People in Society make a constant decision keep electricity and allow Hospitals to continue to function while allowing non-null Child Electrocutions.
People in Society could make a constant decision to not keep electricity and allow Hospitals to fail while potentially not guaranteeing less Child Electrocutions (Electrical Safety throughput is less than ideal, Lightning and Thunderstorms are in by design).
Now if you are in Jail or Prison, trying to go to sleep and there is a bright light that is always on, does that not factor into your perception and comprehension of who profits and who fails in Society?
Sleep factors into capacity to profit from Logic and Reason. Law is Logic and Reason.
My bias is based on my personal experience and World view compounded with World Wars, History, and Situations that have amplified less than ideally, are highly unlikely to amplify the same way in the future. My guess is many if not all people fall into this category. Fee Grade of A given to ideal bias reduced. Trying to learn set to ideal is unwise – progress is valuable, progress does not make me a PhD in reducing bias, required to be a PhD in reducing bias to be valued is unwise.
Even a PhD in reducing bias might likely see their own biases more profoundly and likely needs support and encouragement, including that of being released from corrupt prison that profit few over others in society.
Bias in by design in by default acknowledged factors into Grace and Forgiveness more appreciated by default, more appreciated in advance. That appreciation factors into Throughput for Peace in the Future.
Ideal wind claimed is likely to lead to feeling of insufficiently heard.
Something beats nothing, progress not valued is unlikely to lead to progress sustained.
Happy and Joyfulness brought about by Peace is amazing. I also might venture to think Miracles and Prayers answered factor into divine favor. Words with many definitions sometimes leaves room for creativity, clarification and is also a reminder that clarification and ideal agreement is not always wise to foster as a requirement for peace.
I like Art and Art has potential to reinforce bias at times, bias that could lead to war
Offsets might be less than ideal, offsets and impacts matter
Wars and World Events might make it harder to see that AB Testing, Corporate Strategies have potential to both add and subtract value in dramatic ways
Understanding the concept is important (reminder I the writer of this vlog am not the one on the videos, I do appreciate have videos to reference on AB Testing)
All states might not get same version likely not always ideal trust reinforced
Companies required to give ideally similar experiences? Factors into consumer confidence, consumer protection – at least perceived, and delivered might be perceived as zero bias
All technology is somewhat an AB Test, each product has a certain level of variability
Bias and Corporate Profit drives vastly different experiences might not always be ideal for representation in legal cases, in maintaining a fair and equal Society, different political parties not required to get same experience?
Hire two CEOs show each making speeches to a group of people and then pick the one to leave hired at the end? Research Ethics is corporate practices is desirable and delivered far less than ideally.
AB Testing is Powerful, has potential for being problematic, problematic in a way that is not always understood by all parties, all parties that represent truth. Two AB tests might have different numbers and statistics – see which one better couldn’t be amplified?
AB Testing has potential to lead to better experience, better experience is not always amplified in societal environments that allow oppression (that sadly still exist in 2024)
Imagine if colleges had two of the same class, different professors? Class A and Class B then test at the end, claim ideal truth represented ideally same between the two?
Changes might lead to better, better is up to debate at times in non-ideal ways
Most users guaranteed to see things the same way thought to AB Testing known to known does not deliver that way. Truth is not represented ideally is unlikely to be appreciated by law enforcement. One lingerie version for the police one with human trafficking victims might be possible.
Not 50% 50% for AB Tested likely not always fully appreciated. Could be 99.99% and 0.01%. Competition could have their experience robbed in hard to fully perceive or comprehend ways.
AB Testing known reinforces initial path not always set to ideal. Refinement both necessary and valuable many times in products and services.
Ability to have fair and just elections is dependent upon equal and fair experience that is not always delivered ideally
All defense attorneys likely to know technology experience has the potential to vary widely and truth is lost in complexity is not a fully appreciated system?
Strong consistency claimed to be delivered might not be actual experience, especially in an AB Testing World – might be better to say consistency not always consistent
Inability to claim ideal consistency might lead to less provable for FBI, better experience delivered in advance matters in not fully appreciated ways
Looks like no human trafficking, child labor might not equate to reality is hard to fully appreciate without the concepts
Resources that are vastly restricted for government agencies factors into value delivered and not delivered, truth iffed not always good
More costly fix has potential to lead to not fixed, for capitalized on for not fixed
Inability to comprehend value delivered or not delivered might lead to funds reallocated likely not fully appreciated
Funds don’t always equate to money, sometimes funds equate to time, investment in caring
No direct link to government agencies is hard in not fully appreciated ways at times. Value delivered not always acknowledged. Desire for better does not always equate to full comprehension of problems.
