My Tech Blog

I am listening to encouraging music (JennyMusic channel on YouTube) while practicing typing skills. My actual speed has not seen major gains just by listening to the music, but listening makes the process more enjoyable, and thus more likely to be reinvested in. Practice and amount of practice factors into gains, thus I think listening to encouraging music while practicing has potential to increase gains in typing speed. Typing sometimes with music has potential to give consistent rhythm to throughput, drives progress forward.

If I am in the darkest depth of Space, freezing cold I would not want to see Evil, Nazis, Suicide Bombers from the Rising Sun, Genocide, or Burning Crosses on Church’s Lawns. Blonde Hair is pretty, the warmth of a torch is less than all value out, light from the sun brings hope. Less bias, less racism, less antisemitism, less racism against Oriental and Asians, capacity to value diversity, taught in advance factors into a better future, is high value added, and is far less than ideally turned up in this world. There is oxygen in the room to teach it today, will there be tomorrow?

Easy to take the good times for granted, a future population that is unlikely to always mesh well together on this planet, a future population that is likely to be encouraged to mesh less well together, prevented in advance?

“We will never be one of them, no matter how hard we try” is a thought likely to amp, thinking better of others is hard. Negate inclusivity and reason to doubt to better?

Important to see the good, reasons to hope, even when it is hard to, when it feels like there is no path forward. Truth and Comprehension amplify less than ideally See No Evil potentially not always valued to the level it should be.

Can’t remember if this Dream was yesterday January 20th, 2024 or today January 21st, 2024

Unknown

I have had a dream about a friend I knew growing up. I can’t remember the exact words said. I remember it being dark in the dream, nighttime I think.

I don’t know if the friend still exists or has already passed on – difficult to know how life has change for people I have known over my lifetime. Not knowing, not having talked to anytime recently combined with my own struggles, my own near encounters with death it almost is like I am talking to them in another reality, like I have already passed into a different reality, or possibly they have. Might just be my mind having combined ideas and memories. Could be a demon, what God allows and does not allow is not always known to me – doesn’t feel evil does not equate to zero less than ideal potential.

Dreams that are relevant, that inspire thought are in by design, have potential for real effects on perception of reality and events, and are understood less than ideally. Maybe God will show all the dreams we had at the end of life and show purpose for each one?

Easy to comprehend everything God allows in, God lets happen? Likely things I don’t know might never know might never comprehend. Pursuit of ideal truth and representation of reality sounds nice. Yet the words on this paper (file) wouldn’t have been written without the dream. The dream invests in communication, writing, words written, computers and processors like the one I am typing this on, on Open Source Software (OpenOffice Writer where I am writing this document). Small inflection points matter and are not always versed.

I am not a Doctor, or a Lawyer – some thoughts

Levels of contrast required for action get equated to sufficient representation – a wheel might need to squeak loud to get fixed does not equate to highest level of contrast, contrast that will lead to action, action such as will fix is always truthful or ideal representation established. It is understandable someone or a group of people might desire sufficient levels of contrast perceived and comprehended to get action, yet over amounts, stronger amounts might be generated in pursuit.

If someone says they have pain that is 4 on scale of 10 might not get fixed. If someone says they have pain of 10 on a scale of 10 more likely to get fixed, equated to pain of 4 not a problem, 10 was likely ideal representation. People that have potential to raise comprehension of problems better might be more likely to get their problems fixed, thus using voice to help others is potentially more valuable than people always ponder. If 4 is not respected, blame someone for claiming 10 when fix is desirable, and 4 is known not to deliver? Society (including myself) potentially reinforce non ideal truth by requiring high levels to perceive and comprehend need for action.

If someone else has a problem with an unknown level, say it is a 4 on scale of 10 or a 10 on scale of 10? Desire to help others, implement Golden Rule might never obfuscate truth? Well-meaning people that fight for each other might convolute truth, not all good, and not all bad. People that get their problem fixed might have extra freedom (and their problem fixed first might have or might not have been ideally established) thus carrying it forward to help others seems wise.

