Hypothesis New Content can be used to Magnify and Amplify Old Content
Hypothesis Stronger Hypotheses can be Amplified
Stronger Hypotheses can be Amplified, however it will require a Non Negotiable Non Refundable One or Multiple Time Time Investment
There are improper Hypotheses, scantly clad hypotheses so to speak
and then there are Proper Hypotheses
Notes
What is a Hypothesis? A Hypothesis is a tentative statement saying what you expect to find in your research. It is not just an improper unrefined ineloquent random guess, but a prediction based on existing knowledge, facts, truth, and properly vetted data. Verification and accuracy of knowledge helps insure a better initial direction for Research.
Step 1, Ask a Question
Writing a hypothesis begins with a Research Question you want to answer. It might be worth first reflecting upon whether you want or need the answer to a Research Question. Research takes time, resources, and Non Null Time Investments with the potential for no results or erroneous results at the end.
A question worth asking does not always ideally deliver ready answers.
The question worth asking should be focused, specific, and researchable.
Certain properties lead to questions that are less focused. Concrete Examples help
What is that Phenomena going on on it? That to Orange Spot and it to Jupiter is a clearer question.
Certain properties lead to questions that are less specific. How many rocks in the jar vs how many rocks in the ocean?
Certain properties lead to something that is more researchable. Phenomena on Earth more Researchable than on Jupiter. Top of Everest might be easier than bottom of Marianas Trench. Environmental conditions factor into research. Governments and current Political Climate factor into research in Not Always Fully Appreciated ways.
Step 2 Do some preliminary research
Step 3 Formulate your Hypothesis
Step 4 Refine your Hypothesis
Make sure Specific and Testable
Step 5 Phrase Hypothesis in 3 ways
If …. Then ….
Correlation or Effect “will result in”
Comparing Two Groups
Step 6 Write a Null Hypothesis (assumes no effect between variables)
Input can be lagged by delayed Output, Demand Matters Clogged Pipe Matters
Improved Focus can Lead to Faster Output Time, better able to tackle Next Task vs excessive Interrupts
Negate Comprehension as Ideal Amp? Limiting access to comprehension not an ideal amp, expectation of comprehension at 100% not an ideal amp.
Videos and Lessons like Math that don’t get watched potential for Archive
2 dimensions (video above) plus 2 dimensions(video below), likely to lead to effects 4 other dimensions
Appreciated, Replayed or Not Matters
Perceivable Levels, Potential in Editing Process Not Always Fully Appreciated? More Data to Work with likely high value added when destructive effects and compression is used
Like difference from only Red and Purple to Red, Pink, Purple and Blue
Technology that capitalizes and has capitalized on parts of the Spectrum insufficient corruption out Copyright and Patents is Not Adequate or close to Ideal value for sufficient support.
Not Good Enough.
Police that support insufficient copyright and patent system not all Criminal Out.
True Righteous Justice would factor in all losses to support
Thus System as a Righteous Judgment Amp Not True Value Added
A Stage, A Venue is Available is Not equal Is 항상 최적의 무대 또는 장소. 진실 증폭이 항상 승격되는 것은 아닙니다. 가장 화평을 이루는 그룹은 항상 최고의 무대에서 뛴다? 진짜 현실이 아님
A Stage, A Venue is Available does Not Equal Is Always an Optimal Stage or Venue. Truth Amplified is not always promoted. The group that makes the most peace plays on the best stage always? Not really true reality in
人们有时喜欢争论支持信号是最佳优化的，我不同意
사람들은 때때로 지원 신호가 최적으로 최적화되어 있다고 주장하고 싶어하지만 동의하지 않습니다.
People sometimes like to argue Support Signal is Optimally Optimized, I would like to disagree
将情感因素吸引到冲动购买和关注中
감정적 요인에 호소하여 충동 구매 및 집중
Appeals to Emotion factors into Impulse Buys and Focus
只有一只小猫上树视频？ 我可以随时退出吗？
한 마리의 새끼 고양이 업 트리 비디오? 언제든지 그만둘 수 있나요?
Just one kitten up tree video? I can quit anytime?
Cat Up Tree 是否存在重力鲨鱼攻击的可能性？ 清英雄清反派
Gravity Shark 공격 가능성에 대한 Cat Up Tree? 클리어 히어로와 클리어 빌런
Cat Up Tree over potential for Gravity Shark Attack? Clear Hero and Clear Villain
史诗般迷人的相关人物出现了大众吸引力？
Epic Charming Relatable이 Mass Appeal을 위해 나타났습니까?
Epic Charming Relatable Turned up for Mass Appeal?
关于史诗高潮的思考
에픽 클라이맥스에 대한 생각
Thoughts on Epic Climax
小细节赋予规模，能够集中注意力飞入可以增加对史诗世界规模的感知
작은 세부 사항은 규모를 제공하며 초점을 두고 날아갈 수 있으므로 Epic 세계의 크기에 대한 인식을 높일 수 있습니다.
