My Tech Blog

The Letter K

The letter K is one of 26 letters, letters that are taught to all students studying the English language. Should be no big deal. Yet in the South of USA, the letter K resonates reminders of KKK – an oppressive organization fueled by hatred.

People do not always speak straightforward or say what they mean. This is reinforced in society on the common. I could be speaking about Knowledge and start three sentences with the word Knowledge and be set to have said KKK in a backhanded way.

311 – ck

c is the third letter of the alphabet

k is the eleventh letter of the alphabet

So at two times a day, 3:11 PM, and 3:11 AM one’s speeches, messages, and emails might be misrepresented to mean something racial biased that it was not meant as.

Imagine there is product. A product name that starts with a K and has a white background with a logo. I might like the product. I might like that the product might be protection for people named Keisha or Kevin. I do not like that it might reinforce racial bias as more useful, oppression as more desirable.

There might be reason to tuning fork people in society. Give them iffy ground to stand on and see if what side they fall on. Do you want to protect Caucasian people or do you not want to be racially biased. It is not all fair ground society might make people choose between the two, that society might reinforce tuning forks iffy ground that makes capacity to protect self and others more difficult.

It is not all straightforward, it is not all represented by the Letter K. The ground is less than ideal and reinforced in less than ideal ways while being claimed as not a big problem, not something that requires real conversation. People set to will just know is not true. Some people don’t learn as easy, some people learn in other directions. Play on words, artistic wordplay might be obvious representation to some people and not obvious representation to others.

There is real bias in Society. Real Bias in Society does not equate to it is ok to label people as Ks. Not labeled as KKK does not equate to delivers ideally for all races or even own race. Oppression is IBD – in by design, does not equate to it is always delivered fairly or labeled fairly and that is consequential to society.

I don’t like that there is the potential in Society that being Caucasian and buying something that starts with the Letter K might set me to a klans man. I am from the South, and I know Villain Level Contrast amplifies less than ideally and that factors into gains and losses in society that are not fully comprehensible.

The Letter K is one example. Wearing Blue or Red is another example that isn’t all fair. It has the ability to give momentum to people’s paths in non-ideal ways. Reinforced negative representation is consequential and hard to turn down.

I do believe there is Oppression in Society. I do believe I do not see, perceive, or comprehend all of it. I am Caucasian and I am less than all value added to all races. I do not wish to be labeled a K. I do wish other Caucasians as well as All people to be protected.

Further we are Allies with Kenya and South Korea. K to a less useful system is consequential in less-than-ideal ways. All of this in combination is not easy to ideal. We have new generations of citizens that have potentially grown up in 911 era where categorization and classification of people has not been ideal profiling out. This conversation is important, far from ideally turned up – truly combated and talked about by candidates running for office? Conversation leads to Peace, less conversation is not desirable, consequential.

People do not want to be oppressed or demoralized dependent upon their ethnicity one of many reasons Golden Rule is useful. I know Diversity, Accessibility, and Inclusivity are all important topics that get turned up less than ideally does not equate to I know how much to turn them up, how much time society should be spending on them. Set to ideal seems unwise. Gains perceived and comprehended as can be made factor into people actually investing time and effort. Most people would likely spend some extra time if it meant our society was stronger for wars and natural disasters in the future, yet the combination doesn’t seem to amplify by default.

Subversion

The term G in the urban dictionary says Friend, also refers to Gangster

I don’t want to be rude or reinforce racial stereo types. I have heard the phrase G-ing something to refer to messing something up, making something non-deterministic, and looking for synonyms in the dictionary found the word subversion.

Undermining principles sometimes useful, sometimes common. Law gets set to ideally established and delivered on ideal grounds with ideal comprehension with ideal Golden Rule amplified for all parties subject to a particular law.

People sometimes have words and phrases that are taught, without always being given other choices of words, other paths that might lead to less problems, less financial losses. What people reinforce matters, gets set to has been delivered ideally by default.

Investment in learning matters. English and Language, Communication is one place where people have the potential to learn yet is not always valued to the level it should be. Less valued does not always equate to ideal capacity to argue or defend one’s points of views.

People that have hard hearts, that are set in their ways, have no desire to make peace or a positive path forward for all parties might be subverted at times via systems like CFB – Cute Funny Beautiful. There is reasons at times to reduce seriousness, reduce belief that system and practices have been delivered in ideal manners with ideal problems reduced. Subversion has potential to remind of the need for grace, test people that might be hard nosed, that might want to remove all flex from the system.

