, feeling depressed like the system hates us doesn’t really make us feel free, respected, or increase love for that system and others. Better to see Imperfections as opportunities. A good case for more Love and Grace into the system. Nice to remember other’s aren’t perfect and neither am I.
Getting people to feeling free, respected, and validated requires Gratitude. Gratitude shows people that their Contributions matter and are appreciated!
Oxygen and being able to breathe is also important to energy production. This can be thought of metaphorically and literally. Who wants to feel like they don’t have the freedom to move about freely, like they have to walk on egg shells when they are imperfect and trying to make positive strides towards a better future.
Last thing to remember hydration matters to proper functioning of our bodies. A lot of our body is water. God also said that those that give a cold glass of water to a little one will in no way lose their reward. Wise to remember the big man upstairs is fighting our battles and worrying too much a bit unwise.
Looks good, not always good for me (jealousy++ control–), people like judging – part of the problem, people in charge of solving problems feel underutilized with no problems
Proper Use
Not Safe
using things in correct way do not always equal safe for me or others, proper use of a handgun by my enemy non ideal
사용
안전
심판
오용
안전한
안전한 오용, 잠재적인 문제
오용
안전하지 않음
오용되고 안전하지 않고 무모한
적절한 사용
안전한
잘생김, 항상 좋지는 않음(질투 조절–), 사람들은 판단하기를 좋아함 – 문제의 일부, 문제 해결을 담당하는 사람들은 문제 없이 활용도가 낮음
적절한 사용
안전하지 않음
올바른 방법으로 물건을 사용하는 것이 항상 나와 다른 사람에게 안전한 것은 아닙니다. 적의 권총을 적절하게 사용하는 것은 이상적이지 않습니다.
무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image
“기쁨, 성공, 평화 및 조화를 지원하는 요소” – Jason Lee Davis
“Support factors into Joy, Success, Peace and Harmony” – Jason Lee Davis
내가 왜 그걸 썼지? 지지받는 느낌을 좋아하지 않는 사람은 누구입니까? 나는 단지 오늘 먹을 돈이 충분하지 않거나 거기 가게에 가고 싶었습니까?
Why did I write that? Who doesn’t like to feel supported? I just wanted to not have enough money to eat or go to there store today?
남에게 도움이 되지 않는 성공, 아무도 이야기하지 않고 혼자 있게 하는 성공, 과연 성공일까?
Success that doesn’t help anyone else, success that leaves us alone with nobody to talk to, really success?
지원이 없거나 청구서를 지불할 수 없는 것이 스트레스와 불안을 증가시키거나 스트레스와 불안을 줄이는가? 나를 걱정해주는 사람들, 내가 원하는 대우를 받기를 바라는 사람들은 스트레스와 불안을 증가시키고 싶어하거나 체계적인 지원 감소를 통해 스트레스 불안을 줄이기를 원하는가?
No support, not being able to pay bills, does that increase stress and anxiety or reduce stress and anxiety? Do people that care about me, that wish me to be treated the way I wish to be treated want to increase stress and anxiety or reduce stress anxiety by systematic support reduction?
따라서 지원을 제거하면 조화가 추가되거나 조화가 감소합니까?
Thus does removing support add to harmony or reduce harmony?
지원이 지원인지 또는 지원이 상황에 대한 화재인지에 따라 다릅니다.
Depends on if the support is support or if the support is fire to the situation
a consistent, orderly, or pleasing arrangement of parts; congruity.
Music.
any simultaneous combination of tones.
the simultaneous combination of tones, especially when blended into chords pleasing to the ear; chordal structure, as distinguished from melody and rhythm.
the science of the structure, relations, and practical combination of chords.
an arrangement of the contents of the Gospels, either of all four or of the first three, designed to show their parallelism, mutual relations, and differences.
Deal with problems angry? Anger leads to reacting vs responding. Cool heads and a walk go a long way. Long term unforgiveness and judgement go a long way.
선택과 결정을 통해 서로를 지지하는 조화로운 사회
Harmonious Society, one that supports each other through their choices in arrangements and decisions
장기적인 오판을 방지하면서 “지원”에서 화재를 방지하는 방법?
How to prevent fire in “support” while preventing long term misjudgment?
Examples?
Prevent War while preventing long term reduced love for the proximity of the problem?
중국과 대만은 서로의 뜻을 같이 하고, 억지로 함께 대화를 강요하는 어리석은 대화, 말하자면 불꽃놀이를 벽난로 옆에 두지 않고 장기적 화해를 도모하는 방법
China and Taiwan step on each others toes in agreement, forcing them together to have a conversation unwise, how do we promote long term reconciliation without putting the fireworks next to the fireplace so to speak
The instance becomes a notch, a reminder, something we can use to prove our future points and give for reasons into our paths and decision making
Getting Taiwan to not be support out for China after argument?
Getting China to not be support out for Taiwan after argument?
상처받은 감정은 벽을 만들고, 진정한 화해는 다리를 만들고, 진정한 화해는 항상 간단하지 않으므로 화해 과정이 계속해서 문제가된다면 처음부터 토론에 들어가는 것이 현명합니까?
Hurt feelings build walls, true reconciliation builds bridges, true reconciliation not always simple, thus if the reconciliation process continues to be so problematic, is it wise to get into discussions in the first place
현명하지 못한 조합을 처리할 준비가 된 지원 네트워크가 없는 거대한 국가 문제가 발생할 것입니다.
Giant countries issues will arise, not having a support network ready to handle the combinations unwise
좋은 기회에 대한 구매 증가를 최적화하면서 나쁜 기회에 대한 구매 감소 최적화
Optimizing reduced buy in to bad opportunities for us while optimizing increased buy in to good opportunities
Deoptimize Bad Optimize Good not simple, specially with relationships
역사에서 가능한 시스템 Possible systems from history
남자는 여자를 만난다 Man meets woman
남자와 여자는 서로 친구를 만나 Man and Woman meet each others friends
직면 Confrontation
헤어지다 Break up
이제 친구들은 남자와 여자의 초기 인스턴스화로 인해 발생하는 드라마와 문제를 처리해야 합니다.
Now friends have to deal with the drama and problems caused by initial instantiation of Man meets Woman
매수가 길어질수록 잠재적으로 손실이 커지고, 상황이 좋지 않은 경우 ROI를 높일 수 있습니다.