Keeping people out of the battle, de-know sometimes is the more protective route. People that might mean well might not always mean ideally well. Win wins possible more power here less power there potentials.
Support delivered based upon ideal ground to not ideal ground known?
Less know on Lingerie sites not always good more know on Lingerie sites not always good? Less eyes on problems always less expensive?
I am not authority or an officer, I do have an opinion as a citizen of The USA and The World:
In the battle against human trafficking, child labor does not guarantee experience A or experience B. Higher cost consistency equates to greater complexity, greater complexity has potential for less-than-ideal investment. People that cooperate with authorities should be valued highly. Valued highly factors into divestment seen as possible and desirable. The past leverages the future more divested from in advance is valuable. Free might be a brighter flashlight in dark places.
Anxiety amps, coping mechanisms are useful
Fend a low, fend an experience doesn’t deliver consistency might be not fully appreciated? (Reminder I the writer of this vlog am not a lawyer, I do care, also a reminder I am a man not any of the people on these videos)
Corporations unlikely to always know the non-ideals they reinforce freedom and safety combined deliver in less-than-ideal ways.
Important reminder people trying to protect crime operations might flag false positives, get people to buy in to see who is not loyal to the operation. The combination likely does not always deliver ideal truth perceived and comprehended. Someone doing wrong does not equal not brilliant level of intelligence. I am smart enough to outsmart high level investment in AB delivered society could be called into question.
There are PhD’s in neuroscience in the World. I have a BS and MS in Computer Engineering, claim I can’t be outsmarted, claim there aren’t knowns in that I don’t know? Heroes with less than ideal know allowed to contribute?
I am also not the man on the following video, I do think it reinforces importance of the concept
Accessibility to this document might be, likely is limited. Limited for people that are both victims and potentially leveraged by organized crime is likely not fully respected. In know and out of danger is valuable, hard to perceive and comprehend what people don’t go through themselves.
Aid low is valuable, always allowed to be valuable?
See Heaven, truly see Heaven, claim God can’t meet needs?
From Heaven, looking glass at Earth? No potential for pain in Heaven?
Is there a price for tempting Angels?
Fallen Angel to Demon Possible – not really trying to turn that up
Angels if Man, Man ifs Angels? Fair is Fair? In Heaven equals higher up on totem pole? God loves less, God loves more? Not sure I want Angels feeling less loved.
Man and Woman, Mankind desires greatest level of support possible from God. Claim God can’t turn things up?
Should preachers support people that have Lingerie Companies? Real support vs distant support with potential wars looming – Golden Rule likely to deliver ideally? Temptation reduced matters, Temptation reduced factors into personal profit, Personal profit is always ideal Temptation reduced? Ideal people protected? I don’t want to tempt, I know society tempts by default and claims it does not. Sweaters not always ideal Texas weather, protection from Adultery not always ideally turned up. People with lingerie companies give reasons to claim mitigation, reasons adultery is acceptable both ideally and non-ideally. Understandable, comprehendible gets convoluted with acceptable.
A company that doesn’t get stage time is unlikely to be protected or profitable. When people that want to get their stones ready, they might look to a preacher to what they see as acceptable, potentially a tuning fork, not all good to divest from involvement. Claims of ideal divestment might equate to grounds for reduced support, no support seen as acceptable, righteous. Involved is not sin free, negate involved is not sin free. Golden rule has to deliver ideally to equate to zero sin matters, factors into less stones thrown. Who is the sinner factors into ideal ground established non ideally. No big deal don’t have to get involved might lead to problems not seen, problems not fixed. Divestments and claims of sweaters ideal, less vulnerability ideals. People less attracted to each other if all wearing hazmat suits, not an ideal future to turn up.
I don’t want to sound like the Villain choose one or the other does not always lead to ideal ground, ground free of sin established. Other potential options? Different trajectories not always pondered, potential for not always sin free.
Imagine seek and you will find ideals, ideals in a time frame you desire. I don’t believe it does but work with the hypothetical. Imagine you find another path on your pursuit to find knowledge, knowledge that is far more valuable than the original pursuit? Seeking free of temptation? How valuable is the original piece of information, is the new path fool’s gold or more? No potential for pretty along the way to finding answers?
