World Governments likely are very familiar with sets of phrases. Particular sets of knowledge that might amplify less ideally for others in the world. They likely do not always provide that knowledge to others, withhold that knowledge and it is both useful for maintaining power, profit and potentially protecting people. World Governments own gems, gems that both profit people, reinforce less than ideal profit for all parties, and protect people via preventing others from having access to know. Speaking about a metaphorical gem as a document.
It protects people gets set to a win win. People don’t want people hurt, and maintains, reinforces current power, world order just kind of in by design. System as it stands mins my, mine as a thought – change is desirable, necessary, could always be set to desirable, necessary to over appreciation or under appreciation.
World Governments might have a report on who they do right by and who they don’t deliver ideally for – always published, with ideal clarity, ideal throughput? Statistics about what ethnicities die in prison and which ones do not, set to ideal know, ideal show? Rayed know does not ideal know, perception, and comprehension, ideal reduced relevance limiting. Wade a system based upon profit and wins ideals mins, ideals know?
Think a government if it found this document would publish out of Civic Duty? Which Government, at what time in History? Own presents mins in ideal ways? This isn’t Camelot (hyperbole about a perfect idealized city that delivers ideal justice and representation)? Own LTI value out equals LTI value in? LTI – less than ideal
We know the same. We should be payed the same. We should have the same health problems (speaking in hyperbole here, please don’t install health problems on others). Who gets the supermodel? Me. I called first and as we are all equal, I win. See it grays.
Might be a better way to say this that doesn’t polarize the reader, yet will it be as interesting?
We say we want equality, empathy yet that in fullness would be awful – I don’t want to have the health problems of 8 billion plus people even if I do get a Yacht (both sides of the coin installed all at once). I get all the PhDs and all the all-study hours required to get them?
This could all be an excuse to limit equality, fair treatment, better treatment, and better support. Humanization is important, has shown historic precedent for not being fully invested in.
The combination weighs less than ideally on the imagination of the writer.
Anyone that I included in the words we that did not wish to be included in the words we I apologize for, anyone that had nothing to do with the wrongs against me I apologize for grouping.
Something I thought of that is worthy of note, Societies have potential for Feeing at A-level against World Leaders and Military Families – can’t treat better than others might be champed is not a fully appreciated system. World Leaders in Solitary shouldn’t be allowed, equality not always an ideal system. Bias and hardships that factor into winners might not always be factored in?
People are turned up to appreciate reduced oppression, that authority is not all oppression out, and then they have the potential to be min-ed by authority of opposing parties, being min-ed they might fight back, and might be min-ed further, put in solitary, and solitary combined with fighting back might be less than ideal brain damage out. Solitary gets set to a win, a requirement to min, not sure I fully agree with that. B let gets set to met, then gets set to let. Be let or Ban let, doesn’t matter?
I provide allot of free content on this blog, these videos are not mine thus can’t give away its content for free. I provide them to raise awareness and potentially help expedite the release of hostages.
I have a Masters in Computer Engineering and had many jobs in IT and Software and I don’t think I have gotten a class on High Voltage Electricity during the time. Knowledge gets set to known, and technology, including High Voltage technology seems to be on the rise (solar, and portable inverters). Was going to put an Electrical Safety video here but search on YouTube doesn’t appear to be returning.
I wish the World was full of peace, capacity to prosper for all. Hasn’t really been that way during my lifetime. Others know things that factor into my protection that I do not. Problem is I am also required to know what I need to know to profit and protect family, friends, and self. I also know there is less than ideals that are in by design that are amplified.
I am not trying to die early, but if I were lost my future as a guarantee given some other outcome might likely not be true value added. World Events make future less than ideally known.
This World has not been all wins, negate mins, negate fins. People that protect me also like to profit – equates to wins might be minimized via less than ideals and I am unlikely to always know what factors in and when it factors in. I don’t want the people that protect me not to profit, I also don’t want to be limited from profiting.