Longer the buy in potentially greater the loss, increasing ROI if seems like bad situation wise to get out earlier rather than later
감정, 사랑, 감정을 추가하면 프로세스가 더 어려워집니다. 그리고 상처를 입었다면 감정, 사랑, 감정은 상호 작용 후 훨씬 덜합니다. 냉정하고 냉담하며 장기적으로 판단과 사회에 항상 좋은 것은 아닙니다.
Add in emotion, love, and feelings makes the process harder. And if hurt then emotion, love, and feelings much less after interaction. Cold and callus, not always good for judgement and society long term.
상당한 일회성 손실을 피하면서 검색
Searched avoiding significant one time losses
감소 회피 및 분석 지원
Support Reduction Avoidance and Analysis
내 인생의 기회 A에 대한 기회 경로는 다른 사람의 삶에 대한 기회 A에 대한 기회 경로와 동일하지 않습니다
Opportunity Paths for Opportunity A in my life does not equal Opportunity Paths for Opportunity A for other’s lives
OPOA 내 인생 != OPOA 다른 사람의 삶
OPOA my life != OPOA other’s lives
감정, 재평가, 유혹 요인 내가 집합적으로 똥 요인이라고 부르는 것을 좋아하는 것
feelings, reassessment, temptation factor what I collectively like to call the shit factor
뚱뚱한 여자 -> 슈퍼모델 -> 흔한 줄거리
Fat woman -> super model -> common story line
가난한 사람 -> 억만 장자 -> 일반적인 스토리 라인
Poor guy -> billionaire -> common story line
부자 이야기에 누더기를 좋아하는 사람들과 거대한 대비 알고리즘을 좋아하는 사람들이 문제입니까? 그것은 때때로 사람들을 지원하지 않고, 사람들을 죽일 수 있는 방식으로 지원을 받지 못하게 합니다.
People like rags to riches stories, and people like giant contrast algorithms, the problem? It leaves people under supported at times, under supported in ways that could get people killed
통제, 영향력, 권력, 기회 비용이 항상 큰 용기에 잘 섞이는 것은 아닙니다.
Control, Influence, Power, Opportunity Costs don’t always mix together nicely in a big jug
Hypocrisy is a big part of the problem
그리고 똥 요인의 영향을 받을 때 사람들을 위선적인 유혹자로 낙인찍지
And labeling people hypocritical tempting when under the influence of the shit factor
Useful for them does not equal useful for me, what is hypocritical?
of the nature of hypocrisy, or pretense of having virtues, beliefs, principles, etc., that one does not actually possess:The parent who has a “do what I say and not what I do” attitude can appear hypocritical to a child.
possessing the characteristics of hypocrisy:Isn’t a politician hypocritical for talking about human dignity while voting against reasonable social programs?
Don’t take support from the poor, while signing bills that block SSI
똥 요인의 영향 > 믿음, 은혜, 사랑?
Influence of Shit Factor > Faith, Grace, and Love?
Just Joy on the line
Short term Joy v Long term Joy
Short term Alive vs Long term Alive
Short term belief we have control of God’s paint brush or Long term belief we have control of God’s paint brush?
Short term not hit by a bus vs Long term not hit by a bus
Cancer and Plane crashes don’t equal a bus, strictly speaking
Time equals value, Time equals limited, Support equals value, Support ideally less limited
They are judging my time worth less than theirs, thus they are not treating me the way I wish to be treated
They wouldn’t like their time taken from them early, yet they take other’s time like Rick Rhoades early, and the support – people like I provide to their network
Poor decision making in power, likely could scale up to a greater extent 2023+
Problem for me now, likely equals problems for the masses compounded exponentially, future path not as bright as I would like for others on Shiny Blue Marble
Google Translate is proving to be inadequate in my current setup, too much energy
Support inadequate synonymous with Washington, DC currently
First programs to go when can’t pay bills and cyber security is shit? support for charity, accessibility, translations to other languages
Current system is capitalizing on the factor it is harder to blame them
Blame the oppressive system that can kill me or the man that failed in it?
9 times out of 10 my guess is people will choose the latter
And thus more reduced resources for power, DC, and everyone involved
System likes to sell “job security” while optimizing “sorry, we got to let you go”
Safely executing his “Oath of Office”, if his oath of office was to rob my support lines, Don’t worry let me help you with that
Having support removed when trying to help, if power pushes it likely power doesn’t want to be power
Budget cut’s have to be made, I agree best to start at the top
Increased energy reduction as a consistent issue is a big problem
Energy Diagram, 무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image
Volume and Clarify of Energy Training Factors into overall increased energy in Human Based Organic Life Forms
Energy Diagram v2, 무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image
Forgot to add the timestamp, 2/20/2022
Message like a gas that floats around inspiring beats one that sinks to bottom of ocean
Energy Diagram v2.01, 무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image
무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image
무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image
When a prayer is delayed, when answers not received
Just assume God went out for a pack of smokes?
Can blame the man, Shiny Blue Marble is a bit depressing at times
A little “over sizing” goes a long way
무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image
Free Starter Image
아버지는 Shiny Blue Marble과 우주에서 그리스도의 이름으로 모든 사람들에게 기적, 더 나은 지원, 새로운 놀라운 기회를 제공하십시오.
Father please turn up miracles, better support, and new amazing opportunities for all people on Shiny Blue Marble and in space in Christ’s name I ask this
Employ Damage Mitigation Strategies for protecting Studio Time
“Chorus. The chorus is the culmination of all the big ideas in your song. This is often why the title of the song also appears in the chorus. It’s a summary of what the entire song is about. The chorus typically also contains the hook—the catchiest part of the song. Choruses should serve as the climax to the song. The verses and pre-chorus both serve to build up to this one moment; therefore the chorus should reflect that release of tension.” – https://www.masterclass.com/articles/songwriting-101-learn-common-song-structures#what-makes-a-song
“The prosecution does not have a monopoly” on lost studio time
pertaining to or noting a story, conversation, character, etc., that consciously references or comments upon its own subject or features, often in the form of parody:A movie about making a movie is just so meta—especially when the actors criticize the acting.
pertaining to or noting an abstract, high-level analysis or commentary, especially one that consciously references something of its own type.
noun
a consciously and playfully self-referential story, conversation, etc.:That dialogue was an example of meta at its best.
an abstract, high-level analysis or commentary:writing a meta to explain the character’s motivation.
verb (used without object)
to analyze or comment on something in a meta way:I spend more time metaing about the show than actually watching it.
