Disclaimer: adult topics (including issues with homosexuality), reader discretion is advised, reminder I am not a preacher, minister, or priest
People at Churches are at times under NDAs (non-disclosure agreements). Church might be a perceived as open and honest truth yet in practice might not deliver on that in more ideal ways. Disclosure of that fact is more truthful more honest. Comprehension that relevance limiting that profits some corporations likely factors into support at Churches or out of Churches.
I don’t want to discourage people from going to Church. I also know failed expectations and feeling of lack of transparency could easily lead to divestment from churches. People provided less than ideal truth and less than ideal comprehension are at times discouraged in life – knowing they likely don’t know everything they need to, to value self sufficiently is not always ideally turned up. People like to judge and make decisions about how they are doing in life dependent upon how others are doing (keeping up with the Jones mentality), yet they (including self) aren’t always provided with sufficient information to make accurate assessment.
Engineering leads to desire to make assessment and decisions based upon knowns currently available. Use a computer I have today or one that will be available 10 years from now? Would be more ideal to use a faster computer from the future, yet people don’t generally wait forever to move forward, make assessment, make changes. Accurate data faster facilitates better use of technology, data is not always provided due to NDAs and other concerns in life. If someone is discouraged I think realizing comprehension is less than ideal and has potential to be improved (and still be less than ideal) should equate to saying Never Say Die to self. Systems (including Governments and Churches), People don’t ideally turn up encouragement for each other, encouragement takes time and times is not always free, thinking encouragement couldn’t be improved and shouldn’t be improved for all in this world seems unwise.
I am not gay, I want other men in the world to be encouraged, and I invest in systems and corporations that might value some men over other men at times does not equate to I want others to be discouraged. Encouraging other men might be seen as gay, gay and homosexuality is a problem in our world and system – thus men might be encouraged less for the sake of promoting a world where homosexuality is less of a problem. Perceived as gay has potential to be dangerous (some places in the world kill people for it) – two CEOs in the board room talking about a merger to I don’t like how that sounds? Comprehended incorrectly combined with competitive practices and men might lead to less than ideals on the world stage? Our system is less than ideal homosexuality out and I have paid tax dollars, feels wrong to punish something we all turn up (government (jails), art, tech, medicine (certain drugs, mental institutions), and more fields) and I don’t want to leave future generations with problems? Punishment has potential to reinforce the problem, talking about the problem has potential to reinforce the problem, not talking about the problem has potential to reinforce the problem. Medication might lead to lisp, lisp might get someone killed – feels less than ideal to be in that kind of world.
Is your boss a homosexual or not a homosexual set to a simple question? If one says yes they might be promoted, if they say no they might be promoted – set to A’s value out? A boss not perceived as homosexual matters, factors into how the words “Good job” is heard. Yet bosses perceived as homosexual, less than ideal homosexuality out might factor into protection of others that are homosexual in society, a society that has tendency to contribute without always acknowledging contributions? Fair value and encouragement established and delivered on that as ideal? Seems unwise. Never Say Die to self matters, everything that needs to be factored in is not always versed.
I don’t want to be made out to be homosexual and I also don’t want Cain taking more Abels. Church attendance does not amplify ideally, equates to Without sin cast the first stone does not amplify ideally. Access to editors and increased comprehension matters, gets less than ideally turned up in a competitive world. Simple I want to profit, I want others to profit without getting people killed, without reducing world peace, without reinforcing oppression and injustice.
Not having access to this document does not A value out A comprehension for others equates to shared.
Reminder writer of this document is less than ideal access, perception, and comprehension and I can’t say oppression has not shaped the way this document was formed.
I assess gay and homosexuality as wrong (factors into protection from revolution), I do not want to be the judge of anyone on a cosmic scale (That’s God’s wheelhouse), and F (like in grade of F) I think our society doesn’t turn it up by default, not punished severely factors into protection for all (perception and comprehension does not amplify ideally and less stones thrown, less vigilante justice matters), people don’t always agree upon what is homosexual (I like lingerie shops, might not be A support for all women walking through the mall)
I am an artist, as a man I appreciate paintings that have nude women in them, I realize I am a partial contributor, I feel Statue of David has potential for being a partial contributor for others in less than ideal ways, yet I don’t feel I need to bulldoze it, people are less than ideal sin out set precedent for art that is less than ideal sin out should be destroyed? People don’t always agree upon what is excess is consequential. Worthy of note not all content for all parties, and choice of whether or not to watch or listen to content is sometimes under oppression – I don’t want to make lives of those reviewing content miserable, and I don’t want content I produce to be force fed to anyone.
Caution: adult art on the following Michelangelo – Wikipedia
My guess is that Michelangelo wasn’t thinking in 1501 about how many annoying pictures could be sent on a world full of computers, people might be set to gay in a marketing database then be sent similar to excess?
Defense Law thought – jails with less-than-ideal homosexuality reduced compel the system and corporations to turn down homosexuality in ideal ways to protect those in jail from oppression?
If everyone was to become celibate monks and nuns there might be less sin in the world. James 4:17 Knowing and not doing is set to sin. Yet I don’t think forcing everyone to be monks and nuns is A Golden Rule for the world. Freedom and Less Oppression factors into and facilitates less sin at times. Forced to be a celibate monk or nun, required to be in Church 23.5 hours a day is not how I wish to be treated, factors into me thinking others should not be forced to either.
8 billion plus people all monks and nuns more or less likely to go to war with each other? We chose a different route, thus we need to invest in peace, peacemaking.
My Tech Blog 