I don’t always make things less deterministic on purpose, I have potential to add randomness without that being my goal. Rockstars, People on Stage, and People that Grab Focus are all examples of things that might make life less deterministic. If I go walking down a street and there is someone performing music on the side, it is inspirational, nice to hear. It also makes the experience less deterministic. Walk from point A to point B with no problems nothing new is deterministic, yet deterministic seen as the more valuable path is not always true. That said non-deterministic systems can be miserable as well – imagine you have your life set out in front of you, instead of the determined path you are thrown in jail for a non-deterministic point in time. Altered path sometimes desirable, not always desirable.

Re-branding is useful, subversionist to Value-Added Randomization Rockstar? Celebrated for randomness I add without belittled for it? Public Relations and Re-branding exist for a reason and are useful, win wins are a potential problem solving path not always ideally entertained. Permanent labels are problematic, have potential for less than ideally set.

I am a programmer, I use vars, value-added randomization, set sometimes, not always equates to get

Reliability that is the same results for 99 days does not equate to the same results for 100 days. That does not equal it is, that does not equal reduced capacity and desire to verify is a non-consequential system. People might revisit cases more often given that as a known, does not equate to people likely always question reliability of evidence, evidence that’s comprehension is dependent upon underlying system’s reliability – reminder though not a lawyer or expert witness.

Ideal value established reinforced on the common is a consequential system in my opinion. Not usually a problem for me gets set to sufficient, sufficient factors into repetitions, repetitions reinforce claims to truth, potentially in non-ideal ways. Triple modular redundancy – truth in more than one place is sound truth?

Updated March 23, 2024 – was thinking a bit on this post. I do not want to reinforce racial stereotyping or undermine the seriousness of the topic. Truth is people with less training, less in the know might refer to someone as G, and they might mean that as a friend, as a gangster or subversionist. I know it might amplify less than ideally in practice, inflection in voice, thus I stray from the term might not equate to all people know. Encouraging better communication might lead to bridges and peace built tomorrow, likely not always pondered in a fast paced world that is far from ideal competition and desire to maximize profit reduced. Desire to be less jading to the world might not always equate to trained the ideal words to be less jading.

March 20th, 2024 Thoughts

I do not have PhD in history. A PhD in history would likely lead myself to assess the current level of threat in the world different.

God would tell me if I needed to know more is a nice thought yet feels less than sufficient at times in practice. In a World full of 8 billion plus people, determinism seems to be a bit of a myth. People control truth, including people from Churches – perception and comprehension is far from ideal, potentially scary at times, disseminating the wrong information is costly.

God could likely have told people the right words or right course of actions to anyone in history to stop wars or could have delivered miracles to stop wars. God has potential to does not equate to God does, does by default, will, is likely to, is guaranteed to.

I pray, I want people protected, yet depending on Moses to Part the Red Sea level miracles is forgo-ed for preparation and defense spending. How people think God will act, to what level people think God will act factors into protectionism vs less protectionism on any given day.

I am from a military family. I see the importance in protection, in investing in protection for the country, in the known that protectionism amplifies less than ideally might lead to arms races equates to investing in the correct levels, especially on an international scale seems difficult, potentially costly (in more ways than a price tag).

I have adequate potential to gauge threats in my life seems unwise. Someone that goes to a battle where there are clear sides would likely have better capacity to determine threats vs no threats (not to discount potential for friendly fire on real battle fields). Unable to see the enemy, who is the enemy, to know if there are enemies that are in or not in is more difficult in a World with 8 billion plus people at borders that are open to international travel.

Guess at what is a threat vs what is not a threat? Seems to be best direction. Worrying is far from all value added, protectionism has potential to lead to lack of freedom, hope, and encouragement. 8 billion plus people that are complex equates to far more than 8 billion variables. Given I only have potential to factor in a limited number of variables at a time, I likely have less than ideal potential for deterministic protection for self, family, friends, and fellow citizens.

Best guess has potential to be problematic. Health problems both factor in and are potentially useful – orchestrated in combination possible does not equate to causation. Causation is hard to prove, hard to unprove, does not equate to what is set to cause is guaranteed to be right.

It is useful to withhold information from the perspective of governments and churches. Potentially from God’s perspective seek and you will find might not be finding the next gold mine. Riches that could change things determine path. Riches like truth, truth that is more available to some than others, truth that is not always easy or light, cost free to divulge.

I might have avoided some wars in the past, does not guarantee the wars of the future have no potential for problems, problems I cannot see. Not in a battle also equates to Not in the know is hard to fully appreciate. I have potential to gauge the value added versus subtracted for not knowing what is going on in wars? No. Less knowledge is useful, might be the chosen more ideal value at times, does not equate to that gives ideal determinism, a guarantee for safety.

I want Peace, I invest in Faith.