Less than ideal representation factors into problems solved does not equate to more adequate representation is always likely to be turned up at another date. Speaking in generality, think of the fact that stories and movies can highlight really important problems in society, yet might highlight them in a very shocking way that might lead to problem perceived at a much greater level than actually exists. The actual problem is a problem, the problem perceived at much greater level is sometimes terrifying.

The loudest voice, the voice that sways the most hearts might be set to the one with the most ideal capacity to perceive and comprehend truth non ideally. Delivery of Charm does not require ideal truth delivered initially. A leader has potential to be charming, truthful, yet what is required for them to give ideal representation of truth might be obfuscated from their view. Accurate representation of what is said in a movie, YouTube, or article might be directly correlated to accurate representation. Well-meaning people that speak truthfully do not and are not required to ideally track down the most truthful representation.

Most truthful representation might require probing line of questioning, yet Golden Rule might state probing line of questioning not really how others wish to be treated. The most adequate representation of truth not always the most morally right? The most adequate representation of truth factors into reason and logic, thus reason and logic while sometimes ideal is not always ideal.

Leaders that win via Charisma might be set do ideal paths to start pursuit of Truth. 2024 equates to we are past potential for relevance limiting and obfuscation due to being charmed? It’s nice, desirable to think the future, technology ideals political systems though I don’t think that is how the future and technology have amplified at least during my lifetime. Progress and Change is forward never backwards, up and never down is a nice thought though not really full appreciation for the continuous work required to make change and societal gains have greater throughput for the future. Change that is more maintainable is more sustainable.

Discouragement Limits Throughput

The Church teaches the Golden Rule. If the Golden Rule had ideal throughput, when someone else succeeds we would all be happy, be supportive – that is not how the World seems to work.

One fixes ProblemA, yet ProblemB, ProblemC, and ProblemD left unfixed? What if you are or your support is ProblemD? It makes sense people desire support and seeing others supported when they are not has potential to be hurtful.

That said if someone fixes ProblemA and then are demoralized, discouraged expect ProblemB, ProblemC, and ProblemD to be fixed once the wind is out of their sails? Proclaim the injustice or reinforce the good while attempting to minimize the bad without obfuscating truth?

Supernovas, Blackholes, and Galaxies the Universe is a beautiful place. Yet the Universe and The World is not always a beautiful place. It might be desirable at time to make everything cleaner – organization, everything in its place factors into encouragement, clear thought, and clearer direction. The combination might lead to never desire to get dirty, never to incur liability by getting involved, trying to help others.

No Risk No Reward is somewhat useful saying to inspire Love, taking on increased risk by choosing to fix ProblemA, ProblemB, ProblemC, or ProblemD first. Fix one problem first one will risk increased liability increased visibility of not fixing other problems. Curing injustice in the system doesn’t find the cure for cancer, curing cancer doesn’t cure injustice in governments. Demoralize and Discourage the person that tries to reduce injustice because they don’t cure cancer? Demoralize and Discourage the person that tries to reduce cancer because they don’t cure injustice? Try to solve both claim zero love? claim ideal love?

Success has potential to bring Critics. Success also has potential to save lives, make things better. If I was the person with ProblemE I might desire to call out the injustice, yet it might be potentially more wise to reinforce the good in the successes. Problems left set to unknown does not ideal, problems known and acknowledge not fixed is discouragement, demoralization of its own, those that have potential to fix problems demoralized, discouraged, and limited has potential to factor into less throughput, into reinforcing perceived as less throughput by choice.

