My Tech Blog

Idea for top view camera on hands while typing as a way for supercomputers and AI to pattern match for increased throughput. Potential for easily detecting problems in new typers, potential for same thing used for musical instruments.

I am not a politician. USA is a super power. People that run USA, politicians that run USA are powerful, have potential to be set to ideal value, as will deliver ideal value based on an ideal system with massive amounts of power at their finger tips.

This might not be full appreciation for less than ideals in the system like Global Warming, nuclear arsenals and stockpiles, bias that is inherent in the system, corruption that while might be less might still not be sufficiently insignificant.

I can’t control who is ideally in power gets set to who is in power is less consequential at times, has been established ideally, that God will make sure everything keeps moving forward with zero problems like civil wars, natural disasters, political instability, and economic collapse. Belief these things won’t happen factors into less discussion around these things. If we don’t talk about it won’t be a self fulfilling prophecy approach.

The combination has potential to set the system to ideal, and who is in charge of it set to ideal. Which might not be that big of a problem if you are rich and have a private jet to leave when things get bad but might be a bigger problem if you are stuck in a jail system with iffy medical support.

American Dream invests in more mobility for some over others alongside of God has got us this far, must be doing something right stay the course? There are reasons to be thankful, and there are reasons to desire change, improved experience.

I will not live forever. I have degrees in computer engineering and math and I have invested in this world. Eventually I will move on from this world (preferably at a much later date than now). Once I move on, everything that I have invested in will become owned and property of others, future generations that depending on how well I have equipped them will be enabled or hampered by my investments.

Society builds infrastructure like high voltage lines and bridges. High voltage lines and bridges need people that will maintain them. Many investments are low maintenance might be equated to many investments are no maintenance. On the plus side the population is likely to grow as time progresses. More people and peace is likely to bring increased prosperity and population.

More people enabled with knowledge today like Electrical Safety factors into more people that have the potential to distribute that knowledge tomorrow. In tough times like natural disasters, network outages, and unstable political times, sometimes accompanied by wars, things like Electrical Safety might be overlooked as vital as important. High Voltage sign on fences gets set to sufficient to protect future generations yet reading comprehension, and people to invest in it might be lost to pandemics or wars.

Visibility around all this amplifies far less than ideally. We have numbers on the national debt does not really equate to we understand the problem with the national debt, what having a national debt means to the future, including investments that are less leveraged, like ones that help the environment, green tech. We don’t value numbers as significant equates to math might be turned up less than ideally. Math not trained ideally might lead to missed numbers, 9 nuclear plants or 10 nuclear plants, numbers missed matters.

I cannot guarantee the date I will leave this earth. When I do leave this earth will all be enabled in ideal ways by my investments? Engineers do not always consider the value in making small parts that are less complex and have low cost to maintenance – we grow complexity for good, though guarantees of others to maintain it are inspired by hope does not equate to they are guaranteed. Population might be reduced, might have bigger problems including Global Warming on the agenda. That said less is not always more, problems that we tackle today factor into problem solving capacity tomorrow. Complexity factors into new jobs and new knowledge, new requirements for maintenance that is far less than all losses to the future.

It is important to remember that a system that displays ideal qualities is not an ideal system. Just because we buy computers does not equate to the world that generated them was ideal oppression and wars out, that zero problems factored into their creation in distribution. Known that quality of life and reduced oppression can be improved factors into actual investments in reducing oppression and improving experience for all on Earth (and above it, flights, space stations etc).

Experience can be improved and eventually we all A(like in school grade, 100%) Met as Let.

Kind of banking on Heaven being a tropical paradise rather than being a ghost chained to a fence in front of a power plant to scare people from entering and getting shocked because the High Voltage signs are not maintained due to national debt and failing infrastructure.

Who is wrong in situations factors into High Ground. Apologizing has potential to reinforce perception of right and justified, right and justified is not always ideal representation established or delivered.

If one says to a system of justice that has corruption in it, I am sorry for my actions, does that force the justice system to acknowledge the wrong in its own actions? Who says sorry, when, why, and how matters and has potential for reinforcing precedent, historic precedent that is not always good, not always should.

Inspiring apologies, inspiring others to apologize has potential to limit confidence. Limited confidence is not always ideal support delivered. Sometimes apologies are about more than the apology themselves, they have the potential at time for factoring into capacity of we are right and you are wrong, and that has potential for less than ideal Golden Rule established and delivered.

