문서화 가능한 증거 The Defense는 2021년 10월부터 2022년 6월까지 부패하게 제한되었으며, 전 세계 감옥에 있는 사람들에게 항상 동일하게 시스템에서 부당한 가치가 있었습니다.
Documentable Proof The Defense has been Corruptly Limited from October 2021 to June 2022, equals all the time for people in Jails World Wide has been unfair value out of system
Orange Jersey에 대한 편견이 잘못 할당됨, NFA-NFR Bias against Orange Jersey Wrongly Assigned, NFA-NFR
好像偏见在系统之外没有价值
바이어스가 시스템에서 가치가 없는 것처럼
As if Bias was No Value Out of System
Finding a way to massage data correctly? Not all data is readily available to be used
A = Puzzle Piece -> YouTube Video, Diagram, WordPress Post
B = Time, People, Systems required to turn data into a more wieldy usable system
Requires A+B to get C, also a reminder unknowns D,E,F,G exist
A to Actionable Value in for Shiny Blue Marble and people on the International Space Station and other Space systems
A lot of people that provide pieces A, a lot of people that are designed to move A to C
A and B to valued in Non Corrupt Reproducible Way Not Always a Simple System and leaves some in society with less optimal hands at the end of the day
D,E,F,G to properly accounted for likely unable to factor into system equals requirement for Flex and Grace within the system
Not sure how the formulas translate to other languages
世界翻译系统的价值？ 当我们不懂语言时很简单？
세계 번역 시스템의 가치? 우리가 언어를 모를 때 간단합니까?
Value into World Translation Systems? Simple when we don’t know the languages?
一名员工<五名员工，厨房里的厨师越多越好吗？
직원 1명 < 직원 5명, 주방에 요리사가 많을수록 항상 더 낫습니까?
One employee < five employees, more cooks in the kitchen always better?
如果系统支持我，将可以更快速地访问此处的免费艺术品
시스템이 저를 지원했다면 여기에서 무료 아트워크에 더 빠르게 액세스할 수 있었을 것입니다.
If system was supporting me, there would be more swift access to Free Artwork Here
免费入门图片 무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image
提供更快的质量内容 NAASS
더 빠른 품질의 콘텐츠 NAASS 켜기
Turning Up Faster Quality Content NAASS
提醒人们数字以不可完全预测的方式对未来有价值？
사람들의 숫자가 완전히 예측할 수 없는 방식으로 미래에 가치가 있음을 상기시키십니까?
Reminding People Numbers are Valuable to Future in Not Fully Predictable Ways?
Critical Oversight Not Seen as Value In Unwise
更好地希望这些研究团队接受基础数学教学，疼痛量表 0 到 10、7 = 4？
그 연구팀이 기본 수학, 고통 척도 0에서 10, 7 = 4에서 가르치기를 바라는 것이 더 낫습니까?
Better hope those Research Teams are taught in basic math, Pain scale 0 to 10, 7 = 4?
다른 사람의 퍼즐 조각을 강조 표시하거나 다른 사람의 퍼즐 조각을 강조 표시하는 것과 같이 내 메시지에서 약간의 범위를 얻는 것이 더 간단한 시스템에 대한 더 나은 요구 사항에 대한 최적의 지원으로 항상 이어지는 것은 아닙니다.
Gaining a bit of scope creep on my message, like to highlight others’ puzzle pieces, highlighting others puzzle pieces doesn’t always lead to optimal support to better needs to be a more simple system
我可能不知道它的一半
아마 절반도 모를거야
I likely don’t know the half of it
如果外面的能见度那么差，那么大扫除地毯下的东西的动机
외부 가시성이 좋지 않은 경우 양탄자 아래 물건을 쓸어 버리는 것에 대한 큰 인센티브
Large incentive for sweeping things under the rug, if the outside visibility is that bad
免费入门图片 무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image
“there are people in the world who think only about themselves. They don’t care what happens to other people so long as they get what they want. They put other people down to make themselves feel important” – A Promised Land, Page 6
Turning off Gingers SSI and UBI to a reiterated unwise system
快速成型玻璃半空到半满玻璃
Rapid Prototyping 유리 반 비어 있는 유리 반 가득 찬
Rapid Prototyping Glass Half Empty to Glass Half Full
快速原型制作冲动购买宽恕和和平，仿佛 45 岁的罪是 70% 的学生
Rapid Prototyping Impulse 용서와 화평을 사세요, Sin of 45가 70% 학생인 것처럼
Rapid Prototyping Impulse Buy Forgiveness and Peacemaking, as if Sin of 45 was a 70% student
Rapid Prototyping Impulse 용서와 평화 만들기, Sin of 45가 70% 학생인 것처럼 듣기 사과 사과 해결 감사 명확화 아이디어 개발 구현 확산 수렴 조합 비판적 사고
Rapid Prototyping Impulse Buy Forgiveness and Peacemaking, as if Sin of 45 was a 70% student Listen Apologize Solve Thank Clarify Ideate Develop Implement Divergent Convergent Combinatorial Critical Thinking
Being Single tendency to support couples and married, easy to forget there are other single people out there that need support as well, overcompensation potential NFA, tendency for overcompensation not similar to me NFA-NFR
Turning up diversity without turning down love for self to a simple system?
Society does not always close the gap a bit of an understatement
Diversity hard to get right
People are not perfect underswing punished in not always ideal ways
Overcompensation the result, overcompensation leads to not always enough
Trying to fix the worlds’ problems we miss the one that could have meant the world?
Public Relations as Not a Hero to Hero before or after 10PM?
Commenting on story is personable and relatable can be misused in non ideal ways, story about guilt is personal and relatable having killed a man is not (figured worth clarifying, specially with the PR storms lately)
Like stating my picture of an Axe Murdering Corrupt System is Relatable
免费入门图片 무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image
误读的可能性是公关风险，公关风险值得积极缓解
오판 가능성은 PR 위험, 적극적으로 완화할 가치가 있는 PR 위험입니다.
Potential for Misread is PR Risk, PR Risk Worth Actively Mitigating
不懂英文，只看到血淋淋的画面可能无法完全理解上下文
영어를 이해하지 못함
Doesn’t understand English, Just sees bloody picture might not appreciate the context fully
세계 지도자들은 아마도 내가 볼 수 없는 부패한 시스템이 설치할 수 있는 몇 가지 함정을 보게 될 것입니다.
World leaders probably see a few traps that corrupt systems can install that I can’t see -> knowing world leaders can be value in and value out in NFA-NFR ways
将死刑视为斧头谋杀，即将从闪亮的蓝色大理石中移除更多令人惊叹的人，这会改变人们的看法
사형을 Shiny Blue Marble에서 더 놀라운 사람들을 제거하려는 도끼 살인으로 봅니다. 일종의 인식이 바뀝니다.
View the death penalty as an Axe Murder about to remove more amazing people from Shiny Blue Marble, kind of changes the perception
作为拼图的贡献超级计算机和世界人民可以帮助我们世世代代为人类和文明造福
퍼즐 조각으로서의 공헌 슈퍼컴퓨터와 세계의 사람들은 대대로 인류와 문명의 선익을 위해 우리를 도울 수 있습니다.
Contributions as Puzzle Pieces Supercomputers and People of the World can help us turn up for the good of mankind and civilization for generations upon generations
投资保持势头，为教师和艺术家提供食物高价值
교사와 예술가를 위한 음식을 계속해서 유지하는 모멘텀을 유지하는 데 투자합니다.
Investing in maintaining momentum that keeps food on table for Teachers and Artists High Value In
SSI 和普遍基本收入使德克萨斯州的姜艺术家教师不及格，因此可能会有更多的压迫和不充分的补救措施
SSI와 유니버설 기본 소득은 텍사스의 생강 예술가 교사에게 실패하고 있으므로 더 많은 억압과 부적절한 구제 가능성이 있음
SSI and Universal Basic Income is failing Ginger Artist Teachers from Texas, therefore possibility for More Oppression and Inadequate Remedies Likely
인명구조 조언이 이용자에게 신속하게 전달되지 않도록 하는 지적재산권법 역시 시스템에 대한 고부가가치(High Value Out to system)이므로 모든 기여를 존중하고 적절한 인명구조 조언을 제공하는 시스템을 만드는 것은 시간외 근무가 부적절하다는 것이 입증되었습니다.
Intellectual Property Law that prevents life saving advice from getting to users swiftly is also High Value Out to system, thus creating a system that both respects all contributions and provides adequate life saving advice has proven inadequate overtime
一个新系统的潜力，可能由超级计算机启用，使人们能够从他们添加到方程中的拼图中保持动力
사람들이 방정식에 추가한 퍼즐 조각에서 추진력을 유지할 수 있도록 하는 슈퍼컴퓨터로 가능한 새로운 시스템의 가능성
Potential for a new system, possibly enabled by supercomputers that allow people to maintain momentum from puzzle pieces they have added to equation
失败的艺术家教会和因腐败的知识产权法而失败的美国政府已证明不足以实现和平和允许创新的适当解决方案
실패한 예술가의 교회와 부패한 지식재산법을 통한 실패자들의 미국 정부는 혁신을 허용하는 평화와 적절한 해결에 부적합한 것으로 입증되었습니다.
Church of fails artist and United States Government of fails people through corrupt IP Law has proven inadequate for peace and proper resolution that allows for innovation
系统保护一些而不是其他一些不可长期维护
장기간 유지가 불가능한 일부는 보호하고 나머지는 보호하지 않는 시스템
System of protects some and not others not maintainable long term
Anger to less Anxiety to less Humor to more Creativity to more Linguistics and Communications to more Basics lessons refined on Math HVI in for self HVI in for others win win Story Telling What constitutes a story worth telling? A sentence Why is a sentence valuable? It conveys important information Sentences to Hero of the Story? Do we tell ourself stories? What is in the plan for a day? Listen, Learn, Create, Produce, Enjoy Increasing what we enjoy a non null investment cost Easy to get caught up in the yeses of life Yes that needs to be done, yes this needs to be done Easy to forget we might add more value to something we enjoy Emotionally Invested is not all bad Emotionally Invested like falling in love Sentences like a Super Model? Curvely Shapely? What is great about a short sentence? Fast Information. What is great about a long sentence? More Information more story, more potential for words not always fully appreciated, that less is more. And less is not always more. No story, no ramp up, no characters to be invested in, items of the day just integers, bits to flip 0 to 1. Can a binary be flipped in a loving way? A light switch vs no light? Binaries are just binaries, just another task to complete? Empowered to not empowered, PR that can be fixed to PR that can’t be fixed IBD through corrupt systems A story, a few more bits than binary states. Potential for distinct states, potential for limited resolution, forests that have never truly been explored. Can sentences be sad, happy, strong, weak, epic, or small? Sad – The man worked his whole life put in years of inspiring work and then was diagnosed with terminal cancer. Happy – Elated the team jumped for joy, the research was finished and the cure was found. Strong – The leader made an example of the man for the entire world to see. Weak – The leader thought they should dilly dally a bit before talking about the subject. Epic – The flare rolled from the star with plasma that painted the night sky with shimmering light in ways one could only dream of seeing. Small – The kitten opened to the door outside was left awe struck to move forward or to refrain. No potential for a sequel, what is the fun in that?
Consistent working brief cases for Defense Attorneys in Corrupt System, not consistent working brief cases for Prosecution?
Corrupt System changes a lot
Art work better when
A+B+C and all A+B+C are unknowns?
Or better when
A=this B=that C=?
Artwork that is open to interpretation more variation more variance not always bad, more variation is not always good
缩小我句子上的差距，不确定这到底是什么意思
Closing the gap on my sentences, not sure exactly what that means
改进是可能的，必须批评自己不是所有的价值都不是所有的价值
Improvement is possible, have to critique myself not all value out not all value in
没有重复使用不好，没有放大的潜力更糟，更新激发了希望和快乐
재사용 불가, 확대 가능성 악화, 업데이트가 희망과 기쁨을 불러일으키지 않음
No reuse bad, no potential for magnification worse, updates inspire hope and joy
Sounding like Military not sounding like Military is Not All Value In for Life
High Potential for Discrepancy in who deserved to win
Coveted Orange haired individuals do not grow on trees regardless of what the public might like to believe
No visits from the military to help me turn up my communication skills? To an all value in system, to an all value out system?
Military families with potential for Favorites not viewed highly Combinatorics with Ginger and Short
Null Cost Nuclear Stockpiles effects on Criminal Justice System?
Nuclear Subs, reactor meltdown potential, good for all the fish on Coral Reef?
Where I fall into the picture Null Costed a Bit, power in a Delay
Research studies on how children in military families adapt to society? Wasn’t traveling all the time, might have appreciated some benefits others in society might not have
Shaking impression of unfairly benefiting not always a simple system, specially in system a free market designed on competition a system that unfairly benefits the winning teams
Kind of scares me to think turning up communication skills can lead to someone walking free years in advance or not
People that can mitigate situations more able to escape the webs of societies Evil In By Design is not always value in for those in Jail that weren’t trained properly
Compound it with some non ideals can make the setup an unpleasant experience for all parties involved
Life is but a Vapor, People that are favorited and trained by society get access to freedom others only dream of, Risking adding someone to the system to help train inmates likely high value in, putting people in Jail to make that happen no guarantee they will make it out alive, no guarantee they won’t die on intake process
Plans that add value to a corrupt system, are sometimes risky, risky in NFA-NFR ways
Narrative Control is power, a powerful tool leaders like to use, leaders know how to turn up communications if they want to
Thus if leadership is not encouraging you to turn up communications updates, probably high potential leadership might have a part for you in the story, a part you can’t always full appreciate
Close to 40 year old men watching Cartoons In By Design?