Current paths of let vs let feel less than ideal. Let equated to I don’t have to fix, not fixing is wise, maintenance turned up as less valuable? I know how to establish ideal ground on maintain in a land where heat strokes possible in a large part of the year? Christ and God know how to ideal, have had chance to ideal, yet ideal has not been delivered over time. God could deliver ideal sin out by removing man, has chosen not to sets historic precedent for sin is in by design does not equate to the future is written or easily knowable.
Understand the following logic. All people are less than ideal sin out, if I let people that are less than ideal sin out around me I have temptation, is important to limit temptation, thus it is important for nobody to talk. No communication likely to lead to ideal safety delivered? Strippers need to comprehend high voltage signs? No, Yes. People visiting strippers likely to be talking about electricity? Potentially not, does not equate to not possible, less communication is always wise. How many people are around matters in not fully appreciated ways, left alone not always good does not always factor into ideal support even if support given by someone visiting a strip club is less than ideal. People don’t always see their own light shining in the darkness. Negate hubris lows, hubris woes, negate hubris woes. Be less confident, we need you to follow, not to lead (said not said, comprehended not comprehended)? Low and humble might equate to discouraged seen as righteous, will deliver ideally?
Important to remember that the devil has potential to use both encouragement and discouragement, sometimes in tandem, combination – either ideals not always true. Discouraged from A factors into encouraged to B said from a friend or from a foe?
A question is asked gets set to knows what thoughts it generates based upon own thoughts of potential answers does not equate to all possible answers? Will amplify the same answers I think gets thought, potentially non ideally. What is 2+2? A Math Question? 1+1+1+1? 2 Questions and 2 Answers? 4, simple as that? There is value in knowing there is potential for greater representation. 2 bottles of water and 2 helping hands? Representation to a prettier picture? 4 peace or 4 war? Creativity might less than ideal accounting? Good numbers factor into Research Ethics and Studies, that have potential to be delivered more or less ideally. The next trial after 776 never biased to a jackpot? Encouraged not always ideal oversight, impossible?
Casinos use numbers might get correlated to Math Teachers as convicts. Casinos don’t equal convicts, Math Teachers don’t equal convicts. Not stop feed attach correlation that amplifies less than ideally? Trial 777 maybe the cure? Cures only require one pull of the slot machine, one roll of the dice? Better not risk another pull, didn’t work for me in Vegas? Risk and Risk Aversion ideally valued as valuable? Hedge the bet between the two, sounds good, sounds would, sounds could?
Maximize Good and Minimize Evil might be equated to easily perceivable, easily comprehendible, easily deliverable. Jackpot future no reason to show effects of the bad? Representation should equate to Maximize Good and Minimize Evil does not equate to useful ground never factors into profit seen as Maximizing Good and Minimizing Evil. Some people’s sins get turned up while others don’t. Imagine if everyone talked about how they judged incorrectly all the time. Less desirable for self-equates to greater value delivered? Judgment factors into where focus is delivered. What is focused upon not always ideally established. What should be focused upon not always ideally comprehendible. Desire to protect self factors into value established is not free of consequence.
If I go to a lingerie website I should be punished? Reinforcing less sweaters required in Texas is not valuable? Just because I have potential to defend my point equates to ideal judgment established and delivered? Judgment and assessment never get convoluted? Can win equates to should win? Can win equates to should not win? Who wins an argument, wins a case, wins right always ideal love delivered? Winning is nice, love is not always ideal wins. Love is not nice? Love sometimes leads to gossip, examples set, claim it all nice? Establishing precedent not always ideal love.
Someone that doesn’t try to dissuade me personally from visiting a lingerie website gets to comment on right or wrong surrounding it? Fend involvement matters, I am not married, and exhibition of rings delivers less than ideally. Reminder though I am not a lawyer. Rings could be used as focal points, as remote tests likely not always pondered. Tuning forks more enabled always ideal? Divest from ideal gray in a World of less-than-ideal sin less than ideal comprehends? Feed gray may might not lead to full appreciation for proximity to black, over the line, that people don’t always categorize and classify gray as not black, as not white. Gray is hard to divest from does not make everyone great at categorization and classification by default.