Imagine there are two people both handcuffed to different sides of the room and a key is left in the middle of the room further than either have potential to reach.
Negate May does not establish ideal value.
The words may and may not have a lot of range that might change value.
I don’t want to sound patronizing, thus example choice matters.
I may go to the store, I may not go 200 mph on the Highway.
World leaders may not go to war, may make peace – it is sounds good, but will they listen to me? Trying to say may not drop bombs on little girls (like Vietnam poster), may find ways for international trade that equates to people with cancer are saved.
God could tell people that are against me (and I don’t know who that would be) where there is gold located at the bottom of the ocean. God may factors into reduced losses for self and enemy protected greater, isn’t that part of Christianity? My enemies insufficiently invested in might be part of the problem and God has the gold reserves as a known? Extract resources turn up heat, not something worthy of pondering as a potential problem? God of pay half, increase pressure, pay fourth, increase pressure not really God of an overfilling cup.
Money and Gold does not establish value ideally is part of the problem. Price gets set to end of cost, buy software does not equate to bug free software, software who’s full implications are known, have capacity to be known. We rely upon throughput in the system does not always equate to we challenge values set and get in the system. YouTube is nice, but do we go to their facilities, get a PhD in Computer Science and examine every line of code? Reliance is a less than ideal system. Excuse me if this sounds rude, I am potentially speaking to the audience like I would to another Computer Scientist. I have been both a whistleblower and outed from the industry on far less than ideal comprehension and communications – so someone that is trying to add value, is disallowed, thrown in jail, expect ideal value established and delivered in Silicon Valley? Negate (thought about using Fee or Claim here) we rely is ideal know, ideal oh. Claim would have inspired more thought, fee it, charge it does not always establish ideal value, negate seems apt.
Figured I would attach some encouragement to this post
Free Starter Image (outside of sanctions countries)
People need to understand the problems that they face not fully graced? Negate may factors into grace, may factors into grace. Ideally graced would be ideal, claims of ideal would not be ideally graced. Things like grace and forgiveness are powerful systems, worthy of turning up in advance, will can be iffed through resource reduction is a problem worthy of turning down. Will set potentially not always get when people are tired, worn down. Artists required to tell both sides of the story is not always nice, spiced light – giving each other grace and forgiveness is possible, iffy close to the line art is not test free potentially not always ideally divested from. Imagine you are a professional sports player, and you just lose a game and then someone shows up and says I want you to meet my new supermodel girlfriend. Know set to may not always ideal ray.
Fee-d thin not always free from future mins. See loss see wins claim it ideals fins? Appearance of a Yacht does not equate to having a Yacht, weigh no camera in? We see sets to A’s mins is less than ideal comprehend.
A couple days ago I think, before the eclipse there was a blind man walking on the bike path, potentially had blood around his eyes walking with a kerosene tank. I think I asked him how he was doing or if he needed some water (can’t really remember right now), he turned to me for a moment without speaking then turned and kept walking forward. Figured I would walk close to him because if he was a threat figured the tank might have blew up when he was near me.
I see a lot of odd things, I am tested a lot, I am also dependent upon video laws that make it harder to film in the city. The combination has potential to lead to strange things not always documented.
I kept walking forward, didn’t think much of it (been tested far more than once in my life). Easy to gauge what is going on and happening is not really true value added, combined with I invest in peace talks and world news it is hard for me to know what matters and what doesn’t. Eyes on world stage does not always equate to sufficient comprehension of what is happening in the city I live.
A lot of homeless in the city, might just have been someone with a kerosene heater. African American man silenced with blood around his eyes and a tank, especially in the south is scary, hard to fully appreciate.
Over the summer I was repeatedly tested with reduced resources including food, then had tests like trying to make sure people knew potential high voltage dangers – the combination is heavy. Testing is useful common and has potential to increase liability, should have seen didn’t see type of stuff is heavy – like you spend hours examining a painting, then another image is added right when you get on stage. Can be used to remove people from CEO positions, positions of Authority.