다이어그램은 시스템을 통신하는 데 사용됩니다. 상태 머신과 흐름을 통신하는 데 사용됩니다.
Diagrams are used to communicate systems. They are used to communicate state machines and flows.
이상적인 다이어그램을 디자인하고 싶다면. 이상적인 다이어그램에 대한 내 생각은 다이어그램을 읽기 전에는 시스템에 대한 지식이 없을 수도 있고 다이어그램을 읽은 후에는 시스템에 대한 완전한 지식을 가질 수 있다는 것입니다.
If I wanted to design an ideal diagram. My thought behind an ideal diagram would be that before reading the diagram I might have no knowledge of the system and after reading the diagram I would have full knowledge of the system.
그 이상을 제한하는 요소
Factors that limit that ideal
다이어그램 생성 creation of diagram
다이어그램 배포 네트워크, 매체(포스터, 종이) 이미지 파일 distribution of diagram Networks, Mediums (Posters, paper) Image files
다이어그램 처리, 시각 장애인은 점자 또는 화면 판독기가 필요합니다. processing of diagram, Blind would need braille or screen readers
다이어그램, 개념, 주제에 대한 이해(다이어그램이 얼마나 잘 받아들여지고, 이해되고, 재전송되는지에 대한 지식 및 다루는 주제 요소 -> 시스템 채택의 장벽) understanding of diagrams, Concepts, Topics (knowledge going in and topics covered factor into how well the diagram is received, understood, and recommunicated -> barrier to adoption of system)
다이어그램 및 타임스탬프 인덱싱을 포함한 메시지 저장 및 아카이브 Storage and Archive of Message including indexing of diagrams and timestamps
다이어그램 요소를 2에서 5로 승격
Promotion of Diagram Factors into 2 through 5
들어가는 지식과 다루는 주제 (4) 더 많은 다이어그램에 대한 인센티브 요인, 다이어그램과 다이어그램에서 다루는 주제가 배포 및 홍보되지 않으면 시스템 채택 장벽이 낮아집니다.
Knowledge going in and topics covered (4) factors into incentive for more diagrams, if the diagram and topics cover in diagram are not distributed and promoted, barrier to adoption of system is less likely
다이어그램 및 다이어그램에서 다루는 주제의 놀라운 마케팅 및 프로모션은 시스템 및 시스템에서 논의된 주제에 대한 보다 쉽고 흥미로운 수용으로 이어질 것입니다.
Amazing Marketing and Promotion of the diagram and topics cover in the diagram will lead to easier and more excited reception of system and topics discussed in system
환희의 환영 이야기, 메시지, 도표에 대한 흥분된 환영은 놀라운 내용이 있음에도 불구하고 아무도 읽지 않는 도표보다 훨씬 더 가치가 있습니다.
Jubilant Excited reception of a story, of a message, of a diagram is worth way more than a diagram that no one will read even though it has amazing content
훌륭하고 아름다운 청중에게 홍보하거나 배포하지 않는 놀라운 시스템은 윈윈이 아닙니다.
An amazing system not promoted or distributed to an amazing and beautiful audience is not a win win
Worth associated with answers? Lost time and leverage not an ideal thing to promote
당근으로 답을 잊어 버렸습니다. 확실히 적용 가능합니다. Forgot answers as a carrot, definitely applicable
문제의 일부, 답변이 문제를 해결하면 어떻게 될까요?
Part of the problem, what if the answers solve a problem
응답이 없으면 어떻게 합니까? What if the answers don’t
그것들이 새로운 것을 유발한다면? What if they cause new ones
최대화한다면? Maximize What if?
우리가 묻지 않고 우주에 갈 수 있다면 어떻게 될까요?
What would happen if we didn’t ask, what if we can get to space?
만약 우리가 묻지 않는다면 어떻게 될까요? 만약 우리가 정의를 얻지 못한다면 어떻게 될까요?
What would happen if we didn’t ask, what if we couldn’t get justice?
우리가 묻지 않고 정의를 얻을 수 있다면 어떻게 될까요?
What would happen if we didn’t ask, what if we can get justice?
그 모든 것에 큰 스윙이 없다면 어떻게 될까요?
What if there wasn’t a big swing in all that?
정의는 우리가 기대하는 것과 다를 수 있습니다
Justice might not look like what we expect
사랑의 은혜를 받고 우리에게 남은 시간의 선을 확대하는 것이 더 낫습니다!
Better to have love grace and magnify the good of the time we have left!
실종자를 찾는 데 더 많은 시간을 할애했습니까? 아니면 접시에 담긴 음식을 저장하는 데 더 많은 시간을 할애하시겠습니까?
More time spent looking for one missing? Or more time trying to save the ones on our plate?
그리고 바다에 떨어진 하나의 다이아몬드를 찾으려고 모든 생명? 모든 생각과 자원을 하나의 다이아몬드에 묶는 것은 현명하지 않으며 열쇠 없이 갇히는 재미도 없습니다.
Spend all life trying to find one diamond that fell into the ocean? Not wise to tie up all thoughts and resources on one diamond, no fun being locked up without a key
그가 외출했는지 아는 사람? 타임코드는 2016년, 사람들은 내 시스템의 타임코드를 엉망으로 만드는 것을 좋아한다고 말합니다.
Anyone know if he is out? Timecode says 2016, people like to mess with timecodes on my systems
지난 1월에 있었던 일에 대해 어떻게 생각해야 할지 확신이 서지 않는 트럼프 대통령은 지지선이 끊긴 요즘 “싸우지 않으면 나라가 없을 것”이라는 말이 더 사실로 들리기 시작했습니다. 시스템이 폭력을 예증하고 사형을 조장하는 시스템이 이미 폭력을 예증하고 있음을 언급하는 데 많은 가치가 있습니다.