I like beautiful women, beautiful women encouraged and protected, business profiting – does not equate to I like human trafficking, want to see underaged girls anywhere in the mix. Cheerleaders and Highschool football games ideal gray out? Society miscomprehends. A man in a strip club might equate to not close to your daughter equated to ideal golden rule, ideal love for the man in the strip club? Extra paths min-ed, thinned not all good. Owned delivered let fully pondered? Freedom, Love, and Golden Rule never feels like less-than-ideal ground established? All free of sorrow for the owner? Meant for more claimed from grounds of an imperfect person, ok for their daughter not for my daughter (from a guy with no daughter)? Sons need to be protected too, no desire to talk about that? Sons sometimes Men, Men always ideally protect self, never charge headfirst into the unknown? Women and Children need to be protected always ideal Bike Helmets inspired?
Preachers would likely Preach for a week without ceasing if they thought it would make the World a better place. Support might be available does not equate to people always listen, it is desirable to listen all the time. Each second is consequential vs value delivered over time? Hard to know impact.
People grow over time might get set to people grow in ways that ideally benefit self (meaning the person watching the person grow) not others. Appreciating grow that profits others is both necessary and might feel less than ideal at times. They fixed A and not B and everyone is happier? Yet B factors into my happiness. Friends might grow over time does not equivocate to they will grow in directions that ideally profit self, or personal direction – sometimes friends part ways for good reasons, that might be better for the world yet might feel less than ideal at times. Convolute grow, Convolute grow potentially useful to the devil. Tied up could lead to less-than-ideal value established. Either friend likely to be perfect at the end, No, both worth protecting? Yes.
Might make a good song, a song that doesn’t inspire it? Pull together and increase communication vs space, time to listen, and observation is valuable? A little space does not always equate to feels sufficient, too much is hard to fully appreciate until delivered in a way that has both ideal and less than ideal properties. Space and ample time to read vs fighting alpha winds on teams and in corporations leads to ideal touchdowns scored?
Future gets upsold to will ideal, will ideal without health problems and curveballs. Plenty of time to make peace (which in truth establishes less than ideally at times) gets thought. Less than ideal peace beats no peace, beats friends hurting for infinity. Art and World News, small actions could lead to peace or war, leads to A wind (like Grade of A 100%) desirable, set to if undelivered, less sufficient value added. Accept C level peace and compromise? Where people round, where people accept losses, where people should set something to an acceptable loss amplifies less than ideally, with less-than-ideal perception and comprehension, with less-than-ideal truth established by default or in practice.
Easy to accurately make compromises that lead to better for others and self in communications?
Caucasians shouldn’t be let alone with imperialism
Flight not all little girls running from bombs out, man was meant to fly like birds?
Ground with landmines does not always equate to past leaves future in ideal positions
Things rust and maintenance is not always invested in, could be capitalized on, could be perceived as capitalized on, and that is less than all value added – Peace as shiny new steel?
Marriages pressured by international wars feels like less-than-ideal leverage out – choose someone different equals more little girls live? Fee wars ideal the future with sufficient oppression reduced.
Know don’t know is a common system, teaching Math equals better businesses, teaching Math equals less bombs?
Writing has potential to be both interesting and reinforce correct points, feels right does not always feel like reinforces in ideal ways – gets traction today might equate to has to be interesting tomorrow? On ramp with steeper incline not always ideal.
History got that wrong is useful, not always ideally capitalized on – Fee A (as in Grade, 100%) let is in by design and has potential to be less than all value added to self
I would have done better backspaced. Given similar training and experiences, same World atmosphere I might like to think I would make better choices, but the future knows more than the past is hard to fully appreciate. Investment in Peacekeeping and Art like Photographs that change minds dramatically are in by design. Impact matters gets downplayed, understated.
The writer might think they know sufficient amount of information to write this document. The writer’s mind is always open to the future knows things, adds value – changing perception and comprehension previously stated as fact might be necessary? History even delivered wrongly, is hard to unwrite – Fee change is easy, light, ideally turned up. Setting record straight on past is Important, less than ideally turned up – capacity to change minds is not always easy yet is a necessary part of life and peacemaking. Propagandists left with ideal control of history does not lead to ideal comprehension of history.
10 talking points is useful gets set to ideal value delivered. Useful gets set to ideal value delivered.