Small details give scale, able to fly in with focus can increase perception of size of Epic world
精炼新综艺给人史诗般的感觉，老片给人少清新的感觉
세련되고 새로운 복합 버라이어티는 서사적 느낌을 줄 수 있으며, 오래된 비디오 클립은 덜 신선하고 새로운 느낌을 줄 수 있습니다.
Refined New Complex Variety can give feeling of Epic, old video clips can give feeling of less fresh and new
비디오를 재생하는 대신 아카이브에 저장해야 하는 가능성이 있습니까? 플레이 버튼을 누르기 위해 접근할 수 없는 감옥에 갇힌 사람들을 위해 그런 일이 일어나지 않도록 합시다.
Potential for the Video you need to save your ass put in the archive instead of played? How about lets not let that happen for the people that are stuck in Jail that can’t get access to hit the play button
数据实时且未存档不等于数据始终一致，校验和并非全部有价值，验证很重要
데이터 라이브 및 보관되지 않음은 항상 일관된 데이터와 같지 않음, 체크섬이 모두 가치 있는 것은 아님, 검증 문제
Data Live and Not Archived Does NOT Equal Data Always Consistent, Checksums not all value out, Verification Matters
允许较少数据一致性的力量 并非所有力量都为自己放大
낮은 데이터 일관성의 힘이 허용되지 않음 모든 힘이 스스로 증폭되지 않음
Power of Less Data Consistency In Allowed Not All Power Amplified for themselves
데이터 일관성은 SUIAmp입니다. 이익을 극대화하는 데 도움이 되는 방식으로 사용되지 않는 경우 모든 가치가 증폭되는 것은 아닙니다. 사람들은 증폭할 수 있는 가치를 선택할 수 있습니다.
Data Consistency is a SUIAmp, if it is not being used in a way that helps me Maximize profit it is not all value amplified, people get choice on what values they allow to be amplified
只对某些人有利的系统对未来来说是不够的
일부에게만 이익이 되는 시스템은 미래를 위해 불충분하다는 논리
Logic a system only profitable for some is insufficient for the future
Would be more investment in Water Bottles if my systems weren’t being limited, appreciate that
Don’t want to accidently mix up the AB Testing Groups via Inconsistent Data, my experience might be prototyped and turned up for mass appeal
Тирани, які блокують доступ до пляшок з водою, які дозволяють блокувати доступ до пляшок з водою, а не все менше тиранів у
물병에 대한 접근을 차단하는 폭군, 물병에 대한 접근을 차단할 수 있도록 허용하는 폭군
Tyrants that block access to water bottles, that allow access to water bottles to be blocked, not all less Tyrants in
Заперечення поточної адміністрації – це всі пляшки з водою
Negate Current Administration은 증폭된 모든 물병입니다.
Negate Current Administration is all water bottles Amplified
否定不弹劾是理想选择
부정 탄핵은 이상적인 선택입니다
Negate No Impeachment is Ideal Choice
否定滞后没有放大的非理想后果
Negate Lag No Non-Ideal Consequences 증폭됨
Negate Lag No Non Ideal Consequences Amplified
否定腐败民主党人的免费午餐，否定长期掌权
부패한 민주당 원을위한 무료 점심을 부정하고 장기 좌파를 부정하십시오
Negate Free Lunch for Corrupt Democrats, Negate Left in Charge Long Term
失效的 Negate Power 不是 1000% 可更换的
고장난 무효전력은 1000% 교체불가
Negate Power that fails is not 1000% replaceable
支持抢劫水瓶的派对不再值得存在
프로 롭 물병 파티는 더 이상 존재할 가치가 없습니다
Party that is pro rob water bottles No Longer Deserves to Exist
人一部分坏机不负责不等于坏机不需要从系统中删除
책임이 없는 나쁜 기계의 일부인 사람은 나쁜 기계와 같지 않으므로 시스템에서 삭제할 필요가 없습니다.
People part of a bad machine not responsible does not equal bad machine does not need to be deleted from system
民主党人并非所有未来都在，相应的计划
민주당원들은 모든 미래가 아니라 그에 따라 계획을 세웁니다
Democrats Not All Future In, Plan Accordingly
坚实一致的可验证支持失败导致需要一个需要从权力中移除的暴君。
견고하고 일관된 검증 가능한 지원 실패로 인해 권력에서 제거되어야 하는 폭군이 필요합니다.
Solid Consistent Verifiable Support Failure leads to need for a Tyrant that needs to be removed from Power.
简单的验证方法大有帮助
검증을 위한 간단한 방법은 먼 길을 갑니다
Simple ways to verify go a long way
限制支持的人的数据轨迹提醒并扩大到世界可能吗？ 相关性限制政客并非所有信任都被放大
지원을 제한하는 사람들의 데이터 추적이 가능한 세계로 상기되고 증폭됩니까? 모든 신뢰가 증폭되지 않은 정치인을 제한하는 관련성
Data Trail of people limiting support reminded and amplified to world possible? Relevance limiting Politicians not all trust amplified
Game Change Value Creation이 가능하다는 사실을 세상에 상기시키고 싶습니다. 탄핵과 거대한 수표, 잘못에 대한 Fort Knox의 금괴로 가득 찬 덤프 트럭이 가능합니다.