Not sure what to think about what happened last January, Trump said “If you don’t fight you won’t have a country” starting to ring more true these days with the support lines turned off. A lot of value in stating a system instantiated violence, a system promoting the death penalty already instantiates violence
폭력적인 시위 없이 체제를 바꾼다? 그것이 내가 홍보하고 싶은 것입니다. 시스템의 충분한 흔들림 없이는 홍보하기 어려울 것입니다.
Changing the system without violent protests? That’s what I would like to promote, likely hard to promote that without enough sway in the system
국방 지원을 강탈하고 사형을 찬성하는 민주당원과 공화당원은 신속하게 퇴출되어야 합니다.
Democrats and Republicans that promote the death penalty, robbing the defense support, deserve to be booted out of office swiftly
왜 2001년에서 2022년까지 똑같은 이야기를 들었는지
Why 2001 to 2022 heard the same damn story, wasting time while other countries waste less time and optimize over us
나는 우리가 NASA와 같은 시스템을 증가시킬 수 있는 동안 Goose Chase를 낭비하는 시간을 감사하지 않습니다
I do not appreciate the wasted time Goose Chase while we could be increasing systems like NASA
출시까지 45분, 시스템 지원 문제를 해결하는 데 집중하고 있습니까?
45 minutes to a launch and I am concentrated on trying to fix systemic support problems?
방해에 감사하지 않습니다. 아니요, 저는 NASA의 직원이 아닙니다. 우주에 관련된 엔지니어가 적다는 것은 저에게 별로 좋게 들리지 않습니다.
I do not appreciate the interruptions, no I am not an employee of NASA, less engineers being involved in Space doesn’t really sound good to me
무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image
Free Starter Images of Texas Sky for people that like painting the launch, images taken in Duncanville, TX on Samsung S7+
21 minutes on countdown from Alexa’s notification
무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image
Partial Truth in allegations with Partial Resolution
이것은 거대한 차트가 될 수 있습니다
This one could be a giant chart
이를 줄여서 PTPR이라고 합니다.
Will refer to this as PTPR for short
주장을 하는 사람들은 대개 자신의 불완전성과 실수에 대한 해결을 제한하면서 그렇게 생각합니다.
The thought people making allegations usually do so while limiting resolution to their own imperfections and mistakes rings true.
부분적 해결 Partial Resolutions
다른 언어가 아닌 한 언어로 번역됨
Translated to one language not to another language
시력과 소리 없음 Sight and no sound
소리가 들리고 보이지 않음 Sound and no sight
제한된 색심도 limited color depth
반복 픽셀 해상도 limited pixel resolution
제한된 집중력, 지루함, 메시지를 들을 것인지 여부가 중요합니다.
limited concentration power, boring and whether we choose to listen to a message matters
제한된 시간, 문제를 해결할 충분한 시간이 없음
limited time, not having enough time to address the problem matters
제한된 교육, 문제를 해결할 충분한 교육이 없음
limited training, not have enough training to address the problem matters
현재 이 vlog를 비공개로 설정하는 것과 같은 억압적인 시스템에 의해 차단되면 문제(10분 더 일찍 또는 1일 후에 얻음)가 더 좋습니까 아니면 더 나쁠까요?
blocked by oppressive systems, such as setting this vlog to private currently, matters (get this 10 minutes earlier or 1 day later) better or worse?
YouTube에서 실시간 질문과 답변을 진행하는 데 한계가 있는데 그 가치는 얼마입니까? 엄청난 양입니다. 그렇게 하기 전에 의사 소통을 개선하는 것이 얼마나 좋을까요? 엄청난 양, 그 모든 것에서 권력과 억압의 통제가 얼마나 많은 가치가 있다는 사실 뒤에도 엄청난 가치가 있습니다. 한 언어로 번역되고 다른 언어로 번역되면 얼마나 가치가 있습니까? 스페인이나 수단 사람들에게 항상 좋은 것은 아니지만 엄청난 양의 즐겨 찾기를 재생합니다.
Being limited from running a live show of questions and answers on YouTube, how much is that worth? Huge amounts, how much is getting communication better better before doing that? Huge amounts, how much is control from power and oppression worth in all that even after the fact huge amounts, How much is translated to one language and not others worth? Huge amount, playing favorites not always great for people in Spain or Sudan
전 세계적으로 많은 사람들이 내러티브를 통제하고 사람들이 자신의 메시지를 듣게 하려고 한다는 사실을 추가합니다. 내 메시지를 듣는 시간은 다른 사람의 메시지에 귀를 기울이는 시간 초과를 의미할 수 있으며 그 반대도 마찬가지입니다. 메시지를 존중하고 제한합니다. 모든 사람이 매일 5분씩 게시물을 올리는 것이 지혜인지 확신할 수 없습니다.
Add in the fact that there are a lot of people on the globe trying to control narratives and get people to listen to their message, time listening to my message might mean time out listen to others messages and vice versa, respectful of messages in, limit everyone to 5 minute posts each day, not sure that is wisdom
성공하고 다른 사람의 메시지를 탈선시키는 것은 문제를 일으킬 수 있습니다. 충분히 대중적이며 한 사람의 메시지와 소식만 고려합니까? 너무 많은 중앙 집중식 권력
Success and derailing others message might cause problems, popular enough consider it, only message and news from one person? Too much centralized power
너무 유명하고 대중적이어서 다른 사람이 말하지 못하게 하거나 자신의 메시지를 전달하지 못하게 할 수 있는 잠재적으로 심각한 문제를 일으킬 수 있습니다.
Too popular, popular to the point of preventing anyone else from speaking or getting their message out could potentially cause serious problems, where people get their message from matters, and lies and convolution into the system matters as well
YouTube에서 메시지를 듣는 모든 사람들이 이것을 읽는 것은 아니며 그 반대의 경우도 마찬가지입니다.
Not all people will read this that hear the message on YouTube, and likely vice versa
720p에서 VideoMaker 1.7x 속도는 적어도 내 관점에서 균형이 잘 맞는 것 같습니다.
