Thought the following video was useful. Reminder I the writer of this blog am not the person on any of these videos.
Some thoughts after listening
4D is useful because it something that is both real and is not always easy to visualize. One sees a line not always easy to see it as a square, one sees a circle not always easy to see it as a sphere.
If 3D had no color then it would be more truly 3D. Yet if the 3D has any color even black and white then it is more dimensions than 3. A value between black and white is another dimension. Useful to think of temperature as another dimension that has potential to relate to colors – through thermal imagining yet is another dimension entirely.
Likely electromagnetic radiation that passes outside of the visual spectrum could be considered another dimension as well. Some dimensions have potential to easily be perceived – others might need more capacity to observe and observe in a different way. Further dimensions that are not easy to observe, require more complexity to observe might be more prone to error. We think we see ultraviolet, infrared, x-rays, and microwaves all in ideal ways?
Thoughts of potential for win wins in other dimensions and false dichotomies. Situations perceived as only a line between right and wrong yet we don’t always consider ways to solve problems in dimensions we don’t perceive. Potential for hedged bets in both directions seen and unseen. Thoughts of truth built off of historic precedent, historic precedent built on data sensed through dimensions we perceive. Thoughts of how temperature changes how we perceive 3D – frozen ice or water. Dimensions not always visible to the naked eye have potential to alter other dimensions.
Video editing and watching has potential to make 4D comprehension of time easier – real life can’t hit rewind as easily.
In real life events are observed at a particular point in time. That observation is made with sensors available, with brains and computers as available at that day. The future brings changes that has potential to change initial comprehension of events.
Math has potential to equate to standardized and conceptualized truth. 2+2=4 yesterday so 2+2=4 today. Many problems are more complex than 2+2=4 yet the same thought processes and patterns might lead to belief we had it right yesterday, so we have it right today.
Grow if A as no demon? “I am not sure we got it right”
Grow A as no demon? “We got it right”
False dichotomies as those are the only two dimensions those two dimensions will be perceived and comprehend ideally?
If A sell? It is all 2+2=4?
I don’t get it all right and I don’t get it all wrong and I don’t always know when that is. Others might have information, and I am not always enabled to listen in ideal ways?
My Tech Blog 