Underestimating cute, fun, amazing artwork for controlling things, unwise
Energy Efficiency turned up by solar panels, could potentially create infinite energy
Infinite for our practical purposes, not to mention combos like cheaper Ramen Noodles costs that lead to more food more chemical energy, and more updates to solar panel efficiency via the system
Hypothesis scientists that are supported and fed have higher potential to learn swiftly to make updates swiftly
Scientists sitting on beach with super models are higher value in for NASA?
Hard to think I will break the big problems like Compression or Energy Efficiency
很难有时值得做，结合超级计算机和量子计算机+阅读器也许可以以未知的方式增加一些价值
때로는 할 가치가 있는 어려운 일, 슈퍼 컴퓨터와 양자 컴퓨터를 결합한 독자는 알려지지 않은 방식으로 가치를 추가할 수 있습니다.
Hard sometimes worth doing, combine in super computers and quantum computers + readers might be able to add some value in unknown ways
教人们把铅笔和纸放在身边，平板电脑和智能手机的节能潜力以及有时更高价值的数据一致性
사람들에게 연필과 종이를 가까이 구매하도록 가르치고 태블릿과 스마트폰의 절전 가능성과 때때로 더 높은 가치를 지닌 데이터 일관성을 가르칩니다.
Teaching people to keep pencil and paper close buy, potential for tablet and smart phone power savings as well as data consistency that is higher value in at times
视频内容的潜力可以将我的脑力提高 10 倍吗？
내 두뇌 능력을 10배 높일 수 있는 비디오 콘텐츠의 가능성은?
Potential for video content that could increase my brain power 10 fold?
教自己教自己是高价值的，这个老师的欣赏是高价值的，值得做对的事情
스스로 가르치기 위해 자신을 가르치는 것은 높은 가치가 있습니다. 이 교사 감사는 가치가 높은 가치입니다.
Teaching yourself to Teach yourself is High Value In, thus Teacher Appreciation is High Value In, something worth getting right
Wise to figure out how to appreciate, encourage, and validate self, Society not big into adding that value to Gingers it seems
Lessons and Evil In By Design from Orange Haired Individuals a Less Fully Appreciated System
Given someone with a PHD for basic mathematics class?
Potential for Overtrained Know it Alls to steal the show in NFA-NFR ways?
PHDs that don’t appreciate other parts of the chain, unlikely to be High Value In
Not check the research numbers while sitting on the beach? Don’t mind if I do?
我不知道该怎么做
디자인에 대해 무엇을해야할지 모르겠습니다.
I don’t know what to do about that in by design
老师破坏了人们的美好时光作为系统的价值？
사람들의 즐거운 시간을 시스템의 가치로 망치는 교사?
Teachers wrecking people’s good time as a value in system?
Time is valuable don’t feel like you have to read along, I started a research ethics video would like to finish one
Part Trap Part Inspiration Not Ideal Setup
Iffy Reality and Artists to Less Fully Appreciated Not Fully Appreciated
Life can be made to be like Plato’s Cave
Life as a contrast algorithm, Evil in by design Numbers seem to matter less in NFA-NFR ways
Escaping a maze? Get out the door then find out still in a bigger maze? Theon Greyjoy? Non ideals from Game of Thrones
Potential for being turned into a mouse in a maze NFA-NFR
Physics and Reality can be iffed in Not Fully Appreciated ways
Miracles can be made to seem possible, like magic tricks or Hollywood that includes you in the movie, like an Oculus Rift that is directly linked to your brain
Vanilla sky-ish, Matrix-ish, can factor into systems that are not Vanilla sky-ish or Matrix-ish
More than one way to generate inputs iffed outputs iffed
Iffy and Rapid Creative Problem Solving Prototypes In By Design? Incentive for War to Turn up Technology, Evil In By Design NFA-NFR?
Peacemaking High Value In Healthy Competition Blocked Not All Value In For Future, Corrupt people blocking healthy competition higher potential for competition that is Not Fully Appreciated Not Fully Respected
I believe in somethings that not all might fully believe
Potential for reality to be Iffed by the Devil and to be Iffed by God
Devil using an illusive magic trick to get us to jump off a cliff thinking we can fly? Potential in that
God sending a dream that gives us the miracle inspiration for a cure? I believe there is possibility for that. Dream sent by God yet my life seems to remain imperfect? Human and Inspired by Divine not always ideal setup for trust into the system
If someone healed you instantly, when you were sick for years -> think it is God or think it is the Devil initially?
Easy to think we would have judged better than others in society, knowing the end of the story does not always lead to more accurate judgement of characters in the story
Judgmental people crucified Christ after He healed them, easy to say later people that didn’t believe in his healing wanted him dead
Not trusting a system does not always equal want people dead
Might not trust a strip club, does not equal I want it to burn down
Valuing in systems we don’t fully understand can’t fully comprehend not always a simple system, peacemaking a non null cost, knowledge into system, a non null cost a non null cost that does not always work out best for all parties involved
God loves us and wants us to be successful? If I had infinite power, why not send the cure for cancer upfront?
圣灵在应该像治疗癌症一样，但不是吗？
성신 인은 암 치료제와 같아야하지만 그렇지 않습니까?
Holy Ghost In Should Be Like Cure for Cancer In, but it is not?
Vlog 海报在享受海滩之外需要额外的工作以降低系统价值？
Vlog 포스터 시스템에서 덜 가치 있는 해변을 즐기는 것 외에 추가 작업이 필요하십니까?
Vlog Posters Needed Extra work outside of enjoying beaches to a less value in system?
也许我只是错误地使用了圣灵？ 无限力量无限画笔的高潜力
제가 성신을 잘못 사용하고 있는 것은 아닐까요? 무한한 힘 무한 페인트 브러시의 높은 잠재력
Maybe I am just using the Holy Ghost wrong? High Potential for that Infinite Power Infinite Paint Brush
가족을 돕기 위해 10%의 0%를 기부하는 교회나 치아를 고칠 수 있는 기금을 제공하는 스트립 클럽? 그 시스템이 무엇에 투자하는지 정말 의심스럽습니까?
Church that gives 0% of their 10% to help families or strip clubs that give funds that can fix teeth? Really questionable what that system invests in?
关于宽恕的教训 并非所有价值都脱离系统
용서에 대한 교훈 시스템에서 모든 가치가 있는 것은 아닙니다 생강을 죽은 채로 남겨둘 수 있는 끊어진 지지선은 시간이 지남에 따라 반복되는 모든 가치가 시스템에 포함되지 않음
Lesson on Forgiveness Not All Value Out of System Broken Support Lines that could Leave Gingers Dead Left to Reiterate Over Time Not All Value Into System
该系统的平衡正义和判断？ 在所有看起来干净利落并骑着正义白马的同时拯救了一些人？
그 시스템에 대한 균형 잡힌 정의와 판단? 깨끗해 보이고 정의의 백마를 타고 있는 동안 다른 사람을 죽이는 사람을 구하시겠습니까?
Balanced Justice and Judgement for that system? Saves some kills other while all looking squeaky clean and riding white horse of justice?
很难从监狱里欣赏艺术
감옥 내부에서 예술을 감상하기 어렵습니다.
Hard to appreciate Art from inside a Jail Cell
观众成员减少销售更多浪费时间 NFA-NFR
더 적은 판매에 청중 회원은 더 많은 시간을 낭비합니다 NFA-NFR
Audience members to less sales more wasted time NFA-NFR
正常运行的非损坏系统的非零成本，允许损坏的系统在 Shiny Blue Marble 上运行
손상되지 않은 작동 시스템에 대한 null이 아닌 비용, 손상된 시스템은 Shiny Blue Marble에서 작동하여 도망칠 수 있습니다.
Non null cost to functional non corrupt systems, corrupt systems being allowed to get away with operating on Shiny Blue Marble
当邪恶的设计是高价值的时候，宽恕是高价值的
디자인에 의한 이블 인(Evil In By Design)이 하이 밸류 아웃(High Value Out)일 때 용서 높은 가치 인(High Value In)
Forgiveness High Value In when Evil In By Design is High Value Out
Fg++HVI-EIBD-HVO
宽恕，爱，恩典比设计中的邪恶更大
용서, 사랑, 악보다 더 큰 은혜 In By Design
Forgiveness, Love, Grace > EIBD
FLG > EIBD
宽恕不是最理想的可能是语言学构建方式的问题
용서는 차선책이며 언어학이 구성되는 방식에 문제가 있을 수 있습니다.
Forgiveness is suboptimal might be a problem with way linguistics is constructed
如果通过更新提供的语言有限….
아래의 언어가 제한된 업데이트를 통해 제공되는 경우….
If the language under provides via updates limited….
历史倾向，努力工作，聪明的思维可以在设计中产生比邪恶更大的价值
역사성향, 근면성실, 현명한 사고는 By Design에서 악보다 더 큰 가치에서 실질적인 결과를 낳을 수 있습니다.
Tendency for History, Hard work, Smart thinking can have real results in Value that is greater than Evil in By Design
以防飞机不会从天上掉下来
비행기가 하늘에서 떨어지지 않는 경우의 포인트
Point in case Airplanes Don’t Fall Out of the Sky
如果魔鬼总是从沮丧中获胜，飞行员会在飞行中途放弃
악마가 항상 낙담에서 이기면 조종사는 비행 중간에 포기할 것입니다.
If Devil always won from Discouragement, Pilots would give up half way through the flight
航班并不总是从天上掉下来，只是偶尔会飞入建筑物？
비행기는 항상 하늘에서 떨어지는 것이 아니라 때때로 건물로 날아가 버리나요?
Flights don’t always fall out of the sky, just every once in a while they are flown into buildings?
死于恐怖分子逃跑的可能性不大，来自过程的恐惧是非空的
테러리스트 도피로 사망할 가능성은 낮아, 과정에서 파생되는 공포는 null이 아니다.
Chance of dying from terrorist flight unlikely, fear derived from process is non null
人员系统和政府倾向于尝试将事情从损失变成胜利
사람 시스템과 정부는 손실을 승리로 바꾸려고 노력하는 경향이 있습니다.
People systems and governments tend to try and turn things from losses into wins
比如 Evil In By Design 让航班不会从天上掉下来
예를 들어 Evil In By Design to Flights는 하늘에서 떨어지지 않습니다.
Such as Evil In By Design to Flights Don’t Fall Out of the Sky
放弃支持 Evil In By Design 系统的真正潜力
Evil In By Design 시스템 지원을 포기할 수 있는 실제 가능성
Real Potential for giving up on supporting a system of Evil In By Design
邪恶系统设计非理想公共关系形象闪亮蓝色大理石又名地球
System of Evil In By Design 비 이상적 홍보 이미지 Shiny Blue Marble aka Earth
System of Evil In By Design Non Ideal Public Relations Image for Shiny Blue Marble aka Earth
Real Potential for Giving up on System of Evil In By Design to More Not Always a Simple System
RP4GU-onSoEIBD-2More-NAASS-NNInvC
EIBD-Disc-DiscNI
设计中的邪恶令人沮丧，沮丧是不理想的
Evil In By Design은 낙담하고 낙담은 비 이상적입니다.
Evil In By Design is Discouraging, Discouraging is Non Ideal
说某事是不理想的，以一种不被充分欣赏的方式鼓励
어떤 것이 이상적이지 않다고 말하고 완전히 감사하지 않은 방식으로 격려하기
Saying something is Non Ideal, Encouraging in a Not Fully Appreciated Way
一个非理想的系统比错误的系统更令人鼓舞，设计中的邪恶
시스템은 비이상적이며 시스템이 잘못된 것보다 더 고무적입니다.
A system is Non Ideal is more encouraging than the system is Wrong, Evil In By Design
闪亮的蓝色大理石地球在设计中设置为非理想与邪恶？
Shiny Blue Marble Earth는 Non Ideal vs Evil In By Design으로 설정되어 있습니까?
Shiny Blue Marble Earth set to Non Ideal vs Evil In By Design?
可能导致设计中的邪恶的不理想的可见性
In By Design에 있는 악의 이상적이지 않은 가시성으로 이어질 수 있습니다.
Might lead to non ideal visibility of the Evil that is In By Design
범죄자를 비이상적 벌금으로 상향 판매할 가능성 사회에서 훈련을 받은 적이 있는 선량한 시민이 나쁜 것보다 더 크다는 것을 알고 더 나은 시민이 의도적으로 악함
Potential to up sell criminals as Non Ideal Fine Upstanding Citizens that have been failed by training in society is greater than bad knew better citizen is evil in by design
直接跳跃有时更难
때때로 더 어려운 직접 점프
Direct Jumps sometimes Harder
犯罪领导世界，完全接受？
세계를 이끄는 범죄자, 완전히 받아들여졌습니까?
Criminal to Leads the World, fully accepted?
加速，跳跃很重要，社会喜欢将非空时间成本置于非理想的方式中，而生活只是一团糟
램프 업, 점프 문제, 사회는 인생이 단지 증기일 때 이상적이지 않은 방식으로 Null이 아닌 시간 비용을 넣는 것을 좋아합니다.
Ramp up, Jumps matter, society likes putting Non Null Time Costs in the Way that are Non Ideal when Life is but a vapor
提升并不全是坏事，从囚犯到世界领袖并不总是对其他囚犯来说都是理想的
램프 업이 모두 나쁜 것은 아니며 Prisoner to World Leader가 항상 다른 죄수에게 이상적인 것은 아닙니다.
