Forcing people to believe in Christianity is not a human right. Forcing people to believe in The Golden Rule, treat others as they wish to be treated is not a human right.
Governments set to will ideally protect human Rights seems unwise, offloaded onto people who do not all agree on what a human right is seems probable. Thus people that don’t all agree on The Golden Rule as useful will be in charge of human rights which is unlikely to be all human rights protected.
The combination is not pretty. Is likely to set precedent of what one can do and what one can’t do A fee-d.
Shelter is a human right or not a human right? Freedom is a human right or not a human right?
In a disaster setting hurricane, drought, or flood one might venture to say God is not all protection of human rights then why should I have to? God kicks people out of Eden, do people really deserve bathrooms or should I kick them out to go outside like dogs?
If I am a bartender I can serve drinks and then I can deny access to bathrooms because it is not a human right, true or false? Knowledge is power. Society turns up restaurants, alcohol, a party scene claimed as will ideally protect human rights and dignity when the going gets tough?
If future generations know what can be feed without being questioned they might try it – distribution of resources seems unfair at times, desire for redistribution seems probable at times. I want all protected including future generations and older generations. Precedent for stifle the support, because support isn’t a human right?
People not required to follow The Golden Rule will likely lead to legalism, what can we get away with
A good user experience on tech? Not a human right
Human Rights seen as just a legal obstacle, water that will find the shortest path around the obstacle? It leads to profit, profit is not always good.
Better Research Ethics should be a human right, not sure it will always be respected as such
Peace should be a human right, peace not respected will lead to ideal research ethics?
My Tech Blog 