Being a Critic does not always ideal, problems not acknowledged does not usually ideal – criticism might not always amplify in encouraging way does not equate to problems less known is always higher value added. Problems perceived and comprehended without perceived and comprehended as discouragement and demoralization not a given, right words and grace matters, forgiveness for unknowns matter, don’t judge factors into what needs to perceived as in need of being forgiven. Acknowledged as a problem might leave something in the air, bring in thought paths that are non-null time costs? Should I forgive or should I not forgive, what is the level of the problem, is there similar problems? Thought paths that take time and do not always amplify less judgment, judgment that is in direct contrast to don’t judge.

Feedback delivered in right way, with right level of grace and kindness factors into problems solved vs not solved. As someone that likes tech, I want others problems solved as long as their problems solved does not equate to others hurt or with more problems.

There is injustice in society. I don’t know how to stop all of it. That should not be equated to I want injustice.

There is ambiguity at times in government messages. I don’t know how to stop all of it. That should not be equated to I want ambiguity in government messages.

Things have potential to be perceived and comprehended in ways not intended. I don’t know how to stop all of it. That should not be equated to I want things perceived and comprehended incorrectly. Sometimes might work in my favor, sometimes might be creative, does not equate to I desire it or it will or is likely to always amplify that way.

Less than ideals factor into people’s profit in life. People don’t know how to stop all of it. That should not be equated to they want less than ideals factoring into profit. If I buy gas I might need it to go to the store or to work, or even to buy solar panels. CO2 emissions contribute to global warming does not equate to I or others desire global warming. Continued use of gasoline by Police Cars and Ambulances – both of which save lives, might fuel less energy independence, continued reliance on The Middle East, that said Police and Ambulances should not be equated to desiring global warming, desire energy dependence that empowers less than ideal regimes.

Awareness is raised less than ideally. Awareness raised less than ideally should not be equated to desire. Raising awareness in the right ways, in the way that actually leads to change requires building bridges over demonizing, demoralizing, and discouraging people that might see things another way. I desire more green tech, more energy independence for our country, and less global warming, I might not know how to raise awareness in ideal ways, should not be equated to I desire to discourage others.

New technology does not always deliver. Selling people on the gains matters and has shown precedent at times for amplifying less than ideally for all in society. Supercomputers have been in by design for a while, Homelessness and People on the street have been in by design regardless that Supercomputers have been in by design – what is sold as has potential to make all peoples lives better sometimes only delivers for a portion of Society. Inclusive path forward Matters, and has shown precedent for turned up less than ideally. Green and Less Global Warming should profit all, making implementation desirable and practical factors into real gains.

More Energy independence could equate to less desirable GDPs for some nations which is less than desirable. I want Venezuelan people less oppressed not more poor – though financial power generated via petroleum has not always amplified less oppression ideally. Paths forward that sound good, that are desirable from an environmental standpoint, do not always require less change for those that are hurting.

Reduced Energy dependence equates to less leverage for other countries on The World Stage, combined with Governmental instability compounded by reduced financial power has shown historic precedent for amplifying less than ideally. Is the United Nations and The World prepared for the costs associated with reduce dependence on oil? People (including me) desire Less Global Warming yet I am not sure practically People of The World (including me) are ready to make sure it amplifies ideally for all nations it will affect. Looking at The Middle East, partially idealed seems to be delivering less than sufficiently. True cost of change without Humanitarian crises?

If I take a landmark, an area in the city, and I imagine a kitten walking on the ground close to the crowd, when I visit that landmark again, I might remember a kitten that walked there. Imagination factors into memory and potential for truth obfuscated.

If I take a landmark, an area in the city, and I imagine a tiger walking on the ground close to the crowd, it changes the dynamic dramatically – Tigers are dangerous, can’t have a tiger close to the crowd. Tigers might be endangered, shoot an endangered animal? Or maybe I imagine a circus tiger, trained to be like an attack dog that protects me. Regardless of how I imagine things, it could factor into my memory of the landmark, perception of truth, perception of potential threats at a particular landmark.

Not real factors into perception, perception of truth, capacity to comprehend, details that factor into threats perceived or not perceived accurately.