Ramp ups not all bad, Prisoner to World Leader not always all ideal for other Prisoners
未经培训的支持会导致更多未经培训的支持计划？
지원 아웃에 의해 훈련되지 않은 것은 설계에 의해 지원 아웃에 의해 더 많은 훈련을 받지 않은 것으로 이어집니까?
Untrained by support out leads to more untrained by support out in by design?
容易欣赏 不完全欣赏
감사하기 쉬움 완전히 감사하지 않음
Easy to Appreciate Not Fully Appreciate
Words constructed by letters, Word the building the letter each floor of the building
Sentence constructed by words, Sentence the building words the floors of the building
Paragraphs, Stories, Books, Diagrams, the buildings, constructed from the blocks, sentences as bricks
Building the building not always a simple system
What is a sentence followed by a bad sentence?
What is bad sentence followed by a good sentence?
When is a question value in? When is a question value out?
What would a day spent on syntax and structure do to changing my language changing my thought processes?
Ability to structure in a more logical way could be higher value in at times
Ability to structure in a more absurd way useful to humor possibly not fully appreciated
Ability to structure in a way that confounds, mystery to reveal, like writing a riddle yet to be fully appreciated
Time is a non null investment cost, knowing what level my training might be at the end of one day of time training questionable
value in can’t always easily be quantified, not a fully appreciated system
can’t see and map neurons directly yet or can we?
On the plus side, more sentences more potential to see possible errors in my logic and thought processes
Summarization powerful, pulls relevant information from a larger set of information
Proper categorization and classification without ability to pull relevant information from larger set of information? Without a reminder the system is limited resolution in not fully appreciated ways?
Tendency to judgment, criminal is bad evil in by design, reinforcing the system has full resolution is not all ideal for arguing and solving the issue
Categorization and Classification is not all value out, Summarization is not all value out, refining basics is not all value out, visibility to what children might be being taught not all value out for people that wish to be leaders
讲故事的人能否以更容易正确总结的方式讲故事？
이야기꾼이 이야기를 더 정확하게 요약할 수 있는 방식으로 이야기할 수 있습니까?
Can storytellers tell story in a way that is more easy to summarize correctly?
假设以有用的方式构建故事可以提高正确总结重要信息的能力
유용한 방식으로 이야기를 구성하는 가설은 중요한 정보를 적절하게 요약하는 더 나은 능력으로 이어질 수 있습니다.
Hypothesis structuring story in a useful way could lead to better ability to summarize the important information properly
适合大多数观众的 Dijkstra 算法？
대부분의 청중을 위한 다익스트라 알고리즘?
Dijkstra’s Algorithm for most of Audience?
能够迅速提取相关信息可能是有效沟通的高价值
관련 정보를 신속하게 추출할 수 있어 효과적인 커뮤니케이션을 위한 High Value In이 될 수 있습니다.
Able to pull relevant information out swiftly could be High Value In to effective communication
Writing stories in a way that is easier to summarize better or worse for refining summarization ability? Might lead to false sense of security, words just fall into place
Writing stories in a completely non logical way to make it more difficult to summarize is all value in? Might be value in both very easy to summarize very hard to summarize, get both down right majority of cases better accounted for?
Concise communication can increase throughput, increased throughput is not always ideal for more concise communication in
Increasing the rate our brain communicates with itself
Potential for more ideas, teaching math potential for more things to add up, for more non ideals to be called out for people
Raising awareness about debt is not all value in for reduced stress
焦虑的成本可能高于提醒债务作为价值添加到系统 NFA-NFR 中的成本
부채가 시스템 NFA-NFR에 가치로 추가된다는 알림보다 불안이 더 클 수 있음
Anxiety in might be greater cost than Reminder of Debt Adds as Value into system NFA-NFR
将国家在密室中犯下的所有错误修复到一个简单的系统到一个担心增值的简单系统？
뒷방에서 저지르는 네이션스의 모든 실수를 단순한 시스템으로, 고민하는 것이 부가가치를 높이는 단순한 시스템으로?
Fix all the mistakes of Nations made in back rooms to a simple system to a simple system that worrying about adds value?
Optimized communication can lead to hubris as well, feeling of others points less valid less useful to system
I think that might be 2+3 = 5, duh why would they say that
Inspiring sorry for adding value is not all value in, not all value in for training youth
Patronizing discouraging easy to do with Shiny Blue Marble full of Non Ideals (nicer than saying more realistic Shiny Blue Marble of Evil In By Design that inspires Discouragement and Miscommunication In By Design that has high potential to lead to woe)
Advice that might lead to more saved families more lives saved NFA-NFR
Saying things the right way might lead to less anger and less anger management training, less anger management training is not an all value in system
Systems and people exist that are not perfect, prepare people for that or don’t prepare people for that?
Being a discouraging judgmental jerk in for the good of the world? I told you so, I told you so, I told you so, I told you so -> Not sure I agree with that tactic
Can see how some might disagree, harder when discouragement can used by non perfect people to get their way
Balancing advice hard, not being leverage in, not being personal leverage in driven by evil in by design not a simple system
Potential for Patronizing NFA-NFR
Potential for variations in way things are taught
Taught there is unreasonable punishment for truth value into system
Not all ideal for establishing precision
Being non judgmental of people that say I told you so not simple
I told you not be judgmental (I told you so in its own right)
Being harsher can lead to longer term lessons, being less harsh can be more encouragement in at critical times, hard to get right plus world full of problems
Lessons on how harsh the world can be + a world full of harsh systems can lead to fuck off design not fully appreciated not fully respected
Strong discipline followed by high potential for war the next week NFA-NFR?
Harsh lessons and future not guaranteed, future attempted to be controlled NAVI
Parents have a want to train and add value in real ways to the future, not always a simple system, a month in a university to get hit by a bus walking across the street?
Simple to think Life is guaranteed when death doesn’t happen that often in our lives
Life has longevity in by design factors into decision making
Life has longevity and is but a vapor
Sometimes decisions have two choices that can lead to more than one optimal path
Stay inside and studying leads to degree that pays bills for years or Enjoys Life a little more before getting cancer early life
God allows the problems the idea we were all optimized in the process unwise
God allows evil in by design -> life has longevity or life is but a vapor to more value?
God is fighting our battles and life has longevity
Longevity of hard life not always more value in
God of fighting our battles while allowing evil in by design > No Freedom Worry is Wisdom?
Evil In By Design is a Risk, a Risk Prayer should Ideally Mitigate better than it has been doing, Negated Supply Lines is not Risk Ideally Mitigated
Knowing when to add value to system vs add value through harsh or less harsh lesson always simple? Life can’t raise complexity on a dime in non ideal ways that lead to unable to process effectively?
Listening, Concise Communication, Effective Communication, and Better Queries a Complex System a Complex System that needs to be upsold to be optimized effectively
光顾会教人灰心，灰心会导致对灰心的反思，这并不是所有的价值，以减少灰心
애용하는 것은 낙담을 가르치고, 낙담은 낙담에 대한 가치가 없는 낙담의 반영으로 이끕니다.
Patronizing teaches discouragement, discouraged leads to reflections of discourage that are not all value in to less discouragement in
父母对儿女气馁，儿女气馁对父母来说是不理想的鼓励和气馁，父母不鼓励更容易气馁
부모는 아들과 딸에게 낙담하고, 자녀는 낙담하고 부모에게는 이상적이지 않은 격려와 낙담을, 덜 격려하는 부모는 낙담시킬 가능성이 더 큽니다.
Parents are discouraging to sons and daughters, sons and daughters discouraged are non ideal encouragement out and discouragement in for parents, Parents less encouraged have more potential for being discouraging
Discouragement and Encouragement can be insulating, Discouraging can be critical into system, perfectionism into system
Perfectionism can be discouragement into system NFA-NFR
Getting things right, more potential for getting things wrong to be seen
I teach 5+5=10 to less valued than Calculus reminder to fast paced world?
Addition required for Calculus, but less fully appreciated when more complex systems add to mix
Basic sentence
Never say die
3 words, 3 words of encouragement, basic, maybe of less value
More important to remind people of all the things they got wrong?
You did that wrong, I told you so, punishment, punishing systems in by design
Alcoholic drunk ruined my party, I don’t want them around me anymore….
More free time for them to drink themselves into a coma
Then the updates stop
Easy to value out people that don’t want help, easy to think we got it perfect
Not trained for that, people that are trained for that are not always value in NFA-NFR
Corrupt system trained to “Help”, Corrupt system trained to “Help” an active known by people in the system allowed to fester over years and years of debt into system
Maybe not an active known, maybe more of active obfuscation by challenges of life
Easy to be judgmental with unknowns in system, and easy to teach that as value in for others -> they judge on limited resolution guess I have to as well
Add in expectation same user experience from life while AB Testing is more like ABCDEF Testing
Being less judgmental of judgmental systems is Hard, is Hard NFA, is Hard Worth Doing, is Hard Worth Actively Turning Up
Finding ways to upsell judgmental comments to more value in?
I told you so 2+2=4
Free math lessons, rebuke more than some get
Family member lost is less value in than valuing out I told you so to driving off a cliff
FML-LVI-TVO-ITYS-2PofDOACliff
失去的家庭成员的价值不如珍惜我告诉过你的，以至于要开车掉下悬崖
잃어버린 가족은 소중하게 여기는 것보다 가치가 적습니다.
Family member lost is less value in than valuing out I told you so to point of driving off a cliff
照镜子，我们告诉自己我们需要理发需要淋浴
거울을 보면서 우리는 머리를 자르고 샤워가 필요하다고 스스로에게 말합니다
Looking in the mirror, we tell ourselves we need a hair cut need a shower
모든 사람이 시스템을 비판하는 것은 아니며, 모든 사람이 거울을 볼 수 있는 것은 아니며 일부는 샤워를 할 수 없는 부패한 감옥에 갇혀 있음을 상기시킵니다.
Not all value out being critical of the system, not all value out remind ourselves that not all get to look into the mirror, some are stuck in corrupt jails unable to take a shower
没有完美主义的批判性批评并不总是一个简单的系统
항상 단순한 시스템이 아닌 완벽주의가 없는 비판적 비평
Critical Critiques without Perfectionism in not always a simple system
淋浴和新衣服，现在鼻子突出那些痣突出
샤워와 새 옷, 이제 코가 눈에 띄니 두더지가 눈에 띄네
Shower and new clothes, now that nose stands out those moles stand out
讨厌的，令人厌恶的，并不是所有的价值
불쾌하고 혐오스러운 것이 모든 가치는 아닙니다.
Nasty, Repulsive, is not all value in
주황색 머리는 재정적으로 데이트를 하는 데 있어 항상 부정적인 알림으로 표시되며 모든 가치가 있습니까? 누가 더 적절해 보이는가에 대한 모든 가치는 무엇입니까?
橙色的头发作为对财务状况的持续负面提醒，以约会，所有价值？ 谁的所有价值似乎更合适？
Orange hair as a constant negative reminder to finances to getting a date, all value in? All value in for who seems more appropriate?
논리가 흐르는 방식이 간단합니까? 삶은 문제를 낳고, 문제는 고칠 필요가 있고, 일부를 고치면 더 많은 것을 고칠 수 있기를 바라는 마음으로 이어집니다.
Simple to see the way the logic flows? Life gives problems, problems need fixing, fixing some leads to wishing to able to fix more, more that are not always as easy to fix
可以洗澡但不能约会，这是什么因素？
샤워는 할 수 있지만 데이트는 할 수 없습니다. 그 요인은 무엇입니까?
Can get a shower but can’t get a date, what factors into that?
需要教训导致结果 NFA-NFR？
NFA-NFR 결과로 이어지는 수업을 가르쳐야 합니까?
Need to teach a lesson leads to results NFA-NFR?
Nicotine and Coffee rocks, does not always lead to more ideal encouragement and logic into the system
Logic out of the system ok for them not ok for me? of No Issue?
Nicotine earlier could have lead to better decisions, higher quality output, doesn’t lead to higher quality output, then why would it be allowed to remain in the system?
System is not perfect, then using harsh lessons to teach not perfect either
A+B+C = only listen to A+B?
Parents have C where C=D,E,F,G,H,I etc
Unknowns that factor into A+B advice and logic
System was imperfect and the future provides updates
System is still imperfect, past has lead to issues, potential for overcompensation in other direction
overcompensation does not always lead to less forgiving
Got it wrong, update our process, tendency for hubris to think we got it right
Past was imperfect future will likely be imperfect true
Past was imperfect and future can be more imperfect than the past without active additions to system also true
Imperfect Good Enough Systems Not Always Value for Training rug can be pulled out from under you
Born -> Peace -> Go to school <- Interrupt War
Imperfect Good Enough Systems NAVI4Trn HP2L2 ImpGESys always valued out over a life span
Bring someone else into a system of Imperfect Good Enough Systems are valued out by default?
No Dates Not All Value Out In By Design
Roof over head paycheck is an Imperfect Good Enough System and governments have a tendency to remove them
Seems to be how the logic goes
There is a precedence for that for corrupt governments and evil in by design
Fixed in 2150 does not equal 2022 no problems
Possibly better to be born in 2150 more updates potential for more refined Shiny Blue Marble
My issue is the system keeps iffing to a non enjoyment of the system
Broken Supply Lines continuously re-enabled does give inspiration for teachers, not enough teachers in the system can lead to more Broken Supply Lines
Incentive to artificially add Broken Supply Lines to system of others for inspiration while drinking champagne from the balcony
Harsh Lesson in for Systemic Value while Leaders profit to a less ideal system, a less ideal system worth impeaching
Old leaders that break my supply lines on purpose to inspire more teachers in by design not a fully valuable system
Old have a tendency to not have taught enough lessons need someone to use to communicate their point more effectively
A system that slowly devalues your input over time is not all value in for effective message out, reduced effective message is not always value in, unknowns are a bit of unknowns
Discouragement, shut up, stop talking, I don’t want to hear that, reiterated in nicer ways but still getting message across, not always value in
Didn’t say it in those words doesn’t equal not effective delivery of message
Christ as silence in, forced to listen to the wind to think that might be God in?
