I like tacos. Imagine there is a taco store that gives a tacos and salsa on the side. Now imagine someone else decides to open up a taco stand and deliver tacos with salsa on them. Is the new combination unique enough, different enough? Is there a requirement for uniqueness? Is there anyone that will enforce requirement for uniqueness? Should anyone be allowed to enforce requirements for uniqueness?
Enforceable or Not Enforceable factors into value established and delivered. There are 8 billion plus people in the World. If I paint a picture of a mountain, say I am the only one that gets to paint a picture of a mountain would be wrong. That said if I spend my time and resources working on a painting, having someone else copy it, potentially preventing me from making money on the work (they might try to establish been there first, could set the timestamps on their file to earlier) feels like less-than-ideal value for hard work.
Uniqueness matters, uniqueness as a requirement in a world with 8 billion plus people has potential for less than ideal. If I go north you have to go south, I go east you have to go west, is likely to be a less than ideal way to deliver throughput, value yet decisions that are less unique have potential for be argued over as who decided first, who is the leader and who is the follower as well as other implications. I paint in one color set to you have to use other colors for your painting is not ideal value added.
More combinations, combinations with more variables factor into perception and comprehension, valuation, and thus dependability of uniqueness. Not all will be trained or are required to be trained in value in establishing uniqueness, or the problem with claiming uniqueness in a world full of 8 billion plus people.
Water – not unique enough
Water and Ice – more unique
Should I give the person water or water and ice? Both are taken, can’t deliver not fully comprehended? Art isn’t water, yet if I claim I painted a mountain first you can’t paint one to another artist, could that not stifle their profit, capacity to buy water? That said another artist that has access to my files, potentially through corrupt cyber security practices, couldn’t make a slight modification and call it their own? That lost profit might prevent me from buying water for self, family, friends, and others.
Does use take profit that might otherwise exist, is the profit guaranteed to exist, is it right to claim sufficient uniqueness met, is it wrong to claim sufficient uniqueness met, if not enforceable is it wise to let claims of sufficient uniqueness not met? Enforceability takes time, resources, and effort, could that time resource and effort be used in other directions, other directions limited likely to or not likely to increase or decrease profit for others? Left in air not weightless. Move forward or don’t move forward, James 4:17, Golden Rule? Perfection as a requirement not all bliss. A mins for self or teaches others to A mins, others A-ing mins factors into mins actually at A level.
There is a good chance, that while I am painting a mountain with a world with 8 billion plus other people someone else will be painting a mountain too. Moment in time not always sufficiently unique for combination. My art is likely based on different training and life experiences, that has potential to inspire more unique, not ideally unique investment. Ideally, I would like to profit at the maximum level while also giving others maximum freedom to profit as well, yet claiming that all ideals in a profit-based world that is less than all Golden Rule in seems unwise. Can’t enforce drives things at times, not sure I would say drives things in ideal directions. Just paint a mountain a week from now when I am not painting a mountain is not a guarantee nobody else will be painting a mountain a week from now. I am not saying don’t paint a mountain, I am trying to raise awareness that capacity to view not taken is far less than ideal.
People deliver on Golden Rule at different levels. Not hurting someone, that is one implementation of the Golden Rule. If someone has cancer, dropping everything getting a medical degree as fast as possible spending 23 hours a day study might be another implementation? Levels matter, what people can be depended onto deliver matters, and comprehension of that amplifies less than ideally in combination. I might say please inspire Peace in the world, whether or not that is sufficient value added is up to debate. Golden Rule stop everything I am doing and stand in front of tanks? I don’t want people run over and oppressed by militaries, does not equate to I stand in the way ideally, that factors into delivery or less than ideal delivery of Golden Rule. More adequate delivery on the rule requires awareness raised, comprehension raised, and the combination is not always adequately invested in.
Free Starter Image
LTI representation and investment always appreciated, respected? LTI – less than ideal
Hedge my bet?
Free Starter Image
Art is not standing in front of a tank, standing in front of a tank might not be all peace signs delivered tomorrow, run over by a tank might equate to not dying of cancer at a later time in life
Combination has potential for less-than-ideal value delivered
Sacrificial love is worth respecting should not be equated to turning it up is all good
I don’t want world leaders to lay down in front of tanks and I also want peace
Life as one-shot value added and power vacuums? Better to say we might need tomorrow.
My Tech Blog 