I want a future that protects African Americans and Jewish people better, historic precedent for not carrying forward in ideal ways, in timely ways
I am a caucasian with red hair (or at least was in the past), easy to set voice to matters less? Viking axes to protecting the World from bias and racism vs from enabling it potential for not always ideally turned up. Gingers might need to protect gingers better is hard to fully comprehend. I am a parking cone, you are a parking cone to real humanization? Less desire to like similar, there are reasons that gets turned up – proving not gay, establishing not gay factors into less challenges that are far from all value added. Look at self like a Phoenix, Demi-god might equate to less than ideal hubris out, less than ideal hubris out for engineers has shown less than ideal precedent. People don’t always fully appreciate the range, the desire for overcompensation potentially in non-ideal directions. Antiheros valued for capacity to see evil in self, red kind of goes with vampires fully appreciated? Burns in the light and nobody wants to give sunscreen? Over dramatization is interesting and that is less than ideal value added – a world running to you with sunscreen bottles might sound good in theory. Dating a ginger taking one for the team to actually desired, wise to turn up rare as beautiful and useful in a world full of human trafficking? Protection might lead to discouragement, perception of mistreatment. You can’t always win with gingers, equates to gingers might desire to win less. Ginger and contrarian might not always lead to ideal value established. Choice as a game to be won instead of something to be ideally delivered? Fend see know, fend see negate know? Reminder I am not a lawyer. Think better of others and the world, humanity, even self-delivers less than ideally at times to ideal choices?
Hate war but love the military? What if your family is military? Associated with government always feels like ideal capacity to win? Oppression not reinforced matters, perception and comprehension less than ideals. Stockpiles turn up don’t turn up. Loving family, reinforcing family might not always be ideal love for family, ideal peace that protects family reinforced. Over investment in military might lead to surplus nukes – love hate simple as that? Ideal ground upon what is love is ideally established?
Ginger from a military family can win, equals should win? Silver metals sometimes look prettier than all might venture to ponder. Silver as the win better take the gold? I lose sometimes equates to I win likely better understood for fathers seeing their daughter get married.
Some Free art I created a while back likely inspired a bit by Blackpink as well as other groups, pink fire on atmosphere potentially factored in as well
Free Starter Content to create derivative works from
Reminder artists left in prison don’t get to post
Looking for Pink Fire in the Atmosphere, not the same video I saw a while back but pretty amazing
I don’t like the Death Penalty. I think there is value in not reinforcing the Idea Right (which is also associated with direction, right side of desk) should be associated with The Death Penalty. Imagine if someone is President one day. What they put on The Right Side of their Desk, valuing Life, or valuing throughput has potential to be expedited?
Reading Pardon pleas likely not all time costs free. A system that might have less might be allot higher value added. That said pardon pleas read by Presidents might lead to more ideal Grace and Forgiveness at Critical Times. Someone’s crime or perception of guilt called into question might prevent a war though this is a bit up to speculation from someone that is not a President. All that said Lives hanging in the balance, like the Hostages in Israel doesn’t feel good.
Life and Love protected factors into greater capacity to Live, greater capacity to Love. Gets up-sold to a guarantee, guarantee it will be put on the right side of the desk by default.
There are reasons to hold lives in the balance and in a World that needs narrative control at times for power, that has potential for far from all value added. Delay peace made and bridges built is both useful and turned up more than it should be. Time is not guaranteed, Future with No Wars, No Droughts, No Famine, and No Natural Disasters is not guaranteed, focused on rear view has potential to be problematic at times. Re-litigating the past is not always ideal justice established, thus less potential to devalue life in advance matters.
That said No Death Penalty equates to need to be more on top of things. Stop things that could lead to problems in advance by investing in love, grace, encouragement, hope, and better communication for others in society that we might not always adequately value for being essential to success to the future.
I want a future with less murder including one that has less murder due to injustice. More lives, more people to talk to at the end of the day matters.
Things never get moved to wrong piles, observation throughput always ideal? Fee Presidents have ideal time and capacity to min, to fight injustice? Reminder loss of citizens in War and protecting nation (both overseas and locally by police forces) is sometimes citizens lost unfairly? The future scene as will arrive by default or a war we have to fight against to prevent our friends from dying in wars or in prisons? Not our friends doesn’t matter to Golden Rule fully valued is harder than thought from a rosey world view.
Small things reinforced in similar far from exact systems like Right and Left seems simple enough, yet high capacity for reinforcing myelination that might not always be questioned. Give Grade of A (100%) to value delivered based upon Political systems set to same thing as side of room in front of you?
People in classes that get A’s might be equated to ideal value was established originally. Able to repeat truth does not always equate to truth is delivered ideally.
I did not get all A’s, set my value added that is right, that generates support to less value? It is important to value contributions of all, including those that are less than 4.0 students.
Claim A sets might equate to claims of A delivered, A as liable for deliver, which seems far less than ideal.
Will B and C students be appreciated in Society? In a Society at war vs not at war?