Parents failing you, expected, people not perfect
But when it feels like God has failed you, a God of infinite power that lets your support lines be negated, hard to feel as much value in
Continuous faith tests of broken supply lines are not all value in for encouragement, discouragement in is not all value in for the Church and belief God of Cosmic Power loves and cherishes His people
여배우와 배우, 톤과 억양 Actresses and Actors, Tone and Inflection 여배우와 배우는 특별한 것을 더하고 작가는 특별한 것을 더합니다 Actresses and Actors add something special, Writers add something special 이상적으로 모든 여배우가 역할을 할 수 있고 이상적으로는 영화 캐릭터에서 발견되는 특성이 여배우 및 배우의 정신 상태와 상관 관계가 없습니다. Ideally any actress could play a role, ideally the qualities found in the characters of movies would have no correlation to mental state of Actresses and Actors
영웅과 관련되어 있는 것이 모두 나쁜 것도 아니고 좋은 것도 아닙니다. Being associated to a hero not all bad, and not all good 악당과 관련되어 있는 것이 모두 나쁜 것은 아니며(명성과 재산), 모두가 좋은 것도 아닙니다. Being associated to a villain not all bad (fame and fortune), and not all good
인식이 항상 완전히 인식할 수 있는 것은 아님, 판단하는 다른 사람의 생각을 투영하는 능력 항상 완전히 인식할 수 있는 것은 아님 perceptions not always fully appreciable, ability to project thoughts of others judging not always fully appreciable
대작에서 괴물을 연기하고, 공포영화에서 편히 흔들릴 때? Playing the monster in the block buster, in the horror movie to easy able to shake when convenient?
사람들은 영화에서 자신이 맡은 역할에 대해 사회에 더해진 가치보다 더 가치를 높이 평가합니까? People valued more for the part they play in the movie than their value added to society to fully appreciated?
극장, 명성, 무대 위의 예술가들이 정신에 영향을 미치지 않습니까? Theatre, Fame, Artists on Stage, to no effect on the psyche?
그들이 추가하는 가치로 훈련되고, 무대에서 만들어낸 출력은 당신이 이것을 앉혀야 해서 미안하다는 말을 하는 것입니까? Trained as value they add, the output they make on stage to told sorry you need to sit this one out?
스타 축구 선수는 오랫동안 스타, 스타 복서는 오랫동안 스타, 스타 음악가는 오랫동안 스타 Star football player only a star for so long, star boxers only a star for so long, star musician only a star for so long
DE Magnify Studio는 전쟁과 부패한 정부로 인해 제대로 평가받지 못한 시스템으로 인해 좋은 시절을 보냈습니다. DE Magnify Studio in their good years due to wars and corrupt governments to less fully appreciated systems
명성은 약간의 위험이 있어 잠시 동안만 권한을 부여합니다. Fame is a bit of a risk, empowering only for a time
리더십은 약간의 위험이 있어 잠시 동안만 권한을 부여합니다. Leadership is a bit of a risk, empowering only for a time
의사가 되다가 어느 날 손이 너무 많이 흔들려서 수술을 하기에는 가치가 떨어지게 됩니까? Being a doctor and then one day hand shakes too much to be in surgery, to good years of less value?
시스템의 모든 가치가 아니라 최근에 나에게 무엇을 해줬나요? What have you done for me lately, not an all value in system
최근에 나에게 무슨 짓을 한거야 -> 특권, 사회가 우리에게 빚을 지고 있다는 가정 What have you done for me lately -> Privilege, assumption society owes us something
어제 1달러가 효과가 있었다고 해서 오늘 1달러가 효과가 있다고 가정합니까? Assume that just because a dollar worked yesterday a dollar will work today?
NFA-NFR에서 더 낮은 가치로 설정된 금융 시스템 Financial systems set to less value in NFA-NFR
나에게 일어날 수 없는 일에 대한 기대는 나에게 일어나지 않을 것입니다. 시스템의 모든 가치가 아닙니다. Expectation of that can’t happen to me won’t happen to me not an all value in system
특권은 용서할 수 없는 시스템으로 이어질 수 있습니다. Privilege can lead to unforgiving systems
믿음 계산기를 모든 가치로 가져갈 수는 없습니까? Belief calculators can’t be taken away to all value in?
배우, 여배우, 스타 풋볼 선수는 더 많이 저축해야 할 수 있으며 더 많이 저축하면 사회에서 항상 충분히 인정받지 못하는 엘리트 지위로 이어질 수 있습니다.
Actors, Actresses, Star Football players might need to save more, save more can lead to elite status not always fully appreciated by society
줄 수 있음 뺏을 수 있음, 유지할 수 있음을 유지할 수 없음을 쉽게 나타낼 수 있음
Can be given can be taken away, can maintain that to can’t maintain that easy to be able to turn up
사람들을 거리로 내몰았고 더 많은 사람들을 거리로 내몰 수 있는 잠재력이 있는 바 PR NFA-NFR
Bar PR in that has puts people on the street and has potential to put more people on the streets NFA-NFR
엉뚱한 지도력을 한동안 방치한 채 큰 영향을 미칠 수 있다 NFA가 쉽게 온전히 존중할 수 없음
Wrong leadership left in charge for a while can have large impacts NFA not easily able to fully respect
잘못된 수학으로 공급선을 끊는 제도 탄핵 제도가 간단하지 않다
Impeachment of System that Breaks Supply Lines based on Bad Math Not a Simple System to Turn Up
시스템의 모든 가치에 대해 내가 담당하는 역할을 모르십니까?
Not knowing the part I play in this to an all value in system?
가시성이 제한되어 비이상적인 가능성이 있음 NFA-NFR
Visibility out being limited equals potential for non ideals NFA-NFR
메시지가 제한적일 때 PR에 대한 이익을 통합하기 어렵습니다.
Hard to consolidate gains to PR when message is being limited
그 안에 있는 가치가 있는 것이 항상 보이는 것은 아니며, 보이지 않는 것은 보다 현명하지 못한 시스템에 완전히 존중되지 않습니다.
Value in that is Value in is not always seen, things that are not seen to Not Fully Respected to a more unwise system
항상 단순한 시스템이 아닌 더 많은 것에 대한 편견에 근거하여 사람들을 오판할 수 있는 제한된 해상도와 높은 가능성
Limited Resolution and High Potential for Misjudging People based on Biases to more, not always a simple system
브이로그를 읽을 수 있을 때 브이로그를 입력하시겠습니까? 브이로그를 입력할 수 있는데도 브이로그를 읽고 있나요?
Typing a vlog when I could be reading a vlog? Reading a vlog when I could be typing a vlog?
감옥에서 풀려나면 가장 먼저 하고 싶은 일은 브이로그 포스트를 듣는 것입니다. 메시지를 듣거나 듣지 않는다는 이유로 사람들에 대한 편견을 갖지 않는 것이 가장 좋습니다.
First thing you want to do when release from Jail is listen to a vlog post? Best not to hold biases against people for listening or not listening to message
설계상 제한된 시간의 손상된 시스템은 NFA-NFR의 시스템이 덜 부패할 수 있는 교육에 대한 완전한 이해를 감소시킵니다.
Corrupt system of limit time in by design leads to less full appreciation of training that could lead to less corrupt system in NFA-NFR
5년 뒤에 나가면 이걸 듣고 싶어질 수도 있고, 20년 뒤에 남는 게 남은 시간으로 하는 게 더 나을지도 몰라. NFA-NFR
Let out after 5 years might want to listen to this, left in 20 years might have better things to do with their remaining time NFA-NFR
이것을 들어야 한다, 저것을 들어야 한다, 유용한 시스템, 그것이 유용한 사람들에게
Have to listen this, have to listen to that, a useful system, to those that it is useful to
설계에 의한 제한 시간의 부패한 시스템으로 인해 사회는 설계에 따라 2+2=7 시스템에 대해 더 충분히 이해해야 합니다.
Corrupt System of Limit Time in by Design Leads to Society having to have a more full appreciation of 2+2=7 systems in by design
디자인에 의한 교육을 위한 제한 시간은 디자인에 의한 사회를 위한 논리가 아닙니다
Limit Time for Training In By Design is not more Logic for Society In By Design
그들은 그 잘못을 추가했습니다. 용서가 없습니까? 사회가 그들에게 무슨 짓을 한 후?
They added that wrong, no forgiveness in? After what society did to them?
사람들이 방어적이지 않은 사람들이 자신의 법적 기술을 연마해야 한다고 느끼지 않은 사람들이 감옥에서 결국 자신이 변호사, 시스템의 권력을 잡을 수 있는 변호사가 될 필요가 있다는 느낌을 갖게 된 다음 잠재적으로 오용될 수 있다는 사실을 완전히 이해하지 못합니다. 동일한 시스템에 대한 그 힘
Not sure people fully appreciate that people that were not defensive did not feel like they have to sharpen their legal skills before Jail can end up feeling like they need to be a lawyer, a lawyer that can take power of the system, and then potentially misuse that power against that same system
율법주의는 생명을 위한 시스템의 모든 가치가 아닙니다 NFA-NFR 율법주의에는 부작용이 있습니다 보호주의에는 부작용이 있습니다
Legalism not an all value in system for lives involved NFA-NFR Legalism has side effects protectionism has side effects
모든 부작용이 나쁜 것은 아니며, 경청하도록 가르칠 수 있으며 격려가 추가하는 것과 그렇지 않은 것을 더욱 충분히 감사할 수 있습니다.
Not all side effects are bad, can teach to listen and more fully appreciate encouragement what it adds and what it does not
율법주의와 용서하지 않음, 옳지 못함, 재앙의 가능성 높음
Legalism and Unforgiveness, Hard to get right, High Potential for Woe
다양한 영화와 이야기의 악당을 변호하는 연습을 하시겠습니까?
Practice being Defense Lawyer for Villains in different Movies and Stories?
Having to defend that set without judgement to simple?
네거티브 PR 약간의 절제된 표현
Negative PR a bit of an understatement
간단하죠? Simple Right?
그들의 이야기에서 가장 어두운 부분을 모두 언어학, 조합론 및 NLP가 포함된 믿을 수 있는 하나의 시스템으로 통합하시겠습니까?
Consolidate all the darkest parts of their stories into one believable system turned up with linguistics, combinatorics, and NLP?
무엇이 용서에 이르고 무엇이 용서되지 않는지에 대한 연구 High Value In
Research on what leads to forgiveness and what does not is High Value In
용서해야 할 것인가 아니면 용서하지 말아야 할 것인가에 따라 용서하라는 사람의 메시지를 믿어야 합니까?
Should I forgive or should I not forgive dependent on should I trust the message of the person telling me to forgive?
Walter Cronkite는 용서가 중요하고 할 가치가 있다고 말합니까? 아니면 Bane이 용서가 중요하고 가치가 있다고 말합니까?
Walter Cronkite tells your Forgiveness is important and worth doing or Bane telling you Forgiveness is important and worth doing?
누가 메시지를 전하는지에 대한 선입견, 아니 편견은 항상 간단한 시스템입니까?
Preconceived notions about who is giving the message, no Bias always a simple system?
Bane은 Scorpion Spider Dragon과 같은 대비 알고리즘입니다.
Bane is a contrast algorithm, kind of like a Scorpderagon
신뢰할 수 있는 사람은 이상적이지 않은 방식으로 증가할 수 있습니다. 당시 Cronkite의 나쁜 놈은 음성으로 하루를 구했습니다.
Trustworthy can be ramped in non ideal ways, Bad guy in then Cronkite like voice saves the day
사악한 Cronkite 잠재력 NFA-NFR
Evil Cronkite Potential NFA-NFR
나는 신을 믿고 신을 완전히 이해하지 못한다. 내 논리가 제한된 해상도에 기반을 두고 있음을 세상에 상기시키는 것이 가장 좋다.
I believe in God and I don’t fully understand God, best to remind world my logic is built on Limited Resolution
NFA-NFR을 완전히 보호하고 싶지 않을 수 있는 사람 보호
Protecting people we might not fully want to protect NFA-NFR
대낮에 난파된 경기장에 대한 편견? 왠지 퓨처라마가 생각나네요
Bias for wrecked a stadium in broad daylight? Kind of reminds me of Futurama
“너무 아름답지만 너무 중립적” – Zap Brannigan, Futurama
“So beautiful yet so neutral” – Zap Brannigan, Futurama
당신이 서 있는 공화당원과 민주당원은 부적합한 SSI 시스템으로 이어지는 방식으로 국가 부채를 증가시킨 혐의를 받고 있습니다. 어떻게 변명하시겠습니까?
Republicans and Democrats you stand accused of ramping the national debt in way that leads to an inadequate SSI system, How do you plead?
“나는 휴식을 취한다” – Zapp Brannigan, Futurama
“I rest my case” – Zap Brannigan, Futurama
유머와 안전 최적화 100%?
Humor and Safety Optimized 100%?
유머 시스템의 값이 시스템의 100% 값이 아님, 시스템의 1000%에 대한 잠재력 -50%의 잠재력
Humor a value in system not a 100% value in system, potential for 1000% in system potential for -50% potential
유머는 약간의 예술이자 약간의 문제 해결입니다.