VideoMaker 1.7x Speed at 720p seems to be a good balance at least from my perspective
시간은 소중합니다. 변호사는 일반적으로 놀라운 의사 소통자입니다. 메시지를 보낼 시간이 없다면 문제 없습니다. 접근성에 대한 이 내용이 유용하다고 생각하세요. 이미 본 적이 있다면
Time is valuable, Lawyers are generally amazing communicators, if you don’t have time for the message no issue, think this one about accessibility is useful, if you’ve already seen it already seen it
증가 된 느낌이 항상 좋은 것은 아닙니다. Increased feeling is not always good
긍정적인 방향으로 마음을 바꾸는 것은 좋다 Changing hearts in a positive direction is good
그렇지 않으면 노출되지 않을 노출된 신경 Exposed nerves that would not otherwise be exposed
잘 지내던 사람들이 잘못된 단어나 이야기를 사용하면 감정적으로 고통스럽고 충격적인 사건이 발생합니다.
People that were doing fine and then the wrong set of words or a story triggers emotionally painful and traumatic events.
청중과 독자 기반은 알려지지 않았으며 내가 어떻게 처리하는지 정확히 모릅니다. 내 동영상 블로그를 읽지 않는 잘못된 독자를 선호합니다. 그것이 항상 가능한지는 확실하지 않습니다.
Audience and Reader base an unknown, not exactly sure how I deal with that. Preference for the wrong reader not reading my vlog. Not sure that is always possible.
맹인이거나 병원에 갇혀 있는 것과 같은 큰 어려움을 겪고 있는 사람들에게 격려와 영감을 주기 위해서는 더 많은 재치가 필요할 수 있습니다. 도움을 주려고 하는 것이 항상 도움을 주는 것과 같은 것은 아닙니다. 잘못된 농담은 내 삶의 불안을 부각시킬 수 있고, 대중에게 글을 쓰는 것은 공개적으로 사람들을 모욕하려는 시도로 보일 수 있습니다. 소셜 네트워킹은 복잡성을 가져옵니다. 모든 것이 좋은 것은 아니며 모든 사람에게 좋은 것도 아닙니다.
Being encouraging and inspiring to people with major hardships like being blind or being stuck in hospital might require more tact. Attempting to help does not always equate to helping. The wrong joke could highlight insecurities in my own life, writing to the masses the wrong joke could look like an attempt to publicly humiliate people. Social networking brings complexities complexities not all of which are good, not all of which are good for all people.
소셜 미디어에서 이익을 얻는 군중. 그리고 기술 회사의 정상에 있는 백만장자들이 요트에서 파티를 하는 동안 자원을 찾아 헤매는 군중은? 사람들이 네트워크와 미디어 배포의 범위와 복잡성에 대한 완전한 이해가 없기 때문에 플랫폼을 오용하는 잔인한 그룹으로 인해 가장자리에서 밀려나는 동안? 게다가 결정을 내리기 위해 방향을 통제하고 자신에게 유리한 방향으로 결정을 내리는 것을 좋아하는 억압적인 정부와 사회의 억압적인 알파의 부족을 결합하면 때때로 재앙의 비법처럼 보입니다.
The crowd that gets to profit from social media. And the crowd that gets to scrounge for resources while millionaires at the top of tech companies party on Yachts? While people get pushed off edges due to brutal groups of people misusing platforms because they don’t have a full appreciation for the scope and complexity of networking and media distribution? Combine on top of that the want of oppressive governments and oppressive alphas in society that like to control direction and casting the lot in their favor for decision making, seems like a bit of a recipe for disaster at times.
내가 처리한 억압의 양으로, 비공개에서 공개로 vlog 게시물의 가시성을 설정하는 것이 실제로 공개로 설정하는 것을 보장할 수 없습니다. 진실로 이러한 시스템의 엔터프라이즈 통합 및 백채널의 양을 고려할 때 개인용도 그다지 의미가 없을 가능성이 높습니다. 의미는 있지만 그것이 얼마나 의미하는지 알 수 없는 것입니다. 법처럼. 사람들은 “자신이 보는 대로” 상황에 가장 적합한 최적의 시간에 법을 존중하고 따릅니다. 문제는 의사 결정권자가 내 자원을 줄이기 위해 최고위 권한을 오용하는 것 같습니다. 대중이 법을 존중하도록 하는 이상적인 설정이 아닙니다.
With the amount of oppression I have dealt with, I can’t be guaranteed setting visibility on vlog post from private to public is actually setting it to public. Truthfully with the amount of enterprise integration and backchannels on these systems it is also likely that private doesn’t mean much. Means something but an unknown of how much it means is questionable. Like a law. People respect and follow laws at optimal times, when it suits the situation the best “as they see it”. Problem is decision makers seem to be misusing that power at the top to reduce my resources. Not an ideal setup for getting people in the masses to respect laws.
안정적인 빨간색 흰색 및 파란색에서 불안정한 빨간색 흰색 및 파란색. 그 안에 담긴 가치는 무엇입니까? 초강대국의 꼭대기에 있는 잠재적으로 억압적인 독재자의 가치는?
Stable Red White and Blue to unstable Red White and Blue. What is the value in that? The value to a potentially oppressive dictator at the top of a super power?
What is the prerequisite for militaries seizing power to restore the peace?
If something is a war song, do we always know it is a war song? Does a war song require singing? Can a song not be a systemic rhythmetic approach to restructuring society by and oppressive system?
I have made YouTube video of this, people listening to this backchannel can hear it there
내가 사용한 마이크는 녹음된 것이 아니므로 더 전문적으로 보일 수 있습니다. 시간이 더 지나면 마이크에서 녹음했을까요? 네. 사이버 보안 문제로 인해 데이터가 여러 가지 방식으로 인식되는 방식에 문제가 발생합니까? 네. 내러티브 문제 제어
The microphone I used was not recorded from, it can make me look more professional. With more time would I have recorded it from the microphone? Yes. Does the cyber security problems cause issues in how the data is perceived in more ways than one? Yes. Controlling the narrative matters
VideoMaker set to 1.7x speed seems to be a good speed for my listening, is it better for others listening?
Processing speed of my brain less or more at times, and system doesn’t always respect that rate of communication and ability to learn and train factors into grace and love
Effective communication to those at the top and those at the bottom, those from all different walks of life not simple, specially with targeted marketing
He sounds trustworthy goes a long way in a system of unstable systems
At what point does reaffirming the public outweigh the danger of a problem?
Probably a very hard thing to get right.
Showing the system is unstable likely could cause more instability
I usually like translating to Korean, that becomes a known quantity, a quantity that when missing now seems not normal
Transition from does not depend upon to does depend upon matters to feelings, emotions, hopes, dreams, complexity.