If people see Authority, or an Officer as a kitten, or as a tiger, claim either is good? People use similar not exact systems to amplify comprehension, dehumanization amplifies less than ideally – people are not animals, yet in some prisons in the World conditions have potential to convolute that idea.

Imagination has potential for useful for hypotheticals, what would one do if there was a kitten in the crowd, what would one do if there was a tiger in the crowd (Zoos sometimes have animals, not people escape). Having a plan for potential escaped animals might be useful for cops, reminders of the idea every time they visit a landmark might be less than ideal. Trying to listen to a dispute, citizens communicate and seeing a tiger in their peripheral vision could be less than ideal.

Authority having some imagination matters, thinking things have the potential for only happening one way is not always sufficient citizens protected. A child or an adult could use imagination telling a cop that someone released a tiger into the crowd when they might have been confusing a memory they had of the circus.

Levels and balance matters, wouldn’t want people seeing a circus at every landmark. Capacity to control imagination might be greater in some than others is likely not fully appreciated. I like Imagination – great Writing, great Songs, great Art, and great Movies, that said I do theorize there is the potential for problems, potential for problems I don’t fully know, perceive, or comprehend. Inception is a pretty amazing Movie, also a pretty powerful Movie – that said it was not blocked from the public, for better and worse. Less than ideal truth is in by design yet desire to factor in that fact is potentially less than sufficient at times.

Authority and Cops might not always have ideal access to truth. Less proximity (like being on a boat in the Ocean) might be higher value at times than all fully appreciate. Governments never mislead? Always easy to know, always easy to have access to know when Governments are mislead? Access to oversight is valuable, yet likely distributes knowledge, allows for transparency less than ideally – I have capacity to comprehend threats in society might be thought to known capacity to comprehend is far less than ideal not a given. Having a stable government and society might spoil into thinking it is a given, does not need to be fought for and protected, justice is just in by design and injustice never a problem.

Things are the way they are because God wants them that way thought to change, progress is desirable though change and progress do not always protect all parties. Change and progress, inspired correctly not always a simple system. USA political system constantly changes, leaves change in by design, which is less than all value out for training people to create change and progress in more valuable ways. Practice with Change and Progress factors into better Delivery, delivery of Change and Progress that hurts less and helps more. Being on a boat might limit capacity to interact with the system in a way that protects others, a satellite phone plus distance might be less than all support reduced. Seeing as boats for all to avoid a corrupt system is impractical, better to have a stable non-corrupted system.

Risk mitigation matters, reduced proximity factors into risk mitigation might not always be entertained as an option. Unwise to act on fear, might be comprehended as acting on fear, does not equate to reduced proximity is always value out, should be equated to most value out. That is acting on fear has the potential to be turned up in a way that could reduce risk mitigation. Might be turned up in similar not exact systems in ways that could be allot of value out, thus potentially not always stated. Stand by a defendant, the accused to help protect them, or reduced proximity is higher value added? Standing by one defendant might lead to less capacity to stand by another defendant, likely not fully appreciated people have to choose their battles and more helping protect and defend far from all value out.

Christ has ideal capacity to stand next to people and man that is not God does not have ideal capacity to stand next to all people on Earth and on Space Stations at all times. If I am trying to amplify defense law in Dallas, TX I want God protecting people on the Space Stations? Yes. Desire to cover all bases does not equate to requirement to feels good. Houston is close, yet Space Stations everyone in the World’s neighbor?

I would not want psychopaths or murders walking the streets. That said in The Middle East my understanding is they hang people from cranes – gives feeling of system as more of a Tiger than a kitten. Texas government has used the electric chair, and lethal injection – which gives a feeling of more Tiger than I might like to admit. Dehumanization turned up matters, yet we put people to sleep like animals feels ideal?

I am not authority, that said I want all citizens protected, authority and non-authority, less proximity to dehumanization, dehumanizing systems not always value out.