Humor is a bit of Art and a bit of Problem Solving
들어보세요 – 농담은 충분히 재미있지 않습니다 Listen – Jokes are not funny enough 사과 – 유머가 부족하여 공백기를 남겨둔 점 사과드립니다. Apologize – I apologize for leaving a vacuum with not enough humor 해결 – 명확화 아이디어 개발 확산적 수렴적 사고 구현 Solve – Clarify Ideate Development Implement Divergent Convergent Thinking 감사합니다. 이 사실을 알려주셔서 감사합니다. Thank – Thank you for bring this to our attention
시간 고블린은 나무에서 자라지 않습니다, Free Starter Image Time Goblins don’t grow on trees, Free Starter Image무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image무료 스타터 이미지 Free Starter Image
최고의 결과 일관된 웃음
Top Result Consistent Laughs
Humor as a Non Null Time Cost Reducer?
If You truly value Drama, do you turn up Horror and Humor?
Get served horror all the time leads to wanting to see something else
Get served humor and only laughs all the time leads to wanting to see something else
Perfect vacuum for Drama NFA-NFR
Studio weaponization of other content NFA-NFR
Force leaders to watch 2 hours of news right before a 10 minute press brief is all value in?
Our updates required leads to less appreciation for updates and new updaters combined NFA
Combo buy out of system via forced to watch content for extended lengths NFA?
A세트의 어떤 질문이 A’를 더 웃게 할까?
Which questions from set A will lead to more laughs A’?
모든 질문이 처리량 증가에 가치가 있는 것은 아닙니까?
Not all questions are value in for increased throughput?
내 콘텐츠를 비웃는 게 나쁜가요?
Bad to make fun of my own content?
남자가 통신 업데이트를 하고 있으니 잘 들어보세요….
Man is making communications updates, better listen up….
의사 소통의 이익을 위해 항상 가치를 두지 않는 자기 자신을 너무 진지하게 생각합니다.
Taking self too serious not always value in for communication gains
장난꾸러기란?
Mean hecklers?
Hecklers는 일반적으로 낙담하려고 노력하고 낙담과 싸울 방법을 찾는 것이 높은 가치를 가질 수 있습니다.
Hecklers generally trying to discourage, finding a way to fight discouragement could be High Value In
“명예 배지처럼 착용하십시오” – Tyrion Lannister, Game of Thrones
“Wear it like a badge of honor” – Tyrion Lannister, Game of Thrones
Heckle 자신은 아마도 hecklers가 작동하는 방법을 배울 수 있습니다
Heckle yourself probably can learn how hecklers might work
확인, 존중, 가치 있는 것은 격려가 추가하는 것이며, 낙담은 아마도 야수 같은 사람들이 그 반대를 원한다는 것을 의미합니다
Validation, Respect, Valued is what encouragement adds, discouragement likely means people like hecklers want to do the opposite
격려 -> 작은 여자 남자? 남성다움에 도전하기 때문에 낙담하고, 사회에서 보호자로서의 지위를 무시함
Encouraging -> Little effeminate man? Discouraging because it challenges manhood, disrespectful of status in society as protector
“베이컨을 집으로 가져옵니다.” -> 비꼬는 말을 다른 방식으로 할 수 있습니까?
“Brings home the bacon” -> said sarcastically said in another way possible?
집에서 너무 가까운 곳에서 타격할 가능성이 있습니까? 나 자신을 조롱하고 있음, 내가 복구할 수 없는 방식으로 스윙할 수 있음, 시스템 내부 작동에 대한 이상적이지 않은 액세스, 버튼 누름 방법을 알고 있음 NFA-NFR
Potential for hitting too close to home? am heckling myself, might be able to swing in way I can’t recover from, non ideal access to the inner workings of the system, knows how to push buttons NFA-NFR
알아내면 어떻게 사람들이 날 빤히 쳐다볼 수 있는지, 어떻게 사람들이 날 무시할 수 있는지 연구하면 그에 대비할 수 있어
If I figure out, if I research how people can punk me, how people can disrespect me I can prepare for that
나는 논리를 좋아하고 배우는 것에 관심이 있습니다.
I like logic, I care about learning -> potential to throw shit on that
사람들이 거리로 나가기 전에 보편적 기본 소득을 제공해야 합니다. -> 사람들이 옳은 것에 대해 항상 동의하는 것은 아닙니다. 사람들은 그것을 마약에 사용하고 서로에게 오줌을 싸고 아무 것도 남기지 않는 것이 더 낫다는 야수들이 말하는 것입니다.
We need to provide Universal Basic Income before people wind up on the street -> people don’t always agree on what is right people will just use it for drugs and pissing on each other better to leave them with nothing is what a heckler would say
우리는 버튼을 누를 수 있는 것에 더 많이 접근할 수 있기 때문에 높은 가치에서 자신과 논쟁하는 법을 배우며, 눌린 버튼은 더 많이 눌릴 가능성이 높습니다.
Learning to argue against yourself high value in, because we have more access to what can push our buttons, buttons that an be pushed are more likely to be pushed
나 -> 여자 꼬마 남자 여자 꼬마 여자 여자 남자 여자 여자 남자 여자 여자 남자 여자 여자 남자 꼬마 여자 남자 여자 남자 꼬마 여자 남자 여자 여자 남자 여자 남자 꼬마 여자 남자 , 소녀스러운 남자, 소녀적인 남자, 소녀적인 남자, 소녀적인 남자 마이크를 떨어뜨릴 때까지 몇 번이나?
me -> Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man how many times until he drops the Microphone?
나는 인권을 위해 싸우는 것이 나를 소녀로 만들지 않는다는 것에 동의하지 않는다
I disagree fighting for human rights does not make me a little girly man
나는 그것이 논쟁의 여지가 있다고 생각한다.
I suppose that is debatable
당신은 나를 꼬마 아가씨라고 부르며 불안해합니다.
you sir are insecure calling me a little girly man
당신은 내가 추가하는 가치보다 당신의 성공이 더 가치 있고 당신의 성공이 내 삶과 경쟁에 추가되는 야유와 낙담이 무엇인지 깨닫습니다. 당신은 비방자입니다.
you realize what heckling and adding discouragement adds to my life and competition and your success is valued over the value that I am adding, you sir are a detractor
Heckler 당신은 약간 소녀스러운 남자입니다 -> 당신은 비방자입니다
Heckler You are a little girly man -> You sir are a detractor
장기 제한 헥클러 없이 제한 헥클러? 사람은 완벽하지 않고, 사람은 항상 끌리는 사람이 아닙니다.
Limiting hecklers without long term limiting hecklers? People are not perfect, people are not always attractors
토론 중 대화를 제한하는 것이 토론 후에 항상 적용되는 것은 아닙니다.
Limiting conversation during a debate does not always apply to after the debate
사람들은 가스를 켜고 토론 후에 항상 가스를 끄는 것을 잊습니까?
People turn on the gas and then always forget to turn it off after the debate?
초기 수정 및 재판, 토론에서, 사회의 사람들을 위한 공급 라인을 늘리기 위해 상대방의 대화를 제한합니다.
Initial Fix and in a trial, in a debate, to limit the conversation of the opponent to increase supply lines for people in society
야당을 제한하는 것은 상대방을 신속하게 제한하는 것이 토론에서 시간을 절약하는 데 높은 가치가 있습니다.
Limiting hecklers limiting opponents swiftly is high value in for saving time in debates
토론, 무엇이 토론을 위대하게 만드는가?
Debate, what makes debate great?
세상에는 문제가 있고 악은 의도적으로 존재합니다. 신과 사람들은 더 나은 것을 만들기 위해 배후에서 일하고 있습니다. 그들의 과정, 그들이 그들의 논리와 해결책에 도달하는 방식을 들을 수 있는 좋은 방법
The world has problems, evil is in by design, God and people are working behind the scenes to make it better, nice to hear their process, the way they arrive at their logic and solutions
영웅의 말, 생명을 구할 수 있는 말, 실패할 수 있는 말, 실패할 경우 칼을 휘두르지 못하고 목숨을 잃을 수도 있는 말을 사용하는 싸움
Hero’s fighting using words, words that can save lives, words that can fail and if they do fail potential to lose lives without being able to swing a sword against the competition
변호인처럼 실패하면 무고한 사람들을 죽이는 시스템
Like a Defense Lawyer, if they fail system kills the innocents
토론에서 효과적인 일시 중지?
Effective Pauses in a debate?
업데이트로 인해 딸이 구출되거나 인질 상황에서 구출되지 않는 것처럼 통신 보석을 채굴합니다. 마치 몇 년 전에 추가해야 하는 것처럼 말이죠.
Mining a Communications Gem as if the update would lead to your daughter being saved or not being saved in a hostage situation, as if you had to add it years in advance and you do
최상의 결과를 위해 압력이 항상 중요한 것은 아닙니다.
Pressure is not always value in for best result
최상의 결과를 위해 압력이 항상 가치 있는 것은 아닙니다.
Pressure is not always value out for best result
압력은 일부 압력에 대한 논리를 유발하고 다른 압력은 부정적인 논리를 유발합니다.
Pressure drives logic for some pressure drives negative logic for others
항상 더 나은 결과를 이끌어내는 무언가가 있습니까? 최고의 커뮤니케이션을 위한 트로피 업데이트?
Something on the line always leads to better results? Trophy for best communications update?
당신의 잠재력은 다른 의미로 작은 소녀 같은 남자입니까? 당신은 가족을 부양할 수 없습니다. 아무도 주황색 머리를 한 남자와 데이트하고 싶어하지 않습니다. 그녀는 당신에게 걸어가고 그들은 당신에게도 걸어갈 것입니다. 아무도 당신이 하는 말을 듣고 싶어하지 않습니다. 당신은 절대 그것을 고칠 수 없습니다. 항상 틀렸어, 시스템에 가치를 더하지 않았어, 여기 없었으면 좋겠어, 무대에 없었으면 좋겠어, 목소리 듣는 데 지쳤어
Potential for you are a little girly man said in other ways? You can’t provide for your family, nobody wants to date a man with orange hair, she walked out on you they will walk out on you too, nobody wants to hear what you have to say, you will never fix that, you are always wrong, you don’t add value to the system, wish you weren’t here, wish you weren’t on stage, tired of hearing your voice
당신은 비방자입니다
You sir are a detractor
낙담보다 격려가 낫다.
Better to be encouragement in than discouragement in
부정적인 코멘트, heckler 코멘트를 기록하고 루프에서 실행하시겠습니까?
Record the negative comments, heckler comments and then run them on loop?
모든 작문 멜로디에 대한 슈퍼컴퓨터 Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design 역사에는 완전히 감사하지 않고 완전히 존중되지 않는 비이상적인 역사적 실적이 있습니까?
Supercomputers ka sadaya nulis mélodi Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design History boga Rekor Lagu Bersejarah Non Ideal anu Henteu Dihargaan Sapinuhna sareng Henteu Dihargaan Sapinuhna?
Des superordinateurs à toutes les mélodies d’écriture Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design L’histoire a des antécédents historiques non idéaux qui ne sont pas pleinement appréciés et pas pleinement respectés?
De supercomputadoras a todas las melodías de escritura Del mal por diseño al mal por fuera ¿La historia tiene un historial histórico no ideal que no es totalmente apreciado ni totalmente respetado?
Supercomputers to all writing melodies Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design History has Non Ideal Historic Track Record that is Not Fully Appreciated and Not Fully Respected?
最好在新技术上加倍投资
신기술에 두 배로 투자하는 것이 좋습니다.
Hadé pikeun investasi ganda dina téknologi anyar
Mieux vaut investir le double dans les nouvelles technologies
Mejor invertir el doble en nuevas tecnologías
Better to invest double in new technologies
Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design
Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design
Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design
Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design
Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design
Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design
Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design
Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design
Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design
Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design
Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design
Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design
Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design
Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design
Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design
Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design
Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design
Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design
Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design
Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design
Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design
Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design
Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design
Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design
비이상이 비이상으로 만들어질 수 있는가? 그것은 나에게 새로운 소식이다
Non Ideals can be created by Non Ideals? That’s news to me
감옥에 있는 사람들이 되기 위한 분노 관리 교육에 대한 충분한 액세스 권한이 없는 감옥에 있는 사람들은 감옥에 있는 사회에 더 가치가 있습니까? People in Jail without enough access to Anger Management Training to be People in Jail are more value into society being in Jail?
부패한 감옥, 가족을 감옥으로 보낸다
Corrupt Jail sends family member to Jail
수감자들을 학대한 부패한 시스템은 분노 관리 교육을 받지 않고 쉬브를 통과합니다.
Corrupt System that has mistreated inmates passes shiv and no Anger Management Training
교도소에 있는 가족 구성원, 주소를 더 많이 필요로 하는 덜 이상적인 시스템
Family Member in Jail a less ideal system in greater need of addressing
CJ-SFM2J-CS-ShivNAMT-FM2JFA-LIS-NGNofA-NFA-NFR
디자인에 의해 청소해야 하는 약간의 먼지가 이블 인?
Evil in by design just a little dirt that needs to be swept out?
Evil In By Design이 더 복잡해지면? 사람들이 항상 옳은 것에 동의하지 않을 때, 사람들이 악이 무엇이고 악이 아닌지에 대해 다르게 교육을 받았을 때, 완전히 감사하지 않고 모두가 같은 것을 배우는 것은 아닙니다 1+1 = 2
When Evil In By Design becomes more complex? When people don’t always agree on what is right, when people have been trained different on what evil is and what evil is not, not fully appreciating not all are taught the same 1+1 = 2
악과의 싸움의 가능성은 의도가 좋았을 때 더 적은 것이 아니라 더 많은 악을 만드는 불일치로 이어집니까?
