My opinion, reasoning and logic doesn’t have to be entertained, heard does not guarantee there will be a war. That said enough people’s support set to null of no consequence has potential for problems. Society generally pays for what it turns up (even if that is by turning something, someone down). Others with Glory and Honor from Peace is a sufficient price to pay for Peace. Value added set to ideal value added, no value added, the only value added that has to be entertained is not all good or should – others in by design add vital support need to be supported does not equate to allowing my value to be diminished, misrepresented is all good. Required to stockpile examples to be valued to feel like will be valued sufficiently, will factor into capacity to maintain sufficient support throughput does not feel all good, right. But did they help in the hard times, we have a record of that…. All value added set to seen, seeable
I am in a place of Oppression, with less-than-ideal value out knowable – this factors into desire to have more proof of examples, to be able to cover my ass better. Not all examples of my support to the world are knowable by looking at me, or by examples I have, that said requirement to maintain representation is both useful and feels less ideal at times. The world is less than all shark fins out for anyone, factors into desire to have examples to factor into high ground, be challenged less. Limiting capacity of others to minimize self factors into support, including support for others – nation, family, and friends. Artist with 1 painting, or 1000 paintings in their portfolio – set to they will be valued the same is a defame. 1000 paintings is a lot of time costs, one with 1 painting might generate higher value at times? Off-stage, listeners, listening gets min-ed.
Free Starter Image, Blender file is available on GitHub (or at least used to be)
PartyA has many examples of hard work and support, PartyB has cancer – we base value, valued on knowns. Did PartyA or PartyB have a shark fin – no potential to skew results?
The one without the shark fin makes me feel better might equate to set seen as an ideal system.
Not having a shark fin factors into not being bitten, not being bitten factors into capacity to support. Results are non-deterministically predetermined at times and it all gets set to sublime. A man searching a database finds that a record has been changed from a known villain to his name – he alerts authorities of the problem, trust there will be sufficient data and reduced oppression to exonerate his name, or changes the record? Typos fully pondered? V for Villain, H for Hero – sufficiently far enough to never cause a problem? There is not enough reduced oppression to trust them with that – True. The man searching for the records or authority, authority or the man searching for the records – order and proximity.
My Tech Blog 