I seem to type faster when I read three words at a time
three words speed
like
three
words
speed
vs
three words speed (read at the same time increases throughput)
four words seems to give me a problem at least right now
four words seem garble
four words seem
garble
would be faster for me than
four words seem garble
Helps with 10fastfingers.com Typing Test English – 10FastFingers.com (I don’t own 10 Fast Fingers, I provide for reference to help others with increasing typing throughput), I also have a typing app that is made in Java available on GitHub java-tech/FlashCardsApp.zip at main · jasonldavis-tech/java-tech · GitHub, the app generates a story outline and support amps based once 600 words in reached in the same directory, the outline and support amps are randomly generated – there are examples on this site, and one might should use caution (generated stories might line up things like Villains or descriptive writing amps in ways that might be less than ideal)
Example https://atomic-temporary-16987392.wpcomstaging.com/2024/04/28/support-amps-april-28th-2024/, the story outline uses descriptive writing amps some of which might not correlate well with world events or potential problems in society, thus I advise caution while reading or using the amps and story outlines that are generated
Would likely be more support, less potential for problems and risk if oppression was less in society. Support amps are ordered based upon random generation which equates to re-ordered might be useful at times, even if re-ordered claims of no support or ideal support generated seems wrong.
The typing app has a text file where words, definitions have potential to be replaced with other words and definitions, potentially useful for memorizing and studying
There is value in going through the support amps and story outline at times, sometimes has potential to highlight potential problems in communication that might otherwise be missed – there are exponential possibilities with the amps which equates to best or worst combinations are unlikely to be known. Probably same for combination of books in the world, books read in combination is a different learning experience than books read alone, comprehension of possible outcomes and risk is impossible. See books and writing as no potential for problems, no potential for increased reading comprehension and support? Even a bad book likely helps reiterate pattern matching that factors into seeing High Voltage signs.
The support amps might be generally safe, though critical thinking amps associated with might line up in less than ideal ways Carbon monoxide, and other gases used as a critical thought amp for potential problems, environmental impacts lined up over and over might facilitate depression in non-ideal ways, not meant like that does not equate to has to be read like that, villains on story outlines are scary just like Dragons or Vampires, people that might copycat stories might be in society, general trust in God to handle Hollywood as sufficient, stories and books of all libraries as sufficient – might not always factor in not all content for all people).
Maybe once the world stops having wars, when there is no potential for bombs, society can re-examine the need for villains in stories. Thought capacity to drive perception of threat, heroic behavior is useful outside of wars too. Stories with no villain might be less interesting, yet letting less interesting more interesting always drive things doesn’t feel ideal either.
Went to the beach and nothing happened
or
Saw a fin?
Free Starter Image (please use to decrease oppression not increase it)
Boring beats real life villains, yet do we always turn that up ideally?
My Tech Blog 