아마도 내가 음악을 연주하고 록 스타처럼 들리는 것이 도움이 되지 않을 것입니다. 록 스타처럼 들리는 것이 항상 더 안정적인 시스템과 같지는 않습니다. 스튜디오가 조명을 유지하려면 더 안정적인 시스템이 필요합니다.
Probably doesn’t help I like playing music and sounding like a rock star, sounding like a rock star does not always equal more stable systems, more stable systems are necessary for studios keep lights on.
Life makes us choose at times, what is right for the time. When I don’t really understand the part I play in all this, can make things a bit complex.
Rockstar or Defense Lawyer, which one packs more punch? Rockstar or CEO or New Space program like SpaceX or Blue Origin?
Was thinking about affirming the public in positive ways. A public I seem to have zero contact too possibly because of being blocked by governments
Orson Wells v 2022 건물에 실제 화재가 있습니다.
Orson Wells v 2022 there is a real fire in the building
If the system enough time, then show the person the need, then easy to direct them down the path of the need. Kind of a frustrating setup.
No power for the studio. Be a lawyer.
Engineers being locked up. Be a lawyer.
NASA getting blocked in congress. Be a lawyer.
Now more positions on the Space Ship for me
Society seems to be showing unreasonable precedent for pushing towards being lawyers and legalism at least in 2022
Up to 2022 Lawyers have proven to lead us up to giant US Debt and what is happening between China and Taiwan combined with the shitty setup of the currently oppressive Jail system in Texas.
I also don’t have high level resolution that others have. Others with higher resolution have proven to be untrustworthy or at least uncapable of protecting cyber security within the systems.
Talk to the system, without creating an impact of such system? Test and measure things without effecting the outcome?
지능 대 지능의 외모, 여자가 그것에 대해 결정합니까? 남자들이 그것에 대해 결정을 내립니까? 신뢰할 수 있는 목소리는 미끄러운 경사가 될 수 있습니다. 최선을 다하는 사람도 뇌졸중에 걸리거나 닭뼈에 질식할 수 있습니다. 내러티브를 제어하는 것이 죽음에 가까워지면 더 유용합니까, 덜 유용합니까?
Appearance of intelligence vs intelligence, do women make decisions on that? Do men make decisions on that? A trustworthy voice can be a slippery slope. Even people trying their best can have strokes, or choke on a chicken bone. Controlling narrative more useful or less useful close to death?
I am not close to death, but it seems valuable to make certain people look close to death or very sick as a way to change their route. Control power and control the narrative
Speculation, Inferences, Hypotheses, vs Conspiracy Theories? What is the difference? Seems like the common factor is public trust and context.
A comment made in a research paper vs a comment made on the news?
How are they similar how are they different?
The two examples I chose to use? Shows that I am trying to control the narrative?
Trying to control it in a way of positive public trust without encouraging the negative
Conspiracy Theory using the word, how does it change the context of the paper?
A research paper with hypothesis saying this might be a conspiracy theory?
Wild Conjecture could be true, does not equate to is likely true. Potentially unlikely greater than likely and matters to public trust? A complex topic.
Incentives to increase and protect public trust
Thus the original premise the conspiracy is wild conjecture is subject to bias
How much content to create vs how much to read over and refine what we have written? Live vs not Live
Any not live with level of surveillance systems these days? All up in my studio
I have a live monitor on my Behringer setup and Microphone, just because I did not record with the microphone does not mean it did not effect the way I spoke
Something to think about more information comes out later, changes things a bit
I believe it is somewhat improbably to not change the system in meaningful ways by acting upon it, reading my vlog and recording it changes it and alters it message, in positive ways I hope, potentially not always positive ways
More updates better, more updates do not equal perfect updates. Would like to think extra work I put in will make my message better in 2030, thus my current message still not perfect. Hubris to think things can’t be turned up
Made for kids option on YouTube, not sure what that exactly means
China and Taiwan war news? News is important, understanding what is going on in the world matters. Is it made for children?
Not understanding the option likely could cause the option to be chosen wrongly, add in cyber security problems all bets are a bit off on options choosing
Tried to check the box for no lobotomy does not equate to box remains checked for no lobotomy, not an ideal setup
Speed up version
원본 버전도 추가할 예정입니다. 빠른 메시지 낮은 파일 크기 낮은 해상도 vs. 높은 해상도 느린 메시지 내 편집으로 합성
Going to add the original version as well, fast message low file size low resolution vs higher resolution slower message compounded with my editing
If I take a day off to Korean translation, what does it mean? Might mean a day of improving my communications, thus my message more presentable to Koreans
진실하고 유용한 진술은 동등하지 않다는 것이 항상 더 좋습니다. 작업이 덜 걸리므로 다른 방향으로 이동할 수 있기 때문에 더 좋습니다. 일부 한국 독자들은 이미 그들이 원하는 만큼 적절하지 않음이 입증되고 있는 미국 시스템에 대해 읽을 내용과 신뢰를 덜 갖게 할 수 있습니다.
A true and useful statement does not equate to is always better. Better for me because it takes less work frees me up to move in other directions. Might leave some Korean readers with less to read and less trust for a United States system that is already proving to be not as adequate as they would have liked.
그 모든 것의 복잡성과 시간을 묶는 인센티브, 이미 자원이 줄어들었을 때 시간을 묶는 것? 약간의 A + B = 거리의 저체온증? 한국 독자들이 내가 거리에서 저체온증으로 죽기를 바라는지 확신이 서지 않고, 가게에 갈 자원과 자금도 전 세계의 지원을 위해 상황을 극적으로 변화시키지 않습니다. 받는 사람과 받지 못하는 사람
Complexities in all that, and incentives to tie up my time, tying up my time when my resources already reduced? A little A + B = hypothermia on the streets? Not sure my Korean readers would want me to die of hypothermia on the streets, no resources and funds to go to the store changes things dramatically for support in the world. Who gets it and who doesn’t
Let DC rob Koreans because DC already is robbing Texans?