Potential for fighting evil leads to inconsistencies that create more evil instead of less when intentions were good?
악과 싸우는 동안 생성되는 잠재적인 비이상과 위험
Potential non ideals and risk created while fighting evil
완벽하게 고쳐지지 않은 악은 위험, 완화할 가치가 있는 위험
Evil fixed not perfectly is a risk, a risk worth mitigating
덜 가치있는 안티 악 기술에 투자하지 않는 사람들? 때로는 시스템에 대한 지식이 적은 것이 대체 NFA-NFR보다 낫습니다.
People that don’t invest in anti evil tech of less value? Sometimes less knowledge of system is better than the alternative NFA-NFR
그것에서 벗어나는 것이 항상 가치 있는 시스템은 아닙니다. 우리가 관여하지 않거나 우리가 하는 일에 대해 책임을 지는 것은 위험이며, 서로에게 위험하고, 적극적으로 완화할 가치가 있는 위험입니다.
Stayed out of that is not always a value out system, held responsible for what we don’t get involved with or what we do is a risk, is risk to each other, is a risk worth actively mitigating
유죄로 판단될 가능성을 알지 못함을 선택
Choose not to know potential for judged as guilty
유죄로 판단될 가능성을 알기 위해 선택
Choose to know potential for judged as guilty
얽매이지 않거나 얽매이지 않는 것에 대해 서로에게 은혜를 베푸는 사람들이 무죄라고 말하는 것이 더 낫습니다.
Better to say those that give each other grace for not being involved or being involved are the not guilty ones
악으로 이어질 수 있는 복잡성 비용이 충분히 이해되지 않음, 스트립 클럽에 가지 않으면 해당 스트립 클럽에서 잘못된 선택으로 인한 악의 가능성을 제한
Complexity cost that can lead to evil not fully appreciated, If you don’t go in a strip club, limiting the potential of evil from bad choices in that strip club
악으로 이어질 수 있는 복잡성 비용이 충분히 이해되지 않음, 스트립 클럽에 가면 해당 스트립 클럽에 있는 사람들에게 가치를 추가할 가능성
Complexity cost that can lead to evil not fully appreciated, If you go in a strip club, potential to add value to the people that are in that strip club
스트립 클럽에 가지 않는 아빠가 들어가지 않으면 딸을 구하지 않으면 모든 가치에 대해 훌륭한 선량한 시민으로 간주됩니까? 딸은 아버지가 들어가는 것을 원하지 않을 수 있지만 계획에 따라 악의가 때때로 고칠 수 있습니다.
Dad that doesn’t go into strip club viewed as fine upstanding citizen to all value in if doesn’t go in and save their daughter? Daughter might not want Father to go in, evil in by design can fix that at times
사람들은 무엇이 옳은지 항상 동의하지는 않습니다. 만약 아빠가 근친상간을 책임진다면 어떻게 될까요? 딸이 클럽의 깡패에게 그런 말을 한다면? 기억과 거짓 고발, 마약 관련 이야기가 항상 의미가 있어야 하는 것은 아닙니다 A+B=C
People don’t always agree on what is right, what if Dad was responsible for incest? What if daughter would tell the thug in the club that? Memories and False Accusations, Drugs involved stories don’t always have to make sense A+B=C
아빠가 학대할 수 있습니다. 아빠가 딸을 데려가 다시 학대하게 놔둘까요? 양쪽 이야기를 듣는 것은 항상 간단하지 않고, 항상 쉽지도, 항상 유쾌하지도 않습니다. 사람들은 조기에 인센티브를 없애기를 좋아합니다. 완전히 인정되지 않음 완전히 존중되지 않음
Dad could be abusive, let the Dad take their daughter back and abuse them again? Hearing both sides of the story not always simple, not always easy, not always pleasant. People like to disincentivize early not fully appreciated not fully respected
누군가는 부패한 사람들이 수도 시스템을 수정하고 있다고 말합니다. -> 말을 하면 죽임을 당할 수 있습니다. -> 말하지 않으면 죽을 수 있습니다. -> 쉬운 판단이 항상 간단한 시스템은 아닙니다.
Someone tells you corrupt people are modifying water system -> speaking up can get you killed -> not speaking up can get you killed -> easy judgement not always a simple system
NFA-NFR 방식으로 설치할 수 있다고 들었지만 알리지 않았다는 인식, 홍보?
Perception of told that but was not told that can be installed in NFA-NFR ways, promote that?
사람들이 부패한 시스템에서 외부에서 완전히 인식할 수 없는 덜 충분히 평가된 시스템으로 작동하는 방식
How people operate under corrupt systems to a less fully appreciated system not fully appreciable from outside
Evil In By Design -> 염소를 피해야 할 많은 이유 -> 모든 당사자에 대한 비 이상적 PR이 낮은 우선 순위 NFA-NFR로 설정됨
Evil In By Design -> lots of reason to scape goat -> Non Ideal PR for All Parties set to less high priority NFA-NFR
비이상적인 PR 낙진의 가능성 높음 적극적으로 완화할 가치가 있는 위험
High Potential for Non Ideal PR Fallout a Risk a Risk Worth Actively Mitigating
부패할 가능성이 높은 PR 이미지가 올바른 일을 하는 것보다 더 중요하다고 여겨지는 위험, 적극적으로 완화할 가치가 있는 위험
High Potential for Corruptible PR Image viewed as More Important than doing Right by People, a Risk a Risk Worth Actively Mitigating
사람들은 다르게 훈련될 수 있습니다. 모든 사람들이 이것을 읽는 것은 아닙니다. 그들에게 자비와 은혜를 주십시오. 저에게 자비와 은혜를 베풀지 않는 사람들은 제 콘텐츠를 더 많이 읽고 이해하도록 요구하십시오.
People can be trained differently, not all people read this, please give them mercy and grace, people that don’t give me mercy and grace please require them to read and understand more of my content
피드백 루프에 도움이 되지 않음
Didn’t help with my feedback loop does not equal got to judge me is kosher
은혜와 용서 나의 첫 번째 선택, 적극적으로 위험을 완화하고 가족과 국가를 보호하는 것도 중요합니다.
Grace and Forgiveness my first choice, actively mitigating risk and protecting my family and country is important as well
판단력이 없는 용서하는 사람들은 로봇 행동에 대한 높은 잠재력을 가지고 있습니다.
Judgmental Unforgiving People have High Potential for Robotic Actions, Robotic Actions that can be used against them in Not Fully Appreciable Ways
적시에 사람을 재교육하는 것이 항상 간단한 시스템은 아닙니다. 누군가가 2+2=7을 가르쳤고 7이 모두 사악한 아동 성추행범이라고 믿고 나를 죽이려고 합니까?
Retraining people in timely way is not always a simple system, Someone taught 2+2=7 and is trying to kill me because they believe all 7s are evil child molesters?
사람들을 죽이는 방식으로 사람들에게 잘못된 라벨을 붙이기 쉽습니다.
Easy to mislabel people in way that gets people killed
사람을 죽이는 방식으로 사람을 잘못 분류하지 않는 시스템은 보호하고 영감을 주기가 더 어려운 시스템입니다.
System that doesn’t mislabel people in way that gets people killed is a harder system to protect and inspire
레이블 7은 Vigilante Justice by Society를 통해 사람들을 제거하는 것과 같을 수 있습니다.
Label of 7 could equal OK to remove people through Vigilante Justice by Society
데이터 일관성 문제 NFA
Data Consistency Problems NFA
YourNameHere.criminalRecord = “Non Existent, Fine Upstanding Citizen”
YourNameHere.criminalRecord = “Child Molester, War Criminal”
YourNameHere.criminalRecord = “Non Existent, Fine Upstanding Citizen”
YourNameHere.criminalRecord = “Child Molester, War Criminal”
변수 설정, 레이블 설정은 간단합니다.
Setting a variable, setting a label is easy to do
숫자에 실수하기
Making a mistake on a number
사망에 이를 수 있는 6 또는 7 NFA-NFR
6 or 7 that could lead to death NFA-NFR
People could say every period means meant to hurt someone
People could say every period means meant to hurt someone.
People could say every period means meant to hurt someone
People could say every period means meant to hurt someone.
생성하기 쉬운 크랙 규칙을 밟을 수 없으며 데이터 일관성 및 데이터 손상 가능성 추가, 삶이 망칠 수 있음
Can’t step on crack rules are easy to create, add in data consistency and potential for data corruption, lives can be ruined
용서와 실수(항상 저지르는 것처럼 보이는 실수는 아닌 것 같은 실수)의 가능성을 줄이면 인생이 망가질 수 있습니다.
Reduce potential for forgiveness and mistakes (mistakes that aren’t always the one that appear to be made), life can be ruined
그들이 나에게 약간의 거짓말을 해서 공급 라인이 끊어지게 하는 것은 그들을 광적인 아동 성추행 전범으로 설정하는 것이 현명하지 못하다.
They lied to me a little bit that lead to broken supply lines does not equal wise to set them to child molesting war criminal that is rabid
이중 의미, 말장난, 시스템과의 대조가 항상 완벽하지 않고, 사람과 이야기가 완전히 이해되지 않는 경우 둘 다 완벽하지 않고 이상적이지 않은 방식으로 나타날 수 있습니다.
Double meanings, puns, contrast into system not always perfect, not fully appreciated people and story are both not perfect and can be turned up in non ideal ways
선거를 앞두고 더 악한 방식으로 시스템을 변경할 가능성 NFA-NFR
Potential for changes to system in more evil ways close to elections NFA-NFR
시스템은 적어도 2022년에는 레이블을 오용하는 경향이 있는 것으로 보이며 데이터 일관성을 약화시킬 수 있습니다. 소수만 보호하는 시스템은 곧 소수도 보호하지 않는 시스템
System seems to have tendency to misusing labels at least in 2022, can disincentivize Data Consistency. A system that only protects a few is a system that will soon not protect those few as well
일관된 데이터만 일부 이익을 최상위, NFA-NFR Consistent Data only Profits some at Top, NFA-NFR
바코드는 시스템이 범죄자를 찾는 데 도움이 됩니다.
Barcodes help the system locate criminals is not all value in
범죄자가 누구인지 정의하는 사람 범죄자가 누구인지 충분히 평가되지 않은 문제 완전히 존중되지 않음 현재 상황에서 유용하지 않음 수정할 수 있음 완전히 평가되지 않음 완전히 존중되지 않음
Who defines what a criminal is who a criminal is matters not fully appreciated not fully respected useful to less useful in current situation is modifiable not fully appreciated not fully respected
Compounding Non Ideal Ramp Ups Possible Negate Support is Not Always Value In
편향은 위험 위험은 완화할 가치가 있습니다
Bias is Risk Risk is Worth Mitigating
편향은 위험 위험은 완화할 가치가 있습니다
Bias is Risk Risk is Worth Mitigating
침묵이 항상 가치 있는 것은 아니다 침묵이 항상 가치 있는 것은 아니다
Silence Not Always Value Out Silence Not Always Value In
나는 Shiny Blue Marble에 도전한다, 완벽한 가치가 있는 것이 모든 가치가 있는 것은 아니다
I challenge Shiny Blue Marble, Not Perfect Value in is Not All Value Out
사이코패스 냄새가 나도록 만들어진 녀석들은 가치가 없다?
Guys made to smell like psychopaths can’t be value in?
제이슨 -> 13일의 금요일 Jason -> Friday 13th 프레디 -> 느릅나무의 악몽 Freddy -> Nightmare on Elm 여름 -> 나는 당신이 마지막으로 한 일을 알고 있습니다 Summer -> I know what you did last
예술 감상과 같은 유머 감상 비디오가 필요합니다
Need a Humor Appreciation Video like Art Appreciation
유머 + 도파민, 세로토닌, 노르에피네프린의 혈액 농도에 대한 연구 데이터?
Humor + Research Data on Blood Concentrations of Dopamine, Serotonin, Norepinephrine?
유대감 형성에 유용한 유머, 압력 감소 -> 스트레스 감소 -> 가치 있는 속성
Humor useful for bonding, reducing pressure -> relatable less stress -> attributes worth appreciating
관련성이 있고 스트레스가 적음 -> 무장 해제, 대화 시작 가능성, 더 많은 유대감을 가질 수 있는 가능성, 중요한 중요한 의사 소통이 중요할 때 기회를 개선할 수 있는 더 많은 기회에 대한 가능성
Relatable and less stress -> Disarming, Potential in for Conversation Starting, Potential for More Bonding, Potential for More Opportunity to Improve Opportunity for times when Critical Crucial communication does count
웃음에 대한 이윤 극대화, 더 적은 사망과 부패한 감옥에 갇힌 사람들로 이어질 수 있는 웃음에 대한 이윤 극대화
Maximizing Profit on Laughs, Maximizing Profits on Laughs that could lead to less deaths and less people left in corrupt Jails
숫자는 거짓말을 하지 않아 대부분의 경우
Numbers don’t lie, most of the time
1+1 = 웃어? 1+1 = Laugh?
A+B = 웃어? A+B = Laugh?