Arguing a point and a reason is valuable, factors into high ground established. A point or reason accepted does not equate to arguing the point in the first place was the right choice, that the point is guaranteed to be right.
Defending arguments is sometimes necessary. Defending arguments is also non null time costs. Extra time costs are not always higher value added. What is accepted as right and wrong in law has potential to be set to like a game, winning teams and losing teams. Law that sets Precedent, Historic Precedent delivered and compounded upon by people that desire to profit has potential for establishing less than ideal truth less than ideal capacity to divest at critical times.
The fight is sometimes right, sometimes enjoyable, factors into fighting is always right. I want to prevent the indefensible, yet I do not want to defend the indefensible might be hard to ideally clarify.
Less requirement to fight, peace in advance is valuable in not fully appreciated ways, yet also might lead to less practice. What is most valuable might not always equate to what is valuable to all parties.
Reinforcing laws is in by default in our society – yet determining if they were delivered on ideal ground, in ways that benefit all parties is unlikely to be fully entertained at times.
Claim system like a game, for profit, for win or loss ideals Love and Golden Rule? Justice and Judgment in men’s courts might be non-ideally equated to same in God’s court. I am not God, my perception of assessment and judgment is based both on The Bible and men’s laws, teaching around reasoning and logic. Our Justice system fully brought to Justice at the end of time?
Fee spin is ideal truth compounded upon? Hard to assess equates to factored out yet unlikely to be ideally factored out. People that practice arguing might have more capacity to assess which problems they want to divest from in advance to save time – value likely not always pondered in Time Management.
Reminder I am not a lawyer, I use the term fee to represent make it harder to claim at times, like saying fight it yet in toned down terms (fighting brings a greater level that might not equate to ideal peace established)
People that know I might call out their less than ideals might be more unlikely to call out my less than ideals and vice versa. Mutually assured destruction might not always lead to problems called out in ideal ways. Less argument out on one particular issue might lead to less argument in on another particular issue. What might be beneficial to Lawyers or Teams might not always be ideal truth established. Agreement facilitates gains and profits, potentially in non-ideal ways.
You sin and I sin but we agree not to call out each other’s sins because who is a sinner to judge might not lead to ideal divestment from sin. What sin has to be fixed first up to debate in a system that is far less than all sin out? Come back to me when you fix all the other sin is a perfectly acceptable conclusion that might amplify less than ideally.
Society amplifies less sin based upon practicality. I don’t want all the women at beaches wearing two sweaters to reinforce modesty. Bathing suits less than ideal sin reduced, a known that is in by design in USA Society. Forced to wear 2 sweaters on a hot summer day is not how I would wish to be treated – should be set to sinful to require in my opinion. Fee Society ideals sin out, we would want to live in a society that delivers more ideally on ideal sin out, or at least is perceived as delivering more ideal sin out (to who, who judges and assesses)?
I know the sin is in by design, I know it less than ideals, I know it causes problems like adultery in society – which is far from all problems reduced, yet fixes have shown precedent for delivering less than ideally. Know the police that arrest people, the Judges that judge people, the politicians that create laws and public policy, the preachers and ministers are all reinforcing a system that is both more ideal and less than ideal in ways that leads to real sin? Sin that is factored out as inconsequential? Under the law not really under the law factors into Under the law less useful, desirable.
One example does not equate to all examples. Math and Greed, very real and in by design. A see sin reduced? (A like in a Grade). Might be less people in Jail if we all put away the stones (John 8:7-11) and gave helping hands instead. Perception and comprehension of sin in by design or not in by design factors into valuation of last sentence.
I might ask one to tear down the statue of David before requiring women to wear more modest clothing at the beach. Big rocks before small rocks. I like art, I am not gay, I don’t really desire the statue of David torn down – yet reminding others that less-than-ideal sin out is in by design and reinforced and some not all areas are highlighted is important. Not fixing big rocks first factors into single out, less than ideal punishment and justice delivered – which should be a crime, a crime worthy of punishment! (sarcasm sometimes useful, hard to tell in reading at times)
Sometimes greater levels of punishment are reinforced to deter others from punishing, having capacity to punish self. Can’t punish me because they are too busy being punished is useful. It would be better to divest from all being punished in advance. Punishment pursued might lead to undesirable time costs, and is thus reinforced less than ideally. Turn up a system that is reinforced less than ideally?
I could punish
or
I could give Free Starter Content
The above image is Free for others to use and compound upon, preferably by those that put down the stones
Reminder I am a Christian, I am not a minister, preacher, or priest