어떤 응답도 의미 있는 영향을 미치지 않고, 누가 내 브이로그를 읽고 있는지, 누가 의미 없는 영향을 미치는지 이해할 수 있는 능력이 없으며, 모든 정보를 가지고 있다고 해도 모든 정보를 시의적절하고 효과적인 방식으로 처리할 수 없습니다. 지원 문제
No response has meaningful impacts, no ability to understand who is reading my vlog and who is not has meaningful impacts, and even having all the information does not equate to can process all the information in a timely and effective way. Support matters
Support adds value or support “adds” value
Increased reliance, not always a good thing
Giving should mean getting in a positive way
Not always the case
Star football player torn ACL
Gives ton of time and practice to a team, then are they properly provided for a respected? Valued higher or not by society? By society does not equal by God.
Another example
Star player loses his wife, winds up in too many clubs
Gave a ton to the team and to the career then his wife cheated on him with his best friend
Take into examples where people don’t equal wife, love interests, and lost time on iffy situations, feelings and personal aspirations
Some people are looking for retribution, retribution does not always take into account turbulent flow and the unknowns
Can’t control that, truth in means less value for me, I can appreciate that
Training and learning sometime requires years
Years not everyone has access to
And useful to the Devil
더 나아가 나에게 일어날 수 있다는 것은 다른 사람들에게도 일어날 수 있다는 것을 의미합니다. 항상 사람들이 선택을 더 관대하게 만드는 것은 아닙니다.
Further, if it could happen to me, means it could happen to others. Doesn’t always make people more forgiving of choices.
Dude cheated on me with my wife because cyber security and bad training? Power might enjoy people having their relationships destroyed at times.
Looks like there is a problem in the system likely goes a long way with actresses. Appearance of close does not equate to close in a system built on images
Cheating and Manipulation can derail people. Perception of cheating and manipulation
Perceived wrong and manipulation vs actual wrong and manipulation?
Bad advice -> man hooks up with woman
Good advice -> interrupts from an oppressive system prevent receiving good advice -> man hooks up with woman
가족과 관계를 함께 유지하는 데 필요한 교육 및 의사 소통 문제, 시스템에 있는 사람들이 추가하는 감소된 지원은 매우 중요하고 동시에 내가 본 것과 내가 본 것을 감안할 때 은혜의 여지가 많이 있을 수 있습니다. 내가 보지 않았다면 조종당하고 속임수를 쓰는 것과 동등하지 않습니다.
training and communications matters in keeping families and relationships together, the reduced support added by people in the system fucking with me highly significant and at the same time a lot of room for grace given what I have seen, what I have seen might not be believable had I not seen it does not equate to getting manipulated and cheated on hurts less
prosecutors, likely an emotional argument, emotional arguments do not always lead to rational decisions
Romantic Relationships and cases have a bit of overlap, two sides that formulate ideas based upon “facts” as they see them
Seems the world has a preference for stumble into the truth, stumble into the truth can cause some bad effects
Any ability to inject false memories? Wonder if psychologies have studied that, probably a pretty powerful tool
Are memories created under cybersecurity problems “real”?
Add in neural links and things like lighthouses, the combination likely very useful to defense lawyers in 2022.
단기 및 장기 신경 세포에 알코올 효과를 추가하시겠습니까? 질문하는 많은 이유
Add in alcohols effects on neurons short term and long term? a lot of reason to question things
과음, 의사 영상에 대한 높은 능력
Drink too much, high ability to doctor footage
허위사실유포에 대한 거액의 레버리지 없음
No leverage to large amount of leverage on a false accusation
시스템을 신뢰하고 신뢰를 저하시키는 방법을 찾습니다.
Trusts the system, find a way to degrade the trust
다른 방법으로는 취하지 않았을 새로운 행동과 선택을 활용한 다음 재판에 회부되면 영상을 제거합니다.
Leverage, leverage to new actions and choices that would not otherwise be taken, then remove the footage once the person is on trial
많은 것을 피할 수있는 능력
The ability to get away with a lot
술을 너무 많이 마신 후 외출 중에 때렸다고 비디오와 이미지를 보여주고 활용
Person drinks too much, then say they beat someone up while they were out, show them a video and images of it, leverage
이제 그 사람이 책임지고 어떤 사람이 일을 맡을지 결정합니다
Now that person is in charge, and decides which person gets the job
큰 문제가 아닌 약간의 레버리지? 옵션 A를 선택하고 B와 C에게 다른 경로로 가기로 결정했다고 말하면 됩니다.
Just a little leverage in no big deal? Choose option A, just tell B and C you decided to go a different route
그들이 원래 옵션 A를 고려하고 있었다면?
What if they were originally considering option A
이제 옵션 A가 문제입니다. Now option A is in question
따라서 옵션 A, B 및 C는 거래에 대해 더 나빠집니다.
Thus option A, B, and C end up worse off for the deal.
Power, Control, Narratives, Drugs, Storytelling, Criminal Law, Memory, Arguments, Decisions, Confusion, and Oppression factor in
2022년 간음에 대한 은총은 정말 어렵지 않고 은총을 받기는 여전히 어렵다
Grace for adultery really not hard to have grace for in 2022 and still hard to have grace for
시스템의 BS가 원인일 수 있다고 해서 시스템의 BS가 원인인 것은 아닙니다.
Can be caused by BS from the system doesn’t mean was caused by BS in the system
그리고 그게 문지름 And that’s the rub
사람을 용서하는 것보다 시스템을 용서하는 것이 더 쉽습니다.
Easier to forgive the system than it is easy to forgive the person
시스템은 우리의 권력을 제거하는 능력이 있으므로 우리의 논리는 망가진 시스템이 아니라 사람들에 대한 편견으로 얽혀 있습니다.
The system has the ability to remove our power thus our logic is convoluted into prejudice against people instead of a broken system
우리는 게임이 아니라 플레이어를 싫어한다 We hate the player, not the game
그러나 게임은 말하자면 지진으로 가득 찬 시스템에서 깨진 유리로 만들어졌습니다.
Yet the game is made of broken glass on a system full of earthquakes so to speak
정의가 아닌 정의, 다가오는 슬픈 깨달음
Justice not really Justice, a sad realization to come to
시스템 및 교육에 대한 더 많은 투자, 더 많은 사이버 보안은 누가 사형 집행을 받고 누가 사형이 집행되지 않았는지, 우리 가족 중 누가 살고, 우리 가족 중 누가 사망하는지를 의미할 수 있습니다.
