Repurposed as Useful

Caution: Christian and ethical topics

God said Mercy will be given to the Merciful and Don’t Judge

Yet we are also supposed to know what is wrong, navigate life’s choices

We also have the potential to set a bad example by what we leave in place or change in less than ideal ways

Thus one assesses what is sin, what path is likely to lead to sin, what path is likely to lead to too much temptation, or that another path might be more sin and temptation thus we comprehend the World as less than ideal paths and concessions

If something is sin, is saying it is sin judgment? You should make that call, you shouldn’t make that call?

There is value in not judging as De-Up. Upping acknowledgment of anything might give it more power. A news report about sin or no news report about sin, which one is likely to lead to more sin? News reports can’t start riots, or reduce mercy and grace in non ideal ways?

Not classifying or assessing something as sin is useful but might not be ideal mercy to the future either. If someone runs a stop sign, or if a product causes cancer – what are the consequences of not assessing sin as sin, sin as something in need of being changed? Too many people running stop signs someone could get hurt, not calling out a product that might cause cancer, might lead to not calling out a product that does cause cancer – less speak up, is not always ideal practice for more speak up.

People aren’t always fair with judgment aren’t always required to ideally comprehend or required to spend adequate time researching and learning to facilitate ideal comprehension. If people on the whole win they see sin don’t deal with it adequately, is it wise to tempt them with seeing sin in the first place, showing that sin exists? If people do see sin, is it wise to acknowledge the sin or re-purpose it as useful? Repurposed as useful is not all pretty, running stop signs to a paycheck for police officers, cancer causing products to a paycheck for doctors and nurses? It serves a valuable purpose that profits some is not always wisdom to turn up.

Given that people might judge wrongly and harshly, and people are far from ideal temptation for each other out, it is comprehensible that people might want to resell as valuable, as adds value than calling out sin as just wrong, needs to be exterminated. The sin might need to go away gets confused to the person eradicated is the only way to achieve the goal is partially why the sinner (and thus partially the sin) gets re-established as useful. Lesser cases like running a stop sign might not be conflated to the world is a better place without people that perpetuate that crime, does not equate to all sins and crime will be looked at with the same merciful lens.

If people can’t be trusted to not be tempted, can’t be trusted to judge in an appropriate way – De-Up – including relevance limiting might be inspired – “you can’t handle the truth”. There is no truth in that? Or I won’t handle the truth in a way you (from less-than-ideal capacity to judge and assess) see fit, see as profitable for self, or others who you have a vested interest in? Worthy of note I try to communicate in a way to inspire thought, which might be more A fee for listeners and readers than I would like. This might be greater applied as if you were writing this document and delivering to me or someone else. There might be a better way to write it that feels less exclusionary, though due to current time constraints and a desire to deliver value personally I have not invested in fully thinking all of this through and attempting to rewrite in an ideal way. Worthy of note if I tried to write it in an ideal way it might sound less real, politically correct, less interesting.

There are allot of sins that haven’t been solved in ideal ways since Christ. People have continued to have wars and less than ideal judgment for 2000+ years.

Don’t bear false witness against your neighbor. Yet if one gives truth to someone, and that someone will not be required to gain ideal comprehension before being wrongly tempted to judge, will it not be inspiring more false witness against your neighbor by giving that truth in the first place? If truth can be distributed fairly and equally, claim it will ideal justice? Knowing a system is unlikely to ideal justice is it not wiser to be off on a boat at times, outside of proximity to a system that will not amplify ideally?

People grouped together as ideals value out with bandwagon appeal? Would be nice to think people in groups, working together actually creates more value – one could question that at certain times in history.

Repurposed as useful – sinner actually adds value (silent acknowledgment that their sin is not the end of the world), might be required to save lives, might get people not to throw the first stone. Worthy of note if the people that Christ stopped from stoning did throw the stones, they might see that same sin in self while looking in the mirror and might see it fit to stone themselves. Sin as forgivable, not the end of the world, not the end of better days has value.

De-Up has some other valuable properties. Even considering something for judgment or weighing is sometimes problematic in itself. If one considers something for assessment will they have to realize how they themselves factor into tempting the sin, factor into collective temptation of the sin? Perception of dirty as facilitates the very problems they are trying to stop might not A support and encouragement, might inspire apathy.

Inspire a world with no prostitutes (A) and no prostitutes being stoned (B). If A then B. If comprehend A as not possible then B should be true as well. Vatican has succeed at A over 2000 years? If not, then B should be true as well.

A and B will both be solved before someone is thrown in jail? A and B will have nothing to do with who gets put in Jail, when, why, and how? Comprehend our world punishes some sins, fails to acknowledge others factors into the equation? If ideal justice was possible proximity to civilization would be less dangerous.

Reminder, I support the message on the following video yet I am not the person on the video. I the writer of this document am a man with an engineering background. I realize the system does not do ideally right by all people, and since I am a partial investor in label maker software (software with databases and records) I feel it necessary to try and offset that investment. Websites with usernames – helps us access email, and also partially turns up who’s sins are recorded, who’s sins matter.

If I were falsely accused left in an awful jail awaiting trial I might consider the offset as insufficient, if I were making millions and sitting on a yacht I might say stay the course and I still wouldn’t want the falsely accused left in awful places.