I am not perfect, I like all people on Earth am less than ideal sin out. I know how consequential my sins are, which sins to stop in advance that might lead to dramatic change for the world? No. Sin is consequential, sin is not always respected or valued for level of damage it causes. Others, including Politicians would likely acknowledge the same if it did not undermine their directions chosen, confidence of audience. Relevant information, is limited at times for good reason, does not equate to that information is inconsequential. It is nice to think people make decisions in a vacuum, in an ideal world, a world where sin does not effect outcomes on a day to day basis.

Less greed or lust on any given day is likely valuable for the world, claim to investing reducing either ideally on a day to day basis, claim that investing in either or both sufficiently is sufficient investment in all other sins reduced? Investment in reduced sin is directional, limited.

Others with dirty hands is useful, real conversation that would actually reduce sin costs time, is not always the easiest path, a path that is always easy to take for those with less than ideally clean hands – does not equate to the combination is inconsequential. There is value in not being involved, people are not always sin free in complexity. Claim Golden Rule path is always easy to see in combination? May is a useful system, set to an ideally chosen system? Perception of Authority and Class, Level in Society factors into representation equates to capacity to deliver advice or real conversation is limited at times – not my place a common system, maybe not an always ideally chosen system. Others might know more equates to my advice might be less useful.

Not all people agree on rules, what sin is, does not equate to oversight is not in by design. Oversight that sees rules broken, whether or not the breaker of those rules agrees with the rule is consequential – showing rules can be broken, useful to break not always the ideal direction meant to be chosen by those being watched. One might help direct and choose other’s paths without desire to. Increased oversight in by design does not equate to it is all good, all reduced complexity, sins, and problems.

One man fees another $100 when they only have $50, the man feed at a later point in time fees $50 when the original man with $100 only has $5. Fee-d and lack of mercy has potential for less-than-ideal proportionality established. High Ground is a useful, temporary system. Men and Women like to think of self as merciful, filled with grace and forgiveness yet we fee each other on the common without knowing the price, what else to factor in – LTI comprehension does not always or even usually change fees. The usual thought, at least personally is if I can’t account for that I better increase fees to add more flex, might not always be the correct thought.

World events factor into said and unsaid, should not be translated into ideal value established or delivered.

Deferred Judgment

Better wait until one gets all the facts before Judgment?

Problem with deferring judgment is one might be given facts, facts that might make one think judgment is sound, a good system to turn up.

The Bible says don’t judge.

Turn up the possibility of judgment? No potential for temptation in that?

I don’t need the facts, the facts might make me think I can judge sufficiently.

Is it a fact, that facts always lead to less bias?

Facts are based on review by sight

Facts like the following image exists

Zero potential to bias, zero potential to obfuscate truth?

Review all relevant data only once, when some data is so cute? Review only once or multiple times, claim ideal bias reduction?

A system that is biased by CFB – Cute Funny Beautiful might not always be ideal bias out.

Who determines relevant data matters, might be less than ideally turned up? Reminder though I am not a lawyer.

A see one doesn’t owe? A like in grade of 100%? Yes or No equates to judgment, judgment based upon less-than-ideal grounds?

Know is not all good, not all should. Is that a fact? Biasing facts based upon learning, I warned you about that. You did? I did now.

Defend reading comprehension as a value-added system? Able to read warnings like High Voltage sign outweighs potential evils that are in books? Books that are LTIEO (Less Than Ideal Evil Out) have potential to teach other LTIEO systems like Acronyms, and Art. HP, High Potential, we can’t have our potential smoking pot – representation has potential to be changed in more useful ways depending on circumstance is less than always ideal value added. Candidates might be set to HP and competition might lead to less than ideal representation? Acronyms – I can choose a more useful representation to enable greater throughput?

HP4GTp – High Potential for Greater Throughput

The use of the word high, definition represented serves my purpose better?

Repetitions in Society matter, HP4GTp

How Potential for Greater Throughput? Use of word How instead of High might lead to more learning. One might use the letter A for an Example, a Variable, or an Answer? Set precedent of no consequence, words don’t have to be words? Say Golden Rule ideally delivers on representation that is LTI established and delivered? Technically utilizing what is allowed might deliver in less-than-ideal ways? Representation that is less than ideally straightforward gets set to fair game. Language not a system that has to be perfected to win.

Expectation of ideal use and representation of language seems to be too high of a burden to place on anyone does not mean the consequences feel all good. LTI delivery of Golden Rule IBD with competition and fact language and representation amplify LTI. Less than ideal delivery of Golden Run in by design with competition and fact language and representation amplify less than ideally.

People on different sides want to win, expect them to let each other win because that is what the other side wants (The Golden Rule)? Competition factors into which facts are found useful and relevant potentially not always entertained as important.

Christ of “seek and you will find, knock and the door will open” keeps information hidden for sake of fair game, equal playing field? Potential for find with delay, delay that prevents wins?