Feels like people if the brain, if my health and memory through iffing my resources then try to rob me based upon responsibility and accountability that I am trying to invest adequately in. They might think they are inspired to do so based upon data they think is sound, but is not.
Make Peace swiftly – if someone was robbed of all their resources they might be a greater threat to society.
Someone might wrong me, someone might wrong me based upon what they perceive and comprehend to be good data, that does not require good data delivered, consistent data delivered, data comprehended adequately.
I know people get set to villain that don’t deserve to be, and that might factor into others getting set to villains that don’t deserve to be, when everyone really just wants the situation to get better.
See I might have better words and thus better perception, comprehension, and luck than other parties raising concerns on this. See that less adequate words and comprehension could get people hurt, deliver insufficiently. See language, increased capacity to deliver is both necessary and reduced commonly (lexing, puns, double meanings, multiple definitions). Not to mention education is a profit-based system is hard to fully appreciate the implications of.
I might be A level knowledge in certain directions, that far, far from guarantees capacity to comprehend all possible side effects in other directions. People might have data, good data that they are not required to amplify comprehension of to me. Sufficient access and amplification is not a requirement has implications. We all are working on excess levels of complexity, no requirement to amplify comprehension to each other in society could cause big problems. 8 billion plus people in the World, nobody has capacity to adequately process that information ideally alone, computer systems and summarization processes have potential to reduce details and increase bias.
A (like in school grade, 100%) proceed, move forward might be better set to have we guaranteed there is sufficient grace and mercy in the system, will the system acknowledge problems that are built in or not?
I provide allot of free content on this blog, these videos are not mine thus can’t give away its content for free. I provide them to raise awareness and potentially help expedite the release of hostages.
Our society turns up You May, Freedom for both good reason and in ways that potential leads to less-than-ideal value for all parties.
Imagine two people date each other yet they have both settled. This world is a scary place and the potential for planes flying into buildings calls into question the necessity of not settling.
Imagine you are talking to someone in a bar, you just met, having your first drink – honeymoon stage of honeymoons. The person is attractive, amazing, and you know their personality might equate to they wind up on the street in 20 years, or maybe you don’t know, comprehension and perception are far from ideal systems.
You might be thinking this may or may not work out, I may or may not date them, either of us can just walk away at either time with no problems, no strings attached, no losses to time, money, resources, or energy. That might amplify more ideally for self, yet might lead to the other person in prolonged in and out of bars, failed relationships. We can’t control other people, but can we project how our influence, interactions might influence their long term view on life, their ability to profit in the future? We love, We love freedom, but do We truly Love, Inspire the Golden Rule when we A may, set freedom to an ideal met? A may met set might be A may met get.
Alone I have drank in bars – shouldn’t be equated to any former dates fault, does not equate to the combination might not be useful to learn from. I don’t want other’s futures to amplify less ideally and I also know the pain, if affects me likely might affect others too. People trying to look out for me might represent A it doesn’t hurt, more manly, less manly not all defame free. May let see not always free – it is better for both parties (yet future LTIs?).
Save the future from a similar fate potentially possible.
I rely upon God to protect people that part ways from me, in ideal ways, yet I see people on the street hurting. Fee negate see might not be free, see might hurt wee seems apt. But there is still hope, easy to forget the future is a contested system, victory is possible, not always set in stone what victory is.
Free Starter Image, birds are free (God owns copyrights one would think, though I am not a lawyer, educational rules might apply), the engineering pieces might or might not be in public domain at this point, not sure if there are any rules about showing infrastructure in pictures.
