Hypothesis – AB Testing has yet to be perfected, concept is important, and is technology with potential for upgrades
Imagine you are a Politician and make two speeches and then run the speech against two separate audiences based upon AI. Like a scaled set of Alexa, Siri, and Bixby, Cortana. Feedback from both sets might give greater capacity to know value added and subtracted, potential for application to different locality initial data. Siri from Texas versus Siri from California type of thing.
Potential for tailoring to Majorities and Popularity worthy of consideration.
Data from AB testing is acted upon by humans, humans are not always ideal bias out.
Imagine two people are testing a product and they get the different versions of the AB tests. Then they go out in the world and don’t use the product again. Users that’s uniqueness factored into how the result is set controls the value for the population. Both users might have a different initial version (a non-null piece of time where their product responded in a certain way). History of how product acted might be different between user gets set to null effect when not a null effect. Test has potential to bias results, future results, change how history is perceived potentially not always entertained. Different versions factor into more and less Know A.
Historic results will be different for different parties, likely to be ideally factored in or not likely to be ideally factored in? Uniqueness of people factors into Humanization, uniqueness gets min-ed. Different versions will ray different versions – net effect is greater than initial interaction. People assessing might not always be likely to factor in information and history rays in different ways. Makes a lot of our products better, that said there is grayness in it. 8 billion plus people more versions of the truth than one, uniqueness and potential should be more ideally entertained. Finned versions have effect, are likely stopped does not equate to effect always provable, likely to be entertained as possibility. I don’t have to factor that in is a common useful system. No mins, knows A mins factors into sales.
Has potential for entertained, inspiring ideas as two separate systems (or more) useful in Governments, different subsets not required to have consistent experience, controllable. The world doesn’t A mins, will likely do it again.
Small offsets, contributions min-ed?
Free Starter Image
Following a bit inspired by, not in regard to AB testing.
We don’t mean to A no potential for fins, yet we do. Teach Math, only good results – while factoring out greed, and many many other potential problems associated with math. It all adds up I see no problem with that. It doesn’t add up I see no potential for problems with that. Hyperbolic statements to activate know. Think better of others factors into better from others – idea is less potential to fin?
Numbers exist, are useful, does not equate to always deterministic, get ideally turned up, don’t bias results 90% or 100% of people know that? Just something people say can’t be said thought of as from truth? Owed gets set to may (90% or 100% was used for example, not real numbers). Rounding is in by design, not required to verify results is in by design. Battery at 90% suddenly at 5%? Happens. Factors into wins, profit, cybersecurity thinned. Can’t say that exact problem has happened to me close to 100% of time might not be 100% of the time, I know other systems that should work at that level have not – I don’t document all cybersecurity problems (exponential time costs not always desirable, useful as control mechanism).
Not always deterministic, bug or cybersecurity problem with network attached? Decreased capacity to prove in by design is not an ideal system to claim grounds of justice, or ideal support delivered based upon. Show hurt is not always less hurt is a reinforced system. Time gets set to not a directional system. Owe ideal documentation has potential to min – you need to drive back to work and document that before proceeding. Reliance on computing systems have proven to be less beneficial than desirable during my time on earth. Benefits outweigh problems is less than an ideal system. Time costs can be increased at the profit of some over others is a less than ideal system.
Min fee-d may. There is a library full of books, reading comprehension and those that find the evil wherever it may be is useful, claim to invest ideally? It is easy to say we as human beings A complexity, that there is no fee. Using computers I could generate more words than any human could read – allow others to set my support to less? Owe based upon volume is turned up. There is also good reason to turn up volume, proof of support, reiterations of support as provable – know we example A, example B in documents. Turn up too many words too little words both get set to less value is not all ideal. Never Say Die!
I have delivered less words than I have the capacity to deliver by choice, voiced.
Never Say Die!
Alternations, different, uniqueness factors into heard and remembered.
Don’t give up, there is still hope!
My typing app generates support amps based upon completion of 600 words. I know I have the capacity to run the function trillions of times without typing 600 words. The support amps generated on 600 words I get to read, might find mistakes in, require non-zero human interaction, require me to actually practice my typing skills. Requirement to not factor humanity out not all mins. I have provided the code on GitHub partially because I know I am a human, partially due to oppression (far more oppression than I would like to say my decision making has been ideal throughout the process). Requirement of ideal reduced oppression to contribute to reducing oppression is a less than ideal system.
Some of the Support Amps generate values closer to the line than I would like at times. The words yellow lightning have potential to be generated – knowing Israel, Allies won’t ruin lives based on those words is important. It does not generate the words rising sun swastika (yet solar power wind power or similar might be generated) – I don’t want to turn up hatred for Jewish people or Nazi propaganda, I also don’t want blonde people set to null. Add in corporate profit, potential for gas and non-green deals. Trying to generate great content for the world and art meant to help might reinforce non-ideals doesn’t feel all good. In a lightning storm set to partial blitzkrieg fully min-ed? That photographer takes a lot of pictures of lightning? Control and power as an iffy system with life changing results – more scary than I would like. If I traveled to Egypt and took pictures of the Pyramids I would not want that seen as a middle finger to Israel. Given hostages taken I would not want to give a middle finger to Israel in any ways, that said I am Christian. Christ without sin cast the first stone is a valuable system I think is worthy of turning up.
Power is a contested system potentially not always entertained. Each word I type the most valuable use of my direction in life? I invest in things that I would not always want invested in against me – buying a computer, any product really is a bit of AB testing, yet AB testing at its worse used against me could be awful. I might drive a car, know it has potential to run someone over, yet I don’t want to be run over. We turn up Owe A not all A. I am a Cowboy’s fan, reduced support for me equates to reduced support for them (at least on a certain level), know fins win. Problem is I see the playing field as fair, ideally established. I have a tendency to think what I see on the field is all that has to be factored in – test less know less gets blessed. Others know more in a profit-based system, why it gets a fin. People like to win and Golden Rule in combination gets set to sufficient value – in we negate see mins, set it to sufficient. AC (Air Conditioning or A See) know may, profit biases AC, access to AC. Texas Summers, AC Matters.
I don’t want to judge anyone, that said God that allows de-mat may in a profit-based system feels more than LTI. It is about levels, someone kicks a rock on my shoe is not what I am referring to as de-mat may, getting thrown on the street, robbed of sufficient output is de-mat may. People fighting is likely not always ideal value established and delivered for third parties not always entertained. Reminder I am not the person on the video here (pictures get associated with wrong person is hard to fully appreciate). Owed we may in a profit-based system. A small business denies services to someone, then their funding is cut off. May mayed. A hypothetical useful for example. Golden Rule, Make Peace and work together cheddared is higher value added not fully pondered. May mayed not all free of delays (just sounds right, words that might take flight). A see owned mins, A see idealed comprehend, factors into wins. Winner loser champed amped vamped. Winda menda may, winned a mend may? Friended C will show? Friended see will show?
I talk about some important topics here, yet I know there are cybersecurity problems on this site (my creative writing might even sound like cybersecurity problems at times).
My Tech Blog 