More investment in systems and training, more cyber security can mean the difference between who is executed on death row and who is not, who in our families live, and who in our families die
사실이 아니다? 인질 협상 반 해상도로 비디오를 원하십니까 아니면 전화기가 잘리길 원하십니까?
Not true? hostage negotiation you want that video at half resolution or that phone cutting out?
911에 전화하려고 할 때 깨진 전화 버튼? 그냥 항상 그냥
Broken phone button when about to call 911? Just not always just
내 이야기에 대한 과도한 통제는 우리의 모든 시스템을 덜 안전하게 만들 수 있습니다. 보안이 취약하다는 것은 SSI가 없는 거리에서 더 많은 간음과 더 많은 사람들을 의미합니다.
Excessive control around my narrative can leave all of our systems less secure, less security means more adultery and more people on streets without SSI
적어도 2023년 이상은 누구를 비난해야 하는지에 대한 문서를 갖게 될 것입니다. 물론 비난할 사람을 가리키는 포인터는 그 사람이나 조직이 실제로 존재하는 것과 같지 않거나 지금부터 10년 후에 존재할 것입니다.
At least 2023+ will have documentation about who to blame, of course a pointer to a person to blame, does not equal that person or organization actually exists, or will exist 10 years from now
사실 10년 후 감옥에서 기다리는 사람들에게 슬픈
Sad for people waiting in Jail 10 years after the fact
안전하지 않은 편향된 시스템은 감옥에 갈 사람을 결정하고 안전하지 않은 편향된 시스템은 감옥에서 나갈 사람을 결정합니다.
Insecure biased systems determine who goes into jail, and insecure biased systems determine who gets out of jail
오오 안정적이야” – Bender, Futurama
“ooooh that’s stable baby” – Bender, Futurama
번역하는 사람 1명과 2천만 명이 액세스할 수 있습니다.
1 man that translates and 20 million people have access to
아니면 구글 번역과 2천만 명이 번역하는 링크?
Or a link to google translate and 20 million people translate?
이 브이로그의 El President가 말한 방식이 마음에 드는지 잘 모르겠습니다.
Not sure I like the way El Presidente of this vlog stated that
전쟁이 끝난 후 재판을 받는 사람들, 생각할 거리, 전장에서 잘못된 선택으로 재판을 받은 사람들. 제한된 해상도, 범위 및 훈련이 전쟁을 결정하는 데 사용되었습니다. 이제 해상도와 범위가 증가하고 해상도와 범위가 증가했지만 당시에는 해상도와 범위가 증가하지 않았습니다.
People that are held in trials after wars, something to think about, the people held on trial for bad choices on battle fields. Limited resolution, scope, and training went into the decisions making going into wars. There is now increased resolution and scope, increased resolution and scope does not equal was increased resolution and scope back then.
전쟁에 대한 세계 요인을 잊어 버리기 쉬운 다음, 본보기를 설정하기 위해 격동의 흐름에 따라 결정을 위해 군인을 재판에 넣습니다. 중국과 대만의 전쟁이 일어나기 전에 중단해야 하는 또 다른 이유는 무엇일까요? 왜요? 나는 사람들이 방어 팀이 음식을 식탁에 올리기 위해 더 많은 전쟁 시험을 치르도록 인센티브를 받았다고 말하는 것을 원하지 않습니다.
Easy to forget the world factors into the war, then puts the soldiers on trial for decisions under turbulent flow to set an example. Another reason to stop the war in China and Taiwan before it happens? Why? I don’t want people saying the defense team was incentivized into having more war trials to put food on their table.
군인은 2026년 전장에서 잘못된 결정을 내리는 것이 좋습니다.
Soldiers make bad decision on battlefield in 2026 might be wise to have some protection and reminder in place that support going in was non ideal
미래의 경우에 도움이 될 수 있습니다. 생각해 볼 만한 좋은 일입니다.
Might help with a future case, kind of a nice thing to think about
물론 자존심은 내가 좀 느슨하게 할 수 있습니다
Of course pride, might let me slack a bit
무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image
컨셉 아트, 다른 사람들에게 좋은 더 많은 용품
Concept art, more supplies good for others
약점으로 간주되는 접근성 문제와 그에 대한 조합에 대한 사랑? 주의를 산만하게 하는 데 유용합니까?
Love for those with accessibility problems considered a weakness and the combinatorics on that? Useful as a distraction?
CEO A는 CEO B가 접근성 문제 C를 가진 사람들을 보호하는 희생양이 될 것임을 알고 있습니다.
CEO A knows that CEO B will fall victim to protecting people with Accessibility problem C
그러면 A씨는 사업을 하고 B씨는 시간을 허비한다.
Then CEO A wins business while CEO B wastes time
한 사람에게 소송으로 끝날 만큼 충분한 문제를 일으키지 않는 것이 이상적입니다. 소송을 진행하는 시간은 제품에서 멀어지는 시간과 같습니다. 이미 타이트한 시장에서 회사가 성공하거나 실패할 수 있음을 의미할 수 있습니다.
Ideal not to cause enough problems to any one person to wind up with lawsuits, time working on lawsuits equals time away from products, in an already tight market, could mean company succeeds or company fails
SSI 일과 유니버설 기본 소득은 당신의 친구입니다
SSI working and Universal Basic Income is your friend
SSI가 작동하지 않고 보편적 기본 소득이 작동하지 않는 것은 당신의 적입니다
SSI not working and Universal Basic Income not working, is your enemy
CEO A, CEO B 또는 접근성 문제 C가 있는 사람
be you CEO A, CEO B, or people with Accessibility Problem C
SSI를 끄고 평화를 유지하기 위해 보낸 시간은 지속적인 영향을 미칩니다.
Too turning off my SSI and time spent trying to keep peace has lasting impacts
회사가 서로를 물어뜯는다는 것은 시각 장애인을 위한 시간이 더 많거나 적음을 의미합니까?
Companies back biting each other means more or less time for the blind?
위 영상을 들으면서 그린 무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image, painted while listening to the above video
거위 추적 추측? 엉뚱한 추측을 생각하다
Goose Chase Conjecture? Thinking Wild Conjecture
A bit of reminder of Treasure Goblin from Diablo 3
My Tech Blog 