A-ing Gods will for relationships, at least in many of my adult years seems less than ideal. People could be in the exact same circumstances and if God willed it likely vastly different results. Further I am one person out of 8 billion plus people, 1 story that is very dependent upon locality, World Events, and proximity to government (all in a way that I have reduced perception, comprehension, and visibility of, making claims and projections based upon determinism, that might be pre-determined at times might be less than ideal steel). There is an affect does not equate to I know how much, less deterministic results factors into likely gains and losses in problem solving capacity. Anyone’s results really free from being biased by systemic changes, problems, and additions? It will work in my favor, it is my job to make it work in my favor, what is it? I don’t know
Greater Opportunities has potential to lead to A Material
Humans are not materials (kind of, humans are in pictures, film, musical performances, dance, work in and run companies), Dehumanization is a problem, reduced dehumanization is far from a guarantee.
Delayed better, does not always equate to better (head starts matter, far from ideally turned up, peace time has potential to change to war time, less not always more)
Grace and Forgiveness high value added, Grace and Forgiveness factor into Peace, Conversation, and Expectations, Failed Expectations is not all Graceful and Forgiving
A-ed know with don’t show is in by design (IBD), worthy of note, man is not God, God has A-know, A-visibility, and Power, Governments have potentially more A-know, A visibility, without A-show than man, capacity to plan around that has potential to change direction.
Man or Women have potential to be projected and mislead based upon true or erroneous information, that might have enough true to alter course. Original premises do not have to be correct to have enough data to alter paths in ways that are profitable, to corporations and power, governments. Governments might flag someone as against a cause, that need not be true or untrue for government to vastly limit capacity. We don’t know always set to High, fund ideally, sure thing?
Potential for data time bombs likely not always pondered, someone drops a document in a filing cabinet to be found later? Weighted see from unknown sources potentially not always ideally divested from. We invest and reinvest in systems that ideally prevent potential for problems like that? Filing cabinet locks and badges are useful, set to ideal is not full appreciation for potential problems. A’s for profit does not always equates to A’s for all parties. Protection that factors into future data amplifies less than ideally, amplifies on profit, profit for a certain period of time. Security antivirus, data consistency, backups, backups verified all have potential to be set to less useful, physical security, video cameras have potential to be set to less useful – people that work in software engineering come and go, might not equate to ideal visibility.
Times where people are min-ed, more flux is going on in society, political climates, and World Events might lead to less ideal observation, capacity to protect and that might lead to less-than-ideal value established and delivered. Less valued is not always ideal throughput and truth established for others – there is value in keeping people with sufficient support even in tough times (I am seeing a growing number of homeless, if we have a way to help them in advance, likely might lead to gains not fully comprehendible). Too many low not ideal pro.
All of the AI Systems likely seeing Babies in Hospitals right now, everyone, including those people homeless on the streets were once someone’s baby sitting in a hospital – not call on AI System to make it right? I know the system LTIs less-than-ideals yet I don’t know the ideal way to help make it better. Ray less make em pay, more find a way? Mend may not always min-ed ray. Might be artists in the bunch, that might paint more Peace signs.
It doesn’t have to look like a Peace sign, to be a Peace sign
Free Starter Image
I use to the term ray as a creative way replacement for the word show. Art rays light, color rays light. It also rhymes with ray, pay, stay, lay, gray, may. Fenda winda say? Reminder not a lawyer. Alliteration may-ed gray-ed? It factors into sales. I meant this to look like a peace sign with light rays from the center, looks a bit like a British flag, and potentially more like a confederate flag than I would like. Hard to always know the line as an artists. I don’t want to draw Swastikas and I like Windmills, Wind Power, Green Power might equate to less Global Warming and Environmental Problems, Problems that might more adversely affect certain ethnic minorities at the equator. All said given hostages in Gaza I am not sure the World is ready for Windmills in art. Leveraging reduced value for 8 billion plus people based upon the actions of terrorists in Israel might be less than ideal value added, that said my guess is most of the 8 billion plus people would want those hostages released immediately as well as progress made towards Global Warming.
My Tech Blog 