Accept News you don’t like?
Implications
News could be false. News could be truthful, timed by the enemy.
Anger is good? No, it is blinding
The enemy has no reason to play psychological tricks?
The enemy has no capacity to deliver psychological tricks? I have ideal capacity to comprehend all psychological tricks? Nothing I haven’t seen before, I can comprehend everything possible?
Anger let is get
Allow no time cost is always ideal set and get?
15 days of computer cycles on a lie? Lies have no cost?
People and computers always trustworthy with truth plus less than ideal comprehension. There is an x and y, there are only x and y in the equation. 10-ed no Z in the mix, never happens like that?
https://g.co/gemini/share/6d01e3e9463f
Wiser won’t always be listened to in the storm, gets us from pointvA to point B (safety)
You wake up and your room is flooding. It is news, it is data, news you have to act upon. Requires action is a less than ideal system, can be switched on.
Less may A may A
Less seen as may A might be more A in reality, practice
may A – might see perfection, might lead to ideal outcomes
may A – news that might or might not make things better
Sold as an ideal might lead to confidence required for it to deliver more like an ideal plan – say an economy is good might be what actually leads to more sells, more supply, more demand
If you are given a false piece of information call it TruthA. Then you make a plan and move forward with it. Then 15 days later you find out TruthB is actually correct, how does that change things? Allot of gains in moving forward not knowing all of what is at the bottom of the ocean. Doesn’t mean the Truth is completely less consequential in the longterm, that TruthA didn’t get you from point A to point B, that TruthA to TruthB going forward is not valuable, wise to turn up.
People will dive to scary depths to get real truth? Truth is more than fluff?
Some updates –https://g.co/gemini/share/0b5806b5877f
My Tech Blog 