Rounded edges have potential for less sharp edges, people hurt less and spared more. How things are worded factors into Grace and Forgiveness, how things are worded also factor into Interesting, Inspiration, Inspiration that actually inspires versus falls flat.
Sometimes I write in a polarizing way – a way that questions the status quo and makes people take sides on ideas then I try to explain both sides of an argument. There is value in raising comprehension on reasoning and logic does not equate to it feels all good. Iffed close to the line, maybed, levels, and gray factors into interesting, also factors into capacity to really inspire, install oh (educate).
If something is balanced in the middle, and if it falls left you might profit, and it falls right you might lose. If something is balanced in the middle, and if it falls right you might profit, and it falls left you might lose. Decisions made, capacity to assess factors into value, and the capacity to value is biased at times by different factors.
How do I polarize, use juxtaposition to inspire without making someone feel dumb, like I don’t care? Tower one side to the sky and show the other side as microscopic, then flip it is useful for understanding both sides, how both sides have potential to min, and thin – value that does not always profit all parties fairly or equally, sufficiently. I want people to win yet I have potential to sound like a jerk in communications at times.
People pick sides for good reasons, don’t always entertain the other part of the argument for good reasons – reasons like not trained in all fields. I might not always want to hear why my thought and reasoning, reasoning I have spent time and energy investing in is less value, of less concern than someone else’s training and thus reasoning on the matter, in a world that is much of the time built upon reduced access to training and potential feelings of less than ideal delivery on access to training in the first place.
I might value Juxtaposition at times, complex Literary Devices and Interesting over desire to protect feelings, tell in a way that leads to more ideal comprehension. Interesting factors into traction, and not heard is not heard, not read, put on the shelf, valued less – hard to appreciate value added to others life they can’t see, feel, hear, or touch. The convenient route is sometimes the route that leads to greater throughput, that is capitalized on by both individuals and corporations, does not equate to that ideally protects all parties. Golden Rule A’ed on interesting want to read, over does right be me, doesn’t hurt to read? And then the destitute orphans ran from the bombs, almost as if going 100 mph → interesting, heart wrenching, profitable, will sell – welled? Profit factors into path of Golden Rule chosen, I should be the assessor not judger of that?
Sounding less lax, direct factors into interesting.
If I said I don’t want to hurt people with my words and I still want them to be heard? Sounding needy is not always valued, less challenging not always respected. Problem with A owe words, there is a problem or not a problem with that? Not sure I should say mayed. I also don’t want people that don’t want to read my words, have the time to read my words feel like they have to – adding words to profit make people’s lives better not the opposite. I am also LTI value established and delivered (less than ideal), meaning reading my writing as anyone’s writing my equate to tests, tests that might cause people to sin, and that is not all good yet gets set to sufficient value.
Some people get to profit by words, access to deliver words, and some people’s value is reduced doesn’t feel all good. Might not be sufficient oppression out to write and speak in a way that sufficiently values parties doesn’t feel all good, should either especially in a freedom of speech country. Everyone in the world to silence until peace is made, all hostages released? Someone dies everyday in a world with less-than-ideal oppression out isn’t sufficient reason to force everyone into constant mourning, no parties ever? Trying to inspire the reasoning that setting joy and encouragement to zero value added is wrong. Trying to inspire resistance to less-than-ideal value requirements amped and champed at times is difficult to do right. I want hostages released, I want no more terrorists attacks, I also don’t want people who’s lives are very short prevented from enjoying their lives. Encouragement might lead to less hostages, life more valued.
No cat pictures, and no cat art until all hostages released, all wars stopped, all oppression reduced? Setting precedent for CFB – cute funny beautiful can be limited indefinitely not all good or should.
I try to add value but I was trained not trained for that grayed? I watched a video on hostage negotiation equals no more parties ever? Doctors that spend 10 hours at the hospital couldn’t spend 11, 12, 24? I don’t know how much time to spend on the subject and lives are on the line and I don’t know how much value I add, if I add value at all? I don’t want to stack any more burdens on those suffering and just smiling might be seen as insufficient appreciation for the pain? I don’t think doctors should have endless shifts, people need rest, I also don’t want hostages lost, remaining in the hands of terrorists. Feedback limited factors into comprehension limited, and that factors into greater profit for some parties over others. I am not payed for that gets grayed. Bombs not dropping over heads of people I care about, including Allies factors into greater profit for self. Bombs that are far away have potential to be close, limited in advance is valuable.
I don’t want to stack blame, or extra burdens on hostage families – I am not a professional hostage negotiator, I do care about and want hostages released, I am also in an oppressive environment myself that I can’t fully grasp how much it matters. All leveraged by thought, I should feel guilty for enjoying myself, partying when people are at war, are taken hostage, while my support is less than ideally appreciated, included. Corporations that profit might have less than ideal reason (including profit) to prevent people from saying the wrong things, things that devalue their brand? Trajectories might not lead to reduce foot in mouth for all parties, yet trajectories get set to have been set ideally, based on ideal comprehension. Hostage families don’t likely want people to be discouraged want hostages released, people don’t want to be prevented from enjoying life, and terrorists that have taken the hostages are being allowed to keep them all in combination doesn’t feel good.
Requirement to A reduce pain in writing might lead to no words delivered. I apologize if the words here sound off key, making progress, trying to make progress, help progress does not always lead to ideal value.
People that aren’t familiar with this problem (like self) probably might be off key a bit. Doctors and Leaders likely could provide this information, but do they always? More words factors into more experience. More sentences written with the wrong words has potential to lead to better words, words that might actually change lives, free hostages.
We have the potential to pin shark fins on each other at times when we could be focused together on making a better future. Humanity does not ideal reduced miscommunication, equating to miscommunication perceived and comprehended wrong has potential for influencing things, yet might not always be entertained as possible.
Preventing others from speaking further is not ideal bridges built, support gains made. Owe A doesn’t deliver A equates to we don’t have to hear them again, factor them in is not the right path. Only may min, no may mend not all good.
My Tech Blog 