Apologies are required to be made in public ways at times, requirement to reinforce the rightness of one party and wrongness of another party while failing to acknowledge that the world including both parties are not always ideal sin reduced. Focus might be limited to one topic while failing to adequately acknowledge other topics while reinforcing oppression, less than ideal truth and relevance limiting as a useful system.

Listen, Apologize, Solve, and Thank is part of customer service. Thus it becomes common practice for companies to apologize for the wrongs at times, while still maintaining representation of negated liability and negated responsibility – we are sorry you feel that way but we want to remind you you signed away liability in the terms and conditions. Sorry not sorry turned up as common practice for society is consequential. High Ground matters, opening the door to lawsuits that might bankrupt companies is consequential, how leaders lead matters and that factors into how people act in general.

It is like the national debt, we are in huge debt reiterated yet time and time again we keep spending. Sorry for borrowing from the future, not sorry from borrowing from the future stated not stated. You need to apologize to a justice system that sells away future to national debt, and corporate profit that profits some over others? Forced to apologize to a system like that feels all good, should, would? If I or others say the system should apologize for that, does that factor into High Ground, perception of High Ground, perception of adequate and sufficient value delivered?

Or is it better to say to the system, sorry not sorry? Would it be unreasonable to take a lesson from the system, leadership within the system, relevance limiting within the system? If one person has to apologize, should not all have to apologize, bring forth withheld information and truths? Less than ideal truth as in by design as to remain in by design is consequential, should be more reason for grace and forgiveness, less requirements for apologies, apologies that profit some parties over others to be inspired.

All that said ideally apologizing would establish better relationships, though given at times apologies seem more about establishing right and wrong, high ground and less claims to high ground gives feeling of apologies and apologizing is not always inspired with best of intentions. People might apologize at times because of love and grace, that might not deliver ideal perception and comprehension of right and wrong, value and reason to move forward with in the future. Apologies might be seen as A owe, A will not happen again – factors outside of apologies sometimes factor into what people are apologizing for. World Governments, Corporations, and people all profit from throughput and profit that is achieved on less than ideal grounds, cars lead to car crashes that might take lives, yet we don’t all stop using cars start walking – we are sorry it works out that way, don’t want it to work out that way, doesn’t equate to we are ideally fixing the problem. Mindsets we reinforce by action and inaction is consequential.

If I could inspire people to apologize for the right things at the right times to generate better peace and comprehension I would. That said I don’t think apologies and comprehension or necessity of high ground is always established with ideal intentions. Less than ideal intentions are consequential, might lead to the wrong people in power.

“Just don’t let it happen again” set to A win, A wind, A comprehend, as A’s mins? Friend you row ow, ouch compounded while others set to don’t have to tamed, famed?

Apologies might A owe on the wrong parties, while failing to address the LTIs (less than ideals) that are left IBD (in by design). A World that capitalizes on LTIs, while giving less apologies should not expect ideal apologies in return, turning up better apologies for the right reason matters. Society of gets to withhold forgiveness dependent upon apologies while capitalizing on LTIs IBD feels LTI. I don’t want people to cut me off in traffic and I don’t ideally turn up defensive driving in society, should I be able to require an apology? An apology doesn’t turn up defensive driving by default, might turn up High Ground for me, all Golden Rule inspired? Turning up defensive driving not my responsibility? could capitalize on that? Not an LTI?

Golden Rule treat others as you want to be treated. I want to be cut off in traffic less, also want others cut off in traffic less, I don’t want to be forced to apologize based on less-than-ideal comprehension delivered – you should have known better but I don’t have to raise comprehension feels a bit less than ideal in combination. Trying to limit a conversation like the following:

“If you make a mistake I get to punish.”

“What is a mistake?”

“I don’t have to teach that.”

Should have known better as landmines for less fortunate, those with less money and time to invest in greater comprehension? Better to say raising comprehension for others is important and less than ideally invested in. An important reminder that the writer of this document is far less than ideal comprehension. Might have missed something important does not equate to people have to tell me what that is.

I like to A comprehension of not being cut off in traffic as a right, as just a given, as something society sufficiently establishes by default, as owed. If I see it more as privilege, a privilege that has potential to be turned up or down, I might be more likely to be able to comprehend risk around it more ideally, the value in turning up messages like defensive driving. People like myself, who post videos from others about Electrical Safety and Defensive Driving are sometimes oppressed is worthy of considering, message and raising awareness amplifies far less than ideally.