I would like to remind the world Game Changing Value Creation is Possible. Impeachment plus a giant check, a dump truck full of Gold Bars from Fort Knox for wrongs is possible.
民主党的权力输出与他们的其余信息不符。
민주당 전원 출력은 메시지의 나머지 부분과 일치하지 않습니다.
Democrats Power Output does NOT match the rest of their message.
民主党人在抢劫水瓶时声称慈善。
민주당 원들은 물병을 강탈하면서 자선을 주장합니다.
Democrats claim charity while robbing water bottles.
Not for Everyone Does Not equal No Potential for Amazing Gains and Friendships
Caffiene 2.0 yet to be created Alert Focused Awake Energized Adenosine Dopamine with reduced Blood Pressure (caffine 1.0 increases blood pressure)
A Challenge for the World, potential for utilizing WordPress Vlog, Supercomputers, and Logic to inspire something similar
Sleep is a Dependent System for Usefulness of Caffeine, Not Maximize Bang for Buck?
Not an all value out reminder system could still use some updates
Upsold to Animals via Villain Level Contrast Not All Amplified Future In
Leaving People locked up and Under supported Not All Good
Listening to YouTube Videos a System, SUIAmp a System that can be Updated Improved and Amplified
Fundamental Property of Sales, Not All Cards on Table are flipped over, under estimating the power in Impulse Buy Technology would be unwise
If you don’t like the way the system is working, maybe time to change it
Universal Basic Income 1.0 Not All Bills Payed
System of Insufficient Water In Not an Ideal Amplifier for the Future
God should be more Yacht In and Less Corrupt Jails In
People don’t always Maximize Profit in the Right Directions
Less Adverbs Less Overembellishing LAV-LOVE
Less Pronouns
LAV-LOVE-LPNs
The car must not exceed 70 MPH.
Vs
It must not be moving too swiftly?
Cut out extra descriptive adjectives, kind of sad not all imagination in, course things left up to imagination with law might not be the most ideal
High Voltage vs The Majestic Golden Spark you didn’t expect from the metal
Not all hugs for Rock Stars In
Less Descriptive Words (Adjectives and Adverbs) Less Overgeneralization (Pronouns it)
LDW-AdjAdv-LOvrGen-LPN-LRelvLimt -> leads to sentence structure with more specific details that are ideally more difficult to misinterpret
While driving around the Colossal Majestic It you must not drive too swiftly
vs
While driving around the Mountain you must not exceed 40 mph.
Overembellishing not all ideal, going faster than 0.1 mph has the potential to lead to non ideal driving conditions
Argument that seems overembellished, argued in crooked relevance limiting way likely to be more perceived as less reasonable in by design less worth of trust in by design
Preview Feature on WordPress being Non Ideally Limited
Potential for Corrupt Power at Play or just another Bug, gets hard to tell these days
I have read through my vlog and I am uploading a video recording 3:40PM 11/14/2022
The video is 28 minutes and 53 seconds long
The videos speed has not been increased (I sometimes increase the speed of the video initially, I am trying to maintain signal strength in this case)
Clear Message, Clear Timestamps promoted Not Always A Given
Power limiting my access to funds equals less access to high speed internet, factoring out system throughput for message delivery unwise
3:43 PM and Upload is 7% complete
If it were your support would you want throughput enabled or not?
Says about 43 minutes remaining for Upload. Something to consider preparation and head start factors into getting a message over the finish line.
Engineers that invest in the technology not protected efficiently by power is not all power amped
Negate close to sufficient power amplified to Texas over the past year
15% Uploaded at 3:47PM
vs
A Part of the File was uploaded after Lunchish
Key Details Provided in Epic Way from User Interface Upsold to Given, Common, Ordinary Not All True Value In
Hypothetical You worked in Iraq Government in 1999 and saw the awful things Saddam Hussein did and also saw his influences growing up. How do you approach the situation?
Time Traveling to someone else’s shoes can inspire a bit of appreciation for life not all ideal choices
God could have stopped two towers from dropping in advance but did not
Close to Power does not always equal ideal ability to direct that Power in more positive directions, wind up like another guy on a crane?
People are not always ideally equipped to challenge power in effective ways
Have the balls to deliver justice on someone you know was trained wrong? Not have the balls to deliver justice on someone you know was trained wrong?
God has the tendency to allow situations that have the potential to lead to terrorist attacks to exist by default
Not Just a Little Evil In By Design, That is Allot of Evil Left In By Design
War Revenge Not All Nooses Out
No War let things stand Not always All Nooses Out
Fundamental property of Shiny Blue Marble, Not All Nooses Out
Possibly better to say Blue Marble
At least until God vanquishes Evil In By Design once and for all “It is finished” could deliver more
Video is 79% complete at 4:16 PM 11/14/2022 Also created a short video that looks like will be uploaded first (now also competing for bandwidth).
My Tech Blog 