웃음 = 스트레스 감소 전쟁과 용서하지 않을 수 있는 압력 감소 Laugh = Reduced Stress Reduced Pressure that could lead to war and unforgiveness
A와 B는 더 가치가 있다 A and B become more valuable
A = 토큰 소강 경험 A = token lull experience
B = 터무니없는 상황 B = absurd situation
A = 평범하지 않은 것을 위한 진공 A = vacuum for something out of the ordinary
B = 평범하지 않은 것이 종종 재미있고 놀랍습니다. B = something out of the ordinary can often be hilarious and surprising
A = 공원을 통한 일반 도보 A = normal walk through park
B = 웃음을 유발하는 파손된 도로 표지판 B = vandalized street sign that leads to laugh
훼손된 거리 표지판이 가치가 있는 것은 아니며 웃으면서 가치가 있는 것은 아닙니다. Vandalized street sign not all value in, laugh not all value out
도대체 SOP 표시가 뭐야? What the hells a SOP sign?
정지 표지판을 수정하지 않고 만화에 맡기는 것은 어떻습니까? How about we not modify Stop signs, leave that to the cartoons
NFA-NFR 방식의 위험 완화 가능성 Potential for mitigating, mitigating risk in NFA-NFR ways
코미디를 존중하지 않고 추가하는 것과 없는 것, 가치가 있을 때와 그렇지 않을 때 현명하지 못한 것 Not Respecting Comedy what it adds and what it does not, when it is value in and when it is not seems unwise
너무 심각하다고 모든 가치가 있는 것은 아닙니다. Too Serious is Not All Value In
너무 심각하고 완벽주의 -> 분노, 완화할 가치가 있는 분노 위험 Too Serious and Perfectionism -> Anger, Anger Risk worth Mitigating
분노 관리 훈련이 필요할 가능성이 있는 너무 진지하고 완벽주의 Too Serious and Perfectionism that has potential to require Anger Management Training
분노 관리 훈련을위한 추가 학생, 그 이상을 열망 할 이유가 없습니까? Extra student for anger management training, no reason to aspire to more than that?
ES4AMT-NR2-A2MTT?
너무 심각하면 처벌 Too Serious is Punishing
도끼가 떨어지기 때문에 말하기가 두려운 것은 인명 구조 정보로 이어질 수 있는 효과적인 의사 소통을 위한 모든 가치가 있는 것은 아닙니다.
Afraid to speak up because the axe will drop is not all value in for communication effective communication that can lead to life saving information
직관에 어긋나는 너무 심각하면 안전 논의가 줄어들고 사망으로 이어질 수 있는 안전 논의가 줄어들 수 있습니다. NFA
Counterintuitive too serious can lead to less safety discussions, less safety discussions that can lead to deaths NFA
더 진지한 메시지를 위한 오프닝은 없나요? 구매 금지가 모든 가치는 아닙니다.
No opening act for a more serious message? No Buy In is Not All Value In
NFA NFA의 가능성 Potential for NFA NFA
진지한 비즈니스 NAFA Serious business NAFA
반쪽 미소 vs 완전한 미소를 마스터?
Master the half smile vs the full smile?
Trust people that have mastered what smiles add and what they don’t to perception?
Learning is all value in?
Plenty of reasons not to trust, better reasons not to worry
Worrying is bad, Worrying about things that can’t be fixed worse
Red Haired Gingers named Jason just can’t be fixed?
Sometimes the challenge more value in than the result?
Fix the Red Haired Ginger but don’t love him enough to fix his support lines swiftly?
Failure to factor in Maintenance cost by leadership getting a little old
리더십은 Gingers 및 기타 축소 지원 사례 개인을 완전히 보호할 수 없으므로 보편적 기본 소득이 올바르게 작동하는지 확인하는 것이 더 현명합니다.
Leadership can’t fully protect Gingers and other Reduced Support Case Individuals therefore wiser to make sure Universal Basic Income is working correctly
Progress for Gingers Not All Value In No Progress for Gingers Not All Value In -> Left to Shiny Blue Marble and Evil In By Design seems to have failed time and time again
Prog4Gings-NAVI-NoProg4Gings-NAVI-Lft2SBM-EIBD-S2HFailed-T&TA reiterated over time with a God and Christ that seems to underdeliver makes me question what to do about it
Fix Not All Value In for Non Gingers No Fix Not All Value In for teaching Non Gingers on how to treat other RSCIs
Having to be a punishing system to get working support line, sucks
H2B-PnSys-2GWSLs-Sucks
Having to capitalize on too similar to good experience too different from bad experience to deliver results is not all value in
H2Capt-on-2SimGExp-2DiffBExp-2DR-NAVI
Punishment as Value In System = H2Capt-on-2SimGExp-2DiffBExp-2DR
Pn-asVIS-NAVI
Pn-asVIS = Delivers Non Ideal Results
Delivers Non Ideal Results is Non Ideal for Having to capitalize on too similar to good experience too different from bad experience
DNIR-NI-4H2Capt-on-2SimGExp-2DiffBExp-2DR
Punishment = Uncomfortable is Useful
Trying to polish Uncomfortable is Useful (a bit of a turd) as something prettier NAVI
미국 정부가 비밀리에 홍보한 제이슨이라는 Orange Hair Guys의 고객 서비스를 부정하시겠습니까?
Negating Customer service for Orange Hair Guys named Jason secretly promoted by United States Government?
미국 정부는 어려운 시기에 비이상을 활용하는 것 같습니다.
United States Government seems to be capitalizing on non ideals during tough times
시간이 지남에 따라 다른 사람들이 사무실로 승진했습니다. 제이슨이라는 주황색 머리 남자는 완전히 보호되지 않고 완전히 감사하지 않습니다.
Different people promoted to office over time, Orange Haired Men named Jason Not Fully Protected and Not Fully Appreciated
God and Angels는 사양 수준에서 더 많은 것을 제공해야 합니다.
God and Angels need to be delivering more on Level of Specification
Real Value added to Energy Efficiency?
태양광 패널의 에너지 효율성에 대한 실질적인 진전은 엄청날 수 있으며, 진전이 항상 단순하지는 않습니다.
Making real progress on energy efficiency of Solar Panels could be huge, making progress not always simple
세금 납부는 티타늄, 슈퍼컴퓨터 및 태양 전지판에 대한 투자자와 동일합니다.
Paying Taxes equals investor in Titanium, Supercomputers, and Solar Panels
생명을 구하는 기술에 투자한 사람은 최소한 부패하지 않은 사법 시스템을 제공받아야 합니다.
Someone that has invested in life saving technology should be at least be provided a non corrupt Justice System
때로는 두 배를 투자하는 것이 좋습니다.
Sometimes Nice to Invest Double
국제 우주 정거장은 물 기술에도 약간의 투자를 할 가능성이 있습니다.
International Space Station likely has a few investments in water tech as well
한국의 우주 프로그램?
Korean Space Programs?
Might be wise to invest more in Data Consistency starting now
Evil In By Design a Risk a Risk Worth Mitigating a Risk with Space and Space programs I am not sure I can fully comprehend
A system that tests me too much with broken supply lines has too much access to its own
I am not sure a lag on the process provides adequate support for the future
System designed wrong potential for continuing to hurt people, has hurt people through corrupt methods over the years
Idea system was built correctly, part of the issue
Theory a system built and maintained correctly would lead to Working Supply Lines
If system leads to Broken Support Lines, likely system designed with a square wheel
The idea men in wigs from 1700s got update perfect? No need for updates?
Broken safety valve that doesn’t work fast enough, needs replacing
Delayed update to the process Not All Value In
Lengthy Process with Lives on the Line
As if those Lives were me, as if those Lives were made in the Image of God, and they are
2023 as Ginger Appreciation Year?
Outrageous has value not outrageous has value
Time lag delayed throughput has less value
High Powered blessings more likely when support lines are enabled
What makes for an annoying test that gets a system to enable support lines more swiftly?
Testing System is a value in system, data on decision making
More clarification is not always value in
A+B+C=D, if C is unknown
C requires clarification is relevant
C’s clarification has potential for creating new unknowns in the system
Potential for relevance without relevance added to system
C != just C, C = C+E+F+G+H
If E+F+G+H requires time to process, time that is not available to system?
What happens if C = understandable but F = non comprehendable
F = reveals inconvenient truth to system, Miracle, or data that the government deems not available in publics’ best interest (Area 51 Alien Abduction)
What happens if E reveals personal data that turns over another case, reveals data that personal harms the attorney
Easy to think C only has potential to hurt others, relevance on unknowns will only effect our system
History Non Ideal track record for factoring in unknown losses to defense support network
History Non Ideal track record for including all relevant information Non Ideal track record for no mistakes on a limited resolution system
System that realizes it can’t always effectively processes tests and information with mercy, grace, and love or the alternative?
Sharpened Spear of Grace Mercy and Love or No Sharpened Spear?
Critical Thinking can raise focus making Listening Better
Video A -> Critical Thinking Video -> Concise Communication -> Effective Listening -> Listen to Video A Again, we’ll call this A Prime
A -> CT -> CC -> EL -> A’
Challenges are Valuable, and turning things up is a Non Null Investment Cost
Could be used as infinite loop, one loop can likely go a long way
Add in Time Management and Wala
Sometimes people think they have the potential to hear everything, we miss things we are always missing things, things are being said all over the world we don’t hear all of, excusing ourselves from conversations early, learning to say no to excessive conversations that limit throughput
People don’t finish a sentence -> can be used against perfectionists
The idea people have to finish a sentence, the idea that people require us to listen not always value in
A person telling us about the weather might be trying to make polite conversation, someone is sitting in jail while I am talking about the weather? That is not my purpose
Not appreciating purpose not all value in
Compression Network Throughput Caching -> Words of No Value In?
Any system as all value in wise to turn up?
Spending time working on Fire Codes could equal less time for Cancer Research, spending time working on Cancer Research could equal less time for Fire Codes
Doctors spending time in one hospital means not spending time in another hospital, value in does not equal all value in value in for all people equally
Could have spent more time on research would have lead to a better result for the person 10 years from now versus fixing a problem right now that allows that person to make the discovery 10 years from now?
Research can be a system with no value in for current system if we let it, which is not all value in when life is but a vapor
Untested Research, Research without ethics Not All Value In Either
A better system than YouTube existed but God didn’t let me know which one? Gems and Puzzle pieces always the easiest to find?
Highest Result for Mining Search on YouTube
Beautiful Purple Crystals that lead to better defense for people in corrupt Jails?
Listen to an old movie from 2000, then re-watch it, not think I might not know something new? Might be fun to watch the Matrix again, Cinderella Man again, probably could pick up on somethings I didn’t pick up on in the past
Someone that didn’t understand what the summary Compression Network Throughput Caching meant, if they watched some of the above videos likely will have a better comprehension
Someone that did understand likely knew a bit of where I was going with this post
Summarized Concise Communication Questions turned up by Critical Thinking?
Pertinent Information to Query Equals Better ability to get information we need and information we don’t
Supercomputers with the potential to waste our time not fully appreciated the potential that has to add to the system
Turned up with power of compression, billions of cycles per second
Supercomputers with knowledge of what makes people mad and what doesn’t make people mad, Anger Management
Then used to turn up competition to no issue?
3rd Result from YouTube for Writing Queries, Closest Time Code
Getting to information faster high value in specially in systems that have been turning up Data Consistency Problems
Data Consistency Problem potential to roll back to updates from Years Back as Higher Value in NFA-NFR
Research Data and Numbers don’t matter trust the cancer research?
Length of Video Factors into Decision Making NFA-NFR, Top Result for Writing Queries
15 minutes less time than 50 minutes
15 minutes to better questions better ability to search, ability to search that could save lives?
好像沟通的宝石是你的女儿试图在屋顶上谈论
As if the communication gem was your daughter trying to be talked off the roof
Shiny Blue Marble with less effective communication more potential for deaths not fully appreciated
Easy to think of communication as mundane when we use it everyday, easier to take a prize gem for granted all the way to it being lost
Time pressure is not always more value into communications
Constraints and Tests add value sometimes not always not fully appreciated not fully respected
Constraints and Tests can sometimes effect systems in non ideal ways, context matters not fully appreciated not fully respected will lead to woe
If I shorten the message today, others get time to go elsewhere, for people that want more message
Less art museums burning down is not all value out to artist, biased towards less fires in system NFA-NFR
Load Balancing vs No Load Balancing? Advice or No Advice at a critical time NFA-NFR
Evil In By Design People Need Positive Challenges People Don’t Like Their Time Being Wasted
Evil In By Design Peacemaking Non Ideal Historic Track Record – WWI, WWII, Korean War, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq, potential for China and Taiwan
EIBD-PNPC-PDNL-TTBW -> EIBD-PM-NI-HTR -> If we don’t learn from past doomed to repeat it
Learning from Past > Non Ideal Historic Track Record++
Learning from Past > Promoting Non Ideal Historic Track Record
LFP > Promo-NIHTR -> EIBD Not Enough Challenges Non Ideal Setup for Society
NEC-NIS4Soc
Early Divest Reasons from Challenges
Challenges have Buy In -> Can Fix that, can make that better, can change the world
Challenges have Divest Potential -> Can’t Fix that, brilliant minds from past couldn’t fix that what hope do I have?
CHBI-CHDP-CHP4EarlyDivestNFA-NFR
What makes for an interest sparking valuable challenge vs what makes for a challenge that is passed up for drugs, alcohol, starting wars, shooting guns all day?
