Disclaimer: reminder I am not a lawyer
LTI – Less than Ideal
My name is Jason, thus Friday the 13th, the horror movie that uses the name Jason has greater resonance with me for potential problems. Villain Level Contrast that affects self is likely to be viewed as greater significance than others.
My name is not Jack, thus Jack the Ripper, the horror story that uses the name Jack has less resonance with me for potential problems. Reduced time in critical thinking, thought, and surface area that equates to greater capacity to defend self, than others at times.
The combination is consequential, is likely to be somewhat common in the world. A lawyer that is required to defend their own case, or their own assets, or a lawyer that is required to defend others, others’ assets. Having a stake in the results matters, gets turned up less than ideally.
This should equate to an offset, offset for bias, and less than ideal value established that should factor into Protection, Peace, Grace, and Forgiveness.
Jack the Ripper a cool murder mystery and Jason, Friday the 13th something that might get me killed and reduce my potential for playing professional Hockey? Brilliant inconsistency always entertained? I don’t want people named Jack hurt, that said I and others likely invest greater in solving problems with contrast that affects self over others.
I provide the following as partial protection for self and reminder that CEOs and World Leaders sometimes get Shark Fins attached for the wrong reasons
Free Starter Image
You really want to elect a guy named Ivan? zero bias caused by names? Biases from History reinforced allowed to stand not always pretty.
Reinforcing how the Golden Rule amplifies LTI (less than ideally) factors into the Golden Rule (treating others how they wish to be treated) in my opinion. Capacity to claim value subtracted, or no capacity? may-ed?
Society does not in fins at A level, does not reduce fins at A level, does not change fins at A level
Man makes vampire art or posters about not hurting guys named Ivan?
Less women set to vampires, chained up in dark cells
Freedom is valuable, controlling and oppression not all value added
Combos in art likely might be harder for some people than others, I am ginger (had orange hair growing up), yet I don’t have a ginger mother, likely could be less than ideal value added for people with ginger mothers
Gingers need sunscreen not VLC (villain level contrast)? Less skin cancer, less oppression, and Golden Rule amps LTI > everybody wins?
The following videos are not mine (I don’t own copyrights) I provide for reference
There was another video by a channel called psychotrip that had a video about vampires I figured would be useful as well, current can’t find it. Worthy of note videos that show Villain Level Contrast, might not be free of A B Testing, readily available to all parties they affect. Like my ginger drawings might be less than ideal LTI value established and delivered for women with orange hair in jail. Reinforced stereotypes with uphill battles? Would know in a world full of 8 billion plus people? (found the video, but removed due to current hostage situation – the old movie Speed could be put on sale on movie stores but given current situation, world events would not be in good taste, factors into comprehension limiting is likely not always entertained as good reason to give grace and forgiveness for the unknown, being under a certain level of oppression on top equates to this document should not be considered as ideal value out or ideal value in)
Current thought – A very valuable defense (from someone who is not a lawyer) could be that hypotheticals are not always shared. I go through a hypothetical I might see the power in it, the danger in it, the problems with sharing, the problems with not sharing does not always lead to sharing, requirement to amplify ideal comprehension for others. Golden Rule set to ideal value delivered when we limit comprehension of others based upon side effects, people that might misuse the data against self or others? Example I could do ActionA, but if I do ActionA people might think I am the Villain, if I defend DefendantA they might think I am involved when I am not, if I defend ReasoningA they might think I am involved with ReasoningA – variables that could be associated with a number of things and the idea of limiting surface area, reducing liability. Could amplify a certain way, does not always amplify a certain way, might factor into risk mitigation for some and not all. Some divest from situations for reasons they do not always make known. May set to is free is not always true under oppression, oppression in is not always known. People further away from awful, oppression is valuable in not always fully appreciated ways – reduced proximity is desirable at times, not always easy to ideally turn up, head starts matter.
Corporations potentially go through hypotheticals, hypotheticals that might be highly useful to individuals all over the world, yet desire to profit and NDAs likely prevent disclosure many times. Gets set to we row A see. People that might desire to reduce oppression, reduce obfuscation might have their hands tied at times? Right under reduced comprehension, reduced access to comprehension min-ed?
Leaders and CEOs might be challenged for good reasons at times, does not equate to their challengers always know ideal ways to challenge, the power in the words they speak for good and bad, are challenging from ideal comprehension. Potential to amplify less than ideal might lead to divesting in the first place is a potential reason Leaders and CEOs should give grace, forgiveness, and flexibility in advance. I know personally I have challenged based upon my own comprehension, not the comprehension of others – combination has potential for less than ideals. Leaders of Grace and Forgiveness that raise LTI comprehension to more ideal comprehension inspired? Might help make peace.
My Tech Blog 