If someone goes to school, University for 6 years they have made a non-null investment in making their future better, increase their knowledge in ways that both profit others and self.
Someone that has cancer in a hospital should have less of a stake than someone with multiple degrees? Knows A more has potential for both ideal and less than ideal properties.
Knows A more gets to be limited is not all good not all should. Amplifying only people that know A, know how to profit, maximize profit get support, get to survive is far from ideal as well.
Knows A more, wide receiver that gets the ball to the finish line or does not? Knows A more factors into who profits and who profits less. Trained Doctor or Untrained, who likely to be more supported at the end of the day?
World is kind of Less Know, Fees A. Reading Comprehension factors into High Voltage signs. Life and Death should not really be controlled by Knows A More. One CEO lives one gets put on the street might be turned up, does not equate to we should turn it up.
Knows A More factors into profit, who runs countries, governments. Public sold on Knows A More factors into who gets voted in and who does not.
Required to Know A to not be put on street is insufficient. People that invest in Knowing A not respected and appreciated is not ideal value added, throughput established, win wins for society gained, all peace made. Baseline support factors into more capacity to Know A, to invest in others Knowing A.
A 40-year-old Doctor that has been trained might have greater capacity to deal with hiccups in society (wars, droughts, famine, natural disasters) than someone that has just graduated, has less experience. Head starts matter in not fully appreciated ways. A fairer and more equal, trustworthy society might lead to head starts, head starts before wars, Acts of God. Head starts less oppression adequate support factors into perception and comprehension of A, A Know in the future. Try to do right by each other, treat each other fairly min-ed, Golden Rule matters. See no mins winned – seeing problems factors into others seeing problems, problems fixed. See no potential for wins, peace made winned – believed potential, good faith, hope factors into actual gains, peace made.
PartyA helps 50 people. PartyB helps 51 people. 51>50, Knows A More, set to A’s mins, thins, set to A’s wind, comprehend, Society could appreciate PartyA and PartyB, but that is not how society works, winners and losers perfected as A value in, competition mins thinned.
Society reinforces have to win faster, stronger, better at times. The combination has potential for less appreciation for delays, waiting – potential for not all value added for people driving cars, people walking on streets always entertained? Delays factor into reduced throughput not always seen as value added reinforced not always ideal. Turn up volume, speed, change in Society without first entertaining potential problems, other parties that might be affected is not always ideal value established and delivered. Knows A doesn’t have factor doesn’t Know A in not all good, Knows A doesn’t have to factor in Knows A not all good – less agreement set to ideally establishes value, A value not all good. See mins mayed reinforced in non-ideal ways. See peace mayed reinforced in non-ideal ways. Appreciate delays mayed not all bad not all good. Oks reduced A value in not all delays reduced, delays appreciated less not all good, delays appreciated more not all good. Wait for cancer patient crossing street good, wait for peace made not good set to we reinforce A in A ways.
Imagine there are 1000 people that work for a company, if 1 person doesn’t show up for work do people care or not care? Pursuit of profit might not lead to all problems known, I would like to think if I or others got trapped somewhere, locked up, people would care. We reduce A know based upon profit does not equate to we establish A value ideally. Eyes on the prize problems in disguise (likely have heard this somewhere before, not sure).
My Tech Blog 