Interest Sparking Challenge > Challenge Shelved
IntSpkCh > ChShlvd
IntSpkCh > NNTCs that are wasted and don’t empower my future
Non Null Time Costs that waste my time and don’t empower my future are shelved for more Interest Sparking Challenges
NNTCs-TWMT-&DNEmpF -> Shlvd
Results Matter, Empowerment Matters, Work today, for no food tomorrow? Not really an ideal setup
RMEmpM-WT-4NFT? NRIS-EIBD-PM-NI-HTR
RMEmpM -> For Challenge being Valued
Life is not always logical, doesn’t equal People are Not Generally Logical in their Choices
LinaL-DNE-PNGLogicIn
Logic Generally based on Knowns and Unknowns, logic can be optimized closer to real life if we know what those knowns and unknowns are, like when they type or when they talk, Non Null Investment in Faith, making comments, talking to world online
A = Likes Challenges B = Does not like Drawing Flowers all Day Long C = Where treasure is located at bottom of the ocean (Unknown, big ocean, limited resolution, diving is costly hard and not convenient)
A+B+C = Insight into how I use my time
If results and empowerment is limited such as working today for no increased potential for tomorrow
Might begin to think the formula is wrong
Cannot solidify working support lines, such as paint for my non flower drawings, potential to look into solutions that can solidify my support lines, like Impeachment
Politicians that wish to stay in office, generally need to deliver on Results Matter on delivering Working Supply Lines
Democrats and Republicans in June 2022 like sharp edges on tables like broken glass on the floor like results don’t matter work for future is not value in
Democrats breaking trust of the people is bad, Democrats destroying working supply lines is worse, better leadership that delivers working supply lines is required for a better tomorrow
Others that care out of office bad, others that have greater potential for working supply lines out of office is worse, Swift removal of Democrats that block supply lines are High Value In For Future Yet to Be Fully Appreciated
Others that care out of office bad, others that have greater potential for working supply lines out of office is worse, Swift removal of Democrats that block supply lines are High Value In For Future Yet to Be Fully Appreciated
Democrats breaking trust, Democrats are bad supply lines in, removed from office better potential for working supply lines drives positive change
Democrats breaking trust of the people is bad, Democrats destroying working supply lines is worse, better leadership that delivers working supply lines is required for a better tomorrow
Democrats to future less empowering future of hard work matters lessDems-2FLE-FofHWML
I assert leaderships failure to deliver on working supply lines is high value out for feeling challenges add value and are empowering
IA-LF2D-WSL-HVO-Ch2-RDNM-FNE
I assert leaderships failure to deliver on working supply lines is high value out for feeling challenges add value and are empowering
Others that care out of office bad, others that have greater potential for working supply lines out of office is worse, Swift removal of Democrats that block supply lines are High Value In For Future Yet to Be Fully Appreciated
Democrats breaking trust, Democrats are bad supply lines in, removed from office better potential for working supply lines drives positive change
Democrats breaking trust of the people is bad, Democrats destroying working supply lines is worse, better leadership that delivers working supply lines is required for a better tomorrow
Quality not a guarantee Context not a guarantee Context Matters Quality Matters Context Matters to Quality Discernment of Context Matters Irrelevant information to more relevant information hard Irrelevant information to more relevant information when data security and consistency is not guaranteed is harder
Quality Decision Making Equals Less Evil In By Design
Quality Decisions Made Do Not Always Equal Less Evil In By Design, does that mean the choice was not a quality decision?
QDM-DNAE-LEIBD-DTMTC-WNAQD?
Ethics -> Quality Decision Making is not in by design
QDM-NIBD -> to More -> Not Always a Simple System
Evil In By Design and Quality Decision Making Is Not In By Design to More is Not Always A Simple System
Ethics -> A System -> A System that requires a Non Null Training Cost
Multistage ethics not always easy to fully appreciate
If the motive is decision A leads to B+C+D and finally to E, the motive was for E but the motive looks like B
Like Punishment or Prosecuting, the immediate value not always the motive
Sinking ship
A = Patching hole
E = Can go to sleep on ship without being scared ship is going to sink
Immediate result of A is B = ship stops sinking
Where E is the actual motive, the ability to stay alive and go to sleep without the ship sinking
People might act in very logical ways that are non logical
Easy to expect people mean for B to happen rather than for E to happen
Punishment equals uncalled for non null time costs – B
Where E equals better Decision Making long term
Life is but a vapor, C+D can be Non Null Time Costs, Non Null Time Costs to a life this is potentially vapor, is not always ideal for leading to E
Punishment B is not always optimal for creating E
B set from = Punishment to B = Positive Challenges Earlier on in Life
B set from Punish to B = PCEonNLife
Could potentially lead to C = Better Long Term Decision Making Faster
PCEonNLife > Punishment NFA-NFR
A Video on Understanding and Optimizing Customer Service? A Positive Challenge Finding the Good and the Bad in this Video?
Think about the future
Listening to the environment, storm or no storm Apologies – can mean peace or war, a knife in the back or no knife in the back Solve – solving, able to fix a tire on the way through the dessert, or walking without enough water? Thank – what is the value in a thank you, how does it value us, it reminds us of people need validation, there is reasons to value what it adds to us as well -> Thanking ourselves for money we save for that critical time, for the bottle of water we added at the right time earlier to save ourselves time, can help empower our future with better ability to use time
Updates that can optimize remaining years of life to less value?
Correct time management can mean spending 10 hours in a meeting or spending 10 hours doing something we love
10 Hours in a meeting about a topic you love, challenging, taxing, beats 10 hours in a meeting about a topic you hate
2 hour Concert awesome, 10 hour concert maybe a little less awesome
Time is valuable, Respecting it is not always a given
Working supply lines are valuable, Respecting them correctly are not always a given
Positive Challenges are Value In, Opportunity Positive Challenge Inspiring is not a given
PosChRVI-OPCI-NAGiven
People are good logic in is not always a given
Motives are understandable is not always a given
Now watch Time Management Again, Critical thinking change anything we pick up on?
For Me
Pre Critical Thinking In Control of Our Time Hell Yeah or No (Early Life Yes easier, Later in Life No can be more value in) Treating others as you wish to be treated, Golden rule (Hell Yes leads to less regret) Inspiring Less Regret for use of Time kind of what video is about Writing Down Tasks can help for checking things off Validation of Task Complete Value in, Creates Validation Dopamine In NFA-NFR Success and Validation feeling of progress can encourage more progress Also better use of time Deadlines matter, artificial deadlines add leverage, leverage can lead to anxiety can lead to stress NFA-NFR by perfectionists Things we enjoy matters, protected time Delegation matters, out sourcing responsibility and tasks can add a lot of value Rewrite a word processing software or utilize notepad or word already built in? Value in not always fully appreciated
Critical Thinking Some decisions have higher value than others 10% more water in my glass or not? 60% in glass Maybe not that big of deal 99% in glass, likely to spill, spills not always value in for less Non Null Time Costs Clarifying Relevant from Irrelevant information can be High Value In Knowing how much water is in the glass, helps us prioritize how important the remaining water in the glass being added matters Unintended consequences matter, A leads to B but what does B lead to If B leads to C,D,E is that value in or value out? Potential for combinations of high value in matter as well, A leads to B leads to positives F,G,H,I 4 Positives beats 3 Negatives In By Accident Principle
Post Critical Thinking
We own all of our time -> Value in this statement? Time like water we pour it where we want “Any time you are doing what you most want to be doing” – Fortune Cookie, eating the fortune cookie because sweet desert is nice Wouldn’t be reading message if not, if you don’t want to be using your time in this way, can you change it? Oppressive systems exist, oppressive systems don’t always have ability to truly control how we use our time, is it setting a good example to a corrupt system to allow them to control our time? Time is like water, others can divert its path like a stream, water sometimes takes path of least resistance Hell Yes or No -> Potential to be hit by a bus potential to get cancer, time life is not guaranteed Waste time doing something you really don’t love doing? Daily Highlight -> One thing of high priority to get done each day, one thing that can make that day feel like a success Organization is important and valuable, Hard to get right and takes time, to do lists without prioritization can make direction and forward momentum harder, too many tasks to juggle leads to less effective juggler To do lists matter, physical tactile -> no need for batteries, batteries that can fail, potential power savings for devices NFA-NFR Have to use this for that not the best for creative problem solving
[Half way through]
Streaming Data is Valuable, how could streaming data vs holding updates into big updates add value to time management?
Throughput matters, combining information into bigger sections, more to read more to verify, not always as simple as we would like it to be
Too much time on productivity system can lead to problems Not enough time on productivity system can lead to problems Balance is required, all time spent on productivity system, productivity system is no value No time spend on productivity system, life changing time saving updates and optimizations might be missed
Family time is easy to forget, adding value to Family and Social Networks is a Non Null Investment Cost
Parkinson’s Law -> give myself a day to get something done, will take a day, give myself a week to get something done will take a week, no artificial deadlines are not all value in
“Actionable Advice Leverage Artificial Deadlines” -> also reminder creates Risk for Anxiety, a risk worth mitigating “Do it badly” can be high value in for getting things done and less anxiety
Protected Time, Productivity Tasks, Constant Interrupts in Life can lead to things not getting done, things that we love and care about
Delegation Matters, systems that add value that are reliable can be high value in, also reminder that systems we rely upon can be taken away at non ideal times, forest fires, natural disasters, potential to not have access to things we rely on everyday, same thing for being stuck in a corrupt jail, not a problem in all places in the world does not always equal not a problem in our country in our life, NFA-NFR “we plan and God laughs”
Reliability matters to product lines, to continued use of product lines, a pen and paper that saves data correctly or loss of power causes problems, potential for flood, electronic might be higher value in
Context matters to usefulness of tool NFA-NFR
Better uses of tools such as short cuts like Ctrl-C and Ctrl-V can go a long way for decreasing Non Null Time Costs
Potential for tools like hot keys in life? Life hacks if you will?
Automate scheduling -> rely on reliable systems that provide value (as long as they are value in, visibility is limited NFA-NFR by many in society)
Dissatisfaction to More Not Always a Simple System, Efficiency is Never Perfected, the speed of technology and updates 5 years from now will be much greater
8 Billion people and giant super computers plus 5 years equals less efficient future use of time?
Basically I am saying unwise to beat ourselves up about not perfected optimizations that will be much outpaced by future updates, and a reminder why protected time is so much high value in
Diagnosed with Cancer a Month from Now, 6 months from now, 10 years from now? Do what you love and worrying about not perfectly optimized can lead to less optimized NFA
改进的批判性思维和决策研究数据，关于那个的组合？
Improved Critical Thinking and Decision Making Research Data, Combinatorics on that?
更好地鼓励光顾风险 降低风险 降低风险等于减少对焦虑的需求
Better Encouragement Potential for Patronizing Risk Mitigated Risk Mitigated equals less need for Anxiety
More Risks mitigated less need to worry about the future
MRM-LN2W
Don’t worry -> God controls the weather, Life but a vapor
GCTW-LBAV-MRM-LN2W
Acts of Gods, Storms and Limited Resolution In By Design
Evil Also In By Design
The Sun keeps rising, and while we are alive heart keeps ticking
AoG-SLR-IBD-EIBD-TSKR-WWRA-HKT
AoG-SLR-IBD-EIBD-TSKR-WWRA-HKT-GCTW-LBAV-MRM-LN2W
Acts of God, Storms, Evil, and Limited Resolution is In By Design but the Sun Keeps rising and our hearts keep ticking, able to breathe able to see, risks that are being actively mitigated, seeing the battle is half the battle NFA-NFR
More Risks being Actively Mitigated equals Less Need to Worry
God In Control -> More Risks Being Actively Mitigated
GIC -> MRBAM
GIC -> Faith -> MRBAM -> Not Worrying is High Value In -> Perfectionism that leads to Worry is Not High Value In, Not High Value in to making updates that are High Value In
Potential for more Flexible Systems NFA-NFR
Creating Resilient Supply Lines possibly underappreciated up to June 2022, Potential for Future NFA-NFR
Water is a perfect system necessary for life and it will never be improved upon
Water with sugar or water with no sugar
Someone low on sugar might gain value added by water with sugar
Not all Brown water is good, Coffee and Tea are value in not always fully appreciated
Water in original pure form is useful in some cases, water with sugar or coffee and tea is useful in other cases
Updates add value don’t always add value NFA-NFR
Tea in a Bottle of Water? Could look like something is wrong with the water
Preconceived notions of whether or not a bottle of water is safe not always a simple system
Prone to judgement about molecules we can see, not ones that might be dissolved in the system
Values on this planet control by different systems than can likely be appreciated in other Universes on different planets
System is confusing and irrational at times on Shiny Blue Marble more complicated than people would likely to believe at times, Miracles, Angels, more Unknowns than we can imagine seems very possible and very not fully appreciate not fully respected
Easy to claim we should make decision D based on A+B+C when A+B are knowns and C is considered less relevant, easy to factor out God, Angels, and Other Unknowns F,G,H,I,J
D=A+B+C vs D=A+B+C+F+G+H+I+J
We have a tendency to understate importance of the amount of unknowns into the system to this being a point more worth reiterating possibly not fully appreciated
T = Can modify physics
U = Virtual systems can modify physics
V = Inputs can be iffed
T = Pulleys U = Magnet under the table V = Magnet visible to people on one side of the table
Physics can be modifiable in visible and non visible ways, physics of particles happen when dissolving in solution, easy to have faith they will dissolve even though we don’t see the interactions at a microscopic level
Believable dictates belief, believable does not always equal rational
Belief based on deduction, knowns that matter and knowns that do not
Potential to make relevance harder?
Is a document about relevance relevant or not relevant, process matters, thus I assert it is relevant to systems in the world
Systems that factor out relevance by design are less value in logic in by design
Easy to factor out a mans contributions harder to factor them in at times
Creating a document around Relevance potential to require all lawyers to add it to their decision making, they might not fully appreciate the required update
Maybe they just forgot to factor in relevant information, never happened before?
